Intensive Tank Culture of Tilapia in the UVI Biofloc System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 87
About This Presentation
Title:

Intensive Tank Culture of Tilapia in the UVI Biofloc System

Description:

Intensive Tank Culture of Tilapia in the UVI Biofloc System – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:3400
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 88
Provided by: Aquacu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intensive Tank Culture of Tilapia in the UVI Biofloc System


1
Intensive Tank Culture of Tilapia in the UVI
Biofloc System
  • James Rakocy, Donald Bailey
  • Charlie Shultz and Jason Danaher
  • University of the Virgin Islands
  • Agricultural Experiment Station
  • St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands

2
Objectives
  • Evaluate the production of tilapia in a 200-m3
    tank employing aeration, solids removal, mixing,
    bacterial-based treatment in the water column,
    and denitrification.
  • Modify and improve the system during the course
    of three production trials.

3
Initial Tank Design
  • Size 200 m3, 16 m diameter, 1 m mean water depth
  • Surface area 200 m2 (0.02 ha or 1/20 acre)
  • Bottom 3o slope to center
  • Center clarifier 1 m3, 45o slope, fiberglass,
    10-cm drain
  • Outside standpipe for solids removal
  • Aeration three ¾-hp Kasco aerators
  • Water movement one ¾-hp Kasco aerator angled

4
Biofloc Tank
16 m
1.09 m
Total Culture Volume 200 m3
0.15 m Freeboard
3º Slope
Sludge Cone Volume 1.0 m3
Sludge Removal Line
5
Biofloc Tank
Aeration device
Central cone
Base addition tank
Drain
Flow
Sludge collection and measurement
To storage lagoon
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Procedures
  • Aeration continuously
  • Mix continuously to maintain suspension of
    biofloc
  • Remove settleable solid waste daily
  • Feed twice daily with floating feed (32 protein)
  • Feed ad libitum for 30 60 minutes
  • Monitor pH daily, maintain pH 7-7.5 with Ca(OH)2
  • Add CaCl2 to prevent nitrite toxicity
  • Monitor important water quality parameters

10
(No Transcript)
11
Aeration with vertical lift propeller pumps
Clear well water before stocking
Established with biofloc and algae
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Total Suspended Solids Settling Curve
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
Clarifier Efficiency
Clarifier effluent Culture tank water Sludge from
clarifier
After 10 minutes of settling
25
External Clarifier Efficiency
26
Sludge Removal in Last 21 Days
27
Total Suspended Solids Trial 2(with external
clarifier)
(1744)
(600)
28
Total Suspended Solids
29
Greenwater Tank Trial 3
Denitrification tanks
Base addition tank
Aeration devices
Pump
Flow
Clarifier
Horizontal mixer
Sludge removal to storage lagoon
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
Denitrification
  • 5 HOAc 8NO3- 4N2 10CO2 6H2O 8OH-
  • Must have a carbon source e.g., acetate
  • Denitrification recovers the alkalinity that is
    lost during nitrification.

35
Production
36
Major Inputs and Outputs
37
TSS Trial 2 and 3
38
Nitrate-Nitrogen Trial 1 - 3
39
Biofloc Tank Culture Advantages
  • Simple management
  • Low water requirements
  • Algal die-offs do not cause mortality
  • Algae and bacteria supplement tilapia diet
  • No off-flavor detected
  • Production 30 times higher than ponds for
    tilapia
  • No recruitment problem
  • Wastewater used to irrigate and fertilize field
    crops

40
Biofloc Tank Culture Disadvantages
  • Requires a 6-week period to establish bacterial
    populations
  • Suspended solids nitrification less stable than
    fixed-film nitrification
  • Feeding response fluctuates
  • Algal die-off reduces feeding response
    temporarily
  • High energy input
  • Reliance on continual aeration and mixing
    requires backup power

41
Key Results
  • Total tilapia production (3060 kg in 1/50-ha
    tank)
  • Daily makeup water averaged 0.29 (0.59 m3) of
    total water volume
  • Recovered approximately 36 (0.21 m3) of daily
    makeup water for irrigation and fertilization of
    field crops.

