Timothy Fagan, M.D. Professor of Medicine and Associate Professor of Pharmacology University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 56
About This Presentation
Title:

Timothy Fagan, M.D. Professor of Medicine and Associate Professor of Pharmacology University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Description:

1,702 Holter monitor recordings in 344 subjects/patients, ... by Dinamap , Holter monitor recordings and adverse events (AE) M98-930. E001451 Primary 29 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 57
Provided by: AndreaPof
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Timothy Fagan, M.D. Professor of Medicine and Associate Professor of Pharmacology University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona


1
Timothy Fagan, M.D. Professor of Medicine and
Associate Professor of PharmacologyUniversity
of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
Uprima PresentationTAP Holdings Inc.
2
Hemodynamics
  • Syncope
  • Hypotension
  • Nitrate Interaction
  • Alcohol Interaction

3
Syncope
Safety-Syncope
  • Definition A sudden transient loss of
    consciousness with spontaneous recovery1
  • Signs Associated with hypotension, bradycardia
    or both which occur when a person is in the
    upright position
  • Syncope may occur in up to 40 of the population
    during lifetime

1Murdock BD. South African Medical Journal. v 57
p.771-774
Williams RL. Aerospace Medicine. v 33. P.
545-551.
4
Non-Cardiogenic Etiologies of Syncope
Safety-Syncope
  • Physiological Reflex Syncope (vasovagal)
  • Most common type of syncope (50-80)1
  • Biphasic
  • Initial phase apprehension, anxiety, increased
    HR
  • Vasodepressor phase decreased HR, BP, CO faint
  • Prompt resolution when supine (self-limiting)
  • Accommodation usually occurs (60-85 have only 1
    episode)2
  • Many other types, but represent a small
    percentage of syncope

1Wayne, HH Am Journal Med. v30 p. 418-438. 1961
2Kapoor WN. Am Journal Med. V83 p.700-708. 1987
5
Evidence for Non-Cardiogenic Etiology
Safety-Syncope
  • The syncope observed with Uprima is vasovagal
    in origin based on careful review of
  • Timing and pattern of syncope in individuals
  • Absence of association with known markers of CVD
  • Data from continuous Holter monitoring

6
Evidence for Non-Cardiogenic Etiology
Safety-Syncope
  • 1,702 Holter monitor recordings in 344
    subjects/patients,including those
  • with diabetes
  • on nitrates
  • on anti-hypertensives
  • with and without alcohol ingestion
  • These groups demonstrated a similar incidence of
    arrhythmias in patients when they received
    Uprima compared to when they received placebo

7
Distribution of Syncopal Eventsfor all Uprima
Studies
Safety-Syncope
Dose
Fixed Dose
Dose-Optimization
Recommended Doses
2 mg 0.2 (2/964) N/A 4 mg 1.2 (7/590) 0.6
(4/690) 5 mg 0.8 (7/860) 1.1 (6/556) 6
mg 2.1 (13/621) 0.3 (2/631)
Higher Than Recommended Doses
8
Comparison of Syncope Patients vs. Non-Syncope
Patients
Safety-Syncope
  • No apparent difference in age, height, weight or
    race
  • No association with concurrent medications
  • Prodromal symptoms (moderate or severe nausea,
    vomiting, sweating/hot flashes/vasodilatation,
    dizziness/lightheadedness and pallor) occurred in
    nearly all patients with syncope
  • Any one or more symptoms constitutes the prodrome

9
Comparison of Prodrome in Syncope
vs.Non-Syncope Patients
Safety-Syncope
Phase IIII Studies
  • Syncopal Non-Syncopal Episodes
    with Administrations Prodrome with Prodrome
  • Per Administration2, 4, 5, 6 mg 85.4 2.92, 4
    mg 84.6 1.8
  • Nearly all patients (85) who experienced syncope
    also had one or more of the prodromal vasovagal
    adverse events
  • Among patients who did not experience syncope,
    only 2.9 of all Uprima administrations (1.8
    for 2 and 4 mg) resulted in one or more prodromal
    symptoms

