PCI 6th Edition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 76
About This Presentation
Title:

PCI 6th Edition

Description:

Based on new changes to ASCE 7 and ACI 318. Based current seismic research and ... capable of undergoing large inelastic deformations for energy dissipation. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:140
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 77
Provided by: jason100
Category:
Tags: 6th | pci | dissipation | edition

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PCI 6th Edition


1
PCI 6th Edition
  • Building Systems
  • (Seismic)

2
Presentation Outline
  • Building System Loads
  • Seismic
  • Structural Integrity
  • LFRS Walls
  • LFRS Frames
  • Diaphragms

3
Seismic Changes
  • Based on new changes to ASCE 7 and ACI 318
  • Based current seismic research and observations

4
Seismic Changes
  • Some of these changes are
  • Recognition of jointed panel construction
  • Recognition of strong and ductile connections in
    precast frames
  • Recognition and requirements for connections in
    precast walls

5
Seismic Changes
  • Additional changes are
  • Modification of drift computation and limiting
    drift
  • Deformation compatibility of elements
  • Additional soil type classifications
  • Special considerations locations near seismic
    faults
  • Consideration of redundancy and reliability in
    strength design requirements

6
Seismic Changes
  • Design Forces are Based on Risk
  • Previous codes based on 10 chance of exceedance
    in 50 years
  • IBC 2000, 2003 codes based on 2 chance of
    exceedance in 50 years

7
Seismic Risk
  • Soil factors
  • Other regions of high seismic risk - not just
    west coast anymore

8
  • Practically every precast, prestressed concrete
    structure designed under IBC 2000 will require
    some consideration of seismic effects.

9
Seismic Performance Objectives
  • Current design - minor damage for moderate
    earthquakes
  • Accepts major damage for severe earthquakes
  • Collapse is prevented of severe events

10
Seismic Performance Objectives
  • In order to achieve the design objectives, the
    current code approach requires details capable of
    undergoing large inelastic deformations for
    energy dissipation.

11
Seismic Design Approach
  • Emulation
  • No special requirements for low seismic risk
  • Chapter 21 requirements for moderate and high
    seismic risk
  • Non-emulative design
  • PRESSS
  • Acceptance criteria for frames

12
Earthquake Loads Equivalent Lateral Force
Method
  • Base Shear, V
  • V CsW
  • Where
  • Cs - Seismic Response Coefficient
  • W - Total Weight

13
Equivalent Lateral Force Method Limitations
  • This method may not apply to buildings with
    irregularities in Seismic Design Categories D, E,
    or F

14
Earthquake Loads Total Weight, W
  • Dead Load of structure plus
  • 25 of reduced floor live load in storage areas
  • live load in parking structures not included
  • Partition load if included in gravity dead
  • Total weight of permanent equipment
  • 20 of flat roof snow load, pf
  • where pf gt 30 psf

15
Seismic Response Coefficient, Cs
  • Function of
  • Spectral response acceleration
  • Site soil factors
  • Building Period
  • Response modification factors
  • Importance factor

16
Seismic Response Coefficient, Cs
  • Step 1 - Determine SS and S1
  • Step 2 - Determine site Soil Classification
  • Step 3 - Calculate Response Accelerations
  • Step 4 - Calculate the 5 Damped Design
    Spectral Response Accelerations
  • Step 5 - Determine the Seismic Design Category
  • Step 6 - Determine the Fundamental Period
  • Step 7 - Calculate Seismic Response Coefficient

17
Step 1 Determine SS and S1
  • From IBC Map
  • From local building codes
  • IBC 2003 CD-ROM
  • Based on
  • Longitude / Latitude
  • Zip Code

18
(No Transcript)
19
Step 2 Determine Site Soil Classification
  • If site soils are not known use Site Class D
  • Figure 3.10.7 (a) (page 3-111)
  • From soil reports

20
Step 3 Calculate Response Accelerations
  • SMS FaSS
  • SM1 FvS1
  • Where
  • Fa and Fv are site coefficients from Figure
    3.10.7 (b) and (c) (page 3-111)
  • SS spectral accelerations for short periods
  • S1 spectral accelerations for 1-second period
  • All values based on IBC 2003

21
Step 4 Calculate the 5-Damped Design Spectral
Response Accelerations
  • SDS (2/3)SMS
  • SD1 (2/3)SM1

22
Step 5 Determine the Seismic Design Category
  • Table 3.2.4.1.
  • Sometimes this restricts the type of Seismic
    Force Resisting System (SFRS) used (see Figure
    3.10.8) (page 3-112)

