Providing for Generalization of Behavior Change - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Providing for Generalization of Behavior Change

Description:

In other words the teacher should set a trap. Introduce to Natural Maintaining Contingencies Some behaviors do lend themselves to trapping. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Offic158
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Providing for Generalization of Behavior Change


1
Providing for Generalization of Behavior Change
  • A behavioral change may be said to have
    generality if it proves durable over time, if it
    appears in a wide variety of possible
    environments, or if it spreads to a wide variety
    of related behaviors (p. 338)

2
Many criticisms of applied behavior analysis have
resulted from the short lived results of many
behavior change projects (p. 440)
  • Behavior change is often accomplished
  • only for as long as the contingencies were in
    effect, or
  • only in the presence of the initial trainer, or
  • only for very specific behaviors that were
    trained (p. 338)

3
Acquisition-level behavioral objectives focus on
conditions under which the behavior is to be
performed and the criteria defined for
performance.
  • Given one quarter, two dimes, two nickels, and
    four pennies and the verbal cue, show me your
    bus fare,
  • student will hand teacher the coins equaling
    bus fare to travel from school to home 100 of
    the time.

4
Generalization-level behavioral objectives also
focus on conditions under which the behavior is
to be performed and the criteria defined for
performance. However, the conditions should
reflect the real-life environment.
5
Write a generalization-level behavioral
objective for the same student.
  • Given one quarter, two dimes, two nickels, and
    four pennies and the verbal cue, show me your
    bus fare,

student will _______________________________
____________________ 100 of the time.
6
Big Ideageneralization should be programmed
rather than expected or lamented. (p. 340)
  • If generalization does not automatically result
    when behavior is changed, does that mean applied
    behavior analysis procedures are useless? If you
    have stuck with us this far, you know that we
    dont think so. To most behavior analysts, the
    lack of automatic generalization indicates the
    need for developing a technology of
    generalization as efficient as the technology of
    behavior change. (p. 340)

7
The IEP
  • It is important that the IEP for each student
    with a disability includes objectives for the
    levels of maintenance and generalization.

8
Ok, ok. What are the types of generalization?
  • It is important that the IEP for each student
    with a disability includes objectives for the
    levels of maintenance and generalization.

9
Im glad you asked thatquestion.
2
  • Three types of generalization
  • Stimulus Generalization
  • Maintenance
  • Response Generalization

1
10
Stimulus GeneralizationAKA Transfer of Training
  • occurs when responses that have been reinforced
    in the presence of a specific stimulus occur in
    the presence of different but similar stimuli
  • A group of stimuli that should occasion the same
    response may be considered members of a stimulus
    class. In general, the more similar the stimuli,
    the more likely stimulus generalization will
    occur.

11
(e.g., knowing the concept hammer, you can
point to all varieties of hammer)
DRIVE HAMMERED GET NAILED
12
Response MaintenanceAKA Resistance to
Extinction, Durability, Behavioral Persistence
  • The ability to perform a response over time,
    even after systematic applied behavior procedures
    have been withdrawn.
  • Most experimental evidence indicates that
    extinction occurs unless specific measures are
    taken to prevent it. (p. 444)

13
e.g.,
  • An EDSE student knows that reacting to annoying
    behaviors may actually reinforce those behaviors.
  • Student indicates the same on a test.
  • During practicum the same student gives attention
    to annoying behaviors.
  • This is a non-example of maintenance.

14
Response GeneralizationAKA Concomitant/Concurrent
Behavior Change
  • Refers to unplanned changes in similar behaviors
    when a target behavior is modified.
  • Sometimes changing one behavior will result in
    changes in other similar behaviors. Such similar
    behaviors are often referred to as a response
    class, and changes in untrained members of the
    response class, as response generalization.

15
e.g.,
  • A person learns to copy and paste in Microsoft
    Word.
  • When confronted with making a Power Point
    presentation for class, the person applies the
    principle of cutting and pasting to getting
    pictures into their slides.
  • The same person applies the principle to
    including their behavior change project in their
    Live Text e-portfolio.

Strategies to promote generalization
16
Train and Hope
  • In spite of reported evidence that some
    behaviors are automatically generalized, it is
    important to remember that most are not
  • (p. 347)

17
Sequentially Modify
  • ...generalization is promoted by applying the
    same techniques that successfully changed
    behavior in one setting to all settings where the
    target behavior is desirable. (p. 349)

18
Introduce to Natural Maintaining Contingencies
  • While not an automatic process, the teacher
    should be aware that when naturally maintaining
    contingencies are found, they should be used.
  • In other words the teacher should set a trap.

19
Introduce to Natural Maintaining Contingencies
  • Some behaviors do lend themselves to trapping.
    If behaviors can be generated that result in
    increased peer reinforcement, they are
    particularly likely to be maintained. (p.347)
  • The Teacher who wants the natural environment to
    take over reinforcement should be aware that this
    is by no means an automatic process. (p.348)

20
Introduce to Natural Maintaining Contingencies
  • Observe what seems to be reinforcing for the
    student
  • Choose behaviors that are rewarded in other
    settings, by other persons
  • Teach students to solicit attention (and
    reinforcement) for behaviors (e.g., How am I
    doing?)
  • Teach students to recognize reinforcement when it
    is delivered. (p. 351)

21
Train Sufficient Exemplarsusing general case
programming
  • ...emphasizes using sufficient members of a
    class of stimuli to ensure that students will be
    able to perform the task on any member of the
    class of
  • stimuli (p. 354)

22
Train Sufficient Exemplarsin multiple settings
A lemon is a citrus fruit.
A lemon is a citrus fruit.
Homeroom
Health Class
23
Train Loosely
  • Concurrent training conditions (e.g., 2 skills
    instead of 1) tends to produce more
    generalization than serial training.
  • OYO - READ page 357.
  • The use of naturalistic or loose training
    represents a departure from tradition in special
    education teaching. Its success suggests again
    the importance of teachers maintaining their
    skills and keeping up with current research.

24
Use Indiscriminable Stimuli
  • Thin (e.g., by delaying, or making intermittent)
    the reinforcement schedule as much as possible
    and the behavior may not extinguish no matter the
    setting, person, or time.
  • OYO - Read Ms. Bells Class Learns to Complete
    Assignments on pages 359.

25
Program Common Stimuli
  • This may be accomplished by either increasing
    the similarity of the training situation to the
    natural environment
  • or by introducing elements of the training
    situation into the natural environment. (p. 359)

26
It is possible to increase the probability of
generalization by reinforcing generalization as a
response class....In mediating generalization,
students are taught to monitor and report on
their own generalization of appropriate behavior
(p. 362)
  • Mediate Generalization and Train to Generalize
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com