The nuts and bolts of educational research: A real life example involving collaboration between scho - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

The nuts and bolts of educational research: A real life example involving collaboration between scho

Description:

What type of study makes sense? Procedural logistics. Accessing suitable participants ... Summary of impressions. What our literature review revealed... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: uwrf
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The nuts and bolts of educational research: A real life example involving collaboration between scho


1
The nuts and bolts of educational research A
real life example involving collaboration between
school professionals
Scott A. Woitaszewski, Ph.D. Mark Gillen,
Ph.D. University of Wisconsin River Falls
2
Who are we and what are we hoping to do?
  • Who are we and why are we here?
  • Our goals
  • Start the discussion about research and how it
    can be done (the manure metaphor)
  • Offer real life example of how it has been done
  • Weave these two together
  • Answer your questions

3
Contact information
  • Dr. Scott Woitaszewski
  • scott.woitaszewski_at_uwrf.edu
  • Dr. Mark Gillen
  • mark.gillen_at_uwrf.edu

4
Potential ways to consider accomplishing
research?
  • Action research
  • Needs Assessments
  • Collaboration with Universities or Colleges
  • standard research model-we will be speaking to
    this today
  • Program evaluations

5
Program EvaluationA Seven-Step Approach
  • Clearly state program goals
  • Using program goals, and current literature
    determine appropriate evaluation goals
  • Review evaluation texts to guide development of
    your evaluation process

6
  • Eliminate qualitative methods for the initial
    round of program evaluation only with a darn good
    reason
  • Select sampling method
  • Design measurement strategy for each variable
  • Decide on appropriate research design
  • Conduct research

7
Standard research model Choosing a topic
  • Meaningful but realistic topic
  • What is already out there? Are there holes?
  • What type of study makes sense?
  • Procedural logistics
  • Accessing suitable participants
  • Foresee your intended audience
  • Defining and measuring variables

8
What we did
  • Topic of personal interest and educational
    importance
  • Collaboration between school counselors
    school psychologists?
  • How we got started
  • Inadequate training
  • Territorial issues
  • Additional current data

9
Literature Review Why do it?
  • Avoid duplication
  • Reveals unanswered questions
  • Provides examples of established methods and
    procedures
  • Brings you up to date in area of interest

10
Sources of Information
  • Scholarly Journals
  • Dissertations
  • Books
  • Conventions and Professional Meetings
  • Primary vs. Secondary Sources
  • Others? Website

11
On-line Library Search Tools
  • PsychInfo
  • Academic Search Elite
  • ERIC
  • Thesaurus of Psychological Index Terms (example
    adolescence)

12
Reading the Research
  • Be a critical consumer
  • Two steps initial appraisal careful analysis
  • Good note taking (1/2 page or note cards)
  • Author, title, source
  • Bullet point key findings
  • Summary of impressions

13
What our literature review revealed
  • Very little research on educator collaboration
  • Minimal study has been devoted to identifying
    the extent to which collaboration actually occurs
    or the types of activities for which school
    counselors and school psychologists do
    collaborate.

14
Develop Research Questions
  • 1) Ensure that they are phrased as questions
  • 2) Typically suggest a relationship to be
    examined
  • 3) Be specific
  • 4) Ensure that your variables are measurable

15
Our Research Questions
  • 1) Is there an overall difference between
    actual and desired collaboration for school
    counselors and school psychologists?
  • 2) Do counselors and psychologists differ in
    frequency of actual and desired collaboration?
  • 3) Does professional experience make a
    difference in amount of collaboration?
  • 4) Does gender make a difference in amount of
    actual and desired collaboration?
  • 5) Does administrator encouragement influence
    collaboration?
  • 6) Do other demographic characteristics (e.g.
    grade level, number of students, etc.) influence
    collaboration?

