AN OPEN SOURCE TELE-REPORTING SYSTEM BASED ON RAILS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

AN OPEN SOURCE TELE-REPORTING SYSTEM BASED ON RAILS

Description:

Prof. Aldo Franco Dragoni. Pellegrini F, Falsetti L, ... Prete S, Filippi G, Tarquinio N, Rossini S, Di Stefano S, Ciotti G, Vaccarini I, Clavelli A ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: Flau
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AN OPEN SOURCE TELE-REPORTING SYSTEM BASED ON RAILS


1
Aziende Sanitarie Virtualiper i Popoli Migranti
Aldo Franco Dragoni  
Lorenzo FalsettiNicola Tarquinio  
2
TCP/IP-BASED TELECARDIOLOGYRESULTS PITFALLS -
PERSPECTIVES
U.O. DI MEDICINA INTERNAOSPEDALE DI
OSIMO Director Dott. Prof. Francesco
Pellegrini UNIVERSITA POLITECNICA DELLE
MARCHE FACOLTA DI INGEGNERIA Prof. Aldo Franco
Dragoni Pellegrini F, Falsetti L, Del Prete S,
Filippi G, Tarquinio N, Rossini S, Di Stefano S,
Ciotti G, Vaccarini I, Clavelli A and Aldo
Franco Dragoni
3
A 5-years experience
  • A TCP/IP-based telemedicine system has been
    implemented all over our territory
  • Since then, it has been used to carry several
    kind of informations 1. Cardiological
    Consultation2. ECGs (first opinion/second
    opinion)3. Echocardiograms (second opinion)

4
Standard Protocols
Standard Protocols
  • In order to reduce errors, we Standardized
  • EquipmentThe whole operations were based upon
    the same system
  • OperatorsA formation period of 2 months was
    required for the initial training of a standard
    equipe of 2 nurses.
  • ProceduresAll the procedures, from acquisition
    to report were made upon the same protocol

5
Man power
Man Power
  • This system allowed to manage the work in our
    Hospital with a minimal equipe 1. Physicians
    3 trained physicians Report,
    Quality control
    Case management

    Second-level examinations

  • (when needed) 2. Nurses
  • 2 trained nurses/point Data collection

  • Data transfer
  • Small damages repair

Every acquisition point was entirely managed by
2 Nurses. Resident physicians were excluded
from protocols but could have access to the
system and could ask for a second opinion on
their exhamination
6
(No Transcript)
7
Standardization
  • We applied the same protocols for- Inpatients
    - Admitted in our Unit - Admitted in the
    other Units- Outpatients - Territorial
    cardiology - Other Units Outpatients (Day
    Hospital) - Drug survelliance for psychiatric
    patients- Other Nations Services

8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Nonstandard Procedures
  • Non-standard procedures were allowed only
  • in a service based upon our servers but using
  • another technology for a mission in the
  • Philippines.
  • The whole operation has been managed by
  • University of Siena.

11
Endpoints
Endpoints
  • Reduce reporting times
  • Increase number of reports
  • Standardize reporting
  • Increase productivity
  • Create a large repository of anamnestic data
  • Create a common database for instrumental
    findings

12
Outside Italy
Emerging Countries
  • Despite the massive workload in our Zone we were
    asked to try to export our experience in foreign
    Countries
  • We were asked to install the same system in
    Kerkennah Island, near Sfax (Tunisia)
  • The place have been selected by locals who asked
    for a cardiology reporting system

13
Outside Italy
Outside Italy
  • Another mission, managed by University of Siena
    but hosted in our systems, was installed in the
    Philippines

14
Outside Italy
Outside Italy
  • Kerkennah system is a mirror of our actual
    territorial installations - 2 tunisian nurses
    teached in our hospital- A client and a
    digitizer for cardiological informations
  • In our vision, this installation should have been
    a pilot project in order to extend our model of
    telecardiology outside Italy

15
Pitfalls
Pitfalls
  • In Italy we are working with large volumes of
    data (about 11000 ECGs reported, with a mean of
    500 ECG/digitizer/year).
  • Tunisian equipe didnt send more than 150
    tracings over a two-year period an useless
    volume, counting the high cost sustained by our
    Hospital (Formation, Gear, Installation)

