CONCEPTUALIZING and MEASURING COLLABORATION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

CONCEPTUALIZING and MEASURING COLLABORATION

Description:

CONCEPTUALIZING. and MEASURING COLLABORATION. Collaborative Public ... MODEL OF COLLABORATION. TEST MEASUREMENT MODELS. TEST STRUCTURAL MODEL ... Measurement ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: kendall5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CONCEPTUALIZING and MEASURING COLLABORATION


1
CONCEPTUALIZING and MEASURING COLLABORATION
  • Collaborative Public Management Conference
  • Maxwell School and Program on the Analysis and
    Resolutions of Conflicts (PARC)
  • Syracuse University Greenberg House
  • Washington, D.C.
  • September 28-30, 2006

2
AUTHORS
  • Ann Marie Thomson, IUB
  • James Perry, IUPUI
  • Theodore K. Miller, IUB

3
PREVIEW
  • PROPOSE A STRUCTURAL MODEL OF COLLABORATION
  • TEST MEASUREMENT MODELS
  • TEST STRUCTURAL MODEL
  • CROSS-VALIDATE STRUCTURAL MODEL

4
COLLABORATION DEFINED
  • Collaboration is a process in which autonomous
    actors interact through formal and informal
    negotiation, jointly creating rules and
    structures governing their relationships and ways
    to act or decide on the issues that brought them
    together it is a process involving shared norms
    and mutually beneficial interactions.

5
FIVE PROCESS DIMENSIONS
  • GOVERNANCE
  • ADMINISTRATION
  • MUTUALITY
  • NORMS
  • ORGANIZATIONAL AUTONOMY

6
METHODS
  • Mail survey to 1382 AmeriCorps directors
  • 440 returns 32 response rate
  • 56 survey items for five dimensions

7
RESULTS Measurement Model
  • Can Each of the Five Unobserved Dimensions be
    Derived From Observed Indicators?
  • Support for Five Distinct Dimensions
  • 17 Indicators

8
RESULTS Structural Model
  • Expectation Five Dimensions Influenced by a
    Higher-Order Factor, Collaboration
  • Component indices significant, large relative to
    standard errors, and in hypothesized direction
  • High r-squares for structural relationships
  • Support for close fit is strong.

9
RESULTS Cross-Validation
  • Comparison of correlation matrices for Chen
    (2004) and our resultseach used the same
    17-indicator scale
  • Akaike Information Coefficient (AIC)
  • Governance, mutuality, and trust dimensions are
    similar in the two studies
  • Autonomy represents the greatest difference

10
FINDINGS SUMMARY
  • Support for the Structural Model
  • 17 Indicators Representing the Five Dimensions of
    the Model
  • Expectations Regarding Reciprocity as a Norm Not
    Met
  • Further research on Multi-dimensional Scale
  • Autonomy Dimension
  • Research on collaborations across structures,
    context and time
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com