(with at least 1 prodromal symptom)
10
Syncope 2 and 4 mg
Safety-Syncope
  • Of 1,988 patients who received 2 and/or 4 mg of
    Uprima, 13 had syncope (1 per 2,700 doses)
  • Onset (approximate time post dose) Median 35
    minutes Range 22 to 54 minutes
  • Duration (approximate) Median 60
    seconds Range 1 second to 5 minutes
  • Occurrence 7/13 (54) 1st dose 2/13 (15)
    Increase in dose 4/13 (31) Later dose (range
    3rd-11th dose)
  • Rechallenge 7 patients were rechallenged and
    took a total of 150 additional doses without
    syncope

11
Uprima Development - Patient Safety
Safety-Syncope
  • Early syncopal events were unexpected and in some
    cases resulted in interventions in 2 cases,
    injury occurred
  • With patient/physician education (instructions to
    lie down if lightheaded, dizzy or faint), there
    have been fewer medical interventions and no
    serious injuries

12
Summary of Syncope at 2 - 4 mg
Safety-Syncope
  • Incidence is 0.6 per patient when dose is
    optimized to 4 mg
  • Incidence is 1 syncope per 2,700 administrations
    of Uprima 2 or 4 mg
  • 11 out of 13 patients with syncope had prodromal
    symptoms
  • All syncope occurred within 1 hour of dosing
  • The context of usage and instructions to remain
    recumbent in the event of prodromal symptoms
    should minimize the risk of syncope. This was
    further evaluated in the current home-use study
    with 863 patients submitted to the FDA on March
    30, 2000.

13
Syncope Conclusion
Safety-Syncope
  • Of patients who experience syncope, most will
    experience vasovagal prodromal symptoms before
    the syncopal event
  • When Uprima is used, most people will be
  • Recumbent
  • Accompanied by a sympathetic partner
  • Very unlikely to be driving a car or operating
    heavy machinery
  • Syncope is reported with other approved drugs
  • Bupropion HCl (Wellbutrin/Zyban) 1.2 Depression/
    smoking cessation
  • Alpha blockers 0.5-1 BPH/hypertension
  • MUSE 0.9 Erectile dysfunction

14
Hemodynamics
  • Syncope
  • Hypotension
  • Nitrate Interaction
  • Alcohol Interaction

15
Definition of Mean Maximum Decrease in Blood
Pressure
Safety - Hypotension
  • For vital signs measurements at multiple
    timepoints, the greatest decrease from baseline
    in each patient is determined
  • These changes are then averaged across patients
  • These changes will be greater than the mean
    change at any point in time
  • Placebo represents random variation
  • Using the mean maximum decrease in blood pressure
    provides a conservative (worst-case) estimate of
    mean changes in blood pressure
  • Note Vital signs will be presented both as mean
    maximum decreases from baseline (tables) and
    mean changes from baseline over time (graphs)

16
Vital Signs and Hypotension in the Phase III
Studies
17
Mean Maximum Decrease fromBaseline in Blood
Pressure
Phase III CrossoverM98-941
Safety - Hypotension
M98-941
Higher Than Recommended Dose
Recommended Doses
4 mg (N 145)
2 mg (N 148)
5 mg (N 138)
Uprima
Uprima
Placebo
Placebo
Uprima
Placebo
Supine (mm Hg) Systolic Diastolic Standing (mm
Hg) Systolic Diastolic
-9.1 -4.9 -8.8 -4.7
-11.7 -5.7 -11.1 -5.4
-9.8 -5.7 -9.8 -5.7
-9.9 -5.3 -10.2 -5.3
-15.1 -7.5 -14.4 -7.3
-8.2 -5.5 -8.1 -4.8
, , Statistically significant at p 0.05,
0.01 or 0.001 levels, respectively, compared to
placebo.
18
2 mg Arm Mean Change from Baseline in Systolic
and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Phase III CrossoverM98-941
Safety - Hypotension
M98-941
Changein SBP(mm Hg)



Changein DBP(mm Hg)

Time  Post-dosing (Minutes)
Statistically significant at the p 0.05 level.
19
4 mg Arm Mean Change from Baseline in Systolic
and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Phase III CrossoverM98-941
Safety - Hypotension
M98-941
Changein SBP(mm Hg)




