Title: Intensive Tank Culture of Tilapia in the UVI Biofloc System
1Intensive Tank Culture of Tilapia in the UVI
Biofloc System
- James Rakocy, Donald Bailey
- Charlie Shultz and Jason Danaher
- University of the Virgin Islands
- Agricultural Experiment Station
- St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands
2Objectives
- Evaluate the production of tilapia in a 200-m3
tank employing aeration, solids removal, mixing,
bacterial-based treatment in the water column,
and denitrification. - Modify and improve the system during the course
of three production trials.
3Initial Tank Design
- Size 200 m3, 16 m diameter, 1 m mean water depth
- Surface area 200 m2 (0.02 ha or 1/20 acre)
- Bottom 3o slope to center
- Center clarifier 1 m3, 45o slope, fiberglass,
10-cm drain - Outside standpipe for solids removal
- Aeration three ¾-hp Kasco aerators
- Water movement one ¾-hp Kasco aerator angled
4Biofloc Tank
16 m
1.09 m
Total Culture Volume 200 m3
0.15 m Freeboard
3º Slope
Sludge Cone Volume 1.0 m3
Sludge Removal Line
5Biofloc Tank
Aeration device
Central cone
Base addition tank
Drain
Flow
Sludge collection and measurement
To storage lagoon
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9Procedures
- Aeration continuously
- Mix continuously to maintain suspension of
biofloc - Remove settleable solid waste daily
- Feed twice daily with floating feed (32 protein)
- Feed ad libitum for 30 60 minutes
- Monitor pH daily, maintain pH 7-7.5 with Ca(OH)2
- Add CaCl2 to prevent nitrite toxicity
- Monitor important water quality parameters
10(No Transcript)
11Aeration with vertical lift propeller pumps
Clear well water before stocking
Established with biofloc and algae
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19Total Suspended Solids Settling Curve
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24Clarifier Efficiency
Clarifier effluent Culture tank water Sludge from
clarifier
After 10 minutes of settling
25External Clarifier Efficiency
26Sludge Removal in Last 21 Days
27Total Suspended Solids Trial 2(with external
clarifier)
(1744)
(600)
28Total Suspended Solids
29Greenwater Tank Trial 3
Denitrification tanks
Base addition tank
Aeration devices
Pump
Flow
Clarifier
Horizontal mixer
Sludge removal to storage lagoon
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33(No Transcript)
34Denitrification
- 5 HOAc 8NO3- 4N2 10CO2 6H2O 8OH-
- Must have a carbon source e.g., acetate
- Denitrification recovers the alkalinity that is
lost during nitrification.
35Production
36Major Inputs and Outputs
37TSS Trial 2 and 3
38Nitrate-Nitrogen Trial 1 - 3
39Biofloc Tank Culture Advantages
- Simple management
- Low water requirements
- Algal die-offs do not cause mortality
- Algae and bacteria supplement tilapia diet
- No off-flavor detected
- Production 30 times higher than ponds for
tilapia - No recruitment problem
- Wastewater used to irrigate and fertilize field
crops
40Biofloc Tank Culture Disadvantages
- Requires a 6-week period to establish bacterial
populations - Suspended solids nitrification less stable than
fixed-film nitrification - Feeding response fluctuates
- Algal die-off reduces feeding response
temporarily - High energy input
- Reliance on continual aeration and mixing
requires backup power
41Key Results
- Total tilapia production (3060 kg in 1/50-ha
tank) - Daily makeup water averaged 0.29 (0.59 m3) of
total water volume - Recovered approximately 36 (0.21 m3) of daily
makeup water for irrigation and fertilization of
field crops. -
42Conclusions
- This biofloc tank process was nearly 30 times
more productive than a standard earthen pond
(15.3 vs. 0.5 kg/m3) - External clarification simplifies tank
construction, improves solids removal and water
quality and increases production - Simple open channels with solids accumulation can
provide adequate denitrification - This production technology conserves water and
recovers solids and nutrients
43Design and Operation of the UVI Aquaponic System
