Concurrent Session: Industrial Sector Priorities Pursuing Major Industrial Opportunities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Concurrent Session: Industrial Sector Priorities Pursuing Major Industrial Opportunities

Description:

Long Beach, CA. Working Together, Advancing Efficiency. Objectives ... 14.3 million jobs $5,900 billion in shipments $980 billion in exports ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: stephan64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Concurrent Session: Industrial Sector Priorities Pursuing Major Industrial Opportunities


1
Concurrent Session Industrial Sector
Priorities Pursuing Major Industrial
Opportunities
CEE Winter Program Meeting January 16-17,
2008 Long Beach, CA
2
Objectives
  • Review energy trends in the industrial sector
  • Summarize CEE industry program accomplishments
    and priorities
  • Discuss goals/next steps

3
Industrial Sector Is a Big Opportunity
U.S. industry represents
  • 37 of U.S. natural gas demand
  • 29 of U.S. electricity demand
  • 30 of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions
  • More energy use than any other single G8 nation
  • Large opportunities for
  • Energy reduction
  • Emissions reductions
  • Fuel flexibility
  • 32 quads of energy
  • gt200,000 sites
  • 14.3 million jobs
  • 5,900 billion in shipments
  • 980 billion in exports

4
Baseline Energy Consumption (CA)(Source
California Industrial Existing Construction
Energy Efficiency Potential Study, May 2006)
5
Industrial Sector CEE Coverage
CEE Initiatives Motors Motor Mgmt. Motor
Systems Compressed Air Pump
Systems Transformers Water/Wastewater
Fired Heaters 31
Motor Systems 23
Steam 26
Process Cooling2
Facilities 10
Other 4
Electro-chemical4
6
Decision-making Criteria for CEE Efforts in the
Industrial Sector
  • Relevance to members
  • Alignment with CEEs mission
  • Technical potential
  • Indicators of market change
  • Key stakeholder relationships
  • Other potential assets
  • Level of effort required
  • Makes use of CEEs unique role
  • Fills a gap
  • Time frame

7
Session Context
8
Premium-Efficiency Motors
9
Premium-Efficient Motors Initiative
  • Launched in 1996
  • Based on EPAct 1992 scope of motors
  • Aligned with NEMA PremiumTM in 2001
  • For motors covered under EPACT
  • Forty-seven participants in 2006-7
  • Majority offer prescriptive programs for 1-200 hp
    motors
  • Custom programs for larger motors and motor
    systems

10
Scope of Covered Products
  • CEE Specification
  • 1 200 Hp
  • Low-voltage
  • General-purpose
  • NEMA Premium Specification
  • 1-200 Hp
  • Low-voltage
  • General- purpose
  • ----PLUS----
  • 250 500 Hp
  • Medium-voltage
  • Special definite purpose

11
Major Accomplishments in Motors
  • Revised CEE Premium-Efficiency Motor Initiative
    to include a guidance specification for large,
    low-voltage electric motors (250-500 hp)
  • Released the 2007 Motor and Drive Program Summary
    describing the program offerings of 47 CEE
    members
  • Available on CEEs website www.cee1.org.
  • Current motor research
  • Impacts to programs of the recently enacted
    federal minimum efficiency standards for motors
  • Exploring medium-voltage, special and definite
    purpose motors
  • Exploring 50hz motors (most commonly found in
    Europe) given limited baseline information and
    industry proposed performance levels.

12
2008 Priorities
  • Prepare for implementation of Energy Independence
    and Security Act
  • Anticipate motor standards impact on industrial
    market and on programs.
  • For example
  • Develop best practice repair guidance for
    programs
  • Review energy performance and market readiness of
    advanced motor technologies
  • Develop consistent language to facilitate
    customer education

13
2008 Priorities
  • Monitor proposed tax credits for motors prior to
    the new standards going into effect.
  • Purchasers of qualified energy efficient motors
    would be allowed a credit in an amount equal to
    15 per horsepower of qualified energy efficient
    motors placed in service by the taxpayer during
    the taxable year.
  • Potential implications
  • Encourage end-use consumers to invest in premium
    efficiency
  • Encourage replacement rather than extend the life
    of inefficient motors

