Title: British Economic Growth in the Steam Age: Some Lessons for Today
1British Economic Growth in the Steam Age Some
Lessons for Today
- Nick Crafts
- University of Warwick
2General Purpose Technologies (Lipsey et al, 1998)
- Over time are found to have many uses and
complementarities are pervasive - Initially have much scope for improvement
- Eventually come to be widely used and lead to
(large) rise in aggregate productivity growth - BUT
- Initially may have no positive impact on growth
or even imply a slowdown phase
3The Solow Productivity Paradox
- You can see the computer age everywhere except in
the productivity statistics - Robert Solow, 1987
4Steam as a General Purpose Technology
- Steam Engines, Railways, Steamships
- James Watts Invention 1769
- Liverpool Manchester Railway 1830
- Steamship crosses the Atlantic 1838
5Sources of Power, 1760-1907 (Thousand Horsepower)
1760 1800 1830 1870 1907
Steam 5 35 165 2060 9659
Water 70 120 165 230 178
Wind 10 15 20 10 5
Total 85 170 350 2300 9842
6Steam Engine Technology
- Took a long time to become cost effective in most
sectors - Coal consumption per hp per hour fell from 30 lb
pre-Watt to 12.5 lb for Watt engine to 2 lb by
1900 when psi reached 200 compared with 6 in 1770 - The big breakthrough was not James Watt but the
move to the high pressure steam engine after 1850
7Capital Cost and Annual Cost per Steam Horsepower
per year ( current)
Capital Cost Annual Cost
1760 42 33.5
1800 56 20.4
1830 60 20.4
1850 37 13.4
1870 25 8.0
1910 15 4.0
Note the estimates are for a benchmark textile
mill in a low coal cost region like Manchester
8Total Steam Contribution to Growth of Labour
Productivity ( per year)
9Implications
- Small contribution of steam pre-1830 helps
explain Crafts-Harley view of industrial
revolution - Strong contribution of steam power in second half
of 19th century says climacteric not explained by
hiatus between GPTs - Puts Solow Paradox into perspective
10ICT Contribution to US Labour Productivity Growth
( points per year)
11The Progress of ComputingReal Cost MIPS-E (1998)
12Impact of GPTs on Growth
- ICT much bigger impact on American growth in
recent past than steam ever had on UK growth - Costs of computing have fallen much faster than
did costs of steam power - Society seems to be getting better at exploiting
GPTs more rapidly
13Railway Capital Authorised (mn)
14Railway Share Prices (June 1840100)
15RAILWAY BENEFITS
16RATES OF RETURN
- Average private rate of return 5, 1830-70
- Average social rate of return 15, 1830-70
17Lessons from Railways
- Railway mania ended in tears
- Profits from railways less than optimists had
hoped - Users gained much more than investors
18Does Innovation Generate Supernormal Profits?
(Nordhaus, 2004)
- Innovators capture about 2 of the total social
gain from technological progress - Appropriability is low (7) and depreciation is
high (20 per year) - The US stock market valuation of new economy
firms grew between 1995 and 2000 at a rate that
implied owners could capture 90 of the social
gain
19NASDAQ Composite Index
20The New Economy and Stock Prices
- It was a bubble but fundamentals (trend growth)
had improved - Dot.coms experience would not have surprised
someone who lived through the 1840s - Economic gains from ICT not a mirage but few of
them will be reaped by investors
21Globalization
- Enhanced integration of international markets
- Promoted by reductions in transport and
communications costs .. both steam and ICT do
this - But is the effect to centralize or disperse
economic activity?...to promote divergence or
convergence?
