Search for SUSY in Gauge Mediated and Anomaly Mediated SB Models - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Search for SUSY in Gauge Mediated and Anomaly Mediated SB Models

Description:

2 g s in central calorimeter ( 1.1) w. transverse energy ET 20GeV. g-consistent ... g pointing using highly segmented LAr calorimeter and Preshower strips ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: thomasnu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Search for SUSY in Gauge Mediated and Anomaly Mediated SB Models


1
  • Search for SUSY in Gauge Mediated and Anomaly
    Mediated SB Models
  • Thomas Nunnemann LMU Munich
  • EPS HEP03 16.7.-23.7.2003
  • GMSB searches at LEP/OPAL
  • GMSB searches at Tevatron/DØ and prospects for
    Run II
  • AMSB searches at LEP/Delphi

2
Gauge Mediated SUSY Breaking
  • Alternative to gravity mediated SUSY breaking
    Gauge interactions with messenger fields at a
    scale are responsible for
    SUSY breaking.
  • Gauge interactions are flavour blind, thus no
    FCNC (as in SUGRA models)
  • The LSP is a Goldstone Fermion Gravitino
  • The NLSP (next-to-lightest SUSY particle) is
    either the lightest neutralino (bino) or a
    charged slepton (mostly stau)
  • The NLSP lifetime can range from 0 to ?
  • ? many different topologies
  • Minimal set of parameters
  • L scale of SUSY masses
  • Mmess messenger mass scale
  • Nmess number of mess. fields
  • tan b ratio of Higgs v.e.v.
  • m sign of higgs mass term

3
GMSB Topologies
4
Neutralino NLSP gg Production
Signal Pair prod. of acoplanar gg
Expected SM production
  • GMSB interpretation of CDF eeggET event excluded
  • Within GMSB Snowmass Slope parameter set (used by
    DØ)

5
Stau NLSP
  • Combination of four different analysis, sensitive
    to various stau life times
  • Lower stau mass limits obtained by comparison to
    theoretical predictions of cross section
  • Measurement upper limit on the production cross
    section in the plane

6
Inclusive Search for ?? Missing ET (ET)
  • Dominating production channels at Tevatron
  • In case of Neutralino NLSP
  • Analysis assumes short NLSP life time ? prompt
    decay
  • 2 gs in central calorimeter (???? 1.1)
  • w. transverse energy ET gt 20GeV
  • g-consistent shower shape
  • isolation requirement based on energy deposition
  • e? veto no matched tracks
  • Measurement of missing ET distribution of
    di-photon events
  • g pointing using highly segmented LAr calorimeter
    and Preshower strips
  • g vertex resolution (beam direction)
  • Calorimeter only sz ? 15 cm
  • used in this analysis
  • Central Preshower sz ? 2.2 cm
  • not fully comissioned yet, but good prospects for
    future analyses

7
Background Estimation
  • Background without true missing ET
  • Dominating QCD with direct photons or jets
    mis-identified as gs (due to leading p0)
  • Contribution estimated using fake gg sample at
    least one g candidate fails shower shape
    requirement, normalized at low ET lt 20 GeV
  • Drell-Yan, electrons mis-identified as gs due to
    track reconstruction inefficiency
  • Background with true missing ET (from n)
  • Dominating W? ?e?? (missed tracks) Wjet
    ?e?jet (jet faking g)
  • Constribution estimated using eg sample and e?g
    mis-identification probability derived from data

8
Search for Excess in ET Spectrum
Simulated Signal
  • No excess seen in missing ET distribution
  • Signal efficiencies derived using Snowmass Slope
    for GMSB
  • combined efficiency (7-10) for ETgt30 GeV and
    45ltLlt55 TeV
  • including trigger and reconstruction
    efficiencies
  • Upper limits on cross sections are calculated
    using bayesian approach with cut ET gt 30 GeV

search region
9
Limit for GMSB Model
  • Comparing cross section limits with theoretical
    predictions

95 C.L. Limits
  • Measurement is based on luminosity L 41 pb-1
  • Results are approching limits from Run I
    analyses based on 100 pb-1 (similar models)
  • CDF

10
Prospects for Tevatron RunII
  • Prompt neutralino decays
  • With L 2 fb-1 discovery up to
  • (J. Qian, hep-ph/9903548 v2, similar model, but
    tan b 2.5) )
  • LEP limit (from acoplanar gg search)
  • Intermediate neutralino life-time
  • Sensitivity drops as NLSP decays outside detector
  • Larger sensitivity in photonjetsET channel
  • Opal for any NLSP life-time

ADLO limit
11
Prospects for Stau NLSP Scenario
J. Qian hep-ph/9903548 v2
  • High mass reach also in stau NLSP scenario
  • Short-lived stau
  • Prompt decay
  • Standard SUSY searches Tri-lepton or
    like-sign di-lepton signature
  • Quasi-stable stau
  • Stau escapes detector
  • 2 m-like objects with large dE/dx

12
AMSB Phenomenology
  • SUSY breaking is mediated by anomalies in the
    supergravity lagrangian
  • Provides soft mass parameters in visible spectrum
  • No need for messenger sector
  • Flavour blind ? FCNC automatically suppressed
  • But need additional non-anomaly contribution to
    avoid tachyonic sleptons
  • AMSB model is very predictive
  • Defined by m3/2, m0, tan b and sign(m)
  • LSP
  • Neutralino and chargino are gaugino-like and
    nearly mass degenerate

13
Small ?M Chargino Search
little energy
  • Problem small DM means little visible energy .
  • ? large background from gg-scattering
  • Require ISR tag!
  • Exclusion region depends on sneutrino mass.
  • Leptonic decay mode
    important for small sneutrino masses

Delphi
14
Constraints on AMSB Parameter Region
  • Combination of various analyses to constrain AMSB
    parameter space
  • LEP1 constrain (Z width)
  • SM Higgs search
  • Invisible Higgs search
  • Small DM chargino search
  • Search for
  • Parameter scan using Isajet

15
Summary and Outlook
  • Many different topologies have been studied by
    the LEP experiments.
  • Combination of results is used to set limits for
    all NLSP lifetimes and to cover most of the
    kinematically accessible parameter space for the
    GMSB and AMSB scenarios.
  • First results from Tevatron are approaching Run I
    limits with much smaller statistics.
  • For GMSB models Tevatron has the potential to
    significantly improve lower limits on SUSY
    particle masses.

Many thanks to Christoph Rembser for the valuable
discussion on the LEP results!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com