14
Motor Management Motor Decisions MatterSM
  • A national campaign designed to improve the way
    industrial motor repair/replace decisions are
    made by promoting the financial and performance
    benefits of sound motor management policies to
    industrial managers
  • Increase industrys awareness of motor management
    opportunities
  • Increase demand for NEMA PremiumTM motors best
    practice motor repair
  • Encourage the market to engage in motor planning
  • Collaborate nationally to enhance local
    effectiveness

15
MDM Sponsors
  • Efficiency Program Administrators
  • Advanced Energy
  • BC Hydro
  • ComEd, a division of Exelon Corporation
  • LIPA
  • MidAmerican Energy Company
  • National Grid USA
  • NYSERDA
  • NW Alliance
  • NSTAR Electric Gas
  • PGE
  • SMUD
  • SCE
  • WI Department of Administration
  • Xcel Energy
  • Supporting Organizations
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Motor Manufacturers
  • ABB Inc.
  • A.O. Smith Electrical Products Company
  • Baldor Electric
  • Emerson Motors
  • GE Industrial Systems
  • Regal-Beloit Corporation
  • Rockwell Automation / Reliance Electric
  • Siemens Energy Automation
  • TECO-Westinghouse Motor Company
  • Toshiba International
  • WEG Electric Motor Corporation
  • Trade Associations
  • CDA, Inc.
  • EASA
  • NEMA

16
Major Accomplishments in Motor Management
  • CEE accelerated sponsor delivery of the Motor
    Decisions Matter campaign via annual conference,
    spotlight calls, webinars, and a regional meeting
    in Austin.
  • 4 Spotlight Calls Xcel Energy, PGE, SCE, NStar
    NGrid
  • 2 Educational Webinars
  • Increase Profitability Through Motor Management
  • Jump Start Customer Conversations with MDM Tools
  • CEE worked with members individually to help them
    leverage the resources and relationships that MDM
    has cultivated over the past six years. CEE
    worked with industrial program staff from
    Southern California Edison, Austin Energy, and BC
    Hydro

17
Major Accomplishments in Motor Management
  • CEE assisted the editors of trade and business
    publications to develop 16 articles describing
    the benefits of premium-efficiency motors, motor
    management and the MDM campaign. These
    publications have a combined circulation of
    157,100 readers
  • www.motorsmatter.org (in 2007) received over
    600,000 hits with 23,000 unique visitors

18
2008 Priorities
  • Continue to Implement MDM Phase 3
  • Expand delivery of Campaign message
  • Increase level coordination and collaboration
  • Develop sponsor participation guidelines
  • Identify integration opportunities
  • Position the campaign to respond to new standards
  • Prepare for post Phase 3 transition

19
Motor SystemsMunicipal Water and Wastewater
Facilities
20
Water/Wastewater Initiative
  • Objective Increase awareness of and demand for
    energy efficiency within the municipal water and
    wastewater sector
  • Strategy To build a template of nationally
    consistent tools and messages for members to
    incorporate into their programs and to deliver
    nationally

21
Current Projects and the Initiative
  • ENERGY STAR Benchmarking Field Test
  • Education at Operator Level
  • Forum for programs
  • Way to coordinate on national level
  • ECM Framework
  • Forum
  • Coordinate national research projects, program
    research
  • Program guidance
  • MA DEP CEE Members
  • Awareness
  • Funding procedures

22
Benchmarking in Programs
  • How can efficiency programs use this tool?
  • ComEd, BPA, WI FOE, NYSERDA, TVA, NStar, NGrid
  • Process versus results
  • Lessons Learned
  • Hurdles to Implementation

23
Framework for Evaluating ECMS
  • Analyze opportunity to develop guidelines for
    efficiency measures in W/WW
  • Methodology
  • Industry literature (AwwaRF, WEF, EPRI, EPA)
  • Program Documents/Studies (PGE, BC Hydro, WI
    FOE)
  • Solicit data on past projects
  • Alliant
  • CEC
  • Efficiency Vermont
  • NYSERDA
  • SCE
  • Snohomish
  • Xcel Energy

