Designing Distance Education Learning Materials to Cater for Different Learning Styles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Designing Distance Education Learning Materials to Cater for Different Learning Styles

Description:

By the end of this session you will be able to identify your own learning style ... energizing. TEACHES BY. enabling. sketches and illustrates concepts ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: mohame3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Designing Distance Education Learning Materials to Cater for Different Learning Styles


1
Designing Distance Education Learning Materials
to Cater for Different Learning Styles
  • Dr. Mohamed Ally
  • Athabasca University
  • Canada
  • mohameda_at_athabascau.ca
  • 13ยบ Congresso Internacional da ABED
  • September 2, 2007

2
Objective
By the end of this session you will be able to
identify your own learning style and describe how
to design distance education materials for
different learning styles.
3
Distance Education
  • Separation of professor or teacher and student by
    distance

4
  • Generations of Distance Education

5
First Generation
  • Print

6
Second Generation
  • Print with support

7
Third Generation
  • E-Learning

8
Next Generation
  • Mobile Learning (M-Learning)

9
Kolb Learning Style
10
(No Transcript)
11
Learning Style
  • Learning style is defined as a combination of
    cognitive, affective, and physiological factors
    that serve as relatively stable indicators of how
    a learner perceives, interacts with, and responds
    to the learning environment.

12
Style One Learners
Strength Innovation ideas Function By Value
clarification Goals To be involved in
important issues and bring
harmony. Favorite Question
Why?
13
Style Two Learners
Strength Creating concepts models Function
by Thinking things through Goals Intellectual
recognition Favorite Question
What?
14
Style Three Learners
Strength Practical application of
ideas Function By Factual data fromhands
on experience Goals Align their view of
present with future security Favorite
Question
How?
15
Style Four Learners
Strength Action, getting things done Function
By Acting and testing experience Goals To
bring action to ideas Favorite Question
What if?
16
Learning and Learners
17
LEARNING STYLE ONESUPPORTER
  • LEAD BY
  • the heart
  • build community - seek harmony
  • sense of noble purpose
  • TEACH BY
  • facilitation
  • discussion
  • group work

18
LEARNING STYLE TWOTHEORIST
  • LEAD BY
  • fitting information into current reality
  • sequential thinking
  • use facts to persuade
  • TEACH BY
  • transmit knowledge
  • accurate information
  • knowledge leads to comprehension

19
LEARNING STYLE THREEACHIEVER
  • LEAD BY
  • plans timelines
  • favor productivity
  • shares knowledge of results
  • TEACHES BY
  • matching curriculum to economic usefulness
  • demonstrates detailed hands-on processes
  • uses tricks of the trade - shows short-cuts

20
LEARNING STYLE FOURINFLUENCER
  • LEADS BY
  • offering crisis and challenge
  • looks for patterns and possibilities
  • energizing
  • TEACHES BY
  • enabling
  • sketches and illustrates concepts
  • encouraging the use of alternatives, choices

21
Concrete Experience (CE)
  • Students who score high in the CE dimension
    prefer experience-based approach to learning that
    relies on feelings-based judgment.
  • Tend to be empathetic
  • Find theoretical approaches to be unhelpful
  • Prefer to treat each situation as a unique case
  • Learn best from specific examples in which they
    can be involved
  • Related more to other students rather than the
    instructor
  • Learn from specific experience

22
Implications for Distance Education
  • Provide a variety of learning activities to meet
    the needs of CE.
  • Provide real life examples that students can
    relate to.
  • Provide opportunities to interact with other
    students e.g. small group work using computer
    conference or videoconferencing.
  • Prefer instructor/tutor to be a coach.

23
Abstract Conceptualization (AC)
  • Prefer an analytical, conceptual approach to
    learning that relies heavily on logical thinking
    and rational evaluation
  • More oriented towards things and symbols, and
    less towards other people
  • Learn best in instructor-directed, impersonal
    learning situations that emphasize theory and
    systematic analysis
  • Do not learn from unstructured "discovery
    learning" approaches such as exercises and
    simulations
  • Good at logical analysis of ideas
  • Like to do systematic planning

24
Implications for Distance Education (AC)
  • Layout a plan for the students to follow
  • Use a linear sequence for the learning
  • Like theoretical readings

25
Reflective Observation (RO)
  • Prefer a tentative, impartial and reflective
    approach to learning.
  • Rely heavily on careful observation in making
    judgment
  • Prefer learning situations such as presentations
  • Look for the meaning of things
  • Tend to be introverts

26
Implications for Distance Education (RO)
  • Allow enough time to apply the information
  • Provide all the information to students
  • Provide opportunities to work alone
  • Prefer passive delivery
  • Prefer norm-reference evaluation
  • See the instructor/tutor as the expert

27
Active Experimentation (AE)
  • Prefer an active "doing" orientation to learning
    that relies heavily on experimentation.
  • Prefer to do activities such as projects,
    homework, or group discussions
  • Do not like passive learning situations such as
    presentations and readings
  • Get things done
  • Like to take risks
  • Tend to be extroverts

28
Implications for Distance Education (AE)
  • Use active learning strategies
  • Like to do things
  • Prefer to work in small groups to solve problems
  • Tend to be self-directed

29
Diverger
  • Combination of concrete experience and reflective
    observation
  • Strengths lie in an imaginative ability
  • Interested in people and emotional elements
  • Have broad cultural interests

30
Diverger (Why) Skills
  • Brainstorming
  • Listening
  • Speaking
  • Interacting
  • Knowing oneself
  • Appreciating others

