Project Teams - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Project Teams

Description:

A team builder who keeps the team together, makes it work and maintains harmony. ... Each stage is part of the journey toward production' Blanchard (1993) Resolution ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: leslie82
Category:
Tags: project | teams

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Project Teams


1
Project Teams
2
Objectives
  • At the end of this lecture you should
  • Appreciate the roles required within a team
  • Be able to identify why a team is not effective
  • Be able to adapt the style of leadership to the
    stage the team is at

3
Team issues
  • Can the team be selected?
  • A group or a team?
  • How many make a good team?
  • Communication?

4
Team structure
  • An effective team will need staff to fill the
    following roles although any individual may fill
    more than one role
  • A leader to manage and co-ordinate the team,
    keeping it focussed on its goals and objectives.
  • An ideas person who is creative, innovative and
    good at problem solving.
  • Workers who carry out the main tasks of the
    team.
  • A critic who questions methods, activities,
    highlights problems, monitors progress.
  • A team builder who keeps the team together,
    makes it work and maintains harmony.

5
Belbin Team Roles
  • Dr. Meredith Belbin devised one of the most
    widely used Team Models
  • This gives a framework for understanding the
    constituents of a perfect team and a language to
    describe peoples behaviour and orientation in a
    team context
  • Its usefulness comes from the way in which it
    enables a team to analyse itself and make
    decisions about team roles that are absent,
    over-represented or under-represented

R. M. Belbin, Management Teams Why they succeed
or fail. Butterworth Heinemann
6
Belbin Team Roles
  • Company worker (Implementer)
  • Chairman (Co-ordinator)
  • Shaper
  • Plant
  • Resource Investigator
  • Monitor/Evaluator
  • Team worker
  • Completer- Finisher
  • Plus
  • Specialist

7
Company Worker (CW)
  • Typical features
  • Conservative, dutiful, predictable
  • Positive qualities
  • Organizing ability, practical common sense,
    self-discipline, hard working
  • Allowable weaknesses
  • Lack of flexibility, unresponsiveness to unproven
    ideas, resistance to change

8
Chairman (CH)
  • Typical features
  • Calm, self-confident, controlled
  • Positive qualities
  • Welcomes contribution on merit without prejudice,
    strong sense of objectives, clarifies,
    co-ordinates and disciplines
  • Allowable weaknesses
  • Average intellect and ability

9
Shaper (SH)
  • Typical features
  • Highly strung, outgoing, dynamic
  • Positive qualities
  • Has drive, challenges inertia, ineffectiveness
    and complacency
  • Allowable weaknesses
  • Prone to provocation, irritation and impatience.
    Impulsive and impatient. Prone to hurt peoples
    feelings. Can be seen as arrogant and abrasive

10
Plant (PL)
  • Typical features
  • Individualistic, serious minded, unorthodox
  • Positive qualities
  • Genius, radical and imagination, intellect,
    knowledge
  • Allowable weaknesses
  • Can make careless mistakes, ignore protocol,
    disregard practical details. Conflict if too
    many in the team

11
Resource Investigator (RI)
  • Typical features
  • Extrovert, enthusiastic, curious, communicative,
    externally focused
  • Positive qualities
  • Responds to challenge, contacts people exploring
    anything new
  • Allowable weaknesses
  • Liable to lose interest once the initial
    fascination has passed and not follow through.
    Over-optimistic and uncritical

12
Monitor-Evaluator (ME)
  • Typical features
  • Sober, unemotional, prudent, objective
  • Positive qualities
  • Has judgement, discretion, analyses problems and
    critiques contributions
  • Allowable weaknesses
  • Lacks tack and fails to accept new ideas

13
Team Worker (TW)
  • Typical features
  • Socially orientated, rather mild and sensitive,
  • Positive qualities
  • Fosters team spirit, supports team members, good
    for morale. Helps communications, counters
    friction, likeable and popular.
  • Allowable weaknesses
  • Seen as soft, indecisive in a crisis

14
Completer-Finisher (CF)
  • Typical features
  • Orderly, conscientious, anxious, perfectionist
  • Positive qualities
  • Delivers on time. Takes care that details arent
    overlooked and tasks finished on time.
  • Allowable weaknesses
  • Can get bogged down, worries

15
Specialist
  • Typical features
  • Single mindedness to become expert
  • Positive qualities
  • Drive, dedication, can make good managers
  • Allowable weaknesses
  • Dont see the big picture

16
  • Creative Plants and Resource Investigators
  • Motivators Co-ordinators and Resource
    Investigators
  • Strong Leaders Co-ordinators and Shapers
  • Intelligent Thinkers Plant and Monitor
    Evaluator
  • Promote Harmony Co-ordinators and Team workers
  • Doers Implementers and Completers
  • Dedicated to achieving high standards
    Completers and Specialists

17
6 Key Factors
  • Need a chair
  • Need a plant (one strong one, more than one is
    less productive)
  • Need a good spread of mental abilities (not all
    very clever)
  • Needs a wide coverage of roles/personal
    characteristics
  • Match tasks to peoples personality (dont try to
    change people)
  • Recognise imbalance and act (change roles as
    needed)

18
Characteristics of High Performing Teams
  • Purpose
  • Empowerment
  • Relationships and Communication
  • Flexibility
  • Optimal Performance
  • Recognition and Appreciation
  • Morale

