Cultural Aspects of Innovation, including - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Cultural Aspects of Innovation, including

Description:

against hubris, 'the myth of the machine' for an appropriate technology. Tvindm llen ... The Tendency to Hubris. transgressing established forms of quality control ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: AndrewJ89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cultural Aspects of Innovation, including


1
Cultural Aspects of Innovation, including
grass-roots innovations
NACI Workshop on Broad-based Innovations,
Pretoria, South Africa, Feb 27, 2009
  • Andrew Jamison
  • Aalborg University

Based on
2

By way of introduction... A good
technology, firmly related to human needs, cannot
be one that has a maximum productivity as its
supreme goal it must rather, as in an organic
system, seek to provide the right quantity of the
right quality at the right time and the right
place for the right purpose.

Lewis Mumford, 1961

3
The Cultures of Innovation
culture economic, commercial bureaucratic, professional civic, grass-roots
relevant contexts companies, business networks, markets governments, nation-states, societies movements, communities, regions
policy aims entrepreneurship, competitiveness construction, coordination appropriation,cooperation
policy orientation market-oriented expert-oriented change-oriented
4
Changing Modes of Knowledge Production
Industrial Military
Commercial
Little Science Big Science
Technoscience Mode 1
Mode 1½ Mode 2 Before
WWII 1940s-1970s 1980s-
Form of Knowledge disciplinary multidiscipli
nary transdisciplinary Org
aniza- individuals and RD
departments ad hoc projects and tional
form research groups and institutes
networks Dominant values
academic bureaucratic
entrepreneurial
5
From Little Science to Big Science
  • change in size and scale
  • mission orientation, external control
  • university-government collaboration
  • bureaucratic norm, or value system
  • new role for the state science policy
  • appropriate technology/technology assessment

6
Critiques of Big Science in the 1960s
  • moral, or spiritual (e.g. Martin Luther King)
  • against injustice,poverty of the spirit
  • for a new morality
  • scientific, or ecological (e.g. Rachel Carson)
  • against reductionism, the abuse of the planet
  • for an environmental science
  • humanist, or cultural (e.g. Lewis Mumford)
  • against hubris, the myth of the machine
  • for an appropriate technology

7
An Appropriate Technology Movement in the 1970s
The New Alchemy Institute Ark
Tvindmøllen 1977-1978
Nordic Folkcenter for Renewable Energy
8
From Big Science to Technoscience
  • change in range and scope
  • market orientation, corporate control
  • university-industry collaboration
  • entrepreneurial norm, or value system
  • the state as strategist innovation policy
  • from assessment to promotion foresight

9
The Age of Technoscience
  • A blurring of discursive boundaries
  • between science (episteme) and technology
    (techne)
  • A trespassing of institutional borders
  • between public and private, economic and academic
  • A mixing of skills and competencies
  • across disciplines and societal domains

10
Contending Policy Strategies
  • The dominant , or hegemonic strategy (mode 2)
  • commercialization, entrepreneurship,
    transdisciplinarity
  • The residual, or traditionalist strategy (mode
    1)
  • academicization, expertise, (multi)disciplinari
    ty
  • An emerging, or sustainable strategy (mode 3)
  • appropriation, empowerment, interdisciplinarity

11
Transdisciplinarity, or mode 2
  • Knowledge which emerges from a particular
    context of application with its own distinct
    theoretical structures, research methods and
    modes of practice but which may not be locatable
    on the prevailing disciplinary map.
  • Michael Gibbons et al, The New Production of
    Knowledge (1994)

12
The Tendency to Hubris
  • transgressing established forms of quality
    control
  • a drift of epistemic criteria (Elzinga)
  • transcending human limitations
  • converging technologies (bio, info, cogno,
    nano)
  • neglecting public participation and assessment
  • lack of accountability and precaution
  • overemphasis on entrepreneurship
  • propagation of competition rather than
    cooperation

13
The Forces of Habit(us)
  • Technoscience primarily seen as providing new
    opportunities for scientists and engineers
  • Taught by restructuring established scientific
    and engineering fields multi- or
    subdisciplinarity
  • Politics and the rest of society left largely
    outside of research and education outsourcing
    of ethics
  • A continuing belief in separating experts and
    their knowledge from contexts of use

14
The Discipline as Habit(us)
A discipline is defined by possession of a
collective capital of specialized methods and
concepts, mastery of which is the tacit or
implicit price of entry to the field. It produces
a historical transcendental, the disciplinary
habitus, a system of schemes of perception and
appreciation (where the incorporated discipline
acts as a censorship).
Pierre Bourdieu, Science of Science and
Reflexivity (2004)
15
The Need for a Mode 3
  • At the discursive, or macro level
  • Sustainable innovation, connecting technological
    solutions to social and environmental problems
  • At the institutional, or meso level
  • Responsible innovation, creating accountability
    procedures for science and engineering
  • At the personal, or micro level
  • Community-oriented innovation, fostering
    innovation processes at the grass-roots

16
A Hybrid Imagination
  • At the macro, or discursive level
  • connecting innovation cultures, integrating ideas
  • At the meso, or institutional level
  • making spaces for collective creativity
  • At the micro, or personal level
  • combining identities and forms of competence

17
For example Vandana Shiva
Vandana Shiva and Carlo Petrini at a Slow Food
Cafe
18
Vandana Shiva on GMOs
The conflict over genetically engineered crops
and foods is not a conflict between culture and
science. It is between two cultures of science
one based on transparency, public accountability,
and responsibility toward the environment and
people and another based on profits and the lack
of transparency, accountability, and
responsibility.

Stolen Harvest, 2000
19
For example Fritjof Capra
  • physicist-turned-environmentalist
  • author of many popular books
  • founder of Center for Ecoliteracy

20
Since the outstanding characteristic of the
biosphere is its inherent ability to sustain
life, a sustainable human community must be
designed in such a manner that its technologies
and social institutions honor, support, and
cooperate with nature's inherent ability to
sustain life.
21
For example
The Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) is a
public interest research and advocacy
organisation based in New Delhi. CSE researches
into, lobbies for and communicates the urgency of
development that is both sustainable and
equitable.
Anil Agarwal, the founder of CSE, shown at work
with one of the six State of Indias Environment
reports that the centre has put out since the
1980s.
22
and, not to forget, the new president!
  • Raising money through the Internet
  • Mixing old and new forms of communication
  • Applying techniques of social networking
  • Connecting people and cultures virtually
  • In short, making appropriate use of technology

23
In conclusion...
  • To counteract the dominance of the commercial
  • culture, we need policies that explicitly
    support
  • the civic, not-for-profit culture of
    innovation,
  • interdisciplinary educational programs,
  • mixing expertise and social responsibility,
  • creating sites for collective learning,
  • in short, fostering a hybrid imagination!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com