Semiconductor Design Solutions for IMS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Semiconductor Design Solutions for IMS

Description:

3G wireless and NGN core network - IP based ... 'Multi-core chips do more work per clock ... Intel Pentium 4 to Intel Pentium D (Dual) 90nm 3.83GHz to 3.2GHz ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: LMEL
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Semiconductor Design Solutions for IMS


1
(No Transcript)
2
Semiconductor Design Solutions for IMS
3
Agenda
  • IMS goals and implications
  • Network media processing requirement
  • Semiconductor design solutions
  • Conclusions

4
Media Compression Transport
  • Media compression standards have been tightly
    coupled with transport mechanism for
    telecommunications from inception
  • TDM based PSTN is built on top of G.711 standard
  • GSM is tied to GSM FR compression standard
  • Rate-set 1 is built into the physical layer
    protocol of CDMA system
  • Standards are snapshots of past technology
  • G.729a/b was developed in 1995
  • GSM AMR (AMR-NB) was developed in 1998
  • Newer technologies available today can deliver
    better performances and are more suitable for
    targeted applications

5
Issue With Current Systems
  • Coupling of compression standard with transport
    mechanism prevents use of newer or other
    compression schemes, therefore limits market
    growth
  • Physical layer changes are often required,
    resulting in unwanted equipment cost increase or
    even new upgrades
  • Deployment of EVRC on CDMA networks caused large
    scale network equipment upgrade
  • 3G wireless and NGN core network - IP based
  • It is logical to make access networks that
    support IP based technologies and services in
    order to simplify network equipment
  • Fix-Mobile Convergence (FMC) becomes possible and
    has many advantages to support new value-add
    services

6
IMS Objectives
  • Deliver richer, more personalized IP based
    multi-media communication services
  • Fully integrated real-time or non-real-time
    multi-media communication services
  • Network Convergence (FMC) allowing seamless
    mobility across heterogeneous networks such as
    fixed, mobile, broadband, etc.
  • Support for third-party content and services,
    therefore, a vastly expanded universe of
    potential revenue streams
  • Improve user experience in setting up multiple
    services in one single session or multiple
    simultaneously synchronized sessions

7
Media Transport Characteristics
  • Media transport over IP framework
  • Voice / video over IP
  • IP based content delivery
  • Services become independent from access or
    transport technologies
  • E.g. instant messenger service on a PC or on a
    cell-phone
  • Compression standards are no longer tied to
    physical layer protocols
  • Seamless transition of media type in a single
    communication session
  • Text, video, voice, audio
  • Different QoS expectations based on purchased /
    used access technologies
  • Users generally expect higher QoS on fixed line,
    especially with broadband access while wireless
    users might accept a gracefully reduced QoS
  • Services expansion
  • Ease of introduction of new media processing
    standards or DSP functions

8
IMS Network Media Processing Requirement
  • Simultaneous support of wireline / wireless media
    compression standards
  • Due to IPR cost and associated complexity, it is
    unreasonable to assume end-points would support
    all media processing standards
  • Transcoding / transrating to guarantee
    inter-operability
  • IMS core network equipment entities need to
    support transcoding / transrating in order to
    bridge end-points that dont have a common media
    compression scheme
  • Multi-media conferencing
  • Rich contents
  • Wide-band voice, high quality audio
  • Different service quality grades
  • Chargeable and manageable
  • Future proof
  • To support new services that might require
    introduction of new media standards

9
Manufacturers Challenges
  • Cost effective support of large amounts of
    essential features
  • Voice
  • Wireline G.711, G.726, G.728, G.729a/b,
    G.723.1/a, G.729e/g, G.722, G.722.1, G.722.2,
    G.729.1, iLBC
  • W-CDMA/GSM FR, HR, EFR, GSM AMR, AMR-NB, AMR-WB
  • CDMA QCELP8K/13K, EVRC, EVRC-B, VMR, SMV
  • Video
  • H.263, H.264, MPEG-4, AVC, WMV, MJPEG, etc.
  • Packet / Protocol processing
  • TFO, TrFO, CSD, CTM, TTY/TTD, H.324M, Media
    Forking, Lawful Interception, Encryption, etc.
  • Need non-standard based advanced DSP functions
  • Multi-party, multi-standards, multi-interfaces
    (e.g. TDM, Packet side) conference bridge
  • Transcoding between different standards /
    Transrating within a standard
  • Synchronization amongst media streams, presumably
    processed by different HW elements
  • Future proof
  • SW upgradeable architecture