23
Step 6 (Approximate Period) Determine the
Buildings Fundamental Period
  • Where
  • Ct 0.016 for moment resisting frame systems of
    reinforced concrete
  • 0.020 for other concrete structural systems
  • x 0.9 for concrete moment resisting frames
  • 0.75 for other concrete structural systems
  • hn distance from base to highest level (in
    feet)

24
Step 6 (Exact Period) Determine the Buildings
Fundamental Period
  • Rayleighs formula
  • Where
  • wi dead load weight at Floor i
  • di elastic displacement at Floor i
  • Fi lateral force at Floor i
  • g acceleration of gravity
  • n total number of floors

25
Step 7 Determine Seismic Response Coefficient,
Cs
  • Lesser of
  • Where
  • R Response Modification Factor
  • Figure 3.10.8 (page 3-112)
  • ? Seismic Importance Factor

26
Step 7 Determine Cs
  • Minimum Value of Cs
  • Special Cases In Seismic Design Categories E and
    F

Cs 0.044SDS?
27
Vertical Distribution of Lateral Force
  • Where
  • Fx Force per floor
  • Cvx Vertical distribution factor
  • V Base shear
  • k 1 - buildings with a period 0.5 sec
  • 2 - buildings with a period gt 2.5 sec
  • hi and hx height from base to Level i or x
  • wi and wx Level i or x portion of total
    gravity load

28
Location of Force in Plane
  • Accidental Torsion
  • calculated by assuming that the center of mass is
    located a distance of 5 of the plan dimension
    perpendicular to the applied load on either side
    of the actual center of mass
  • Total torsion sum of the actual torsion plus
    the accidental torsion

29
Seismic Drift Requirements
  • Elastic Displacement Amplification
    Factor, dx
  • Stability Coefficient Limits, q
  • P-D Effects

30
Drift Limits
  • Figure 3.10.9 (page 3-113)

31
Drift Amplification Factor, dx
  • Where
  • dx Amplified deflection of Level x
  • dxe Deflection of Level x determined from
    elastic analysis, includes consideration of
    cracking
  • Cd Deflection amplification factor
  • (Figure 3.10.8)
  • ? Seismic Importance Factor

32
Stability Coefficient, ?
  • Where
  • Px Total vertical unfactored load including
    and above Level x
  • ? Difference of deflections between levels x
    and x-1
  • Vx Seismic shear force acting between levels x
    and x-1
  • hsx Story height below Level x
  • Cd Deflection amplification factor

33
Stability Coefficient, ?
  • The stability coefficient is limited to
  • Where
  • ß ratio of shear demand to shear capacity
    between Levels x and x-1

34
P-D Effects
  • To account for P-? effects, the design story
    drift is increased by
  • (1- ?)-1
  • If ? lt 0.10, P-? effects may be neglected

35
Reliability Factor, ri
  • Required in High Seismic Design Categories D, E,
    and F
  • The Earthquake Force is increase by a Reliability
    Factor, ri
  • 1.5 Maximum Required Value
  • ri 1.0 for structures in Seismic Design
    Categories A, B and C

36
Reliability Factor, ri For Moment Frames
  • Where, for each level
  • Ai floor area
  • rmaxi For moment frames, the maximum of the
    sum of the shears in any two adjacent columns
    divided by the story shear. For columns common to
    two bays with moment-resisting connections on
    opposite sides, 70 of the shear in that column
    may be used in the column shear summary.

37
Reliability Factor, ri For Shear Walls
  • Where, for each level
  • Ai floor area
  • rmaxi For shear walls, the maximum value of
    the product of the shear in the wall and 10/lw
    divided by the story shear.

38
Load Combinations
  • U 1.4(DF)
  • U 1.2(DFT) 1.6(LH)
  • U 1.2D 1.6(Lr or S or R) (1.0L or 0.8W)
  • U 1.2D 1.6W 1.0L 0.5(Lr or S or R)
  • U 1.2D 1.0E f1L 0.2S
  • U 0.9D 1.6W 1.6H
  • U 0.9D 1.0E 1.6H
  • f1 1.0 Parking garages
  • 1.0 Live load 100 psf on public assembly
    floors
  • 0.5 All others

39
Modification for Vertical Acceleration
  • E ?QE 0.2SDSD
  • Seismic Load Combinations Become
  • U (1.2 0.2SDS)D ?QE f1L 0.2S
  • U (0.9 0.2SDS)D ?QE 1.6H

