Foundation Fieldbus Economics Comparison - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Foundation Fieldbus Economics Comparison

Description:

Verify the installation of new control technology is more economic than present ... 'Unclaimed' Benefits. Reduction in Cabling. Reduction in Terminations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:162
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: IanVer2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Foundation Fieldbus Economics Comparison


1
Foundation Fieldbus Economics Comparison
Productivity 18 Harry Elliott
  • Ian Verhappen
  • Syncrude Canada Ltd.

2
Purpose of Work
  • Objective
  • Verify the installation of new control technology
    is more economic than present Analog Control
    Systems
  • Why
  • Strategic Projects planned over the next 10 years
    to double plant capacity

3
Basis for Calculations
  • 3 Scenarios
  • Conventional Installation
  • Hybrid Installation
  • Foundation Fieldbus Installation
  • 3 Sizes / Types of Installations
  • 20 point pilot plant
  • 200 point plant migration
  • 10,000 point grass roots facility

4
Basis for Calculations
  • Data Sources
  • 3 Distributed Control Systems
  • 5 Device Manufacturers
  • Signal mix
  • 29 On/Off signals
  • 75 of these were Digital Outputs
  • 71 Analog
  • 23 of these were Analog Outputs

5
Instrument DistributionAnalog Input
6
Instrument Prices
7
Assumptions
  • 4 Devices/segment
  • 300 meter Home Run
  • 20 meter spurs

Host
8
FF Cable Specs
Twisted Multipair without shield, Max Length 400 m
Basis Belden 3077F
9
Hybrid Assumptions
  • 2 increase in Engineering Costs
  • 65 decrease in loop checks
  • 70 decrease in tag/test terminations

10
Fieldbus Assumptions
  • 20 increase in Engineering Costs
  • 90 decrease in loop checks
  • 25 decrease in tag/test terminations
  • 75 decrease in home run cables
  • Temperature Transmitters reduction
  • 25 for fieldbus

11
Unclaimed Benefits
  • Reduction in Cabling
  • Reduction in Terminations
  • Reduction in Control Room and Panel Space
  • Reduction in Inventory Control

12
Installed Cost Comparison
1.2
1.0
0.5
13
Project Savings
  • Based on Rules of Thumb
  • Automation 15 of project cost
  • Foundation Fieldbus saves 4 of Automation Budget
  • 0.6 of Total Project Costs

14
Life Cycle CostsOperating Costs
  • Maintenance
  • 40 of Operating Costs
  • Control System
  • 45 of Maintenance
  • OVERALL 18 of Operating Costs

15
Life Cycle Costs
  • NAMUR
  • 20 Maintenance support reduction
  • 40 Inventory reduction
  • Remote calibration
  • 15 savings
  • Single Loop Annual Cost
  • 4,700.00 Analog loop
  • 1,200.00 Fieldbus loop (field based control)

16
Life Cycle CostsMaintenance Costs
  • Basis
  • 80 of requests are unnecessary
  • Embedded diagnostics identify 75 of false
    requests
  • 60 savings
  • Basis
  • 33 of time is on actual repair
  • Embedded diagnostics capture half of diagnostic
    time
  • 17 savings

Combined Maintenance Savings 77
Offset by increased system complexity
17
Fieldbus Savings
  • Initial Construction and Commissioning
  • 4 minimum versus conventional system
  • Ongoing Operations
  • Maintenance 77
  • Operating Cost 17
  • Fieldbus provides savings now and in the future
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com