24
Supporting MA DEP Project
  • 14 facilities in Massachusetts
  • CEE Members
  • Bay State Gas
  • Berkshire Gas
  • Cape Light Compact
  • National Grid
  • NStar
  • Unitil
  • Benchmarking WW
  • Using list of ECMs from Framework Project
  • Follow through to Funding

25
Priorities for 2008
  • Benchmarking Integration
  • Expand ECM Framework
  • New Technologies
  • Project Implementation
  • Funding Process
  • Supplier Role
  • Drinking Water Benchmark

26
Industrial Program Planning
27
What is the opportunity?
  • Current environment for broader and deeper energy
    savings is driving members to re-assess
    industrial energy savings in the process area and
    to identify program opportunities.
  • identifying cross-cutting, process-specific
    measures
  • targeting industrial sub-sectors

28
Process Energy Use by SIC and Application
29
Industrial Sector Energy Use by Sub-sector
  • The refining, chemical, paper and metal
    industries together use 71 of total inputs of
    energy for heat, power, and electricity
    generation.

30
Emerging Program Models
  • Sector-Specific Approaches
  • Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance is focusing
    on food processing and pulp and paper
  • PGE and SCE are focusing on data centers,
    bio-tech, water treatment, agriculture, food
    processing, wineries and oil refining
  • NYSERDA is focusing on sector-specific
    strategies, such as hospitality, municipal water
    and wastewater and industry.

31
Industrial Process Energy is an Emerging
Opportunity for Programs
  • CEE members are coming together through the
    Industrial Program Planning Committee
  • to provide a forum for members to share program
    strategies in the industrial sector
  • to tap into the collective experience of member
    industrial efficiency programs (Technical
    Assistance, Custom Projects, Demonstration
    Projects, SPC/Standard Offer)
  • to identify and prioritize industrial
    opportunities resources (DOE, EPA)
  • to recommend program strategies, as appropriate

32
Priorities for 2008
  • Review member program needs and priorities in the
    industrial sector in order to understand where
    the greatest opportunities are for programs
    nationally
  • Continue to explore opportunities for an enhanced
    performance specification for distribution
    transformers (particularly low-voltage, dry-type)
  • Establish a framework to assess savings
    opportunities by industrial sub-sector and
    cross-cutting technologies (system, process,
    etc.)

33
Priorities for 2008
  • Assess available DOE and EPA research and
    resources that could potentially support member
    programs
  • Map DOE and EPA industrial program offerings to
    member priorities
  • Identify program initiatives aimed at particular
    industrial sub-sectors and/or process
    opportunities
  • Explore a process to accelerate market acceptance
    of newly developed industrial technologies

34
Questions?
35
CI Distribution TransformersBack-up Slides
36
CEEs CI High-Efficiency Distribution
Transformer Initiative
  • Launched in 1998, serves as a platform for
    programs to build demand for more efficient
    transformers in the commercial and industrial
    sector.
  • The initiative consists of four key components
  • A voluntary low voltage transformer efficiency
    performance specification
  • Guidelines for using cost-of-ownership methods in
    transformer purchases
  • Awareness building
  • Incentives (where possible)
  • Energy Star began labeling low-voltage
    transformers soon afterwards.

37
The Opportunity for an Enhanced Performance
Specification
  • The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005)
    established federal minimum standards for
    low-voltage, dry-type distribution transformers
    which went into effect on January 1, 2007.
  • New standard is equivalent to the NEMA
    specifications supported by CEE and ENERGY STAR
    on a voluntary basis since 1998.
  • During the last few months of 2006 and early in
    2007, a CEE subcommittee met to explore the
    development of specifications for dry-type, low
    voltage transformers based on the analysis
    developed by DOE during a transformer rulemaking
    process.
  • DOE rulemaking in process for medium-voltage
    products.

38
Major Accomplishments in Distribution Transformers
  • The CEE Distribution Transformers Committee has
  • reviewed DOE research on low-voltage, dry-type
    distribution transformers
  • explored the availability of products that exceed
    the new federal minimum standard.
  • The Committee is considering an enhanced
    specification for low-voltage products that will
    be vetted with industry later this year.
  • The Committee has also identified
    super-efficient performance level for
    distribution transformers that are not currently
    available on the market.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com