42
Conclusions
  • This biofloc tank process was nearly 30 times
    more productive than a standard earthen pond
    (15.3 vs. 0.5 kg/m3)
  • External clarification simplifies tank
    construction, improves solids removal and water
    quality and increases production
  • Simple open channels with solids accumulation can
    provide adequate denitrification
  • This production technology conserves water and
    recovers solids and nutrients

43
Design and Operation of the UVI Aquaponic System
  • James Rakocy, Donald Bailey
  • Charlie Shultz and Jason Danaher
  • University of the Virgin Islands
  • Agricultural Experiment Station
  • St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands

44
(No Transcript)
45
System Layout
Base addition
Hydroponic tanks
Effluent line
Degassing
Rearing tanks
Sump Clarifier Filter tanks
Return line
Total water volume, 110 m3 Land
area - 0.05 ha
46
System Design
  • Four fish rearing tanks, 7.8 m3 each
  • Two cylindro-conical clarifiers, 3.8 m3 each
  • Four filter tanks, 0.7 m3 each
  • One degassing tank, 0.7 m3
  • Six hydroponic tanks, 11.3 m3 each
  • Total plant growing area, 214 m2
  • One sump, 0.6 m3
  • Base addition tank, 0.2 m3
  • Total water volume, 110 m3
  • Land area - 0.05 ha

47
(No Transcript)
48
(No Transcript)
49
Treatment Processes
  • Air stones, 22 per rearing tank, 24 per
    hydroponic tank
  • Solids removal, three times daily from
    clarifier, filter tank cleaning one or two
    times weekly
  • Denitrification in filter tanks
  • Continuous degassing of methane, CO2 , H2S, N2
  • Direct uptake of ammonia and other nutrient by
    plants
  • Nitrification in hydroponic tank
  • Retention time rearing tank, 1.37 h clarifier,
    20 min, hydroponic tanks, 3 h

50
(No Transcript)
51
(No Transcript)
52
(No Transcript)
53
(No Transcript)
54
(No Transcript)
55
(No Transcript)
56
(No Transcript)
57
(No Transcript)
58
(No Transcript)
59
(No Transcript)
60
(No Transcript)
61
(No Transcript)
62
(No Transcript)
63
Treatment Characteristics
  • Removal rates using romaine lettuce
    (g/m2/d)NH3-N, 0.56NO2-N, 0.62COD, 30.3Total
    nitrogen, 0.83Total phosphorous, 0.17

64
Important Principles
  • Optimum feeding rate, 60 - 100 g/m2 plant
    area/day prevents nutrient accumulation or
    deficiency
  • Slow removal of solids increases mineralization
  • Frequency of filter tank cleaning controls
    nitrate levels through denitrification
  • Treatment capacity of hydroponic tanks is
    equivalent to 180 g of feed/day/m2 of plant area

65
Production Management
  • Feeding three times daily ad libitum 32
    protein, floating, complete diet
  • Stagger fish production, 24 week cycle, harvest
    every 6 weeks
  • Stagger plant production
  • Use biological insect control
  • Monitor pH daily, maintain pH 7.0 by
    alternate and equal additions Ca(OH)2 and KOH
  • Add chelated iron (2 mg/L) every 3 weeks
  • Add makeup water daily, about 1.5 of system
    volume
  • Purge fish for 4-5 days before sale

66
(No Transcript)
67
(No Transcript)
68
(No Transcript)
69
(No Transcript)
70
(No Transcript)
71
(No Transcript)
72
(No Transcript)
73
Energy Consumption
  • One blower for fish and degassing, 1.5 hp
  • One blower for hydroponics, 1 hp
  • One water pump, ½ hp
  • Total energy consumption 3.0 hp

74
Production
  • Tilapia - 5 mt annually , 580 kg every 6 weeks,
    160 kg/m3/yr
  • Stocking rate Niles, 77 fish/m3 reds, 154
    fish/m3
  • Leaf lettuce - 1,404 cases annually, 24-30
    heads/case, 27 cases/week
  • Basil 5 mt annually
  • Okra 2.9 mt annually

75
(No Transcript)
76
(No Transcript)
77
(No Transcript)
78
(No Transcript)
79
(No Transcript)
80
(No Transcript)
81
(No Transcript)
82
(No Transcript)
83
(No Transcript)
84
(No Transcript)
85
Advantages of Aquaponics
  • Fish provide most nutrients required by plants
  • Plants use nutrients to produce a valuable
    by-product
  • Hydroponic component serves as a biofilter
  • Hydroponic plants extend water use and reduce
    discharge to the environment
  • Integrated systems require less water quality
    monitoring than individual systems
  • Profit potential increased due to free nutrients
    for plants, lower water requirement,
    elimination of separate biofilter, less water
    quality monitoring and shared costs for
    operation and infrastructure.

86
Perspective on UVI Aquaponic System
  • The system represents appropriate or intermediate
    technology
  • It conserves water and reuses nutrients
  • The technology can be applied at a subsistence
    level or commercial scale
  • Production is continuous and sustainable
  • The system is simple, reliable and robust
  • Management is easy if guidelines are followed

87
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com