Taphonomic Analysis of Fusulinid Epibionts Tolypammina and Serpulopsis and its Implications for the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Taphonomic Analysis of Fusulinid Epibionts Tolypammina and Serpulopsis and its Implications for the

Description:

... OF KANSAS, Journal of Paleontology, 76(1), pp.181-184. ... Journal of Paleontology, Vol. 58, No. 1 (Jan., 1984), pp. 185-196. Barytichisma -Sediment Level ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: Remote9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Taphonomic Analysis of Fusulinid Epibionts Tolypammina and Serpulopsis and its Implications for the


1
Taphonomic Analysis of Fusulinid Epibionts
(Tolypammina and Serpulopsis) and its
Implications for the Paleoecology of the Upper
Pennsylvanian (Hughes Creek Shale, East-Central
Kansas)
  • Scott Hageman Park UniversityDepartment of
    Geology and GeographyParkville, MO 64152

2
Review of Hageman - Kaesler
Hageman, Scott A., Kaesler, Roger L., and
Broadhead, Tom W., 2004. FUSULINID TAPHONOMY
ENCRUSTATION, EROSION, COMPACTION, AND
DISSOLUTION. Palaios 19(6), p.610-617. Hageman,
Scott A. and Kaesler, Roger L., 2002.
FUSULINIDS PREDATION DAMAGE AN REPAIR OF TESTS
FROM THE UPPER PENNSYLVANIAN OF KANSAS, Journal
of Paleontology, 76(1), pp.181-184. Hageman,
Scott A. and Kaesler, Roger L., 1998. WALL
STRUCTURE AND GROWTH OF FUSULINACEAN
FORAMINIFERA, Journal of Paleontology, 72(2),
pp.181-190. BUT WAIT, THATS NOT ALL!
3
HUGHES CREEK SHALE MEMBER OF THE FORAKER
LIMESTONE (I-70 near Paxico, KS)
From http//csd.unl.edu/fossils/nebrinvert.asp
4
BIOSTRATINOMY AND DIAGENESIS
(From Hageman, Kaesler, Broadhead, 2004)
5
DAMAGE AND REPAIR
(From Hageman Kaesler, 2002)
6
DAMAGE AND REPAIR
(From Hageman Kaesler, 2002)
7
BIOADJUSTMENT
BIOPLASTERING
(From Hageman Kaesler, 2002)
8
BIOSTRATINOMY
(From Hageman, Kaesler, Broadhead, 2004)
9
BIOSTRATINOMY (CORRASION)
(From Hageman, Kaesler, Broadhead, 2004)
10
BIOSTRATINOMY (ENCRUSTATION)
(From Hageman, Kaesler, Broadhead, 2004)
11
PHYSICAL DIAGENESIS
(From Hageman, Kaesler, Broadhead, 2004)
12
CHEMICAL DIAGENESIS
13
CHEMICAL DIAGENESIS
(From Hageman, Kaesler, Broadhead, 2004)
14
CHEMICAL DIAGENESIS
(From Hageman, Kaesler, Broadhead, 2004)
15
DIAGENESIS
(From Hageman,
Kaesler, Broadhead, 2004)
16
DIAGENESIS
17
THE REST OF THE ENCRUSTATION STORY
(From Hageman, Kaesler, Broadhead, 2004)
Serpulopsis insita (white lines).
18
EXPECTED EPIBIONT DISTRIBUTION
19
Would a fusulinid antetheca act as a barrier to
oscillation?
20
Recordable Fusulinids with low corrasion and
complete spirothecas.
21
DIVIDE THE LAST VOLUTION OF THE FUSULINID TEST
INTO QUARTERS TO ANALYZE THE POSITION OF THE
EPIBIONTS.
22
RECORDED 13 PAGES OF FOR 250 SPECIMENS
23
EPIBIONT DISTRIBUTION ON LAST VOLUTION OF THE
SPIROTHECA
24
What would the preferred orientation be to
support the data?
25
Significance of Epibionts on Horn Corals from the
Chainman Shale (Upper Mississippian) of Utah
William J. SandoJournal of Paleontology, Vol.
58, No. 1 (Jan., 1984), pp. 185-196
Barytichisma
26
Fusulinid coming to rest on the antetheca on the
seafloor surface, exposing the 2nd and 3rd
quarters with the most substrate likely for
epibiont encrustations. Not what the results
would indicate.
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
----------------
---------------------- Sediment Level
27
Fusulinids coming to rest with the antetheca
slightly submerged in the clay-rich sediment.
This would make the 1st and 2nd quarters the
likely substrate for encrustations and the 4th
quarter least likely.
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
----------------
---------------------- Sediment Level
28
EPIBIONT DISTRIBUTION ON THE LAST VOLUTION OF
THE SPIROTHECA
29
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-----------------
------------------------------------------
---------------- Sediment Level
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-----------------
30
(No Transcript)
31
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-----------------
------------------------------------------
---------------- Sediment Level
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-----------------
32
CONCLUSIONS
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-----------------
33
CONCLUSIONS
1. Energy levels of the during the deposition of
the Hughes Creek Shale were strong enough to
oscillate many of the fusulinids causing
corrasion. However, the energy in the water
(most likely due to depth) was at times minimal
allowing dead fusulinid tests to come to rest in
a preferred orientations. 2. This preferred
orientation of fusulinid tests allowed for 67 of
the epibionts to occupy the last half of the
final volution. The most likely orientation to
explain these results would be the fusulinid
tests coming to rest slightly submerged in the
clay-rich environment. This would greatly reduce
the substrate for encrusters of the
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com