Dr' Shani Orgad - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Dr' Shani Orgad

Description:

The capacity to remain anonymous and disembodied while communicating the most ... online anonymous. and private ... a disembodied, anonymous, patients-only and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: itse111
Category:
Tags: anon | orgad | shani

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dr' Shani Orgad


1
The pink side and the darker side of women and
the InternetThe case of breast cancer
patients online communication
A lecture in the CRI Scholar Program Series
Gender and Technology
  • Dr. Shani Orgad
  • London School of Economics and Political
    Sciences.s.orgad_at_lse.ac.uk

2
The relationship between gender and technology
Troubled and problematic
Empowering and liberating
  • Technology as reproducing traditional gender
    power relations exclusion of women
  • Masculine cultural dominance of technology
  • Women as incapable of using technology
  • Women as passive users of technology
  • Technology as constructed around mens
    interests
  • Technology as liberating women from their
    constraints, endowing them with powers they did
    not have before
  • Subverting the intended purposes of technology
  • The potential of technology to challenge gender
    power relations
  • Reconstructing technology around womens
    interests
  • Women and interpersonal communication technologies

3
1924
Sourcehttp//scriptorium.lib.duke.edu/adaccess/
4
Sourcehttp//scriptorium.lib.duke.edu/adaccess/
5
Commodore 1981
VisiSchedule 1982
Source http//www.aci.com.pl/mwichary/computerhis
tory/ads
6
IBM 1981-2
Source http//www.aci.com.pl/mwichary/computerhis
tory/ads
7
Verbatim 1982
Source http//www.aci.com.pl/mwichary/computerhis
tory/ads
8
France, 2001
Source http//www.gracenet.net/events_disgrace.ht
m
9
Women and the Internet
Reproduction of masculine dominance
Empowerment and liberation
  • Political economy the embeddedness of the
    Internet and CMC within wider public discourses,
    societal and economic power relations
  • Flaming, trolling and online practices of sexual
    harassment the persistence of traditional
    gender power relations and domination in CMC
  • Women in developmental contexts what are the
    consequences of their online activity for the
    material conditions of their lives? Have
    these conditions changed or m remained
    disregarded?
  • Cyberfeminism, women weaving the web the
    capacity of the networked organisation of the
    World Wide Web to erode or subvert the culture of
    masculine dominance.
  • Online spaces as safe spaces, enabling women to
    evade unpleasant practices
  • Post-modern approaches CMC as enabling the
    experimenting with a new sense of self,
    gender-free and fluid reconfiguration of gender
    categories.

10
The online communication of women who suffer
from breast cancer
Centrality of the disease in public discourse and
communication
High prevalence of the disease
Proliferation of online resources, particularly
patients forums
11
www.breastcancer.org
12
www.youngsurvival.org
13
www.bcexperience.org
14
(No Transcript)
15
The pink side and the darker side of the online
ribbon
16
The pink side of the online ribbon
The ways in which breast cancer patients online
communication shapes and challenges gender power
relations
17
Translating silence into visibility
  • Women should translate the silence surrounding
    breast cancer into language and action against
    this scourge (Audre Lorde, The Cancer Journals,
    1980).

18
Critical debate by lay-expert women
  • The possibility of the marginal (women
    patients) to enter into a dialogue with the
    dominant (medical authority, predominantly male).

19
Control of representation
  • Control over time and space (when their story
    will be published and where)
  • Control over the content of the representation of
    their experience After absorbing all the
    information garnered from the net and from
    anecdotal information provided by the people
    genre Ive arrived at several personal
    conclusionsThe most important conclusion for me
    is that each persons breast cancer is uniquely
    their own. No two people reach the same medical
    treatment, nor do any two people with the same
    diagnosis and survival stats have identical
    chances of survival (online interview 24).

20
Personalisation and specificity
  • The availability of hundreds of patients
    disclosures on numerous forums reflects the
    variable and unpredictable nature of the illness
  • The recognition that there is no
    one-size-fits-all treatment
  • The capacity to perform highly specific searches.
  • Example http//www.sharedexperience.org/experienc
    esearch.lasso

21
Bonding and sisterhood
  • Camaraderie, collaboration and support
  • Realisation that one is not aloneI found the
    web sites for cancer, because I was searching to
    see if I was the only one who experienced this
    type of tumor. Your sometimes feel all alone when
    its happening to you and I was greatly impressed
    at the wealth of information out there. And the
    letters I have received because of it. I'm
    hoping that by sharing this with people, maybe I
    won't feel so alone and perhaps we can get either
    a glimmer of hope, some insight, or, if this
    the beginning of the end, some courage.
  • (posted on Shared Experience message board).