Changein DBP(mm Hg)
Time  Post-dosing (Minutes)
Statistically significant at the p 0.05 level.
20
Mean Changes in Supine Systolic Blood
PressureComparison of Uprima to Viagra
Safety - Hypotension
4 mg Uprima
100 mg Viagra
M98-941
Changein SBP(mm Hg)
Changein SBP(mm Hg)

Pre-dose
Time  Post-dosing (Minutes)
Time  Post-dosing (Hours)
1 Phase III crossover studies (M96-470, M97-658
M98-941). 2 Viagra Package Insert, June, 1999.
21
Adverse Event of Hypotension
Phase III M96-470, M97-658, M97-763, M98-941
M98-876
  • In the Phase III Crossover Studies, hypotension
    was reported as an adverse event in less than 5
    of patients overall
  • Crossover studies Dose-optimization studies
  • 3/429 (0.7) at 2 mg 0/146 (0) at 2, 4, 5 mg
  • 18/426 (4.2) at 4 mg 6/242 (2.5) at 2, 4, 5,
    6 mg
  • 14/282 (5.0) at 5 mg
  • 12/262 (4.6) at 6 mg
  • Nearly all patients (52 of 53) who had an adverse
    event of hypotension reported one or more
    concurrent vasovagal adverse events (prodrome)

22
Phase III Hypotension Summary
Phase III
Safety-Hypotension
  • No clinically significant mean decreases in blood
    pressure were observed for the recommended dose
    of 2 mg
  • No clinically significant mean decreases in blood
    pressure were observed for the recommended dose
    of 4 mg
  • The higher than recommended dose of 5 mg resulted
    in statistically significant mean decreases from
    baseline in standing and supine blood pressure
    only within the first hour of dosing
  • Mean decreases in BP observed following Viagra
    100 mg were both larger in magnitude and longer
    in duration than those seen with Uprima 4 mg
  • Hypotension was reported as an adverse event by
    less than 5 of patients in the Phase III
    crossover studies, and 98 of these patients
    experienced one or more prodromal vasovagal
    adverse events

23
DiabetesStudy M97-804
24
Mean Maximum Decrease from Baseline in Blood
Pressure
Phase III Diabetes
Safety-Diabetes
M97-804
Supine (mm Hg)
Systolic Diastolic
-6.8 -3.9
-6.3 -2.4
-7.9 -3.0
-5.0 -2.5
Standing (mm Hg)
Systolic Diastolic
-8.4 -3.8
-7.8 -2.9
-6.2 -3.0
-6.9 -3.0
  • No significant blood pressure differences between
    Uprima and placebo in diabetic patients

25
Diabetes Safety Conclusion
Phase III
Safety-Diabetes
  • Adverse event profile at maximum recommended dose
    or higher in diabetic patients similar to adverse
    event profile in Phase III studies
  • No abnormalities noted in the subset of patients
    with Holter monitoring
  • Syncope in 3 of 205 patients

26
Hemodynamics
  • Syncope
  • Hypotension
  • Nitrate Interaction
  • Alcohol Interaction

27
Nitrate InteractionStudy M98-930
28
Antihypertensives and Nitrates Study
M98-930
  • Objective To evaluate potential pharmacodynamic
    interactions between Uprima and commonly used
    cardiovascular medications
  • Study design Multi-center, double-blind,
    randomized placebo-controlled, fixed-dose,
    crossover
  • Dose Uprima 5 mg, chronic therapeutic doses
    of antihypertensives and/or nitrates
  • Number of patients 162 with hypertension and/or
    coronary disease
  • Measurements Supine and standing blood pressure
    (BP) by Dinamap, Holter monitor recordings and
    adverse events (AE)

29
Uprima Antihypertensives and Nitrate
Interaction Studies
Safety-Nitrates
M98-930
  • Higher than recommended dose of Uprima (5 mg)
  • Multiple concurrent drugs capable of decreasing
    blood pressure
  • Patients with cardiovascular diseases were
    subject to frequent orthostatic maneuvers

