Translating Research into Practice: A United States Perspective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Translating Research into Practice: A United States Perspective

Description:

Translating Research into Practice: A United States ... Carroll et al, 1997; Charles , 2000; Funk et al, 1991, 1995; Katz, 1999; Pettemgill et al, 1994) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:79
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Kimjo2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Translating Research into Practice: A United States Perspective


1
Translating Research into Practice A United
States Perspective
  • Marita G. Titler, PhD, RN, FAAN
  • Director of Research, Quality and Outcomes
    Management
  • Department of Nursing Services and Patient
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
  • and
  • Clinical Professor
  • University of Iowa College of Nursing
  • Iowa City, IA

2
Focus of this Paper
  • Overview the state of the science of translation
    research in the United States
  • Stimulate a discussion about translation science
    from various world perspectives
  • Stimulate discussions of possible international
    collaborative research

3
Definition of Translation Research
  • Testing the effect of interventions aimed at
    promoting the rate and extent of adoption of
    evidence-based practices by nurses, physicians,
    and other healthcare providers (Titler Everett,
    2001)
  • Describing organizational, unit, and individual
    variables that effect the use of evidence in
    clinical and operational decision-making

4
Healthcare System in the U.S.
  • Private not-for-profit
  • Private for profit
  • Public
  • Third party reimbursement (private, governmental)
  • Uninsured
  • Veteran Healthcare
  • CMS (Medicare reimbursement)

5
  • Between the healthcare we have and the care we
    could have lies not just a gap but a chasm.

6
The Dilemma and Challenge
  • The stark reality is that we invest billions
    in research to find appropriate treatments, we
    spend more than 1 trillion on healthcare
    annually, we have extraordinary capacity to
    deliver the best care in the world, but we
    repeatedly fail to translate that knowledge and
    capacity into clinical practice

(IOM, 2003 Priority Areas for National Action
Berg et al, 1997 Dickersin Manheimer, 1998
Kamerow, 1997)
7
Examples
  • Fewer than half of adults gt50 years of age
    received recommended screening tests for
    colorectal cancer.
  • Inadequate care after a heart attack results in
    18,000 unnecessary deaths per year.
  • 17 million people were informed by their
    pharmacist that the drugs that were prescribed
    could cause an interaction

IOM, 2003
8
The Harkin Question
  • There is a reason its the National Institutes
    of Health and not the National Institutes of
    Science. We expect the NIH to be actively
    involved in translational research. Yes, you get
    the basic science done, but we want to know, how
    does that help us lead healthier lives?

(Brainard J., The Chronicle of Higher Education,
Feb. 6, 2004)
9
NIH Roadmap
  • These initiatives are integrated to accelerate
    our knowledge into effective prevention and
    treatment strategies, and in many ways transform
    the way we conduct research and the way we
    accelerate the translation of that research to
    the bedside and eventually to clinical practice.

(Zerhouni quotation in The Scientist, October 1,
2003).
10
Big Message Its Important
  • Translation of research findings is critical in
    the NIH agenda/roadmap.
  • AHRQ - translating research into practice (TRIP I
    and II studies Partnership Studies)
  • Magnet Designation
  • JCAHO Accreditation Criteria
  • CMS
  • Specialty Nursing Organizations (e.g. ONS,
    AWHONN, AACN)

11
Funding Agencies in the U.S.- Translation Science
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • Veterans Health Administration is the largest
    healthcare delivery system in the U.S.
  • CMS
  • RWJ
  • NIH (fairly new area)

12
Design/Methods
  • Electronic search strategies
  • Manual search strategies
  • Federal agency web-sites
  • Limited to research and U.S.
  • Major search terms

13
Purpose of Studies
  • Describe barriers and facilitators of
    evidence-based practice/research use (Baessler et
    al, 1994 Barta, 1995 Carroll et al, 1997
    Charles , 2000 Funk et al, 1991, 1995 Katz,
    1999 Pettemgill et al, 1994)
  • Assess research use/levels of adoption of certain
    evidence-based practices (e.g. pressure ulcer
    prevention) (Brett et al, 1987 Coyle Sokop,
    1990 Morin et al, 1999 Omery Williams, 1999
    Rutledge et al, 1995 Wells Baggs, 1994)

14
Purpose of Studies
  • Demonstration projects (1970s-90s) to implement
    evidence-based practices.
  • Multiple case reports of evidence-based practice
    projects to improve patient care
  • Describe factors that influence adoption of
    evidence in practices.
  • Testing the effect of interventions designed to
    translate research into practice.
  • Improve quality of care based on evidence in
    multiple sites (e.g. CalNoc project on falls).

15
Methods Used
  • Descriptive cross-sectional designs
  • Qualitative methods
  • Randomized designs
  • Case reports
  • Partnership models

16
Findings Across Studies
  • Most focused on clinical topics
  • Most nonexperimental/paucity of randomized
    clinical trials
  • Most acute care focused, primary care, and then
    long-term care
  • A variety of single and multifaceted TRIP
    interventions were investigated

17
Selected U.S. Studies
  • Dufault et al
  • Sales et al
  • Donaldson et al
  • Jones et al
  • Watson et al
  • Titler et al
  • Feldman et al
  • Fifield
  • Kovner
  • Resnick

18
Methodological Challenges
  • Single and multifaceted strategies
  • Metric of TRIP intervention
  • Selection/measurement of dependent measures
  • Multi-site studies
  • Level of engagement (individuals and
    organization)
  • Statistical analysis (clustering/nesting)

19
Sustainability
  • Where is the boundary between the downstream
    effect of the TRIP intervention as compared to
    evidence that the improvement is being sustained
    over time.
  • What type and dose of TRIP interventions are
    needed to keep/sustain the adherence to the EBPs?
    Are sustainability interventions necessary?

20
Sustainability
21
Summary
  • More experimental studies to test the effect of
    TRIP interventions
  • Address measurement issues
  • Multi-site and international studies
  • Take advantage of the natural experiments by
    studying what works and what does not work (e.g.
    Magnet status VA AHRQ Partnership grants)

22
Closing Thoughts
  • American healthcare could benefit greatly from
    the establishment by the federal government of a
    Health Care Extension Service modeled on the
    Agricultural Extension Service (Berwick, 2003)
  • To create a future different from its past,
    healthcare needs leaders and scientists who
    understand innovation and how it spreads, who
    respect the diversity of change itself, and who
    will design and conduct research to hasten the
    transfer of knowledge into care delivery.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com