Optimizing the capillary irrigation system for better yield and quality of hot pepper - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Optimizing the capillary irrigation system for better yield and quality of hot pepper

Description:

frequent water application in small flow rates either on or below the soil surface ... Water source ... of leaves, leaf area, water consumption, and plant and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:219
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: bio97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Optimizing the capillary irrigation system for better yield and quality of hot pepper


1
Optimizing the capillary irrigation system for
better yield and quality of hot pepper
  • V. Nalliah,
  • R. Sri Ranjan Ph.D., P.Eng.
  • DEPT. OF BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
  • UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA
  • WINNIPEG
  • CANADA

CSBE/SCGAB 2008 50th Annual Conference Vancouver,
British Columbia July 13 - 16, 2008
2
A need for capillary irrigation
  • Water conservation is important in irrigated
    agriculture
  • limited water resources
  • losses during irrigation
  • competition for water among the different users
  • Improving the sustainability of water resources
  • A potential solution is micro irrigation
  • frequent water application in small flow rates
    either on or below the soil surface
  • Drip, bubbler, spray jet, and subsurface
    irrigation systems

3
Types of irrigation in Canada
  • 49.8 sprinkler irrigation
  • 23.2 travelling gun
  • 13.1 drip system and
  • 13.8 other irrigation systems such as flooding
    and subsurface irrigation

4
Advantages of subsurface irrigation
  • Lower risk of evaporation, runoff losses from the
    soil surface
  • Greater savings of water, nutrient, and labor
  • Fewer chances for foliage diseases
  • More uniform plant growth
  • Very adaptable to different soil conditions
  • Gives a better chance to optimize the use of
    fertilizer and other chemical applications, and
  • lower rate of weed growth

5
Capillary pressure concept
  • No pumping needed
  • Low installation cost
  • Undemanding operator expertise and system
    maintenance

H
Schematic representation of the capillary
irrigation system for container grown plants
6
Research in the past
  • Livingston (1908) introduced the negative
    pressure concept with porous clay cups
  • Richards and Loomis (1942) studied the
    performance of improved double-walled irrigator
    pots suitable for low flow rates and tension
  • Kato and Tejima (1982) performed a theoretical
    analysis in subsurface irrigation on the basis of
    different negative pressures
  • Lipiec et al. (1988) proposed a porous tube
    negative pressure water circulation technique
    suitable for measuring plant water uptake
    continuously under laboratory conditions

7
Research in the past...
  • A study on the efficiency of subsurface
    irrigation under various elevation differences by
    Jiang et al. (2004)
  • tested various pressures ranging from 0.5 m
    positive pressure to 4.0 m negative pressure
  • water infiltration into soil was observed up to
    2.0 m soil depth without applying any pressure to
    the system
  • A soil-cooling and auto-irrigating system by Liu
    et al. (2006)
  • simultaneously irrigating and cooling the soil
  • used porous ceramic pipes
  • electric pump was used to maintain the pressure

8
Objectives
  • To compare the yield and quality of hot pepper
    using capillary irrigation systems under
    different negative pressures.
  • To optimize the pressure of the system for
    producing pepper under controlled environment.

9
System Design
PES membrane on the disc
Perforated acrylic discs
Disc fixed into the plastic cup
Plexiglass tube connected to the cup
10
System setup
As growth progressed...
Initial setup
11
Treatments and Measurements
  • Jalapeno hot pepper (Capsicum annuum) was grown
    in a controlled-environment
  • -0.20, -0.40, -0.60 m negative pressure
    irrigation, and hand-watered treatments
  • A Completely Randomized Design (four treatments
    replicated seven times)
  • The four irrigation treatments received the same
    experimental conditions (light, temperature, RH)
  • Measurements taken were
  • Plant height, number of leaves, leaf area, water
    consumption, and plant and fruit biomass
  • Hotness of pepper fruits was quantified using
    HPLC

12
Determination of pepper hotness
  • Capsaicinoids are responsible for hotness of
    pepper
  • Capsaicinoids Capsaicin Dihydrocapsaicin
  • The ground oven-dried fruits were used to extract
    the capsaicinoid using acetonitrile by heating at
    800C for 4h
  • An Agilent-1100 series HPLC system with 4.6x250
    mm Eclipse XDB-C18 column was used
  • Standards of capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin were
    used to identify and quantify the concentration
    of capsaicinoid in samples

13
Results and Discussion
PLANT HEIGHT
LEAF NUMBER
14
LEAF AREA
15
Capsaicin (CAP) and dihydrocapsaicin (DICAP)
concentration for pepper plant under -0.2 m, -0.4
m, and -0.6 m capillary pressures, and hand water
(HW) treatments
16
Total water consumption, biomass yields, and WUE
of hot pepper plant
a Means in the same column followed by
different letters are significantly different
using LSD at P lt 0.05.
17
Effect of two irrigation treatments on fruit
biomass, fruit size, and water use efficiency
(WUE)
a Means followed by the same letter in the
same column are not significantly different using
LSD at P lt 0.05.
18
Conclusions
  • Jalapeno hot pepper was able to grow well under
    capillary irrigation systems
  • Continuous water supply in the system eliminated
    the need for larger soil depth to store water
  • The plant height, leaf number, leaf area, and
    plant biomass were significantly higher in the
    -0.2 m and the control irrigation treatments
    compared to the -0.4 and -0.6 m treatments
  • The vegetative growth parameters were not
    statistically different between -0.2 m and the
    control irrigation treatments

19
Conclusions...
  • The reproductive growth parameters (fruit length,
    diameter, and fruit biomass) in the -0.2 m
    capillary irrigation treatment were also
    comparable to the control treatment
  • The hotness of fruits in water starved plants
    were greater than in the plants under sufficient
    water
  • The -0.2 m negative pressure irrigation had
    better performance in terms of growth and yield
    parameters when compared to the manual irrigation
    while saving a considerable amount of water
  • The system is simple, inexpensive, water saving,
    and reproducible with minimum labor requirements
    for container grown plants

20
Acknowledgement
  • Manitoba Agri-Food Research Development
    Initiative (ARDI)
  • Dr. Aluko Rotimi (Dept. of Human Ecology,
    University of Manitoba)
  • Ms. Amarbeer Bandari (Richardson Centre for
    Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals, University
    of Manitoba)
  • Dr. R. Zakaluk (Civil Engineering Technology
    Department, Red River College, Winnipeg, Canada)

21
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com