30
Patients Taking Nitrates
Safety-Nitrates
M98-930
  • Average age of 67.4 years and average weight of
    186 lbs.
  • The majority of patients were on a variety of
    concurrent cardiovascular medications in addition
    to nitrates(e.g., 75 on antihypertensives, 12
    on digitalis, 52 on lipid lowering agents, 18
    on antidiabetic agents)
  • Patients had expected CVD risk factors including
    hypertension, previous MI, previous
    CABG/angioplasty, previous stroke, diabetes,
    congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation

31
Nitrates Plus Uprima 5 mg Mean Maximum Decrease
from Baseline in Blood Pressure
Safety-Nitrates
M98-930
Long-Acting Nitrates (N 20)
Short-ActingNitrates (N 20)
Uprima
Uprima
Placebo
Placebo
Supine (mm Hg) Systolic Diastolic Standing (mm
Hg) Systolic Diastolic
-13.5 -6.0 -22.1 -8.9
-15.1 -6.7 -18.9 -9.9
-11.5 -4.9 -10.6 -5.1
-22.1 -11.6 -22.3 -13.9
  • Statistically significant differences only
    occurred in the standing position

Statistically significant at p 0.05 level
compared to placebo.
32
Short-Acting Nitrates Mean Change from Baseline
in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Safety-Nitrates
M98-930
Changein SBP(mm Hg)


Changein DBP(mm Hg)
Time  Post-dosing (Minutes)
  • No statistically significant mean changes
    compared to sublingual nitroglycerin alone (N20)

30 minute timepoint Baseline
33
Long-Acting Nitrates Mean Change fromBaseline
in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Safety-Nitrates
M98-930
Changein SBP(mm Hg)






Changein DBP(mm Hg)


Time  Post-dosing (Minutes)
  • Statistically significant changes occurred only
    in the standing position (N20)

, Statistically significant at p0.001,
p0.05 level compared to placebo.
34
Short-Acting NitratesChanges in Systolic Blood
PressureComparison of Uprima to Viagra
Safety-Nitrates
Uprima 5 mg Standing (N20)(higher than
recommended dose)
Viagra 50 mg Sitting (N16)
Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg)
Standing Systolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg)
Treatment
Treatment

2
Sildenafil 50 mg GTN
1
Placebo GTN
1
2
Baseline
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
Baseline
0.17
0.33
0.5
1.0
1.5
Time Post Dose (hours)
Time Post Dose (hours)
1 19 on 0.4 mg sublingual nitroglycerin and 1
patient on 0.3 mg sublingual nitroglycerin. 2 Stud
y 148-231 A double-blind, placebo-controlled,
randomized, two way crossover study to
investigate theeffects of a single dose of
Sildenafil (50 mg) in patients with stable angina
taking sublingual glyceryl trinitrate 0.5 mg.
35
Short-Acting NitratesChanges in Diastolic Blood
PressureComparison of Uprima to Viagra
Safety-Nitrates
Uprima 5 mg Standing (N20)(higher than
recommended dose)
Viagra 50 mg Sitting (N16)
Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg)
Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg)
Treatment
Treatment

2
1
Sildenafil 50 mg GTN
1
Placebo GTN
2
Baseline
0.17
0.33
0.5
1.0
1.5
Time Post Dose (hours)
Time Post Dose (hours)
1 19 on 0.4 mg sublingual nitroglycerin and 1
patient on 0.3 mg sublingual nitroglycerin. 2 Stud
y 148-231 A double-blind, placebo-controlled,
randomized, two way crossover study to
investigate theeffects of a single dose of
Sildenafil (50 mg) in patients with stable angina
taking sublingual glyceryl trinitrate 0.5 mg.
36
Long-Acting NitratesChanges in Standing Systolic
Blood PressureComparison of Uprima to Viagra
Safety-Nitrates
Uprima 5 mg Standing (N20)(higher than
recommended dose)
Viagra 50 mg Standing (N16)
Treatment
2
Sildenafil 50 mg ISMN 20 mg
Placebo ISMN 20 mg
2
Standing Systolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg)
Standing Systolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg)
Treatment