10
IMS / FMC MGW Requirements
  • VoIP / Wireless TDM-to-Packet capability
  • Wireline VoIP
  • High density G.711 only Trunk GW Low latency
    G.711 only Trunk GW
  • PacketCable
  • Wireless media GW or base-station base-band
    processing
  • W-CDMA / GSM
  • CDMA2000 / CDMA
  • TD-SCDMA
  • Packet-to-Packet capability
  • Transcoding without pay-load format conversion,
    e.g., CDMA(EVRC)??VoIP(EVRC)
  • Transcoding with pay-load format conversion,
    e.g., IuUP(AMR-NB)??VoIP(G.729AB), or
    IuUP(AMR-WB)??VoIP(G.729.1-WB)
  • Packet-side conferencing
  • Mixture of TDM-to-Packet and Packet-to-Packet
    capability
  • Multi-function media gateway
  • Network convergence MGW

11
Industry Solution Trends
  • IMS ready SoC solutions
  • Simultaneous support of all media compression
    standards on the same chip (eg. Mindspeed
    Comcerto for voice)
  • Future proof capability based on downloadable
    HW/SW architecture
  • Often it is a clean and optimal design from
    ground up
  • Manufacturer in-house development
  • Typically by established equipment manufacturers
  • Evolved either from fixed-line MGW, or wireless
    MGW
  • Might be sub-optimal optimized MGW for
    fixed-line NGN might not have the right HW/SW
    architecture or resources mixture to also be
    optimized for wireless applications
  • Future proof concern
  • E.g., existent HW processing capacity and memory
    space

12
Chip Technology Solutions
  • CMOS Scaling Limit Implications

13
CMOS Scaling Limits
  • Electrical consequences of industry-trend
    scaling (points) are contrasted to classic
    scaling (dashed curves). While the inverter delay
    scales nearly the same as the classic case (as
    LGATE), the active-power density does not.
    Instead, the active-power density increases with
    decreasing LGATE because of the lag in VDD
    reduction, which is only partially mitigated by a
    reduction in GGATE. IDSAT is the drain current
    drawn with the gate and drain voltages set at the
    nominal power-supply voltage, VDD.
  • E.J. Nowak, IBM J. RES. DEV. VOL. 46 NO. 2/3
    MARCH/MAY 2002

14
The Rise of Leakage Power
  • Active-power density and subthreshold-leakage-pow
    er density trends calculated from industry trends
    are plotted vs. LGATE (points), for a junction
    temperature of 25C. Empirical extrapolations
    (dashed curves) suggest that subthreshold power
    will equal active power at LGATE 20 nm this
    point is encountered closer to LGATE 50 nm when
    elevated temperatures, typically required of
    applications, are factored in. This collision,
    already encountered by applications that are more
    power-sensitive, will spur further circuit and
    technology design efforts to manage subthreshold
    leakages.

15
CMOS Scaling Conclusions
  • CMOS scaling continues to provide more
    transistors per die area
  • Cost per transistor continues downward square
    of gate length
  • CMOS scaling continues to provide faster
    transistors
  • Inverter delays decreasing one over the gate
    length
  • CMOS scaling is stalling on active power
    improvements
  • About same switching power density (about same
    power per area)
  • CMOS scaling is getting worse on in-active power
  • High temperature can make this exponentially worse

The Predominate CMOS SoC Design Limits are Now
Power and Thermal Density Costs
16
Chip Architecture Solutions
  • Increasing Thread Level Parallelism

17
Processor Architecture Trends (Multi-Core)
  • Discovering Multi-Core Extending the Benefits
    of Moores Law - Intel Technology Magazine
    July 2005.
  • First, memory speeds are not increasing as
    quickly as logic speeds.
  • As interconnects stretch from hundreds to
    thousands of meters in length on a single
    processor, path delays cancel the speed
    increases of the transistors.
  • A 1993-era Intel Pentium processor had around 3
    million transistors while todays Intel Itanium
    2 processor has nearly 1 billion transistors.
  • If this rate continued, Intel processors would
    produce more heat per square centimeter than the
    surface of the sunwhich is why the problem of
    heat is already setting hard limits to
    frequency.

