Title: NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM Total PM Local PM Speciated Seasonal Pattern
1NARSTO PM AssessmentChapter 5 Spatial and
Temporal PatternTOC Introduction Data Global
Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM Total
PM Local PM Speciated Seasonal Pattern
- The seasonal aerosol aerosol pattern at the
IMPROVE sites is examined using two
methodologies - Seasonal Mass Balance Charts
- Seasonal Percentile Frequency Charts
-
2Background Chemical Speciation of the Fine Mass
- From Previous Work IMPROVE
- See Sisler Malm
- Over the most of the Eastern US, sulfates
dominate the Fine Mass - The Southeast is also influenced by organics,
carbon and dust. - Over the West, organics, nitrates and dust
dominate
3Method 1 Cumulative Seasonal PM2.5 Composition
- PM2.5 chemical components were calculated based
on the CIRA methodology - In addition, the the organics were (tentatively)
further separated as Primary Smoke Organics (red)
and Remainder organics (purple) - PSO 20(K - 0.15Si 0.02 Na)
- Remainder Org Organics - PSO
- Also, the Unknown mass (white area) is the
difference between the gravimetrically measured
and the chemically reconstructed PM2.5. - The daily chemical composition was aggregated
over the available IMPROVE data range (1988-99)
to retain the seasonal structure. - I order to reduce the noise the daily data were
smoothed by a 15-day moving average filter.
Shenandoah
4Method 2 Seasonal Percentiles, 1992-99
- The charts depict the magnitude of seasonal and
synoptic variation - The synoptic-scale variation (day-to-day) can be
measured by the 20-80 percentile spread
Great Smoky Mtn.
Lye Brook
Dirty days, 80-90
Dirty days, 80-90
Clean days (20)
Clean days (20)
- At Lye Brook, VT, the clean days (20 percentile)
corresponds to 4 ug/m3 throughout the year - The dirty days are (80-90-ile) have 2-5 times
higher concentration than the clean days.
At the Smoky Mtn, the clean days in the winter
are also 4 ug/m3. However in the summer, even
the clean days have 14 ug/m3 PM2.5. The dirty
days are have 2-3 times higher than the clean
days through out the year.
5Regional Grouping of Sites
- For this presentation the IMPROVE sites were
grouped as follows - New England ()
- Mid-Atlantic ()
- Central EUS ()
- Peripheral ()
- For each region, the seasonality is displayed
for - Chemical Mass Balance
- Carbonaceous Mass Balance
- Fine Particle Mass Percentiles
- Coarse Mass Percentiles
- Sulfate Percentiles
- Fine Soil Percentiles
- Tot. Carbon. 'Unknown' Percentiles
- Smoke Organics Percentiles
6New England Chemical Mass Balance
Moosehorn
Acadia
Lye Brook
7New England Carbonaceous Mass Balance
Moosehorn
Acadia
Lye Brook
8New England Fine Particle Mass Percentiles
Moosehorn
Acadia
Lye Brook
9New England Coarse Mass Percentiles
Moosehorn
Acadia
Lye Brook
10New England Sulfate Percentiles
Moosehorn
Acadia
Lye Brook
11New England Fine Soil Percentiles
Acadia
Lye Brook
12New England Tot. Carbon 'Unknown' Percentiles
Moosehorn
Acadia
Lye Brook
13New England Smoke Organics Percentiles
Moosehorn
Acadia
Lye Brook
14Mid-Atlantic Chemical Mass Balance
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
15Mid-Atlantic Carbonaceous Mass Balance
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
16Mid-Atlantic Fine Particle Mass Percentiles
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
17Mid-Atlantic Coarse Mass Percentiles
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
18Mid-Atlantic Sulfate Percentiles
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
19Mid-Atlantic Fine Soil Percentiles
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
20Mid-Atlantic Tot. Carbon 'Unknown' Percentiles
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
21Mid-Atlantic Smoke Organics Percentiles
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
22Central EUS Chemical Mass Balance
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
23Central EUS Carbonaceous Mass Balance
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
24Central EUS Fine Particle Mass Percentiles
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
25Central EUS Coarse Mass Percentiles
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
26Central EUS Sulfate Percentiles
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
27Central EUS Fine Soil Percentiles
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
28Central EUS Tot. Carbon 'Unknown' Percentiles
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
29Central EUS Smoke Organics Percentiles
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
30Peripheral Sites Chemical Mass Balance
- Eastern N. America is surrounded by aerosol
source regions such as Sahara and Central
America. - As a consequence, the PM concentration at the
edges ranges between 4-15 ug/m3 much of it
originating outside. - The chemical composition of the inflow varies by
location and season. - Sahara dust, and smoke from Central America and
W. US/Canada are the main contributions.
Voyageurs (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
Acadia
Badlands (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
Big Bend (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
Everglades
31Peripheral Sites Carbonaceous Mass Balance
Voyageurs (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
Badlands (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
Acadia (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
Big Bend (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
Everglades (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
32Peripheral Sites Fine Particle Mass Percentiles
Voyageurs
Acadia
Badlands
Big Bend
Everglades
33Peripheral Sites Coarse Mass Percentiles
Voyageurs
Acadia
Badlands
Big Bend
Everglades
34Peripheral Sites Sulfate Percentiles
Voyageurs
Acadia
Badlands
Big Bend
Everglades
35Peripheral Sites Fine Soil Percentiles
Voyageurs
Acadia
Badlands
Big Bend
Everglades
36Peripheral Sites Tot. Carbon 'Unknown'
Percentiles
Voyageurs
Acadia
Badlands
Big Bend
Everglades
37Peripheral Sites Smoke Organics Percentiles
Voyageurs
Acadia
Badlands
Big Bend
Everglades
38Missing Fine Mass
- The gravimetric PM2.5 is generally higher than
the reconstructed mass. - The excess Unknown gravimetric mass is highest
in the Eastern US. - The Unknown mass is highest in the summer,
reaching 3 ug/m3 near the Appalachian region. - Coastal sites also show significant missing
mass. - In some areas, e.g. near the LA Basin, the
gravimetric mass is less then the chemical mass. - This tends to coincide with significant amount of
aerosol nitrate. Indication of nitrate loss from
the gravimetric filters?