A Study of the Effect of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator on Team Effectiveness - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

A Study of the Effect of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator on Team Effectiveness

Description:

A Study of the Effect of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator on Team Effectiveness Tricia Varvel, M.S., Stephanie G. Adams, Ph.D. and Shelby J. Pridie, B.S. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:427
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: engineeri52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Study of the Effect of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator on Team Effectiveness


1
A Study of the Effect of the Myers-Briggs Type
Indicator on Team Effectiveness
  • Tricia Varvel, M.S., Stephanie G. Adams, Ph.D.
    and Shelby J. Pridie, B.S.
  • University of Nebraska-Lincoln

2
Monitoring
Pre-Assessment of Individuals and Teams on
Attitudes About teaming
Post-Assessment
Continuous
Effectiveness
Outcomes
Task
Task
Training before Task
Training
Rewarding Achievements
3
References
  • Session 3242 A Conceptual Model for the
    Development and Assessment of Teams Stephanie G.
    Adams, Ph.D., Laura C. Simon Vena, Bianey C.
    Ruiz-Ulloa Fernando Pereira University of
    Nebraska-Lincoln
  • A Pilot Study of the Performance of Student Teams
    Stephanie G. Adams, Ph.D., Laura Carmen Simon
    Vena, M.S. and Bianey C. Ruiz-Ulloa, M.S.
    University of Nebraska, Lincoln

4
Background
  • Individual characteristics of group members, as
    well as the diversity of skills and traits within
    a group, are important factors related to group
    effectiveness. Shaw
  • When a team fails, problems are often blamed on
    poor communications, an overly broad label for
    a range of personality differences that can
    create tensions and misunderstandings. Culp and
    Smith
  • Most managers agree that people rarely fail due
    to a lack of knowledge, skills, or intelligence,
    but invariably fail because they are unsuitable
    in terms of temperament and motivation. Acuity
    Psychometrics

5
Objective
  • This research study sought to test whether
    psychological type training had an effect on the
    effectiveness of a team.
  • Specific Research Question
  • Do team members perform better when given the
    Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and then educated
    with the required information on psychological
    type in a brief training session?

6
Methodology and Analysis
  • A comparison was made by examining the
    performance of a set of teams that received MBTI
    training against those who did not.

7
Sample
  • 200 senior design students
  • Enrolled in 60 teams
  • Majors
  • Agricultural and Biological Systems, Chemical,
    Computer, Construction Management, Electrical,
    Industrial, and Mechanical Engineering

8
Data Collection
  • Data was collected at two points during the
    semester
  • During the first two weeks of class- MBTI
  • During the last three weeks of the semester -Team
    Effectiveness Questionnaire (TEQ)

9
MBTI
  • Designed by Isabel Myers-Briggs and Katherine
    Briggs to provide an economical summary of
    central aspects of personality, one which
    increases self-understanding and implies certain
    ways of behaving more than others. Rayne

10
4 Dimensions
  • Extroversion/Introversion
  • Source of energy, either from the outside world
    of people or from the inside world of thoughts
    and ideas
  • Sensing/Intuition
  • Preference for the details of a situation or the
    overall picture of an experience.
  • Thinking/Feeling
  • Indicates the way people make their decisions.
  • Judging/Perceiving
  • addresses the way that people prefer to organize
    their world.

11
MBTI in a team
  • helps to overcome team performance obstacles by
    encouraging team members to better understand
    each other.
  • demonstrates the value of having diverse styles
    on the team, and
  • reduce stress levels by helping the team
    understand which situations will energize an
    individual and which will stress an individual
    Culp and Smith

12
Training
  • Certified MBTI facilitator scored the tests
  • Approximately half of the students received one
    hour of training (N95)
  • Content of training
  • an explanation of the different type preferences
  • how people with a given type preference are
    likely to react to a certain situation
  • aggravations of opposite type preferences, and
    the strengths and
  • weaknesses that each type preference brings to
    the teaming environment.

13
TEQ - Team Effectiveness Questionnaire
  • Self-report measure of performance and attitude
  • Comprised of seven characteristics
  • Common Purpose
  • Goal Clarification
  • Role Clarity
  • Psychological Safety
  • Mature Communication
  • Productive Conflict Resolution and
  • Accountable Interdependence

14
TEQ
  • Divided into two sections
  • demographic data and information on individual
    preferences regarding teaming and previous team
    experiences.
  • a measure of students ability to effectively
    work in teams and to measure their understanding
    of each of the characteristics.

15
Measuring Performance
  • The grade that the teams received in their senior
    design classes.
  • The second measure of performance was generated
    from the responses to the TEQ questions that
    dealt specifically with performance.
  • The average level of performance was obtained by
    averaging all of the team members answers to the
    performance related questions.

16
Results
  • MBTI completed by193 senior design students
  • most commonly present type the (ISTJ)
    introversion, sensing, thinking, and judging
    preferences
  • TEQ by completed188

17
    Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Performance Between Groups 1.252 1 1.252 4.263 0.043
  Within Groups 17.324 59 0.294    
  Total 18.576 60      
Conflict Between Groups 0.283 1 0.283 1.583 0.213
  Within Groups 10.544 59 0.179    
  Total 10.826 60      
Communication Between Groups 0.587 1 0.587 4.452 0.039
  Within Groups 7.776 59 0.132    
  Total 8.363 60      
Interdependence Between Groups 1.987 1 1.987 7.854 0.007
  Within Groups 14.925 59 0.253    
  Total 16.912 60      
Psych Safety Between Groups 0.887 1 0.887 5.100 0.028
  Within Groups 10.266 59 0.174    
  Total 11.153 60      
Attitude Between Groups 1.819 1 1.819 11.323 0.001
  Within Groups 9.481 59 0.161    
  Total 11.300 60      
18
Conclusions
  • Team training on psychological type can have a
    significant affect on team effectiveness and
    performance.
  • Particularly, this research found that team
    training associated with the Myers-Briggs test
    was very helpful.
  • This research did not conclude that there is a
    particular combination of team preferences that
    perform better.

19
Final Thought
  • The psychological type profiles of the team alone
    cannot predict the level of a teams performance
    or effectiveness.
  • The greatest gift that the MBTI gives individuals
    is the increased understanding of both themselves
    and others.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com