Science Centers and the Citizens of the Future: Do citizens need basic scientific knowledge in order - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Science Centers and the Citizens of the Future: Do citizens need basic scientific knowledge in order

Description:

Science Centers and the Citizens of the Future: Do citizens need basic scientific knowledge ... Concrete, energizing goals. Manageable, unbureaucratic rules ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: hans129
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Science Centers and the Citizens of the Future: Do citizens need basic scientific knowledge in order


1
Science Centers and the Citizens of the Future
Do citizens need basic scientific knowledge in
order to participate in a modern democracy?

2

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
2003
1979
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
Human Culture
Human Nature
17
THEORY WITHOUT ACTION IS EMPTY. ACTION WITHOUT
THEORY IS BLIND.
Empty theory
High degree
Complex competence
Reflective practice Practical theory
Theoretical under-standing
Blind practice
Simple competence
Low degree
High degree
Practical usability
Low degree
18
THE EDUCATIONAL ENCOUNTER
(legitimate illegitimate) (legitimate
illegitimate) (legitimate
illegitimate) Economy - Pedagogy/Culture
- Politics Demands for Learning Desi
re to Learn Natural science -
Psychology - Social science
characterized by a balance between meaningful
challenges (demands) and own engagement (desire)
The mutually respectful, acknowledging encounter
19
  • IF the demands for learning choke the desire to
    learn, here is the predictable outcome
  • Participants have a duller life
  • They learn less (slower)
  • They forget more (quicker)
  • They become less creative
  • They become less socially responsible
  • They will be less motivated for further studies

To no ones benefit
Everyone loses by this except the competitors
of course
20
SOME PROMINENT BENEFICIARIES
21
EVALUATION MUST CONTRIBUTE TO HAPPINESS AND
WELL-BEING - BY EASING AND ENRICHNING DAILY WORK
22
GoodWork Project
  • Really GOOD work is simultaneously
  • Psychologically good (engaging, learning-rich,
    creative)
  • Disciplinarily/technically good (living up to the
    standards)
  • Societally good (contributing to a better world)
  • - and it provides three STABLE anchors in a
    turbulent world

23
COMPETENCE? HAPPINESS? PROGRESS?
24
(No Transcript)
25
THREE ASPECTS OF HAPPINESS AND WELL-BEING
  • Brief positive emotions order in body and mind
  • Re. the past pride, serenity, satisfaction etc.
  • Re. the now physical health, physical and
    psychological energy, inspiring settings, food,
    music etc.
  • Re. the future security, confidence, trust,
    optimism, hope etc.
  • Important preconditions for learning and
    creativity but rarely so in itself
  • Longer lasting engaged immersion (flow) order
    in attention
  • E.g. play, hobbies, reading, exiting work

  • Often a very learning-rich and creative state of
    mind because it implies the combination of
    optimal challenge and concentration
  • More permanent experience of higher meaning
    social and existential order
  • The experience of being important part of
    something much larger than oneself
  • Deeper foundation for learning and creativity

(Inspired by Csikszentmihalyi, 1991 and Seligman,
2002)
26
ASPECTS OF HAPPINESS AND WELL-BEING
Flow
(Knoop, 2002 after Csikszentmihalyi, 1991)
27
GENERAL PRECONDITIONS FOR FLOW
  • Good opportunities for self-initiative and
    self-regulation under responsibility to the
    surroundings
  • Concrete, energizing goals
  • Manageable, unbureaucratic rules
  • Flexibility to regulate challenges and
    competencies to match
  • Ongoing, clear, non-humiliating, information
    about how well one is doing
  • The possibility of being able to screen out
    distractions making concentration possible

(Knoop, 2002 after Csikszentmihalyi, 1991)
28
(No Transcript)
29
THANK YOU !
30
RELATED LITERATURE IN DANISH
31
LITERATURE AND LINKS
  • Knoop, H. H. Lyhne, J. (red.) (2005). Et nyt
    læringslandskab Flow, Intelligens og det gode
    læringsmiljø. København Dansk Psykologisk
    Forlag.
  • Knoop, H. H. (2002). Leg, læring og kreativitet
    hvorfor glade børn lærer mere. København
    Aschehoug.
  • Knoop, H. H. (2006). Når lysten til at lære
    overlever mødet med skolen. I Hejgaard, J. et
    al. Mit barn skal I skole. København
    Mejeriforeningen, Rådet for Større
    Færdselssikkerhed og Skole Samfund.
  • Knoop, H. H. (2007). Wise Creativity and Creative
    Wisdom. In Craft, A., Gardner, H. Claxton, G
    (eds.) Creativity, Wisdom and Trusteeship .
    Thousand Oaks, CA Corwin Press.
  • Knoop, H. H. (2007). Control and Responsibility
    A Danish Perspective on Leadership. In Gardner,
    H. (ed.). Responsibility at Work How Leading
    Professionals Act (or Don't Act) Responsibly. San
    Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass.
  • Knoop, H. H. Gardner, H. (2001). Good Work in a
    Complex World. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard
    University.
  • Lyhne, J. Knoop, H. H. (red.) (2008). Positiv
    Psykologi Positiv Pædagogik. København Dansk
    Psykologisk Forlag.
  • Tidsskriftet Kognition Pædagogik. Virum Dansk
    Psykologisk Forlag
  • www.universeresearchlab.dk
  • My homepage at DPU / Aarhus Universitet
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com