PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF AGRICULTURAL FUTURES MARKETS IN INDIA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF AGRICULTURAL FUTURES MARKETS IN INDIA

Description:

Almost three and half years of futures trading in agricultural commodities. Agricultural futures are more relevant in an agrarian economy like India ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: nicri
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF AGRICULTURAL FUTURES MARKETS IN INDIA


1
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF AGRICULTURAL FUTURES
MARKETS IN INDIA
  • JATINDER BIR SINGH
  • NCDEX Institute of Commodity Markets and Research
    (NICR)

2
Need for study???
  • Almost three and half years of futures trading in
    agricultural commodities
  • Agricultural futures are more relevant in an
    agrarian economy like India
  • To know clearly how have they fared? Do they need
    some change? What are their effects on prices?
  • What ails futures trading in agricultural
    commodities?

3
EMPIRICAL QUESTIONS
  • To look into the inter-relationship between the
    spot and futures markets for the agricultural
    commodities.
  • Study the role of the different participants in
    the futures market and the inter-relationship
    between the commercial hedgers and the
    speculators.
  • Forecasting ability of futures prices
  • Hedging efficiency of agricultural futures
    markets
  • Price influence on physical markets.

4
DATA
  • Daily futures prices and spot prices of
    agricultural commodities-pepper, soya oil, jeera,
    chana, guar seed, mentha oil, castorseed, wheat,
    from NCDEX, MCX and NMCE
  • Also production and imports data to look at total
    supply
  • Hedging limits utilized by hedgers
  • Primary spot price data in maturity month

5
HypothesisConvergence of spot and futures
  • Arbitrage should force convergence and basis
    should approach zero at expiration. So no basis
    risk and no need to predict convergence.
  • If perfect convergence doesnt exist it means
    existence of delivery options and costs of
    arbitration

6
Methodology Predictability of Basis
  • Return to short hedgerX(B2-B1)
  • Convergence of SP and FP at maturity of contract
  • ?Bt ? ?B1t ?t
  • Regress change in basis (B2-B1) on initial basis
    (B1)slope-1, intercept0
  • Initial basis (B1) basis immediately after the
    expiry of preceding contracts
  • Final basis(B2) 1st trading day of expiration
    month and delivery day

7
Arbitrage Principle-Mispricing
  • Xt,TF t,T-Ste(rs-d)(T-t) is difference
    between FP and theoretical spot price
  • Departure of X t,T outside a range means lack of
    arbitrage capital.
  • Is Mispricing time dependent on maturity

8
Likely explanation--?
  • Futures prices quote higher than fundamental
    values (accg to stock-to-use ratio)
  • Wrong polling methods-not representative spot
    prices
  • Prices quoted refer to different quality
  • Cartel among traders

9
Futures Prices as Forecasts
  • Fti ? ?Ft ?ti
  • where Ft is forecast and Fti is actual price
    realization
  • Or alternatively
  • Fti- Ft ? (?-1)Ft ?ti
  • where i can be maturity or can be before
    maturity. This is forecast evaluation tool.
  • Week-form efficiency ? ?-10
  • Current price is the best estimate of coming
    price and has no ability to forecast prices.

10
Forecasting Efficiency
  • Evaluation equation
  • Pti- Pt ? ?(Ft-Pt ) ?ti (1)
  • or Pti ? ?Ft-?Pt ?ti (2)
  • Where ?1- ?
  • The evaluation eqn.(2) have large R2 but may have
    little or no ability to forecast price change.
    Same with basis equation (1)

11
Forecasting Efficiency-technical issues
  • Appraisal of efficiency of different maturity
    months separately vs. judging efficiency of all
    pooled contracts in one equation.
  • The effects of outliers
  • The nature of price distribution including the
    possibility of nonstationary series
  • The possibility of bias of OLS estimator in
    fitting models with a lagged endogeneous
    variables
  • If Jeera actual December 2007 prices are
    underestimated by October futures Prices, doesnt
    mean market is inefficient.

12
HEDGING EFFICIENCY
13
HEDGING EFFICIENCY
14
Hedging effectiveness
15
Hedging effectiveness
16
Hedging effectiveness
17
(No Transcript)
18
PRICE INFLUENCE
  • Hypothesis Futures prices influences inventory
    decisions and hence stabilize effect on spot
    prices
  • Methodology
  • nit
  • Mit ( ? (pitj p itj-1)2 / nit )1/2
  • j1
  • where Mit is the volatility of month i in
    year t (monthly volatility of weekly changes),
    nit are number of the weeks in month i in year t
    and pitj is the price in week j in month i in
    year t.
  • Normalized variance Vit Mit / pit
  • where pit is average monthly price.

19
PRICE INFLUENCE
  • 11
  • In Vta b InPt ?cjdjt aD b(DIn Pt)
  • j1
  • 11
  • ? cj(D djt) ?
  • j1
  • where dj are monthly dummy variables, where
    j1,2,3,11 denote the eleven dummies for 12
    months of the season. D stand for the dummy for
    the period 2004-2007.
  • Use model selection criteria-AIC, SBC

20
Price Inluence
  • dj can tell us about seasonal nature of
    volatility----Does futures trading help changing
    intra-seasonal volatility.
  • Most important issue is inter-year price
    variability. Futures markets encourage rate of
    storage hence stabilize spot prices.
  • We can also look at intertemporal price
    relationships to know the effects of futures
    markets on allocating inventories with in a year.
  • Improvements- We can use time varying volatility
    changing the length of estimation window. Can use
    rolling estimation-extending estimation by one
    period. To take time-dependence we use
    exponentially weighted volatility estimates.

21
THANK-YOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com