16
Determine variablesCommon Variable Types
  • Dependent Variables (outcomes of interest)
  • Independent Variables (what youll manipulate)
  • Continuous
  • quantified on a continuum
  • e.g., Time it takes to complete an exam
  • Categorical
  • Put into one of two or more categories,
  • e.g., gender, geographic location of school

17
Our variables of interest
  • Actual Collaboration Desired Collaboration
  • Dependent variables
  • Several questions each (e.g., develop
    pre-referral interventions)
  • Rated on a scale (continuous 4-3-2-1-0)
  • Scale (Daily, Weekly, Once per Semester, Once
    per Year, Never)
  • Demographics
  • Independent variables
  • Categorical (e.g., gender, years of experience
    groups, position type)

18
Document your procedures
  • And how do you do that
  • you may ask?

19
Methodology
  • Telling the story of exactly what you did so that
    others can evaluate and/or recreate to validate.
  • Our methodology included information on
  • Participants
  • Instrument
  • Procedure

20
Common Statistical Analyses Oh goodness!
  • Correlational procedures
  • For research questions involving relationships
    (how two or more variables go together)
  • Bivariate Correlation
  • Multiple Regression
  • Looking for significant differences
  • Independent Samples t-test (2 categories)
  • Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) (3 categories)

21
Correlational
  • Cannot fully understand cause (can only
    hypothesize about potential cause)
  • Example correlational research questions
  • Is there a correlation between SAT scores and
    success in college?
  • Is there a correlation between smoking and lung
    cancer?
  • Be aware of other unmeasured variables that may
    influence cause

22
Experimental Research
  • Experimental group and control group
  • Randomly assigned groups
  • Exposes experimental group to intervention
  • Example experimental research question
  • Does teaching curriculum A increase the basic
    standard scores in Math (above and beyond the
    control group)?

23
Causal-Comparative
  • Uses two or more samples where the groups already
    exist (not randomly assigned)
  • Cannot fully understand cause
  • Example Causal-Comparative Research Questions
  • Do elementary school students differ from middle
    school students in their attitude toward
    school?
  • Do female educators collaborate more than male
    educators?

24
Qualitative Approaches
  • Often called case study or ethnography
  • Often involves interviewing, observing
  • Going from lots of data to determine the research
    outcome vs. research questions to sorting through
    lots of data.

25
Some of the statistical analysis we used
  • A paired samples t-test was used to examine the
    difference between actual and desired
    collaboration for the entire sample of school
    professionals.
  • A one-way ANOVA was used to help determine the
    influence of years of experience on the total
    actual collaboration variable for the entire
    sample.

26
Our results
27
Actual vs. Desired Collaboration
  • Analysis of a sample of school psychologists and
    school counselors (N 147) revealed
    significantly more desire to collaborate than
    actual collaboration. Actual Mean near once
    per semester
  • Desired Mean near once per week

28
Most desired collaboration activities
  • When consulting with teachers
  • When developing pre-referral interventions
  • When developing behavior management strategies
  • Counseling groups (significant more desire for
    lower SES schools)

29
Psychologist/Counselor Differences
  • No overall collaboration differences between
    counselors and psychologists (both actual and
    desired collaboration)

30
Administrator Encouragement
  • Those who are encouraged by administrators are
    significantly more likely to collaborate than
    those who are not encouraged. Encouraged Mean
    near once per week Not encouraged Mean near
    once per semester

31
Experience
  • More experienced psychologists and counselors
    report significantly more actual collaboration.
  • Less experienced report a desire to collaborate
    at a similar level to those with more experience.

32
Reporting Your Research
  • Public presentation to your school
  • Public presentation at a professional conference
  • Written summary for a newsletter
  • APA style publication for a professional journal

See www.uwrf.edu/csp/rip for examples of various
formats
33
How we reported our research
  • Guess, P., Gillen, M., Woitaszewski, S. (in
    press). Practice implications for collaboration
    An investigation with school counselors and
    school psychologists. Journal of School
    Counseling.

See www.uwrf.edu/csp/rip for a draft version of
this article
34
References
  • Campbell, D. Stanley, J. (1990). Experimental
    and quasi-experimental designs for research.
    Houghton Mifflin.
  • Cook, Campbell, Shadish (2001). Experimental
    and quasi-experimental designs for generalized
    causal inference. Houghton Mifflin
  • Patton (1987). How to use qualitative methods in
    evaluation. Sage.
  • Patton (2002). Qualitative research evaluation
    methods. Sage
  • Rossi, Freeman, Lipsey (2003). Evaluation A
    systematic approach. Sage.
  • Robinson, J., Shaver, P. Wrightsman (1990).
    Measures of personality and social psychological
    attitudes. Elsevier
  • Strauss Corbin (1998). Basics of qualitative
    research. Sage
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com