31
Assimilator
  • Combination of abstract conceptualization and
    reflective observation
  • Like to create theoretical models
  • More concerned with abstract concepts rather than
    with people.
  • They are good at planning

32
Assimilator (What) Skills
  • Observing
  • Analyzing
  • Classifying
  • Seriating
  • Drawing conclusions
  • Theorizing
  • Seeing patterns and connections
  • Conceptualizing

33
Converger
  • Combination of abstract conceptualization and
    active experimentation.
  • Like to apply ideas
  • Tend to be unemotional
  • Prefer to work with things rather than with
    people
  • They have narrow technical interest

34
Converger (How) Skills
  • Experimenting
  • Manipulating materials and ideas
  • Making things work
  • Testing reality
  • Tinkering
  • Trying and failing

35
Accommodator
  • Combination of concrete experience and active
    experimentation
  • Like to do things and involve themselves in new
    experiences
  • Very adaptable to new situations
  • Tend to solve problems intuitively
  • Rely on others for information
  • Like to work with people

36
Accommodator (If) Skills
  • Modifying
  • Shifting
  • Adapting
  • Risking
  • Intuiting
  • Acting
  • Innovating
  • Creating

37
Learning Style Data (Montgomery)
  • 67 of the students learn best actively, yet
    instruction is passive
  • 69 of the students are visual, yet instruction
    is mostly verbal and textual
  • 28 of the students are global, yet we seldom
    focus on the big picture''

38
Presence in Distance Education
  • Using mediated technology (virtual reality,
    simulation, video conferencing, etc) to provide
    an illusion that the mediated experience is not
    mediated.
  • The distance education experience should create a
    strong sense of presence.

39
Sample Strategies for Distance Education
  • Learners must construct a memory link between the
    new information and some related information
    already stored in long-term memory. On the web,
    learners with diverse background and knowledge
    can choose the most appropriate link to review
    previous learning before new information is
    presented.
  • Active strategies can be built into distance
    education materials to allow learners to process
    the information.

40
  • On-line testing can be done to check learners
    achievement level and to provide appropriate
    feedback.
  • Use the browsing capabilities of the web to
    encourage higher level learning.
  • Network learning theory suggests that information
    is stored as networks in LTM. Hence, the
    hypermedia structure of the web should facilitate
    storage and retrieval.
  • Visuals can be integrated into the learning
    materials.

41
  • Promote interactivity by providing feedback,
    adapting the instruction to the learner, and
    suggesting activities for the learner to process
    at a deep level.
  • Allow collaboration using synchronous and
    asynchronous communication.
  • Use guest experts.
  • Access on-line libraries.
  • Use computer conferences for student-student and
    instructor-student interaction.
  • Ask students to keep an electronic journal.
  • Link to appropriate learning materials on the web

42
Designing Distance Education Materials
  • Give the Big Picture (Content map)
  • Connect to the learner and gain interest
    (Rationale)
  • Set expectations for learning (Objectives)
  • Include strategies to organize the learning
    (Advance Organizer)
  • Check for readiness (Prerequisites)
  • Check for prior knowledge (Self-assessment)

43
Designing Distance Education Materials
  • Provide opportunities for learning
  • Activities to Motivate the Learners
  • Activities to Explore to Find the Information
  • Activities to Use the Materials to Improve
    Performance
  • Activities to Transfer the Knowledge and Skills
    to New Situations

44
Designing Distance Education Materials
  • Give learners the opportunity to practice and
    provide feedback
  • Bring Closure to the Learning Experience
  • Check for Achievement of Objectives
  • Provide Opportunities for Real Life applications

45
Sample Materials
46
Group Exercise
  • Form small groups
  • Identify a lesson topic and prepare four learning
    activities (for each type of learner in the Kolb
    model) for distance education.
  • Select a group leader to present back to the
    large group (5 minutes).

47
Further Research
  • Interaction pattern by learning style.
  • Tutor and students learning style.
  • Which learning style adapt better to distance
    education?
  • Level of support required by the different
    learning styles.
  • Learning style and success in distance education.
  • Adapting instruction for different learning
    styles.

48
References
  • Ally, M. Fahy, P. (2005). Learning Style in
    Online Interaction in Distance Education. Indian
    Journal of Open Learning, 14(1), p. 15-33.
  • Ally, M. (2005). Designing Instruction for
    Successful Online Learning. In C. Howard (Ed.).
    Encyclopedia of Online Learning. Idea Group Inc.
    Hershey, PA.
  • Ally, M. (2005). Multimedia information design
    for mobile devices. In M. Pagani (Ed.).
    Encyclopedia of Multimedia Technology and
    Networking. Idea Group Inc. Hershey, PA.
  • Ally, M. (2004). Staff Training and Development
    in Open and Distance Learning. In Weiyuan Zhang
    (Ed.) Global Perspectives Philosophy and
    Practice in Distance Education. China China
    Central Radio and Television University Press, p.
    277-297.
  • Ally, M. (2004). Intelligent Tutoring Systems for
    Distributed Learning. In Fahua Oscar Lin (Ed.)
    Designing Distributed Learning Environments with
    Intelligent Software Agents, Hershey, PA
    Information Science Publishing, p. 162-183.
  • Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of education theory
    for online learning. In T. Anderson and F.
    Elloumi (eds.), Theory and Practice of Online
    Learning. Athabasca Athabasca University Press,
    pp. 3-32, 2004. Available at http//cde.athabasca
    u.ca/online_book/.
  • Montgomery, S.M. Addressing Diverse Learning
    Styles Through the Use of Multimedia. University
    of Michigan.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com