A womens thing?
22
Anonymity and disembodiment
  • The capacity to remain anonymous and disembodied
    while communicating the most private, intimate,
    and highly embodied experiences publicly
  • lurking as a central communicative practice
    controlling the degree of ones visibility
  • A very different kind of transformation from that
    described by post-modern views.

23
Publicity, privacy and safety
24
The darker side of the online ribbon
Do patients proliferating online voices
necessarily exist outside gender power relations?
To what extent is this CMC context indeed
transformative and empowering for women?
25
Anonymity and invisibility
  • Anonymity as a double-edged sword
  • Im very loud within the online breast cancer
    community, but not in the general public
    (Barbara, interview 2).

26
Can women patients online anonymous and
private experiences translate into meaningfully
visible, and thus publicly recognised terms?
27
Privatisation of experience
  • Patients discussions focus predominantly on the
    individual and the personal There is awful
    sentimentality about it. I just felt I couldnt
    relate to it... I didnt ever post ever any
    messagesit just seemed like these women
    weresilence involved in a form that was about
    mutual support, it wasnt about having arguments
    (Kate, interview 11).
  • The connections and relationships that emerge
    between women online remain private affairs
    rather than translating into some kind of a
    collective form of political action

28
The bias of self-responsibility
  • RE STILL TRYING TO DECIDE (Tamoxifen)
  • I guess I would look at it this way. Ask
    yourself why you took Tamoxifen in the first
    place (Im sure the percentages were about the
    same back then). Then ask yourself about the side
    effects and your tolerance to them. (Source
    Breast Cancer Online In Our Own Words).
  • The ones who stick around are the
    fightersthose that come on and are passive and
    feel its just too hard to fight it, give up and
    give in to their disease and dont stick around
    (Online interview 15).

See also http//www.onein9.org.il/health-movie.ht
m
29
Information is power
Educate yourself
Empower yourself
Inform yourself
30
Limited reach

Online resources and patients disclosures are
proliferating, but can CMC create the awareness
and political action facilitated by mass media?

31
Self-sufficient closed spaces
http//bcans.ca/forum/help.htm
ALL WALKS OF LIFE? Participants in breast cancer
online forums are mainly educated,
English-speaking women patients.
32
Conclusions
  • While CMC contributes to the widening of the
    communicative infrastructure of the illness, and
    to its coming out into the public arena, at the
    same time it seems to reinforce the opposite.
  • The combination of a disembodied, anonymous,
    patients-only and highly personalised space and
    discourse on breast cancer sites seems to
    separate, rather than integrate the illness
    experiences and the public political realm.

33
Questions
  • How can online spaces such as breast cancer
    patients forums transcend their invisible
    private boundaries?
  • Can they constitute more than anonymous
    confessional spaces, providing resources for
    therapy, interiority and self-elaboration?
  • Can CMC truly help women recognise themselves as
    publics?
  • So long as the material reality of breast
    cancer does not change, and its dominant
    representation remain unchanged, the so-called
    empowerment of patients by CMC remains highly
    limited.

34
Implications for website design Transforming
private exclusive issues into an inclusive
political agenda
  • Creating more inclusive forums - Stop treating
    issues such as breast cancer as exclusively
    womens personal issues
  • - Open forums for non-patients, men, from
    varied educational and multi-lingual backgrounds
    (at the same time maintain safety).
  • Providing patients with communicative spaces and
    tools to talk outside their private realm,
    creating a dialogue with others.

35
Contribution of this kind of study for a critical
understanding of gender and technology
  • Exploring whats behind the screen
  • Attending to users voices and experiences
  • At the same time, taking a a critical distance
  • Thinking about gender as a source of technology,
    and at the same time a consequence of technology
    (Wajcman, Technofeminism,2004).
  • Examining the relationship between technology and
    gender in its complexity, rather than in utopian
    or dystopian terms
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com