Where QE Horizontal Seismic Force
40
Modification for Vertical Acceleration
  • E ?QE 0.2SDSD
  • Seismic Load Combinations Become
  • U (1.2 0.2SDS)D ?QE f1L 0.2S
  • U (0.9 0.2SDS)D ?QE 1.6H

41
Overstrength Factor, Wo
  • Components within the Diaphragm
  • Chord ties
  • Shear Steel
  • Connectors
  • ?o 2.0 - Seismic Design Categories C, D, E
    and F
  • ?o 1.0 - Seismic Design Categories A and B

42
Special Load Combinations
  • U 1.2D fiL Em
  • U 0.9D E
  • Where
  • Em WoQE 0.2SDSD
  • and
  • Wo Overstrength Factor

43
Overstrength Factor, Wo
  • Connections from Diaphragms to Seismic Force
    Resisting System (SFRS)
  • ?o Seismic Design Categories C and higher
  • Figure 3.10.8 (page 3-112)

44
Structural Integrity Requirements
  • All members must be connected to the Lateral
    Force Resisting System (LFRS)
  • Tension ties must be provided in all directions
  • The LFRS is continuous to the foundation
  • A diaphragm must be provided with
  • Connections between diaphragm elements
  • Tension ties around its perimeter
  • Perimeter ties provided
  • Nominal strength of at least 16 kips
  • Within 4 ft of the edge
  • Column splices and column base connections must
    have a nominal tensile strength not less than
    200Ag in pounds

45
Structural Integrity Requirements
  • Precast vertical panels connected by a minimum of
    two connections
  • Each connection is to have a nominal strength of
    10 kips
  • Precast diaphragm connections to members being
    laterally supported must have a nominal tensile
    strength not less than 300 lbs per linear ft
  • Connection details allow volume change strains
  • Connection details that rely solely on friction
    caused by gravity loads are not to be used

46
Lateral Force Resisting Systems (LFRS)
  • Rigid frames and shear walls exhibit different
    responses to lateral loads

47
Influential Factors
  • The supporting soil and footings
  • The stiffness of the diaphragm
  • The stiffness LFRS elements and connections
  • Lateral load eccentricity with respect to center
    of rigidity of the shear walls or frames

48
Shear Wall Systems
  • Most common lateral force resisting systems
  • Design typically follows principles used for
    cast-in-place structures

49
International Building Code(IBC) Requirements
  • Two categories of shear walls
  • Ordinary
  • Special

50
ACI 318-02 Requirements
  • Created an additional intermediate category, but
    has assigned no distinct R, ?o and Cd

51
ACI 318-02 Wall Definitions
  • Defines all shear walls as structural walls
  • Three levels of definition
  • Ordinary structural (shear) wall
  • Intermediate precast structural (shear) wall
  • Special precast structural (shear) wall

52
Ordinary Structural (Shear) Wall
  • Wall complying with the requirements of Chapters
    1 through 18
  • No special seismic detailing

53
Intermediate Precast Structural(Shear) Wall
  • Wall complying with all applicable requirements
    of Chapters 1 through 18
  • Added requirements of Section 21.13
  • Ductile connections with steel yielding
  • 1.5 factor for non-yielding elements
  • IBC imposes restriction that yielding be in the
    reinforcing

54
Special Precast Structural (Shear) Wall
  • Precast wall complying with the requirements of
    21.8.
  • Meeting the requirements for ordinary structural
    walls and the requirements of 21.2
  • Requires precast walls to be designed and
    detailed like cast-in-place walls, emulative
    design
  • Meet the connection requirements of Section 21.13.

55
Design Guidelines for Shear Wall Structures
  • Evaluation of building function and applicable
    precast frame
  • Preliminary development of shear wall system
  • Determination of vertical and lateral loads

56
Design Guidelines for Shear Wall Structures
  • Preliminary load analysis
  • Selection of shear walls
  • Final load analysis
  • Final shear wall design
  • Diaphragm design

57
Moment Frame Classifications
  • Three Classifications
  • Ordinary Moment Frame
  • Intermediate Moment Frames
  • Special Moment Frames
  • Based on Detailing
  • Seismic Design Categories

58
Ordinary Moment Frames
  • Seismic Performance Categories A B
  • ACI 318 Chapters 1 to 18
  • Response modification factor, R 3

59
Intermediate Moment Frames
  • Seismic Performance Category C
  • ACI 318 only defines intermediate as
    cast-in-place
  • Response modification factor, R 5

