The European Research Area and Pockets of Knowledge Growth in the Social Sciences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

The European Research Area and Pockets of Knowledge Growth in the Social Sciences

Description:

1. The European Research Area and Pockets of Knowledge Growth in the Social ... Baltic Sea research programme Bireme (incl. RFBR) Bonus ERA-NET ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: sami187
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The European Research Area and Pockets of Knowledge Growth in the Social Sciences


1
The European Research Area and Pockets of
Knowledge Growth in the Social Sciences
Humanities in the non-EU CountriesThe Case of
RussiaEuropean University at St.
Petersburg21-22 September 2006What did we
learn from the EU-Russia cooperation in the FP6?
Programme Manager Mikko YlikangasAcademy of
Finland
2
Russia and NIS active in FP6
  • Russias participation has been very active in
    FP6
  • Of the non-EU countries and regions only Russia
    and new independent states participated in all
    FP6 activities

3
Strong areas
  • Russia has been active in almost all priority
    areas but extremely active in
  • Information society technology
  • Nanotechnologies and nanosciences
  • Aeronautics and space
  • Sustainable development
  • Less activity in priority theme 5 (Food quality
    and safety)
  • Russians have participated successfully also in
    the horizontal research activities involving SMEs

4
Good ground for FP7
  • There is mutual sincere interest for scientific
    cooperation
  • Top researchers in Russia and in EU can find each
    other and start cooperation
  • Cooperation on project level is active
  • The variety of cooperation between EU and Russia
    is broad
  • Growing need of extended cooperation between
    Russia and EU
  • Where/when SSH do come in?

5
Practical Finnish-Russian research and research
funding cooperation
  • Russia in Flux research programme (incl. RFH
    2005)
  • Baltic Sea research programme Bireme (incl.
    RFBR)
  • Bonus ERA-NET
  • Substance Use and Addictions research programme
    with RFBR and RFH 2006
  • Optical material research joint call with RFBR
    2006
  • Business Know-How joint call with RFH 2006
  • Materials technology, and Biosciences joint call
    with RFBR 2007(?)

6
EURAB report recommendation 1
  • A new competitive international system of science
    and technology has emerged
  • The EC needs a new proactive international policy
    in science and technology to
  • strengthen its scientific, technological and
    economic position
  • help to solve global environmental, health and
    other problems
  • give opportunities to EU researchers to develop
    strong international partnerships
  • The EC has to develop large, visible projects
    that would attract attention

7
EURAB report recommendation 2
  • Mutual interest is important for true cooperation
  • Win-win situation needed
  • Priority to make Europe attractive for the best
    researchers in the world and for investment in
    scientific infrastructures
  • The EC should revitalise the European RD system
    by
  • investing new resources in
  • lowering barriers to cross-border mobility as
    well as between the public and private sectors at
    national, intergovernmental and EU level

8
EURAB report recommendation 3
  • Right kinds of instruments needed for each non-EU
    region to promote international cooperation and
    to properly address the interests of different
    partners
  • EU needs in this respect more flexibility, more
    boldness to rethink new forms of action
  • European challenges exists outside Europe, as
    well climate change, drug and human trafficking,
    and human rights are also European challenges
  • Multi- and interdisciplinary research needed to
    cope with these challenges gt social sciences and
    humanities ought to play important role

9
EURAB report recommendation 4
  • The Commission should establish an efficient
    management structure to initiate and coordinate
    international actions across administrative
    boundaries
  • All such units, which have international RD
    activities, should be in closer contact with each
    other
  • The potential clients should be able to get all
    needed information coordinated

10
EURAB report recommendation 5
  • International cooperation should become an
    integral part of the FPs and it should receive
    adequate funding
  • Each theme should have a single horizontal budget
    line for international cooperation to ensure
    participation of EU and non-EU research
    communities in research actions
  • This budget should be reallocated to the themes
    on the work programme level and adjusted in
    regular updates according to the needs and
    capacity to utilise resources

11
??????? ?? ????????!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com