All zeroes of the jls are distinct no energy degeneracy in n and l' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

All zeroes of the jls are distinct no energy degeneracy in n and l'

Description:

Atomic Physics. Nuclear Physics ... Assessment of theoretical nuclear physics by W.S.C. Williams, an experimental nuclear physicist. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: ronpo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: All zeroes of the jls are distinct no energy degeneracy in n and l'


1
Count the available states
Closed Shells
n 1 l 0 ? 2 l 1 ? 6 l 2 ? 10 l
3 ? 14 l 4 ? 18
  • All zeroes of the jls are distinct ? no energy
    degeneracy in n and l.
  • For given n and l, all mls are degenerate in
    energy (2l 1)
  • For given n, l and ml, there are ? and ? spin
    states for n and p.
  • Total degeneracy 2(2l 1) slots to fill for
    every n and l.

Good News predicts existence of nuclear magic
numbers.
Bad News Only some of the predicted magic
numbers match observed ones.
Other ns bring in other closed shells, but still
not the right set.
What do we try next? More/different/better
potentials to start.
2
Harmonic Oscillator
Has some degeneracy, reduced set of magic
s. Still not the right set!
3
Keep trying
  • Tweak the wells Get rid of features like
    infinite barriers/sharp edges.
  • Reasonable nuclear potentials, incl.
    Woods-Saxon, adjust energy levels, break some
    degeneracies ? new magic numbers.
  • Still the wrong ones.
  • Bottom line No central potential can produce all
    of the observed magic numbers and only the right
    ones.
  • Need a more complicated strong interaction for
    the nucleon in a nucleus.

4
Spin-Orbit Interaction
  • Atomic Physics

Spin of e ? magnetic dipole moment, interacts
with EM field (magnetic field component in e rest
frame).
  • Nuclear Physics

Nucleon-nucleon strong interaction postulated to
have spin-orbit term. Nucleon deep in nucleus
feels no effect (symmetry), but one near surface
feels net interaction with all others.
Differs from atomic f(r) to be chosen Sign
chosen to match observed level splitting
Next step is to exercise our facility with
angular momentum and deduce the form of the
resulting level splitting.
5
Compute the energy shifts (perturbatively)
Total splitting
Key observation Splitting grows with l ? can
reorder the levels.
6
And it does
  • Even-Even Nuclei JP 0
  • Odd-A Spin-Parity Assignments
  • p and n levels fill independently
  • paired in every level ??
  • Last unpaired nucleons j determines nuclear spin
    and its l determines nuclear parity (-1)l.

6 protons, all paired ? no effect
7 neutrons
j 1/2 l 1 ? odd parity
  • The SPSM has been coaxed to do what we need
    provide a physics rationale for observed level
    ordering in the nucleus.
  • Deduce consequences!

Other successes magnetic moments Omission
odd-odd nuclei
7
Nuclear Physics
?
  • A pastiche of slightly related ideas and
    techniques
  • Assessment of theoretical nuclear physics by
    W.S.C. Williams, an experimental nuclear
    physicist.
  • Models do not represent a coherent, fundamental
    framework, because
  • Underlying interaction (strong force) is not well
    understood.
  • Many-body effects are very difficult to handle,
    central to collective models of nuclear
    matter, but
  • Still, it works quite well on an empirical level.
  • Choose your function intelligently and give it
    enough parameters and you can both fit the
    elephant and make its tail wiggle.
  • Set aside any misgivings and use these models and
    empirical tools to address observed behaviors of
    nuclei, especially radioactive decay, but also
    the energy-producing processes of fission and
    fusion.

8
Radioactivity
(2006 PDB p. 274 for units/radiation safety)
  • 1 Becquerel (Bq) Amount of material giving 1
    decay per second
  • 1 Curie (Ci) Amount of material giving 37
    billion decays per second (e.g. 1 g of 226Ra)
  • For radiation safety, its not the raw counts,
    but the effect
  • Energy Deposition (integrated)
  • 1 Gray (Gy) 100 rad ? 1 J/kg or 6.24 ? 1012
    MeV/kg
  • Exposure/Photon Fluence ? ionization
  • 1 Roentgen (R) 2.58 ? 10-4 C/kg
  • Equivalent Dose ? tissue damage
  • 1 Sievert (Sv) 100 rem,
  • absorbed dose in Gy times a
  • weighting factor)

9
Radioactive Decay
(DF 5.4 for math review)
All of this applies in the rest frame of the
decaying particle. Remember ?? in the lab.
10
  • Decay chains of unstable nuclides can be complex,
    with multiple steps involving ?, ?, ?, and even a
    few other processes.
  • Some states decay in more than one way

11
For very short-lived particles.
?
Lifetime ?
Full Width ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com