60
Special Moment Frames
  • Seismic Performance Categories D, E, and F
  • Yielding will be concentrated in the beam, Strong
    column -weak beam behavior
  • Special Moment frames
  • ACI 318 Sections 21.2 through 21.6
  • Response modification factor, R 8

61
Diaphragms
  • A diaphragm is classified as rigid if it can
    distribute the horizontal forces to the vertical
    lateral load resisting elements in proportion to
    their relative stiffness
  • Long-span applications suggest that many precast
    diaphragms may in fact be flexible

62
Diaphragm Design
  • The distinction between rigid and flexible
    diaphragms is important not just for diaphragm
    design, but also for the design of the entire
    lateral force resisting system.

63
Diaphragm Classification
  • Flexible diaphragm
  • Lateral deflection twice average story drift
  • Rigid diaphragm
  • Not flexible
  • Implies capability to distribute load based on
    relative stiffness of LFRS elements

64
Steps in the Design Method
  • Step 1 - Calculate and compare distribution and
    diaphragm forces
  • Based on rigid diaphragm action
  • Based on flexible diaphragm action
  • Step 2 - Check of diaphragm deformation with
    respect to drift limits
  • Step 3 - Check attached element drift limits
  • Step 4 - Adjustments in vertical element
    stiffness and placement to limit drift

65
Diaphragm Design Forces
  • Based on Wind and Seismic Events
  • Wind
  • Combined windward and leeward wind pressures
  • Act as uniform load on building perimeter
  • Distributed to the LFRS based on diaphragm
    behavior

66
Seismic Diaphragm Design Forces
  • Separate calculations from the design of the LFRS
  • Diaphragm Design force, FP
  • Seismic Design Categories B or C
  • Fp 0.2IESDSWp Vpx
  • Where
  • Vpx represents forces from above levels that
    must be transferred through the diaphragm due to
    vertical system offsets or changes in stiffness.

67
Seismic Diaphragm Design Forces
  • Seismic Design Category D
  • 0.2IESDSwpxlt Fp lt 0.4IESDSwpx

68
Diaphragm Detailing
  • Wind and Low Seismic Hazards
  • Moderate Seismic Hazards
  • Seismic Design Category D - Topped Systems
  • High Seismic Hazards - Untopped Systems

69
Wind and Low Seismic Hazard
  • Seismic Design Category A
  • Strength requirements imposed by the applied
    forces, No Amplification
  • Seismic Design Category B
  • Requires the design of collector elements
  • Does not require forces to be increased by over
    strength factor, ?o (Revised from IBC 2000)

70
Moderate Seismic Hazard
  • Topped and Pretopped Systems
  • Seismic Design Category C
  • Concrete wall systems have special requirements
    IBC 2003
  • Diaphragm must include
  • special continuous struts or ties between
    diaphragm chords for wall anchorage.
  • use of Sub-Diaphragms, the aspect ratio of is
    limited to 2½ to 1

71
Moderate Seismic Hazard
  • Walls classified as Intermediate Precast Walls
  • Collector elements, their connections based on
    special load combinations
  • Need to include overstrength factor
  • Ductile connections with wall interface
  • The body of the connection must have sufficient
    strength to permit development of 1.5fy in the
    reinforcing steel

72
Seismic Design Category (SDC) D
  • Topped Systems
  • Untopped Systems
  • Not implicitly recognized in ACI 318 - 02
  • Section 21.2.1.5
  • permits a system to be used if it is shown by
    experimental evidence and analysis to be
    equivalent in strength and toughness to
    comparable monolithic cast-in-place systems

73
SDC D Topped Systems
  • High strain demand across the joints
  • Reinforcing steel needs to be compatible with
    this demand
  • Use of larger wire spacing or bars may be needed
  • Mesh in the topping must take the entire shear
    across the joint.
  • Correct lapping to maintain diaphragm integrity

74
SDC D Topped Systems
  • Specific provisions in ACI 318-02
  • Chord steel determined from flexural analysis
  • Shear strength based entirely on reinforcement
    crossing the joint
  • Vn Acvrnfy
  • Where
  • Acv thickness of the topping slab
  • ?n steel ratio of the reinforcement

75
SDC D Topped Systems
  • ACI 318-02
  • minimum spacing requirement of 10 in
  • Diaphragm f -factor vertical element fshear
    -factor
  • May result in f 0.6, based on ACI 318-02
    Section 9.3.4

76
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com