1
1
Baseline
0.17
0.33
0.5
0.67
0.83
1.0
1.5
2.0
Baseline
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
0.25
Time Post Dose (hours)
Time Post Dose (hours)
1 16 patients on isosorbide mononitrate and 4
patients on minitran patch. 2 Viagra Study
148-231 A double-blind, placebo-controlled,
randomized, two way crossover study to
investigate theeffects of a single dose of
Sildenafil (50 mg) in patients with stable angina
taking isosorbide mononitrate 20 mg oral therapy.
37
Long-Acting NitratesChanges in Standing
Diastolic Blood PressureComparison of Uprima to
Viagra
Safety - Nitrates
Uprima 5 mg Standing (N20)(higher than
recommended dose)
Viagra 50 mg Standing (N16)
Treatment
2
Sildenafil 50 mg ISMN 20 mg
Placebo ISMN 20 mg
2
Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg)
Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg)
Treatment
1

1
Baseline
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
0.25
Baseline
0.17
0.33
0.5
0.67
0.83
1.0
1.5
2.0
Time Post Dose (hours)
Time Post Dose (hours)
1 16 patients on isosorbide mononitrate and 4
patients on minitran patch. 2 Viagra Study
148-231 A double-blind, placebo-controlled,
randomized, two way crossover study to
investigate theeffects of a single dose of
Sildenafil (50 mg) in patients with stable angina
taking isosorbide mononitrate 20 mg oral therapy.
38
Nitrate Interaction Conclusion
Safety-Nitrates
  • No syncopal events
  • No Holter monitor changes attributed to Uprima
  • Compared to Viagra, blood pressure decreases
    were considerably smaller in magnitude and
    shorter in duration
  • The 4 of 40 patients taking nitrates who had
    clinically significant decreases in blood
    pressure also had prodromal symptoms
  • With adequate patient instruction (lie down if
    you experience prodomal symptoms), Uprima can be
    administered to patients taking nitrates

39
Antihypertensive Interaction Study M98-930
40
Antihypertensives Plus Uprima 5 mg Mean Maximum
Decrease from Baseline in Blood Pressure
Safety-Antihypertensives
M98-930
Calcium Channel Blockers (N 26)
Alpha1 Blockers (N 24)
Diuretics (N 21)
ACE Inhibitors (N 25)
Beta Blockers (N 26)
Supine (mm Hg) Systolic Diastolic Standing (mm
Hg) Systolic Diastolic
Statistically significant at p 0.05 level
compared to placebo.
41
Antihypertensive Interaction Conclusion
Safety-Antihypertensives
  • No clinically significant mean changes from
    baseline in blood pressure or pulse rate for
    patients receiving ACE Inhibitors, beta
    blockers, calcium channel blockers, alpha1
    blockers, and/or diuretics
  • Incidence and type of adverse events reported
    were similar to other Uprima Phase I, II and
    III studies
  • No Holter monitor changes attributed to Uprima
    except those consistent with vasovagal effects
  • One of 122 patients had syncope (0.8 at 5 mg)

42
Hemodynamics
  • Syncope
  • Hypotension
  • Nitrate Interaction
  • Alcohol Interaction

43
History of Alcohol Interaction
Safety - Alcohol
  • In an early Phase III trial, a syncopal event
    occurred in a patient who consumed excessive
    alcohol. For this reason Uprima/ethanol
    interaction studies were conducted.
  • In the first alcohol interaction study (M97-745)
    at high doses of Uprima (5 mg) and ethanol (0.6
    g/kg), two serious adverse event (SAE) occurred.
    There were no sequelae. However, ethanol
    interaction studies were redesigned, starting
    with lower doses of ethanol
  • With 6 mg of Uprima and 0.15 g/kg of ethanol
    (M97-762) there were no SAEs after experiencing
    nausea or pallor, 4 subjects received oxygen as a
    precaution
  • Further trials were conducted with 6 mg of
    Uprima and 0.3 g/kg (M98-838) and 0.6 g/kg
    (M98-891) of ethanol

