NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM Total PM Local PM Speciated Seasonal Pattern - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM Total PM Local PM Speciated Seasonal Pattern

Description:

Dolly Sods. Jefferson. Mid-Atlantic: Fine Particle Mass Percentiles. Fine mass. Shenandoah ... Dolly Sods. Jefferson. Central EUS: Chemical Mass Balance. Upper ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: Rudolf5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM Total PM Local PM Speciated Seasonal Pattern


1
NARSTO PM AssessmentChapter 5 Spatial and
Temporal PatternTOC Introduction Data Global
Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM Total
PM Local PM Speciated Seasonal Pattern
  • The seasonal aerosol aerosol pattern at the
    IMPROVE sites is examined using two
    methodologies
  • Seasonal Mass Balance Charts
  • Seasonal Percentile Frequency Charts

2
Background Chemical Speciation of the Fine Mass
  • From Previous Work IMPROVE
  • See Sisler Malm
  • Over the most of the Eastern US, sulfates
    dominate the Fine Mass
  • The Southeast is also influenced by organics,
    carbon and dust.
  • Over the West, organics, nitrates and dust
    dominate

3
Method 1 Cumulative Seasonal PM2.5 Composition
  • PM2.5 chemical components were calculated based
    on the CIRA methodology
  • In addition, the the organics were (tentatively)
    further separated as Primary Smoke Organics (red)
    and Remainder organics (purple)
  • PSO 20(K - 0.15Si 0.02 Na)
  • Remainder Org Organics - PSO
  • Also, the Unknown mass (white area) is the
    difference between the gravimetrically measured
    and the chemically reconstructed PM2.5.
  • The daily chemical composition was aggregated
    over the available IMPROVE data range (1988-99)
    to retain the seasonal structure.
  • I order to reduce the noise the daily data were
    smoothed by a 15-day moving average filter.

Shenandoah
4
Method 2 Seasonal Percentiles, 1992-99
  • The charts depict the magnitude of seasonal and
    synoptic variation
  • The synoptic-scale variation (day-to-day) can be
    measured by the 20-80 percentile spread

Great Smoky Mtn.
Lye Brook
Dirty days, 80-90
Dirty days, 80-90
Clean days (20)
Clean days (20)
  • At Lye Brook, VT, the clean days (20 percentile)
    corresponds to 4 ug/m3 throughout the year
  • The dirty days are (80-90-ile) have 2-5 times
    higher concentration than the clean days.

At the Smoky Mtn, the clean days in the winter
are also 4 ug/m3. However in the summer, even
the clean days have 14 ug/m3 PM2.5. The dirty
days are have 2-3 times higher than the clean
days through out the year.
5
Regional Grouping of Sites
  • For this presentation the IMPROVE sites were
    grouped as follows
  • New England ()
  • Mid-Atlantic ()
  • Central EUS ()
  • Peripheral ()
  • For each region, the seasonality is displayed
    for
  • Chemical Mass Balance
  • Carbonaceous Mass Balance
  • Fine Particle Mass Percentiles
  • Coarse Mass Percentiles
  • Sulfate Percentiles
  • Fine Soil Percentiles
  • Tot. Carbon. 'Unknown' Percentiles
  • Smoke Organics Percentiles

6
New England Chemical Mass Balance
Moosehorn
Acadia
Lye Brook
7
New England Carbonaceous Mass Balance
Moosehorn
Acadia
Lye Brook
8
New England Fine Particle Mass Percentiles
Moosehorn
Acadia
Lye Brook
  • Fine mass

9
New England Coarse Mass Percentiles
Moosehorn
Acadia
Lye Brook
  • Coarse mass

10
New England Sulfate Percentiles
Moosehorn
Acadia
Lye Brook
  • Non-sea salt sulfate

11
New England Fine Soil Percentiles
Acadia
Lye Brook
  • Fine Dust

12
New England Tot. Carbon 'Unknown' Percentiles
Moosehorn
Acadia
Lye Brook
  • Carbonaceous

13
New England Smoke Organics Percentiles
Moosehorn
Acadia
Lye Brook
  • Smoke organics

14
Mid-Atlantic Chemical Mass Balance
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
15
Mid-Atlantic Carbonaceous Mass Balance
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
16
Mid-Atlantic Fine Particle Mass Percentiles
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
  • Fine mass

17
Mid-Atlantic Coarse Mass Percentiles
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
  • Coarse mass

18
Mid-Atlantic Sulfate Percentiles
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
  • Non-sea salt sulfate

19
Mid-Atlantic Fine Soil Percentiles
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
  • Fine dust

20
Mid-Atlantic Tot. Carbon 'Unknown' Percentiles
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
  • Carbonaceous

21
Mid-Atlantic Smoke Organics Percentiles
Washington DC
Brigantine
Shenandoah
Dolly Sods
Jefferson
  • Smoke organics

22
Central EUS Chemical Mass Balance
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
23
Central EUS Carbonaceous Mass Balance
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
24
Central EUS Fine Particle Mass Percentiles
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
25
Central EUS Coarse Mass Percentiles
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
  • Coarse mass

26
Central EUS Sulfate Percentiles
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
  • Non-sea salt sulfate

27
Central EUS Fine Soil Percentiles
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
  • Fine dust

28
Central EUS Tot. Carbon 'Unknown' Percentiles
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
  • Carbonaceous

29
Central EUS Smoke Organics Percentiles
Upper Buffalo
Mammoth Cave
Shining Rock
G.Smoky Mtn.
Sipsy
  • Smoke organics

30
Peripheral Sites Chemical Mass Balance
  • Eastern N. America is surrounded by aerosol
    source regions such as Sahara and Central
    America.
  • As a consequence, the PM concentration at the
    edges ranges between 4-15 ug/m3 much of it
    originating outside.
  • The chemical composition of the inflow varies by
    location and season.
  • Sahara dust, and smoke from Central America and
    W. US/Canada are the main contributions.

Voyageurs (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
Acadia
Badlands (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
Big Bend (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
Everglades
31
Peripheral Sites Carbonaceous Mass Balance
Voyageurs (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
Badlands (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
Acadia (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
Big Bend (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
Everglades (scale 0-15 ug/m3)
32
Peripheral Sites Fine Particle Mass Percentiles
Voyageurs
Acadia
Badlands
Big Bend
Everglades
  • Fine mass

33
Peripheral Sites Coarse Mass Percentiles
Voyageurs
Acadia
Badlands
Big Bend
Everglades
  • Coarse mass

34
Peripheral Sites Sulfate Percentiles
Voyageurs
Acadia
Badlands
Big Bend
Everglades
  • Non-sea salt sulfate

35
Peripheral Sites Fine Soil Percentiles
Voyageurs
Acadia
Badlands
Big Bend
Everglades
  • Fine Dust

36
Peripheral Sites Tot. Carbon 'Unknown'
Percentiles
Voyageurs
Acadia
Badlands
Big Bend
Everglades
  • Carbonaceous

37
Peripheral Sites Smoke Organics Percentiles
Voyageurs
Acadia
Badlands
Big Bend
Everglades
  • Smoke organics

38
Missing Fine Mass
  • The gravimetric PM2.5 is generally higher than
    the reconstructed mass.
  • The excess Unknown gravimetric mass is highest
    in the Eastern US.
  • The Unknown mass is highest in the summer,
    reaching 3 ug/m3 near the Appalachian region.
  • Coastal sites also show significant missing
    mass.
  • In some areas, e.g. near the LA Basin, the
    gravimetric mass is less then the chemical mass.
  • This tends to coincide with significant amount of
    aerosol nitrate. Indication of nitrate loss from
    the gravimetric filters?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com