Hydrogen Peroxide vs Formalin technology Discussion Group 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Hydrogen Peroxide vs Formalin technology Discussion Group 3

Description:

Health and Safety Commission (HSC) regulates workplace H&S in GB ... The biocide is well established but the method of delivery is new. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:134
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: gary357
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hydrogen Peroxide vs Formalin technology Discussion Group 3


1
Hydrogen Peroxide vs Formalin technologyDiscussio
n Group 3
  • Steven Copping
  • Health and Safety Executive

2
Discussion Group
  • Welcome and introduction
  • Health and Safety Executive
  • Aims of this session
  • Overview
  • Hydrogen peroxide
  • Formaldehyde
  • Key points for discussion
  • Summary and outputs

3
Health and Safety Executive
  • Health and Safety Commission (HSC) regulates
    workplace HS in GB
  • Sponsored by Dept Work and Pensions
  • Health and Safety Executive (HSE) local
    government are HSCs enforcing authorities

4
Mission
  • "Our mission involves us (HSC and HSE) working
    with LAs to protect peoples health and safety by
    ensuring that risks in the changing workplace are
    properly controlled."

5
Vision
  • Our vision is to gain recognition of health and
    safety as a cornerstone of a civilised society,
    and with that, to achieve a record of workplace
    health and safety that leads the world."

6
New HSE Strategy
  • Sensible health and safety is a cornerstone of a
    civilised society
  • Sensible health and safety is about managing
    risks, not eliminating them
  • The people best placed to make workplaces safer
    are the staff and managers who work in them.They
    do this best by working together and
  • HSE is committed to being a good partner
    working with others to improve health and safety

7
Biological Agents Unit
  • Promote high standards of biological safety
  • Provide assurance to public, government and
    others that standards are being met
  • Partner in the development and application of the
    biological sciences

8
Responsibilities
  • National inspection remit
  • Management of statutory notification schemes for
    GM activities
  • Technical support to other parts of HSE, local
    authorities and other government depts
  • Development of standards and guidance

9
Aims of this session
  • Share knowledge and experience
  • Changing workplace
  • New technology
  • Start a dialogue
  • Goal is to achieve a consensus opinion
  • Identify gaps in our knowledge and determine
    research needs
  • Identify participants who would be interested in
    joining a community of practice and interest
    (CoPI)

10
Personal agenda
  • List of topic areas/ questions
  • Approach industry
  • Identify research needs
  • Potential to sponsor
  • Advertise CoPI
  • Ongoing development and learning
  • Finalise HSE guidance
  • Available on HSE website

11
Overview
  • Hydrogen peroxide
  • Formaldehyde
  • Application
  • Microbiological safety cabinets
  • Containment level 3 laboratories
  • Healthcare setting

12
Hydrogen Peroxide
  • 2H202 2H2O O2
  • Hydrogen peroxide Water Oxygen

13
HPA Rapid Review Panel (Healthcare setting)
  • This is a system for decontaminating the
    environment using vapourised hydrogen peroxide.
  • The biocide is well established but the method of
    delivery is new.
  • It has potential application for fumigating
    rooms in clinical and pharmaceutical areas.
  • Basic research and development has been completed
    and the product may have potential value. In use
    evaluations/trials are now needed.

14
Wet versus Dry
  • Dry (VHP)
  • Concentration of VHP is maintained below the
    condensation point
  • Four phases
  • Dehumidification
  • Conditioning
  • Sterilisation
  • Aeration
  • Wet
  • Layer of hydrogen peroxide micro-condensation on
    all exposed surfaces
  • Three phases
  • Pre-conditioning
  • Gassing
  • Aeration

15
Efficacy and validation
  • Broad spectrum, rapid antimicrobial
  • Efficacy affected by presence of organic and
    inorganic materials (e.g. proteins, lipids)
  • Presence of blood
  • Mycobacterium species
  • Catalase producers

16
Validation
  • Type, scope and source of contamination
  • Reflect worst case conditions
  • Most resistant organism on the most resistant
    material
  • Documentation
  • Risk assessment
  • Information, instruction and training

17
Fumigation
  • Planned exercise
  • Appropriate controls in place
  • Named, trained personnel
  • Agreed plan
  • Method that is known to be effective in the
    circumstances of use

18
Formaldehyde
  • Advantages
  • Claimed broad spectrum efficacy
  • Inexpensive and easy to handle
  • Effective against M. tuberculosis
  • Disadvantages
  • Slow acting, poor penetration
  • Health effects
  • Toxic, carcinogenic

19
Health effects
  • Exposure
  • 0.1 5ppm
  • burning of the eyes, tearing
  • general irritation of upper respiratory passages
  • 50-100ppm
  • Pulmonary oedema, pneumonitis, death

20
Carcinogenicity
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer
    (IARC)
  • Overall, the working group concluded that the
    results of the study of industrial workers in
    the USA, supported by the largely positive
    findings from other studies, provided sufficient
    epidemiological evidence that formaldehyde causes
    nasopharyngeal cancer in humans.

21
HSCs advisory committee on toxic substances
  • Working group on action to control chemicals
    (WATCH)
  • Formaldehyde has probably caused nasopharyngeal
    cancer
  • It is probable that formaldehyde exposure has
    caused nasopharyngeal cancer in humans, via a
    mechanism to which it can be predicted that
    chronic inflammation (provoked by irritancy) and
    genotoxicity contributed

22
Formaldehyde
  • HSE to produce further advice and guidance
  • CHAN
  • Possible re-classification
  • Potential occupational carcinogen
  • Prevent exposure
  • Engineering controls
  • Stringent work practices

23
Key points for discussion (1)
  • Formaldehyde
  • Positives
  • Concerns
  • Health
  • Carcinogenicity
  • Environment
  • Legal
  • COSHH
  • The Future

24
Key Points for discussion (2)
  • Hydrogen peroxide
  • Application
  • Key concerns
  • What are the issues?
  • Efficacy
  • Sufficient peer review?
  • Practicalities
  • Use of fans
  • Routine vs emergency fumigation

25
Key points for discussion (3)
  • Is Hydrogen peroxide a suitable alternative?
  • Evidence base
  • Experience
  • How do we achieve suitable and sufficient
    validation?
  • Next steps?
  • CoPI

26
Community of practice and interest
  • Bio-decontamination CoPI
  • Continue dialogue
  • Develop a network of interested parties
  • Learn from each other
  • Keep up to date with future developments
  • Valuable resource for anyone developing guidance

27
Bio-decontamination CoPI
  • Delegates and others are asked to express their
    interest in joining this CoPI by sending an email
    to
  • germs.gmos_at_hse.gsi.gov.uk
  • A formal invitation and password will then be
    supplied by the organiser
  • Details on how to use the CoPI will appear when
    you first register

28
Further contact
  • Steve.copping_at_hse.gsi.gov.uk
  • TEL (44) (0)151 951 3964
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com