16
Pitfalls
Pitfalls
  • Technology issuesa. Network incompatibility
    fixedb. Software bugs
    fixed
  • c. Client Hardware errors
    fixed
  • Manpower issuesa. On-site training and
    re-training doneb. On-site quality
    control missions done

17
Pitfalls
Pitfalls
  • Still, this project, despite the hard work, is
    not growing as expected
  • The main reason is that local physicians have
    (mis)interpreted the presence centralized system
    as an exclusion from the diagnostic process
  • Thus, despite continous interventions, this
    project is not growing as expected

18
(No Transcript)
19
The Future
Perspectives
  • Despite pitfalls, we are enlarging the networkby
    creating more acquisition points
  • In 2008 we will install two more stations, one in
    our territory and one in a foreign country
  • This project will evolve, in the next future,
    with another project called Miro which
    should solve many issues

20
The Future
Perspectives
  • The actual system is, as already stated, a
    centralized system
  • Its main limit is that it depends on one or few
    centers
  • On the other side, a centralized telemedicine is
    easier to administer. Quality is easier to be
    controlled.

21
Actual Situation
22
doctors
requesters
23
both the doctors and the requesters have to be
authenticated
24
DIGITAL SIGNATURE Smart Card
25
ASINCHRONOUS BROKER-BASED ARCHITECTURE
VIRTUAL COMMUNITY
SOCIAL NETWORK
  • no complex dedicated hardware (PC-based clients)?
  • data-transfer throught Internet (ADSL or Dial-Up
    modems)?
  • costs independent on the number of installations.
  • independent on the particular field of medicine.

26
Differences
Osimo Telecardiology(Actual Situation) Miro(Future Convergence)
Centralized Diffuse
One Lab, One Standard Many Physicians
Same quality for pts Heterogeneus
Mainly Cardiological Virtually covers all
Excludes local physician Includes local physician
Propietary Code Open Source
Links DICOM Peripheral Links DICOM Peripheral
Propietary Format Most Common Formats
EBM-based Lab EBM-based System
Costly Free
Requires High-End Systems Runs also on Low-Ends
27
Problems Of Other Systems
  • Not easy-to-use
  • Specific applications and architectures
  • Dedicated hardware
  • Dedicated connections
  • Costs proportional to number of connected hosts
  • Lack of sustainable and stable services

28
Three Steps
Convergence
Step One Complete Coding Enhance Compatibility
  • Step One
  • Create Competent Professionals
  • Create Trusted Centers

Step Two Enlarge the Network Continuous Teaching
Step Two Create Migration Tools Beta Testing
Step Three Migrate DataInvolve local
InstitutionsInvolve international institutions
29
HOSTING in the west world health records of
migrating people
we only needInternet connections
30
is for stable and reliable organizations
31
is for stable and reliable organizations
32
is for stable and reliable organizations
33
Conclusions
  • being data stored in a central server, a virtual
    health-care agency takes place that maintain
    clinical folders of patients wherever theyll go
    all around the world
  • telereporting is an advantage especially for
    regions where there are few sanitary resources
  • flexible software architecture for telereporting
    activities based on TCP/IP.
  • data-transfer through Internet using digital
    certificates and timestamp.
  • creating communities for searching/offering
    medical opinions

34
  • THANKS FOR THE ATTENTION

35
workflow

1. an operator, through MIROs interface,
inserts the patient's data and the information
about the the diagnostic tuipe of the datum (for
instance the ECG) the software will store all
the data on the database of the central server.
2. any specialist is able, through the
appropriate dotation HW/SW, to remotely consult
their appropriate requests he can choose the
case he wants to report and eventually accesses
the patient's clinical folder
3. eventually the specialist might be able to
draw up the report in electronic format.
4. the report is made directly through the
application interface.
5. eventually the operator close the event
36
Why Open Source?
  • bringing good quality medical services to rural
    and remote areas mainly in developing regions
    with scarce resources
  • software development requires little or no
    initial investment
  • potential for evolution are generally easier with
    open source software
  • interoperability and standards compliance

37
clinical folder
38
SCHEMA E-R
39
timestamping
40
REQUESTERs opening mask
41
DOCTORs operating mask
42
DOCTORs examination viewer
43
DOCTORs operating mask
44
DOCTORs report mask
45
DOCTORs operating mask
46
REQUESTERs viewing mask
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com