Natural radioactivity in groundwater in the Negev Desert and the Arava Valley, Israel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Natural radioactivity in groundwater in the Negev Desert and the Arava Valley, Israel

Description:

In the last years high concentration of uranium and radium isotopes and radon ... sandstone (Kurnub) and the upper cretaceous limestone (Judea) aquifers in the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: webusersF
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Natural radioactivity in groundwater in the Negev Desert and the Arava Valley, Israel


1
Natural radioactivity in groundwater in the Negev
Desert and the Arava Valley, Israel
Gustavo Haquin Soreq Nuclear Research Center,
Yavne 81800 ISRAEL
2
Introduction
  • In the last years high concentration of uranium
    and radium isotopes and radon were measured in
    groundwater from the Nubean sandstone (Kurnub)
    and the upper cretaceous limestone (Judea)
    aquifers in the Negev and the Arava valley.
  • As most of the groundwater basins in the Middle
    East are being diminished or contaminated,
    exploitation of the deep aquifers units is
    increasing.
  • Objectives of present work
  • Mapping the natural radioactivity in groundwater
    in the south of Israel
  • Comparison of radium measurement methods
  • Understanding the physical and chemical
    processes of radium enrichment in groundwater
  • Assessment of the radiological consequences of
    consuming high radium groundwater

3
Natural decay series
4
(No Transcript)
5
Study area
Kurnub aquifer
Group 1 NE Negev - Craters
Group 2 NE Negev Dead Sea
Group 3 South Arava
Group 4 Ashalim
Judea aquifer
Group 5 South and central Arava
Group 6 NE Negev
Group 7 NW Negev
6
Processes for radium enrichment in ground water
  • Precipitation
  • Enrichment of SrSO4 and PbSO4 instead of BaSO4
    atomic radius
  • Decrease in radium content in solid with
    increasing temperature
  • Adsorption and ion exchange
  • Kd increase with time and decrease with T
  • Source for decay products flux into water
  • Linear correlation between radium concentration
    and salinity
  • Radium adsorption with MnOx depends on redox of
    water
  • Dissolution
  • Low PH and T increase dissolution
  • Recoil
  • Recoil energy (daughter) following alpha
    disintegration of parent radionuclide
  • Change in decay product position in host rock

7
Analytical methods
Method 226Ra 228Ra 223Ra 224Ra 222Rn 234U 238U
g spec liquid (1) ? ?
g spec MnO2 (1) ? ? ? ?
RAD 7 MnO2 (2) ?
Delayed coincidence MnO2 (3) ? ?
Emanometry (1) ?
ICP-MS (4) ?
(1) Soreq NRC, (2) BGU University, (3) Stanford
University, (4) NRCN and GSI
8
Radiological consequences
  • The IL d.w. standard limit the overall dose from
    drinking water to 0.1 mSv/year.
  • This limit is translated to activity
    concentration thresholds for each radium isotopes
    as presented in the table.

New IL std Bq/l Old IL std Bq/l Isotope
0.5 0.6 226Ra
0.2 0.5 228Ra
2.1 1.7 224Ra
1.4 223Ra
9
Results of method comparison
  • Good correlation between different measurement
    methods.

R0.98
10
R0.97
11
R0.95
12
Results of radium mapping
  • Radioactivity distribution Dispersion of the
    phenomena along all the study area.
  • No hot-spots.
  • Anomalies of 222Rn in the region south to the
    Dead Sea.

13
Mapping radium conc.
222Rn 224Ra 228Ra 226Ra Name Group
2.5 0.29 0.18 NE Negev - Craters 1
1.8 0.30 0.24 NE Negev Dead Sea 2
3.3 0.44 0.36 South Arava 3
2.5 0.34 0.25 Kurnub Kurnub
6.9 0.08 BDL 0.52 South and central Arava 5
36.5 0.06 BDL 1.52 NE Negev 6
7.4 BDL BDL 0.55 NW Negev 7
14.0 BDL 0.70 Judea Judea
14
Study area
Kurnub aquifer
Group 1 NE Negev - Craters
Group 2 NE Negev Dead Sea
Group 3 South Arava
Group 4 Ashalim
Judea aquifer
Group 5 South and central Arava
Group 6 NE Negev
Group 7 NW Negev
15
Mapping radium conc.
16
Results of drinking water quality
  • The majority of the water in both aquifers are
    not suitable for consumption

17
Water quality
Kurnub aquifer 66 over old IL std. 96 over new
IL std.
Judea aquifer 34 over old IL std. 38 over new
IL std.
18
Results on geochemistry
  • Radium isotopes according to lithology (Judea
    226Ra, Kurnub 228Ra and 226Ra).
  • Large daughter/parent disequilibrium
  • 222Rn/226Ra (0.2 - 225)
  • 234U/238U (1.3 - 5.3)
  • 224Ra/228Ra (0.1-5.4).

19
Lithologic characterization
234U/238U 224Ra/223Ra 228Ra/226Ra Aquifer
3.2 gt30 gt1.5 Kurnub
1.8 lt5 lt0.5 Judea
20
Kurnub NE Negev - craters
21
Total radium salinity Craters
  • High salinity low Ra Adsorption of 226Ra in
    host rock.
  • Less precipitation of Ra with BaSO4.

Total radium salinity, DO. NE Negev (DS)
22
South and central Arava
23
Increase in total Ra with T
24
Judea NW Negev
25
Ra related to chemistry
Ra release in low DO water
High salinity adsorption sites
Less Ra precipitates with BaSO4
26
Conclusions
  • A systematic and comprehensive survey of
    natural radioactivity in the Kurnub and Judea
    aquifers was performed.
  • The natural radioactivity phenomena in
    groundwater is scattered along the south of
    Israel.
  • A comparison of five analytical methods for
    radium measurements was performed and an very
    good correlation was found between the different
    methods.
  • Isotopic radium characterization according to
    lithology.
  • 228Ra/226Ra lt 1 as expected in carbonate
    aquifers (Judea)
  • Almost 40 of the wells do not fit IL and EU
    d.w. Standards.

27
  • 228Ra/226Ra gt 1 as expected in sandstone
    aquifers (kurnub).
  • Almost 96 do not fit new IL d.w. standard
  • The groundwater is supplied to the population
    after desalination which lower the radium
    concentration in the water.
  • Radium enrichment in groundwater is due to
    adsorption, dissolution, precipitation and
    recoil.
  • The predominant geochemical process for radium
    enrichment are influenced in-situ by local
    characteristics (chemistry) of the water.
  • High U disequilibrium was found in both
    aquifers.
  • High excess of 222Rn was measured in both
    aquifers.

28
In cooperation withA. Vengosh and N. Pery Ben
Gurion University.A. Paytan Stanford
UniversitySponsored by Water quality Division
at the Israel Water Commission
29
?? ???? ???? 2005
Thank you Gracie ????
Dead Sea
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com