On the mass and metallicity distributions of the parent AGB stars of presolar grains - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

On the mass and metallicity distributions of the parent AGB stars of presolar grains

Description:

Presolar stardust compositions reflect interplay of galactic chemical evolution, ... Interpolate DUP models of Boothroyd & Sackmann (1999) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Lar9186
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: On the mass and metallicity distributions of the parent AGB stars of presolar grains


1
On the mass and metallicity distributions of the
parent AGB stars of presolar grains
Larry R. Nittler Department of Terrestrial
Magnetism Carnegie Institution of Washington
Gallino-Fest Sep 2008, Torino
2
Isotope anomalies workshop, Washington
University, Nov 1993
3
Presolar Grains and Galactic Evolution
  • Presolar stardust compositions reflect interplay
    of galactic chemical evolution, nucleosynthesis,
    physicochemical conditions of stellar dust
    formation
  • Represent sample of stars that was present
    shortly before formation of Solar System but had
    formed over long history of galactic disk.
  • Complementary dataset to astronomical
    observations on Galactic Chemical Evolution

4
  • Most presolar grains from AGB stars
  • Can we infer mass/metallicity distributions for
    parent stars?
  • Consistent with expectations from
    models/observations?
  • Is there an age-metallicity relationship in Milky
    Way?
  • Is the Suns O-isotopic composition anomalous?
  • Is there evidence for local evolution (e.g.
    galactic mergers)?

5
Presolar AGB dust
  • Oxides/Silicates
  • 200 ppm in primitive meteorites
  • O isotopes indicate most formed in low-mass AGB
    stars
  • SiC
  • 50ppm
  • C, Al, Ne, Mo, Ba, Zr, Ne isotopes indicate AGB
    origin for gt90
  • Graphite
  • 10ppm
  • C, heavy-element isotopes, s-process enriched
    sub-grains indicate (low-metallicity) AGB origin
    for majority.

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
O-isotope MC simulations
  • Randomly select parent star masses from IMF
    (Salpeter 1955 NM-2.35)
  • Min, Max masses are parameters
  • Metallicity Distribution
  • AMR Assume Fe/Habt, select value for each
    stellar mass, based on lifetime and assumed
    scatter (params a, b, s)
  • No AMR Assume no age-metallicity relationship
    (params are average Fe/H and s)
  • Compare O isotopic dredge-up values for resulting
    M,Z distributions with oxide/silicates
  • Interpolate DUP models of Boothroyd Sackmann
    (1999)

11
  • Peak in First Dredge-up curve for 17O/16O versus
    mass
  • 17O/16O distribution thus sensitive measure of
    maximum mass

12
(No Transcript)
13
Data indicate maximum mass for parent stars of
2.2 M? Similar analysis indicates lower limit
of 1.15 M?
14
(No Transcript)
15
Most O-rich grains from different stars than SiC
16
Where are the IMS grains??? Should be 50
(GailHoppe)
17
Is there an age-metallicity relationship in the
Milky Way?
YES (Edvardsson et al. 1993, Reddy et al. 2003,
Haywood 2006)
NO (Nordström et al. 2004 Feltzing et al. 2001)
18
Age-metallicity relationship?
  • Monte Carlo simulations better match to data with
    AMR than without
  • Requires 0.04-0.06 dex range of Fe/H (10-15
    of Z) at any given time (model-dependent)

19
Age-metallicity relationship?
  • Monte Carlo simulations better match to data with
    AMR than without
  • Requires 0.04-0.06 dex range of Fe/H (10-15
    of Z) at any given time (model-dependent)

20
  • Haywood (2006) AMR

21
  • Haywood (2006) AMR
  • MC distribution parallel to Haywood, scatter
    smaller than observational error, offset to
    slightly higher Fe/H (effect of O isotope GCE
    assumptions)

22
Is 18O/17O anomalous in the Sun?
  • Sun 5.2
  • ISM 3 (WilsonRood ARAA 94)
  • Nearby protostars 3 (Young et al 2008)
  • Is Sun anomalous for age/location?
  • Self-Pollution in parent molecular cloud?
    (Prantzos et al. 1996, Young et al 2008)

Prantzos et al AA (1996)
23
18O/17O ratio?
  • Poor match to data
  • Cannot explain grains with 18O/17Ogt3.5
  • Suns 18/17 ratio typical of stars forming for
    several Gyr before
  • Not effect of molecular cloud self-enrichment
  • Galactic merger (D. D. Clayton, 2004)?

24
SiC
Nittler and Alexander (2003)
25
Presolar Galactic Merger?(D. D. Clayton 2003)
  • Explains SiC isotopic correlation lines (Si, Ti)

26
Presolar galactic merger?
  • Max 12C/13C decreases with increasing 29Si/28Si
  • Larger 12C/13C requires higher mass AGB stars (gt3
    M? for Y grains)
  • Shorter lived
  • Implies temporal evolution to lower 29Si/28Si
    ratios.
  • Increasing mixing fraction from merging galaxy?
  • Solar/oxide 18O/17O ratio also possibly explained
    (D. D. Clayton 2004)

More than 3700 grains plotted Nittler
Alexander 2003
27
Conclusions
  • Monte Carlo simulations can reproduce O-isotopes
    of presolar O-rich grains
  • Indicate parents stars of mass 1.1-2.3 M?
  • Indicate age-metallicity relationship in presolar
    solar neighborhood of MW
  • Indicate solar 18O/17O not atypical of stars of
    its metallicity (not due to late input in parent
    molecular cloud)
  • Most SiC grains from 1.5 3 M? AGB stars
  • Si and C isotopes in SiC grains support presolar
    galactic merger suggestion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com