19
perform
20
To assess your teams ratings
  • Think how your team would rate on a scale of 1 -
    5 (1 - low, 5 - high)
  • REMEMBER None of us is as smart as all of us

21
Purpose
  • Members can describe and are committed to a
    common purpose
  • Goals are clear, challenging and relevant to the
    purpose
  • Strategies for achieving goals are clear
  • Individual roles are clear

22
Empowerment
  • Members feel a personal and collective sense of
    power
  • Members have access to necessary skills and
    resources
  • Policies and practices support team objectives
  • Mutual respect and willingness to help each other
    is evident

23
Relationships and Communication
  • Members express themselves openly and honestly
  • Warmth, understanding and acceptance is expressed
  • Members listen actively to each other
  • Differences of opinion and perspective are valued

24
Flexibility
  • Members perform different roles and functions as
    needed
  • Members share responsibility for team leadership
    and team development
  • Members are adaptable to changing demands
  • Various ideas and approaches are explored

25
Optimal Productivity
  • Output is high
  • Quality is excellent
  • Decision making is effective
  • Clear problem-solving process is apparent

26
Recognition and Appreciation
  • Individual contributions are recognized and
    appreciated by leader and other members
  • Team accomplishments are recognized by members
  • Group members feel respected
  • Team contributions are valued and recognized by
    the organization

27
Morale
  • Individuals feel good about their membership on
    the team
  • Individuals are confident and motivated
  • Members have a sense of pride and satisfaction
    about their work
  • There is a strong sense of cohesion and team
    spirit

28
  • An effective team starts with a clear purpose.
    The hoped-for end results are optimal
    productivity and good morale. The means to those
    ends are empowerment, relationships,
    communication, flexibility and recognition and
    appreciation
  • Blanchard (1993)

29
Developing high performing teams
  • The team leaders need three major skills
  • diagnosis - observe the team interacting
  • adaptability - become a situational leader
  • empowerment - turning over the responsibility for
    direction and support to the group

30
The team leader is balancing the needs of
Each Team Member
The Customer
The Team
The Organisation
Other Teams
Ken Rabey 1999
31
When observing teams
  • content (what, the task)
  • process (how, team functioning)
  • communication and participation
  • decision making
  • conflict
  • leadership
  • goals and roles
  • group norms
  • problem solving
  • climate/tone

32
Group Development
  • Stage 1 - Orientation
  • Stage 2 - Dissatisfaction
  • Stage 3 - Resolution
  • Stage 4 - Production

33
Orientation
  • Characteristics
  • Feeling moderately eager with high expectations
  • Feeling some anxiety Where do I fit? What is
    expected of me?
  • Testing the situation and central figures
  • Depending on authority and hierarchy
  • Needing to find a place and establish oneself

the sniffing stage
34
Dissatisfaction
  • Characteristics
  • Experiencing a discrepancy between hopes and
    reality
  • Feeling dissatisfied with dependence on authority
  • Feeling frustrated anger around goals, tasks
    and action plans
  • Feeling incompetent and confused
  • Reacting negatively toward leaders and other
    members
  • Competing for power and/or attention
  • Experiencing polarities dependence/counter-depen
    dence

35
  • No developmental stage is bad. Each stage is
    part of the journey toward production
  • Blanchard (1993)

36
Resolution
  • Characteristics
  • Decreasing dissatisfaction
  • Resolving discrepancies between expectations and
    reality
  • Resolving polarities and animosities
  • Developing harmony, trust, support and respect
  • Developing self-esteem and confidence
  • Being more open and giving more feedback
  • Sharing responsibility and control
  • Using team language

37
Groupthink
  • Irving Janis (a psychologist) discovered that
    often social pressure prevented group members for
    disagreeing.
  • No-on wants to rock the boat.

38
Production
  • Characteristics
  • Feeling excited about participating in team
    activities
  • Working collaboratively and interdependently with
    whole and sub-groups
  • Feeling team strength
  • Showing high confidence in accomplishing tasks
  • Sharing leadership
  • Feeling positive about task successes
  • Performing at high levels

39
Group Development Stages
High
Low
40
Becoming a Situational Leader
  • Leadership styles
  • autocratic - telling people what to do, how, when
    and where to do it
  • directive
  • democratic - emphasis on listening, praising
    efforts and facilitating interactions
  • supportive
  • The two extremes can lead to problems

41
The four leadership styles of situational
leadership
High
Coaching
Supporting
Supportive Behaviour
S2
S3
S4
S1
Directing
Delegating
Low
High
Directive Behaviour
42
Empowerment
  • Empowerment is all about letting go so that
    others can get going
  • You will never have an empowered self-directed
    team unless the manager is willing to share
    control
  • The leader still needs to provide the kind of
    behaviour that the team is not able to provide
    for itself at each stage






























43
Team Development Game Plan
  • Determine vision, set goals and roles
  • Diagnosis
  • determine development level of the group
  • Match appropriate leadership style
  • Deliver the appropriate leadership style
  • Begin to manage the journey to group empowerment

44
Bibliography
  • Belbin R M (1981). Management Teams Why they
    succeed or fail. Butterworth Heinemann
  • Blanchard K, Carew D Parisi-Carew E (1993).
    The One Minute Manager Builds High Performing
    Teams. Harper Collins Business
  • Maddux R (1994). Team Building An exercise in
    leadership. Crisp Publications Inc.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com