44
EthanolInteraction Studies M98-838 M98-891
45
Ethanol Interaction Studies
Phase I
Safety-Alcohol
M98-838 M98-891
  • Study Design Double-blind, randomized,
    placebo-controlled, three- period crossover
    studies in healthy male subjects
  • Crossover periods Ethanol Beverage Uprima
    Placebo Beverage Uprima Ethanol
    Beverage Placebo
  • Dose Uprima 6 mg M98-838, M98-891 Ethanol 0.
    3 g/kg M98-838 0.6 g/kg M98-891
  • Day 1-3 Uprima or placebo tablet
  • Day 3 Ethanol or placebo beverage, 1hr. before
    tablet
  • Washout Four days

46
Ethanol Interaction Studies
Phase I
Safety-Alcohol
  • Higher than recommended dose of Uprima (6 mg)
  • High dose of ethanol (0.6 g/kg in M98-891),
    equivalent to 5 one-ounce shots, consumed within
    30 minutes
  • Healthy male volunteers were subjected to
  • frequent orthostatic maneuvers
  • frequent blood draws

47
Ethanol Plus Uprima 6 mg Mean Maximum Decrease
from Baseline in Blood Pressure
Phase I
Safety-Alcohol
M98-891(0.6 g/kg Ethanol) (N61)
M98-838(0.3 g/kg Ethanol)(N64-66)
Uprima Ethanol
Uprima Ethanol
Uprima
Uprima
Ethanol
Ethanol
Supine (mm Hg) Systolic Diastolic Standing (mm
Hg) Systolic Diastolic
-14.0 -8.9 -16.6 -9.5
-10.9 -6.5 -21.8 -12.6
-14.7 -8.6 -23.2 -10.6
-13.2 -7.8 -19.3 -12.1
-15.9 -9.1 -26.8 -16.9
-15.2 -7.1 -22.3 -14.2
  • Changes for Uprima ethanol greater than
    ethanol alone in the standing position

Statistically significant at p 0.05 level
compared to Uprima plus ethanol.
48
Mean Change from Baseline inSystolic Blood
Pressure
Phase I
Safety-Alcohol
M98-838
SupineSBP(mm Hg)
Uprima 6 mg EtOH 0.3 g/kg Uprima 6 mg
Placebo Placebo EtOH 0.3 g/kg
StandingSBP(mm Hg)
Time  Post-dosing (Minutes)
  • No statistically significant differences from
    ethanol alone (N66)

49
Mean Change from Baseline inDiastolic Blood
Pressure
Phase I
Safety-Alcohol
M98-838
SupineDBP(mm Hg)

Uprima 6 mg EtOH 0.3 g/kg Uprima 6 mg
Placebo Placebo EtOH 0.3 g/kg
StandingDBP(mm Hg)
Time  Post-dosing (Minutes)
  • No clinically meaningful changes (N66)

Statistically significant compared to Uprima
ethanol at the p 0.05 levels.
50
Mean Change from Baseline inSystolic Blood
Pressure
Phase I
Safety-Alcohol
M98-891



SupineSBP(mm Hg)





Uprima 6 mg EtOH 0.6 g/kg Uprima 6 mg
Placebo Placebo EtOH 0.6 g/kg

StandingSBP(mm Hg)


Time  Post-dosing (Minutes)
  • Of the statistically significant changes seen,
    some may be attributable to ethanol alone as
    well as the combination of Uprima and ethanol
    (N61)

, , Statistically significant compared to
Uprima ethanol at the p 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001
levels, respectively.
51
Mean Change from Baseline inDiastolic Blood
Pressure
Phase I
Safety-Alcohol
M98-891




SupineDBP(mm Hg)
Uprima 6 mg EtOH 0.6 g/kg Uprima 6 mg
Placebo Placebo EtOH 0.6 g/kg





StandingDBP(mm Hg)
Time  Post-dosing (Minutes)
  • Of the statistically significant changes seen,
    some may be attributable to ethanol alone as
    well as the combination of Uprima and ethanol
    (N61)

