How fitting, patient, and environmental factors affect directional benefit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

How fitting, patient, and environmental factors affect directional benefit

Description:

The directional benefit is similar whether the fitting is monaural or binaural. The binaural advantage is lost with monaural fittings, resulting in 20-30 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Tina179
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How fitting, patient, and environmental factors affect directional benefit


1
How fitting, patient, and environmental factors
affect directional benefit
  • ???

2
This directional benefit has been demonstrated
through both
  • Word-recognition(??????)
  • Self-report measures(???????)

3
Brian Walden et al
  • The Hearing Journal indicate that average
    hearing aid wearers report positive direction
    benefit in about a third of the listening
    environments they experience.

4
The directional mode
  • Provides less average output for sounds arriving
    from all angles than for sounds arriving from
    directly in front of the listener.

5
eSNR
  • The signal of interest is in front of the
    listener, the result is an improvement in
    effective signal-to-noise ratio for the
    direction mode.
  • Directional benefit averaged across hearing aid
    wearers ranges from approximately 0 to more than
    70.

6
Vast differences in directional benefit
  • Compression
  • Two omnidirectional microphones a single
    directional microphone
  • Monaural binaural fitting
  • The type of signal processing(analog or digital)

7
compression
  • No difference between linear and compression
    processing modes .
  • However, compression parameters will interact
    with electroacoustic measures of directivity such
    as the front-to-back ratio(FBR).
  • Therefore, compression parameters should be
    identified in the compilation of normative FBR
    data in clinical and research settings.

8
Two omnidirectional microphones a single
directional microphone
  • Stephen Thompson points out the use of a single
    directional microphone verus two omnidirectional
    microphones is an important design consideration.
  • In practice, data suggest that optimization for
    maximum directivity is generally impacted much
    more by factors other than the number of
    microphones used.

9
Monaural binaural fitting
  • The directional benefit is similar whether the
    fitting is monaural or binaural.
  • The binaural advantage is lost with monaural
    fittings, resulting in 20-30 poorer
    speech-recognition performance in both
    omnidirectional and directional modes when
    compared with binaural amplification.

10
signal processing(analog or digital)
  • The maximum improvement in eSNR is unaffected by
    the processing following the microphone, whether
    that processing is analog or digital.

11
Fitting factors that impact benefit
  • Frequency range of directivity
  • Hearing aid style
  • Venting
  • Microphone orientation
  • Low-frequency gain compensation

12
Frequency range of directivity
  • DI( directivity index).
  • Variability exists both on average and in the
    frequencies where directivity is high.
  • DI values among and within hearing aid models and
    manufacturers.
  • Connected Sentence Test (CST)
  • Speech intelligibility index (SII)

13
(No Transcript)
14
Hearing aid style
  • Quite similar for BTE ITE
  • ITE style instruments is significatly less than
    that reported for BTEs.

15
(No Transcript)
16
venting
  • Allow low-frequency sounds originating from
    behind the listener to pass through the vent
    without attenuation.
  • DI direction benefit are generally reduced
    with increasing vent size.

17
Microphone port orientation
  • Maximum directional benefit
  • Other port orientations can disrupt the delay
    that is assumed to occur as port angle is
    impacted by the length of the earmold tubing.
  • Fortunately, small deviation from the horizontal
    plane (approximately-10) do not significantly
    impact directivity, but larger deviations should
    be avoided.

18
Low-frequency gain compensation
  • Due to differences in their physical design,
    directional microphone hearing aids provide less
    low-frequency gain than their omnidirectional
    counterparts for sounds that arrive from the
    front.
  • The closer together the ports, the higher the
    frequency at which gain reduction starts will be.

19
Patient Factors
  • The listening situations that patient are in .
  • The magnitude of SNR loss.
  • COSI
  • HINT
  • Quick-SIN

20
(No Transcript)
21
Environment Factors
  • Reverberation
  • The number and position of noise sources
  • Reflections from the same source that may arrive
    from various directions.
  • Distance from the source increases, the
    proportion of reflected versus direct energy also
    increases.
  • Effective critical distance(eCD).

22
(No Transcript)
23
Summary
  • How fitting factors might impact directional
    benefit.
  • How hearing aid processing interacts with the
    patient and his or her listening environment.
  • Optimize our counseling and offer the most
    appropriate listening strategies.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com