Title: All zeroes of the jls are distinct no energy degeneracy in n and l'
1Count the available states
Closed Shells
n 1 l 0 ? 2 l 1 ? 6 l 2 ? 10 l
3 ? 14 l 4 ? 18
- All zeroes of the jls are distinct ? no energy
degeneracy in n and l. - For given n and l, all mls are degenerate in
energy (2l 1) - For given n, l and ml, there are ? and ? spin
states for n and p. - Total degeneracy 2(2l 1) slots to fill for
every n and l.
Good News predicts existence of nuclear magic
numbers.
Bad News Only some of the predicted magic
numbers match observed ones.
Other ns bring in other closed shells, but still
not the right set.
What do we try next? More/different/better
potentials to start.
2Harmonic Oscillator
Has some degeneracy, reduced set of magic
s. Still not the right set!
3Keep trying
- Tweak the wells Get rid of features like
infinite barriers/sharp edges. - Reasonable nuclear potentials, incl.
Woods-Saxon, adjust energy levels, break some
degeneracies ? new magic numbers. - Still the wrong ones.
- Bottom line No central potential can produce all
of the observed magic numbers and only the right
ones. - Need a more complicated strong interaction for
the nucleon in a nucleus.
4Spin-Orbit Interaction
Spin of e ? magnetic dipole moment, interacts
with EM field (magnetic field component in e rest
frame).
Nucleon-nucleon strong interaction postulated to
have spin-orbit term. Nucleon deep in nucleus
feels no effect (symmetry), but one near surface
feels net interaction with all others.
Differs from atomic f(r) to be chosen Sign
chosen to match observed level splitting
Next step is to exercise our facility with
angular momentum and deduce the form of the
resulting level splitting.
5Compute the energy shifts (perturbatively)
Total splitting
Key observation Splitting grows with l ? can
reorder the levels.
6And it does
- Even-Even Nuclei JP 0
- Odd-A Spin-Parity Assignments
- p and n levels fill independently
- paired in every level ??
- Last unpaired nucleons j determines nuclear spin
and its l determines nuclear parity (-1)l.
6 protons, all paired ? no effect
7 neutrons
j 1/2 l 1 ? odd parity
- The SPSM has been coaxed to do what we need
provide a physics rationale for observed level
ordering in the nucleus. - Deduce consequences!
Other successes magnetic moments Omission
odd-odd nuclei
7Nuclear Physics
?
- A pastiche of slightly related ideas and
techniques - Assessment of theoretical nuclear physics by
W.S.C. Williams, an experimental nuclear
physicist. - Models do not represent a coherent, fundamental
framework, because - Underlying interaction (strong force) is not well
understood. - Many-body effects are very difficult to handle,
central to collective models of nuclear
matter, but - Still, it works quite well on an empirical level.
- Choose your function intelligently and give it
enough parameters and you can both fit the
elephant and make its tail wiggle. - Set aside any misgivings and use these models and
empirical tools to address observed behaviors of
nuclei, especially radioactive decay, but also
the energy-producing processes of fission and
fusion.
8Radioactivity
(2006 PDB p. 274 for units/radiation safety)
- 1 Becquerel (Bq) Amount of material giving 1
decay per second - 1 Curie (Ci) Amount of material giving 37
billion decays per second (e.g. 1 g of 226Ra)
- For radiation safety, its not the raw counts,
but the effect - Energy Deposition (integrated)
- 1 Gray (Gy) 100 rad ? 1 J/kg or 6.24 ? 1012
MeV/kg - Exposure/Photon Fluence ? ionization
- 1 Roentgen (R) 2.58 ? 10-4 C/kg
- Equivalent Dose ? tissue damage
- 1 Sievert (Sv) 100 rem,
- absorbed dose in Gy times a
- weighting factor)
9Radioactive Decay
(DF 5.4 for math review)
All of this applies in the rest frame of the
decaying particle. Remember ?? in the lab.
10- Decay chains of unstable nuclides can be complex,
with multiple steps involving ?, ?, ?, and even a
few other processes. - Some states decay in more than one way
11For very short-lived particles.
?
Lifetime ?
Full Width ?