Design of a Robotic Manipulator for a Wheelchair - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Design of a Robotic Manipulator for a Wheelchair

Description:

High maintenance and manufacturing costs. 1997-1998 Design ... Current large pinion gear is due to mounting and placement limitations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: wrightstat4
Learn more at: http://cecs.wright.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Design of a Robotic Manipulator for a Wheelchair


1
Design of a Robotic Manipulator for a Wheelchair
December 8, 2000
  • 2000-2001 Gateway Coalition
  • Ohio State University
  • Sinclair Community College
  • Wright State University

2
2000-2001 Team Members
  • Ohio State University
  • Prof. Gary Kinsel
  • Corey Johnson
  • Tim Kocher
  • Curt ODonnell
  • Michael Stevens
  • Aaron Weaver
  • Jeff Webb

Sinclair Community College Prof. Beth
Johnson Brad Cutting Chris Shirkey Tim Tarp
Wright State University Prof. James Menart Shawn
Riley Jason Ruge Lawrence Thomas Eric Yu
3
Project Overview History
  • Program Background
  • 1996-1997
  • 1997-1998
  • 1999-2000
  • 2000 Graduate Design

4
Program Background
  • National Science Foundation
  • Seven Institutions
  • Advancement of Engineering Education

5
1996-1997 Design
  • Cables and Transmission Pulleys
  • Keeps motor on base of robot
  • Short comings
  • Inappropriate motors
  • Large size
  • High maintenance and manufacturing costs

6
1997-1998 Design
  • Addition of knuckle joint and rotating base
  • Short comings
  • Expensive
  • Not mounted to wheelchair
  • One-directional gripper activation

7
1999-2000 Design
  • Six degrees of freedom
  • Fully functional gripper
  • Mounted on wheelchair
  • Short comings
  • Heavy
  • Expensive
  • Difficult to manufacture

8
2000 Graduate Design
  • Chris Fearson
  • Ohio State University Graduate Student
  • Totally enclosed design
  • A little lighter
  • Short comings
  • Very expernsive
  • Hard to mount
  • Two-piece clamps

9
2000-2001 Design Objectives
  • 1.5 kg ( 3 lb) Lift Capacity
  • 0.5 m/s Maximum linkage Movement Speed
  • Total Assembly Weight Less Than 30 lbs
  • Total Manufacturing Cost

10
Preliminary Design Calculations
  • Estimated Moment Calculations
  • Initial calculations
  • Shoulder moment 500 in-lbs
  • Elbow moment 125 in-lbs
  • Updated calculations
  • Shoulder moment 473.8 in-lbs
  • Elbow moment 169.8 in-lbs
  • Application factor 1.5
  • Weight to lift (load) 3.3 lbs

11
Complete Arm Design
12
Design Characteristics
  • Freedom of motion
  • Shoulder joint
  • 360 of twist
  • Up to 200 of bend
  • Elbow joint
  • 280 of bend
  • Wrist
  • 360 of twist
  • 300 of bend
  • Both shoulder motors in the base
  • Reduces the weight of the lower arm
  • Length
  • Lower arm 15.5 in.
  • Forearm 13.65 in.
  • Full extension 35.5 in.
  • Width
  • Extends 3.25 in. beyond wheelchair width.
  • Wheelchair width with arm 27.75 in.
  • Typical Door Width 34 in.
  • Compact travel position
  • 5 in. tall
  • 15.5 in. long

13
Travel Position
14
Full Extension
15
Shoulder Assembly
  • Design Limitations (clearance, gear size, bearing
    size)
  • Mounting Brackets
  • Motors Placement
  • Gearing
  • Bearings

16
Design Limitations
  • Maximum distance from the side of the chair must
    be less than 6 inches
  • Limits the diameter of twist gear and width of
    base plate
  • Also limits the size of the twist bearing
  • Spacing of the mounting brackets governed by the
    current design of the wheelchair frame