- James Rakocy, Donald Bailey
- Charlie Shultz and Jason Danaher
- University of the Virgin Islands
- Agricultural Experiment Station
- St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands
44(No Transcript)
45System Layout
Base addition
Hydroponic tanks
Effluent line
Degassing
Rearing tanks
Sump Clarifier Filter tanks
Return line
Total water volume, 110 m3 Land
area - 0.05 ha
46System Design
- Four fish rearing tanks, 7.8 m3 each
- Two cylindro-conical clarifiers, 3.8 m3 each
- Four filter tanks, 0.7 m3 each
- One degassing tank, 0.7 m3
- Six hydroponic tanks, 11.3 m3 each
- Total plant growing area, 214 m2
- One sump, 0.6 m3
- Base addition tank, 0.2 m3
- Total water volume, 110 m3
- Land area - 0.05 ha
47(No Transcript)
48(No Transcript)
49Treatment Processes
- Air stones, 22 per rearing tank, 24 per
hydroponic tank - Solids removal, three times daily from
clarifier, filter tank cleaning one or two
times weekly - Denitrification in filter tanks
- Continuous degassing of methane, CO2 , H2S, N2
- Direct uptake of ammonia and other nutrient by
plants - Nitrification in hydroponic tank
- Retention time rearing tank, 1.37 h clarifier,
20 min, hydroponic tanks, 3 h
50(No Transcript)
51(No Transcript)
52(No Transcript)
53(No Transcript)
54(No Transcript)
55(No Transcript)
56(No Transcript)
57(No Transcript)
58(No Transcript)
59(No Transcript)
60(No Transcript)
61(No Transcript)
62(No Transcript)
63Treatment Characteristics
- Removal rates using romaine lettuce
(g/m2/d)NH3-N, 0.56NO2-N, 0.62COD, 30.3Total
nitrogen, 0.83Total phosphorous, 0.17
64Important Principles
- Optimum feeding rate, 60 - 100 g/m2 plant
area/day prevents nutrient accumulation or
deficiency - Slow removal of solids increases mineralization
- Frequency of filter tank cleaning controls
nitrate levels through denitrification - Treatment capacity of hydroponic tanks is
equivalent to 180 g of feed/day/m2 of plant area
65Production Management
- Feeding three times daily ad libitum 32
protein, floating, complete diet - Stagger fish production, 24 week cycle, harvest
every 6 weeks - Stagger plant production
- Use biological insect control
- Monitor pH daily, maintain pH 7.0 by
alternate and equal additions Ca(OH)2 and KOH - Add chelated iron (2 mg/L) every 3 weeks
- Add makeup water daily, about 1.5 of system
volume - Purge fish for 4-5 days before sale
66(No Transcript)
67(No Transcript)
68(No Transcript)
69(No Transcript)
70(No Transcript)
71(No Transcript)
72(No Transcript)
73Energy Consumption
- One blower for fish and degassing, 1.5 hp
- One blower for hydroponics, 1 hp
- One water pump, ½ hp
- Total energy consumption 3.0 hp
74Production
- Tilapia - 5 mt annually , 580 kg every 6 weeks,
160 kg/m3/yr - Stocking rate Niles, 77 fish/m3 reds, 154
fish/m3 - Leaf lettuce - 1,404 cases annually, 24-30
heads/case, 27 cases/week - Basil 5 mt annually
- Okra 2.9 mt annually
75(No Transcript)
76(No Transcript)
77(No Transcript)
78(No Transcript)
79(No Transcript)
80(No Transcript)
81(No Transcript)
82(No Transcript)
83(No Transcript)
84(No Transcript)
85Advantages of Aquaponics
- Fish provide most nutrients required by plants
- Plants use nutrients to produce a valuable
by-product - Hydroponic component serves as a biofilter
- Hydroponic plants extend water use and reduce
discharge to the environment - Integrated systems require less water quality
monitoring than individual systems - Profit potential increased due to free nutrients
for plants, lower water requirement,
elimination of separate biofilter, less water
quality monitoring and shared costs for
operation and infrastructure.
86Perspective on UVI Aquaponic System
- The system represents appropriate or intermediate
technology - It conserves water and reuses nutrients
- The technology can be applied at a subsistence
level or commercial scale - Production is continuous and sustainable
- The system is simple, reliable and robust
- Management is easy if guidelines are followed
87(No Transcript)