Title: Exploration of Teamwork in Extension: Identifying Indicators of Success Using a Modified Delphi Stud
1Exploration of Teamwork in Extension
Identifying Indicators of Success Using a
Modified Delphi Study
- The Ohio State University
- Department of Human and Community Resource
Development - Beverly Kelbaugh, Ph.D.
- Extension Agent, Franklin County
2 Exploring Extension Program Teams
- Purpose of Study
- To identify indicators of success of Extension
program teams in order to use these items to
develop a standard for measuring team success, to
assess individual contributions to a team and
incorporate a persons contribution to a team in
their individual performance review
3Problem Statement
Teams are an effective way to address clientele
needs and current issues. The need for continued
support of the team approach and the need for
teams to succeed in order to address current
clientele issues has been well documented. Baker
Verma, 1993 Boone, 1990 DeVries, 1997
Fehlis, 1992 Henson, 1987 Holder, 1990Ukaga,
et.al, 2002 and Yeates, 1990.
4Justification of Study
- Importance of teamwork today
- Diversity and number of teams within
University Extension Systems - Teams in the college are important
- as a means of
- improving customer satisfaction
- improving productivity
- improving quality of products and services
- (Gross, 1995 Johnson, 1993)
5Justification of Study cont.
- Teams in and across colleges and other
organizations may help by - Increasing staff flexibility
- Streamlining overall personnel
- Improving employee satisfaction
- (Zobal Wilkins, 1998)
6 Background of Teams in OSU Extension
Teams introduced in the mid 1980s
Success of teamwork in business and
industry Seeking ways to meet clientele needs in
a changing environment. Serving internal and
external clientele with high quality programs and
products Teamwork as an effective way to work
supported in the College of Agriculture, Food and
Environmental Sciences Project Reinvent strategic
planning processes
7Research Questions
- This descriptive survey research design was
designed to identify critical indicators of
success of Extension program teams. - To identify indicators of success perceived by
experts as fulfilling the goals of the team
8 Population and Sample
- A purposeful sample of experts on teamwork in
Extension from across the United States - 25 individuals nominated by Extension Directors
comprised a panel of experts deemed as
knowledgeable individuals and were from all
levels of Extension organizations.
9 Methodology
- A multi-phase modified Delphi study
- Initial items were based on the literature on
teamwork - Zoomerang an internet service for business and
individual surveys was utilized to collect
participant responses to three rounds - Zoomerang allowed for the data to be recorded and
analyzed in real time and allowed results to be
anonymously shared with participants.
10Steps to Success
- Panel of experts to
- Define and rate critical indicators of team
success
- Content and Face Validity Panel to examine
instruments for - Face validity
- Content validity
- Research Sounding Board
- Review Round II and Round III statements
11Methodology
- Content and face validity of the team indicators
used in round one were field tested with a review
panel of six OSU Extension Faculty - Instrument II and III were developed based on
responses to the previous instruments. - Consensus was achieved on an item when 80 of the
ratings from the Delphi panel of experts,
responding to each questionnaire, fell within two
rating categories on the six point Likert-type
scale (Ulschak, 1983)
12Critical Indicators of Success
- Evidence that team members are committed to the
work of the team and follow through with agreed
upon roles and responsibilities - A clear vision of where the team is going and
agreed upon and understood goals - The impact of programs delivered to clientele
- An established process for communication among
team members that allows for efficient and open
information sharing in a timely manner
13 Indicators of Success with High Importance
- Team members engaged in ongoing learning
opportunities to enhance their skills and
knowledge related to the work of the team - Evidence that the team members have a clear
understanding of their role and the roles of
other team members - Team members practice a respectful and caring
way of working together
14High Success Indicators cont.
- The personal and professional satisfaction of
team members with the team - The quality of subject matter publications
- Established processes for conducting the business
of the team assure follow through and good
communication before during and following team
meetings
15High Success Indicators cont.
- Team members ability to utilize team
contributions in the promotion and tenure process
or for yearly performance reviews - Regularly reviewing goals and measuring
attainment of those goals - Reporting team accomplishments in an appropriate
and timely manner to immediate supervisors and
administration. - An established method of reproting outocmes to
the teams stakeholders
16High Success Indicators cont.
- Generating and utilizing evaluation data on
inservices, workshops and seminars - Team members being recognized for their
contribution to the body of knowledge which is
related to the teams area of expertise - Utilize a team coach or organizational leader as
an advocate of the teams accomplishments and
organizational importance - Documenting and analyzing participants level of
satisfaction with information provided on teams
website and in newsletters or other publications
17High Success Indicators cont.
- Team secures external funding when needed and
considered appropriate - Team develops quality publications in response to
identified needs - Team agrees upon decision making methods
- The use of technology to share the teams
research and scholarly activity and enhance
timely communication in a cost effective manner - When appropriate and meaningful, team documents
environmental and ecological impact of its work
and scholarly activity
18High Success Indicators cont
- Team should have an agreed upon method for
resolving conflict
19Moderate Level Success Indicator
- Team and or individual team members share their
expertise at national meetings
20Organizational Readiness and Support for Teams
- Ongoing learning opportunities to enhance skills
and knowledge related to the work of the team - Technology needs of teams to conduct applied
research, and other work of the team - Technology required to share results of applied
research, and disseminate results.
21Organizational Expectations of Teams
- Teams need to periodically review their
performance in relationship to both their vision
and goals as well as those of the organization.
22 Performance Appraisal of Teams and Team Members
- Importance of team members ability to utilize
team contributions in the promotion and tenure
process - A persons contribution to teamwork must be a
part of annual performance appraisal - Reporting systems must support team reports
- Persons providing reviews must be trained to
value and assess contributions to teamwork
23 Team Member Behaviors
- The success of teams seems dependent upon team
member skills and team processes - Communications
- Decision making
- Resolving conflict
- Information sharing
- Member interactions
- Leadership
24 Team Programming
- Quality of subject matter publications
- Documenting and analyzing participant level of
satisfaction - Impact of programs delivered to clientele
- Importance of providing training and support to
Extension team members to develop effective
teaching strategies, program evaluation
techniques and cutting edge technology for
program development and dissemination.
25 Recommendations for Extension
- Create a vision and culture conducive to
developing and supporting teams - Implement organizational policies and guidelines
to support teams - Provide team development or teambuilding
activities for team leaders and team members - Integrate the indicators of success for team
performance measurements into the criteria for
performance appraisal and promotion and tenure
guidelines
26 Recommendations for
Extension
- Require training for assistant directors,
specialists, district directors, department
chairs and county office chair persons acting as
supervisors of other Extension program faculty to
help them understand, foster and assess team
efforts. - OSU Extension administration should review the
indicators not gaining consensus to determine if
there are additional indicators essential to Ohio
based upon its unique needs or circumstances
27Thank you for serving on my Committee
- Jo M. Jones, Ed.D.
- OSU Extension - Employee Development Network
- Associate Professor Food, Agriculture, and
Environmental Sciences - HCRD - Garee W. Earnest, Ph.D.
- Associate Professor - OSU Extension
Administration - Program Leader - OSU Leadership Center
- Barbara G. Ludwig, Ph.D.
- Professor OSU Extension Associate Director