, , Statistically significant compared to
Uprima ethanol at the p 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001
levels, respectively.
52
Possibly Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse
Events gt5 in Uprima (6 mg) Plus Ethanol (0.3
and 0.6 g/kg)
Phase I
Safety-Alcohol
M98-891
M98-838
Uprima (6 mg) Ethanol0.3 g/kg N 68
Uprima (6 mg) Ethanol 0.6 g/kg N 64
Uprima (6 mg) N 67
Ethanol 0.3 g/kgN 64
Ethanol 0.6 g/kgN 63
Event
Uprima (6 mg) N 67
Nausea 34 (50.0) 21 (31.3) 1 (1.6)
31 (48.4) 23 (34.3) 2 (3.2) Dizziness 30 (44.1) 15
(22.4) 6 (9.4) 22 (34.4) 12 (17.9) 6 (9.5) Pallor
21 (30.9) 18 (26.9) 1 (1.6)
19 (29.7) 10 (14.9) 0 Sweating
18 (26.5) 12 (17.9) 0
9 (14.1) 6 (9.0) 1 (1.6) Vomiting
11 (16.2) 5 (7.5) 0
17 (26.6) 13 (19.4) 1 (1.6) Hypotension 9 (13.2)
5 (7.5) 1 (1.6) 24 (37.5) 9 (13.4) 9 (14.3) Head
ache 9 (13.2) 6 (9.0) 5 (7.8) 9 (14.1) 4 (6.0) 9 (
14.3) Asthenia 4 (5.9) 10 (14.9) 2 (3.1) 10 (15.6
) 7 (10.5) 5 (7.9) Yawning 3 (4.4) 6 (9.0) 2
(3.1) 0 0
0 Somnolence
3 (4.4) 2 (3.0) 3 (4.7) 3 (4.7) 2 (3.0) 4 (6.4) Va
sodilatation 3 (4.4) 3 (4.5) 0
8 (12.5) 5 (7.5) 0
53
Patient Instructions in Phase III Trials
Safety-Alcohol
  • You should limit yourself to a minimal amount of
    alcoholic beverages during the six hours prior to
    taking study medication. For most people, a
    minimal amount of alcoholic beverages is 2
    glasses of beer, or 2 glasses of wine or 1 ounce
    of hard liquor.

54
Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events ³10
Phase II/III Studies
Safety-Alcohol
Alcohol Use Phase II/III Studies
Includes Higher Than Recommended Dose
Recommended Dose
2 and 4 mg doses
All doses (2, 4, 5, 6 mg)
Alcohol Users(? 1 drink/day) N350 n
()
Alcohol Users(? 1 drink/day) N414 n
()
Non-Alcohol Users N685n ()
Non-Alcohol Users N858n ()
Adverse Event
Nausea Somnolence Dizziness Sweating Yawning Synco
pe
62 (17.7) 32 (9.1) 25 (7.1) 19 (5.4) 22 (6.3)
3 (0.9)
140 (33.8) 70 (16.9) 66 (15.9) 49 (11.8) 43 (
10.4) 6 (1.4)
99 (14.5) 50 (7.3) 67 (9.8) 38 (5.5) 35 (5.1)
5 (0.7)
261 (30.4) 101 (11.8) 137 (16.0) 115 (13.4) 7
7 (9.0) 12 (1.4)

55
Ethanol Interaction Conclusion
Safety-Alcohol
  • Subjects were stressed with high doses of
    Uprima, high doses of ethanol, frequent
    orthostatic maneuvers and blood draws
  • Between 30 and 60 minutes post-dosing, mean
    decreases in standing blood pressure were greater
    when Uprima 6 mg was combined with ethanol 0.6
    g/kg than with ethanol administered alone. No
    clinically meaningful changes in supine blood
    pressure were noted
  • An increased incidence of adverse events was
    associated with Uprima 6 mg when combined with
    ethanol
  • Modest changes in apomorphine pharmacokinetic
    parameters were observed with ethanol 0.6 g/kg
    but not 0.3 g/kg. No clinically significant
    changes were seen in ethanol pharmacokinetics
  • In all Phase II/III studies, the adverse event
    profiles in alcohol users vs. non-alcohol users
    were comparable, and the syncope rates were the
    same

56
Ethanol Interaction Conclusion (cont.)
Safety-Alcohol
  • No holter monitor changes due to Uprima except
    those attributed to vasovagal effects
  • No increased vasovagal Holter monitor changes
    with Uprima and ethanol compared to Uprima
    alone
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com