Conclusion Multi-core chips do more work per
clock cycle, and thus can be designed to operate
at lower frequencies than their single-core
counterparts. Since power consumption goes up
proportionally with frequency, multi-core
architecture gives engineers the means to address
the problem of runaway power and cooling
requirements.
18
Processor Architecture Trends (Large On-Chip
Memory)
  • Off-chip memory access performance hasnt kept
    pace
  • DDR2-667MHz vs. 3GHz processors
  • Trend is to incorporate larger wider internal
    memories
  • 2MByte internal caches, etc.
  • 256 bit wide access on chip access, etc.
  • Simultaneous support of large number of media
    compression standards can only be possible by
    using external memories
  • 64MBytes external memory capacity vs. 2-5MBytes
    internal memory capacity

19
Chip Architecture Conclusions
  • Power and thermal density limits are driving chip
    architectures from frequency scaled single cores
    to area scaled multi-cores
  • Intel Pentium 4 to Intel Pentium D (Dual)
  • 90nm 3.83GHz to 3.2GHz
  • AMD Athlon FX to AMD Athlon X2 Dual
  • 90nm 2.8GHz to 2.6GHz
  • Further power and performance gains come from
    incorporating application specific processors
    with multi-core general purpose processors
  • X-Box 360 Xeon Processor Three 3GHz Cores
    Graphic Processor

Processor Architectures are Trending Away from
Frequency Scaling of General Purpose Processors
to Multi-Core Scaling of General and Application
Specific Processors
20
VoIP Systems Solutions For IMS/FMC
  • Application (VoIP) Specific Systems

21
Multi-Core Solutions
  • In VoIP SoC solutions, many identical VoIP
    threads are run
  • This application decomposes nicely to many low
    frequency parallel threads
  • The most optimum power, area, and cost solution
    is to provide many application optimized
    processors on a single die
  • For IMS/FMC applications, efficient support of
    different VoIP threads is a must
  • Multi-core architecture fits this need nicely

22
Infrastructure Multi-Core Solutions
  • Comcerto 600
  • 150nm CMOS process
  • 6 cores (2 RISCs, 4 DSPs) 6 simultaneous VoIP
    threads
  • Comcerto 700
  • 130nm CMOS process
  • 8 cores (2 RISCs, 6 DSPs) 8 simultaneous VoIP
    threads
  • Comcerto 900
  • 90nm CMOS process
  • 18 cores (2 RISCs, 8 DSPs, 8 DSP CPs) 18
    simultaneous Voice-o-IP or Video-o-IP threads

23
Comcerto 900 Architecture
24
Comcerto 900 DSP Sub-System
25
Comcerto 900 SW Architecture
  • Comcerto SW architecture from start was driven
    by flexible channel type strategy that is now
    fundamental for FMC, multi-function GW and SBC
    applications
  • HW resources allocation strategy
  • External SDRAM/DDRAM used for SW storage and
    packet / network processing, providing future
    upgradeability
  • Embedded RAM used for active program codes and
    DSP context storage of active channels
  • All DSP cores run from the codes on E-RAM, so the
    SoC itself is not limited to any particular
    application
  • DSP processing power and tightly coupled fast
    memories are used for active channels
  • Time division allocation of DSP resources
  • Each DSP core and associated tightly coupled fast
    memories are independently allocated from other
    DSP cores
  • Time division allocation of DSP resources
  • Intelligent resources manager to optimize HW
    resources allocation and maximize efficiency

One AMR-NB channel with one frame processing
every 20ms
20ms
Example of Matisse DSP resources allocation
AMR-NB channel
G.729AB/20ms
G.711/20ms
EVRC-B channel
EVRC
Transcoding EVRC??G.729
G.729AB/10ms
Time
26
Conclusions
  • Telecommunication industry will move away from
    tightly coupled compression standards and
    access/transport networking. IMS seems to be a
    good next step
  • FMC is an inevitable trend of the industry for
    many economical reasons, and IMS is a good
    framework for it
  • More demanding IMS network infrastructure
    equipment
  • Support large amount of media compression
    standards and processing functions
  • Flexible and efficient use of HW resources
  • Future proof requirement
  • Advanced non-standard based DSP technologies are
    required to support future growth of IMS
    applications
  • Semiconductor HW / SW architecture and design
    capability are keys to support this evolution of
    the telecom industry
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com