Pearce/Robinson - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Pearce/Robinson

Description:

Accidents are the leading cause of death of young people (under age 44) ... Bottom up - Considering each failure & analyzing what can lead to it ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Jana116
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pearce/Robinson


1
IE 486 Work Analysis Design II
Instructor Vincent Duffy, Ph.D. Associate
Professor of IE/ABE Lecture 20 Safety
Design Tues. April 10, 2007
2
Safety, Accidents and Human Error
  • Ch.14 in Wickens text
  • Introduction to Safety and Accident Prevention
  • Safety Legislation
  • Factors that contribute to accidents
  • Human Error Approaches to Hazard Control
  • Safety Analysis for Products and Equipment

3
Introduction to Safety and Accident Prevention
  • Accidents are the leading cause of death of young
    people (under age 44).
  • 47000 in motor vehicles
  • 13000 from falls
  • 7000 from poisoning
  • In 1993, 10000 deaths in the workplace alone.
  • Overexertion, impact accidents, falls
  • Accidents are costly safety is an economic
    issue
  • Workplace accidents alone are estimated to cost
    48B per year.

4
Safety Legislation
  • It is commonly recognized that during the 1800s,
    workers performed under unsafe and unhealthful
    conditions.
  • OSHA established in 1970
  • Monitors safety in the workplace, however, it is
    understaffed.
  • NIOSH National Institute of Occupational Safety
    and Health
  • Typically performs research that may later be
    integrated into OSHA standards
  • These days, most change with regard to safety is
    due to litigation eg. Product liability
    lawsuits.

5
Factors that contribute to accidents
  • Task components
  • Age younger have more accidents,
  • Ability, experience, drugs, alcohol, gender,
    stress
  • Alertness, fatigue, motivation, accident
    proneness
  • Job
  • Arousal, fatigue, physical and mental workload,
    work-rest cycles, shifts, shift rotation, pacing,
    ergonomic hazards, procedures
  • Equipment tools
  • Controls displays, electrical, mechanical and
    thermal hazards, pressure hazards, toxic
    substances, explosives and other component
    failures

6
Factors that contribute to accidents
  • Physical Environment
  • Illumination, noise, vibration, temperature,
    humidity, airborne pollutants, fire hazards,
    radiation hazards, falls
  • Social/psychological environment
  • Management practices, social norms, training,
    incentives

7
Model of causal factors in occupational injury
Fig 14.1
  • Management or design error creating certain
    conditions in the
  • Work system
  • Includes employee characteristics, job
    characteristics, equipment tools, physical
    environment, social environment
  • Natural factors, hazards, operator error
  • Leading to accident or injury

8
Human error
  • Errors of omission
  • Leaving out a step
  • Errors of commission
  • Doing a step incorrectly or adding a step
  • Slips
  • Intend to step on rung of ladder, but miss
  • Intend to save file, but save incorrectly and
    lose it
  • How to reduce human error?
  • One of three ways
  • Selection, training, or system design

9
Human error
  • It is also important to identify potentials for
    human error
  • Some techniques such as THERP
  • Technique for human error prediction provide
    guidelines for an analyst to
  • identify errors that might occur at each point in
    a task analysis
  • Assign probabilities to each error
  • Other such methods exist
  • Some may suggest the psychological mechanism that
    caused the error, others rely on the
    skills/rules/knowledge based model
  • To explain behavior in relation to Rasmussens
    Information processing model.
  • So far, none are comprehensive and they tend to
    rely on the ability of the person using the
    method (not very repeatable)
  • It is suggested that more than one method be used

10
Approaches to Hazard Control
  • Risk hazard severity likelihood
  • Severity catastrophic, critical, marginal,
    negligible
  • Frequency frequent, probable, occasional,
    remote, improbable
  • Reducing hazards can be focused on
  • Source, path, person, administrative controls
  • Source eg. Design out
  • Path eg. safeguard
  • Keep worker from entering a hazardous area
  • Wear protective equipment

11
Table 14.3 Hazard Matrix
12
Approaches to Hazard Control
  • Person eg. Warning or training
  • These include attempts to change the behavior
    that may be hazardous
  • Eg. Warning dont place hands near pinchpoints
    on machine.
  • Administrative eg. legislation
  • Other examples include shift rotation, mandatory
    rest breaks, sanctions for incorrect and risky
    behavior
  • These are typically not as effective as design
    out (or source solutions).
  • How to identify possible methods of hazard
    reduction? read a lot, know/study how people
    will use the product.

13
Safety Analysis for Products and Equipment
  • Three alternatives
  • 1. Designers can consider safety during initial
    design
  • Identifying potential hazards of a product, tool
    or piece of equipment when it is first designed.
  • 2. Facilities or systems can be evaluated
    proactively to identify hazards to control them
    before accidents occur.
  • 3. Facilities and systems can be evaluated in a
    reactive manner by evaluating actual accidents
    to fix the hazards that caused them.

14
Safety Analysis for Products and Equipment
  • One such method suggests
  • Breaking the system or product into
    sub-components
  • Then analyzing the sub-components or sub
    assemblies for potential failure
  • And then evaluating potential effects of each
    failure
  • This the failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA)
  • This is sort of bottom-up approach
  • A top-down approach could be the fault-tree
    analysis
  • From incident or undesirable event to possible
    causes

15
Bottom up - Considering each failure analyzing
what can lead to it
  • Failure Mode, Effects Criticality Analysis

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
QOTD
  • 1. FMECA is a a. bottom up approach to safety
    analysisb. top down approach c. top down to
    analysis of work designs that use automationd.
    all of the abovee. none of the above
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com