17
Mounting Brackets
  • Single-piece design
  • Rubber lining to protect the finish of the
    wheelchair
  • Close tolerances make installation easy
  • Simple clamping technique one person can secure
    entire arm to wheelchair

18
Motors and Placement
  • Twist and bend motors placed on the base
  • Design reduces weight in the lower arm
  • Bend motor mounted to the twist gear
  • Rotates with the arm

19
Gearing
  • Twist Gearing
  • Simple spur gear design
  • Gear size cannot be reduced due to shoulder
    bracket position
  • Current large pinion gear is due to mounting and
    placement limitations
  • Future investigation into use of a idler gear
  • Bend Gearing
  • Bevel gear design
  • Currently 83 ratio

20
Bearings
  • Twist bearing
  • Large bearing
  • 3.5 in. O.D.
  • 3 in. I.D.
  • Concerned with thickness
  • Ideally .5 in.
  • Current findings gt2 in.
  • Investigating Oil Impregnated
  • Bend Bearings
  • Mounted in the shoulder brackets
  • 1 in. O.D.
  • .5 in. I.D.
  • Flanged

21
Lower Arm Assembly
  • 2.5 in. Square Aluminum Tubing
  • Elbow Motor
  • Shaft
  • Bearing
  • Gear

22
2.5 in. Square Aluminum Tubing
  • Creates an enclosed and clean design
  • Structurally strong, yet fairly light weight
  • Requires minimal machining

23
Shoulder Shaft
  • Diameter .5 in.
  • Length 3.625 in.
  • Snap-ring attachment

24
Bearing and Gearing
  • Bearings at elbow side of the lower arm to allow
    free rotation
  • Mounted in the square tubing
  • Same bearing used in the shoulder for the bend
    motion
  • Bevel gears used to move the elbow joint
  • Currently the ratio is approximately 83

25
Elbow Joint
  • Bracket Design
  • Elbow Bracket
  • Bent 1/8 in Stock Aluminum Plate
  • Snap-ring attachment
  • Bolted to the forearm
  • Degree of Movement
  • Design allows for 280 of motion at the elbow

26
Forearm Assembly
  • Same assembly used in previous design
  • Last modified by Chris Fearson
  • Components
  • 2.5 in. square tubing
  • Both wrist motors completely enclosed by tubing
  • Mounting for the differential gearing at the wrist

27
Forearm Assembly Model
28
Differential Gear Set
29
Forearm Assembly Model
30
Preliminary Finite Element Analysis
  • Mounting Brackets
  • Stationary Plate
  • Lower Arm Tube
  • Elbow Links

31
FEA Mounting Brackets
100 lb
Front
  • Constraints
  • Front and top inner surfaces fixed
  • Rear bolt hole fixed
  • Loading
  • 100 lb load applied to top surface of bracket
  • Maximum Stress
  • Front 272 psi
  • Factor of Safety 184
  • Rear 338 psi
  • Factor of Safety 148

Rear
100 lb
32
FEA Stationary Plate
  • Constraints
  • Fixed at mounting bolt holes
  • Loading
  • 100 lb load at bearing hole
  • 500 lbin moment at bearing hole
  • Maximum Stress
  • 8000 psi
  • Factor of Safety 6.25

100 lb
500 lbin
33
FEA Lower Arm Tube
  • Constraints
  • Fixed at shoulder shaft hole
  • Loading
  • 100 lb at elbow shaft hole
  • 100 lb side load at end (to simulate side impact)
  • Maximum Stress
  • 36057 psi
  • Factor of Safety 1.39

100 lb
100 lb
34
FEA Elbow Links
  • Constraints
  • Fixed at elbow shaft hole
  • Loading
  • 50 lb total load at distributed over bolt holes
  • 170 lbin moment at forearm end
  • Maximum Stress
  • 17808 psi
  • Factor of Safety 2.81

50 lb
170 lbin
35
Preliminary Bill of Materials
  • Not a complete listing
  • No machining costs or estimates
  • Twist shoulder bearing still under investigation
  • Gears can not be found until motor data is
    complete

36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com