22Transport/Communication Costs
- VERY HIGH activity is dispersed
- VERY LOW activity is dispersed
- INTERMEDIATE agglomeration with feedback
effects based on large markets and linkages
23Agglomeration Benefits
- External economies of scale
- Productivity rises with city size
- Proximity to customers and suppliers
- Thick labour market
- Still very important and cannot easily be
replicated
24Steam Power and Industrial Location
- Reduced transport costs for goods rather than
services both on land and at sea - Industry moved closer to natural resources
- Manufacturing cities proliferated in Europe and
North America - Centralizing not dispersing
25Real Cost of Ocean Shipping(1910 100)
26Steam-Powered Globalization
- Helped manufacturing and finance
- Hurt arable agriculture, especially land rents
- Lancashire cotton textiles enjoyed an Indian
summer
27Wheat Prices
England and Wales (Sh/d per quarter) Ratio of Liverpool/Chicago
1852/6 62/1 2.00
1868/72 54/8 1.49
1895/9 27/10 1.26
1910/3 32/5 1.06
28Lancashire Textiles and Globalization (Leunig,
2005)
- Lancashire a high wage industry (6 x India and
Japan in 1910) - But continued to dominate world trade (60 world
market share in 1910) - Unit costs no higher than in India or Japan even
before adjusting for quality - Lancashire flourished because of agglomeration
benefits (productivity 33 higher than rest of
Britain)
29Regional GDP/Head (GB 100)(Crafts, 2005)
1871 1911
London 147.3 165.6
Rest SE 88.5 86.3
East Anglia 92.0 76.8
North West 108.1 97.2
Yorks Humbs 94.4 89.5
Wales 87.7 90.1
30Coefficient of Variation of Regional GDP/Person
31Globalization and the Regions
- Both then and now regional income inequality
rises with globalization - London then and Greater London now prosper
while imports hurt the provinces - East Anglia suffered in 19th century and West
Midlands in 20th century
32London as a Financial Centre
- Agglomeration where size matters
- Benefits from thick labour markets and importance
of proximity for deal-making - Clerical jobs will increasingly be offshored
- This will strengthen the core business
33UK Asset Management Core BusinessOXERA (2005)
Importance Score
Financial Infrastructure 4.00 3.96
Size of Labour Pool 3.96 4.24
Quality of Life 3.77 3.36
Market Liquidity 3.69 4.29
Regulatory Regime 3.69 3.40
34UK Asset Management Back-OfficeOXERA (2005)
Importance Score
Total Labour Cost 4.00 2.74
Size of Labour Pool 3.92 4.08
Flexibility of Labour Market 3.89 3.22
Property Rentals 3.59 2.11
Financial Infrastructure 3.42 3.85
35Death of Distance
- Greatly exaggerated
- ICT enables some things to go to the periphery
but enhances the strengths of the core at the
same time (e.g. strengthens London as a financial
centre) - Like steam, ICT rearranges geography but doesnt
abolish it - Globalization requires sectoral and spatial
adjustment
36Did Victorian Britain Fail ?
- Choices of technique basically correct
- Foreign investment profitable
- Emulation of USA not feasible
- Natural resources, economies of scale,
non-universal technology not a neoclassical
world - New growth economics and new economic geography
complicate the argument
37Pre-1914 Globalization
- Driven by falling transport and communication
costs - Protectionism increasing in product markets and
USA a high tariff country - Massive international factor flows
- BOTH capital and labor go from Old World to New
World
38Anglo-American Wage Gap Contributions to
Change, 1870-1913 (ORourke, 1996)
39Why No Wage Convergence ?
- TFP gaps increase because of British
incompetence - USA develops its own non-transferable technology
- USA benefits from increasing returns to scale and
agglomeration economies sustained by migration
40North Atlantic Economy
- Heckscher-Ohlin
- US comparative advantage from land abundance
remains in agriculture - Tariffs imply less trade and more migration
- New Geography
- Migration and increasing returns virtuous circle
of industrialization plus manufactured exports - Tariffs imply more migration and promote switch
in comparative advantage
41American Overtaking of Britain
- Best understood in the context of globalization
- Reveals some limitations of neoclassical
economics - May have no important policy implications