Do Firms Target Credit Ratings or Leverage Levels Darren J' Kisgen Discussion by: Michael R' Roberts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Do Firms Target Credit Ratings or Leverage Levels Darren J' Kisgen Discussion by: Michael R' Roberts

Description:

Credit ratings matter because they are proxying for some ... How can your empirical framework distinguish targeting a credit rating & a range of leverage? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: financeWh
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Do Firms Target Credit Ratings or Leverage Levels Darren J' Kisgen Discussion by: Michael R' Roberts


1
Do Firms Target Credit Ratings or Leverage
Levels?Darren J. KisgenDiscussion
byMichael R. Roberts2006 Western Finance
Association
2
Summary
  • The question
  • Do credit ratings changes affect financial
    policy?
  • Empirical Approach
  • Regress net security issuances (net debt net
    equity) on an indicator for a ratings change and
    controls
  • Results
  • Downgrades ? relatively less net debt issuance
  • Upgrades ? no significant affect
  • Conclusion
  • Firms target minimum credit rating levels

3
Overview
  • What I like about the paper
  • This is an interesting topic with relatively
    little hard evidence (Faulkender and Petersen
    (2005), Kisgen (2005), Lemmon and Roberts (2006))
  • The paper is well-written (but documentation
    could be improved)
  • Remainder of the discussion
  • Wheres the identification coming from?
  • Is this the right empirical specification?
  • What do the results mean?

4
Where is the Identification Coming From?
  • The empirical model is
  • This specification assumes that, conditional on
    firm characteristics, firms are randomly assigned
    upgrades and downgrades in their credit
    rating?!?!?!
  • This endogeneity must be addressed.
  • Faulkender and Petersen (2005) use IV
  • Lemmon and Roberts (2006) use a natural experiment

5
Do We Have the Right Empirical Specification?
  • What is the economic model (i.e., null
    hypothesis) motivating the empirical
    specification?
  • This implies the following firm FE model

6
Do We have the Right Empirical Specification?
  • Alternatively,
  • This implies the following differences model

7
Do We have the Right Empirical Specification?
  • Darrens specification

implies
  • None of this addresses the endogeneity issue

8
What do the Results Mean?
  • Credit ratings matter because they are proxying
    for some underlying friction (e.g., information
    asymmetry, bankruptcy costs, capital
    constraints)
  • Theres no effort to distinguish among these
    alternative hypotheses.
  • Firms target a credit rating?
  • How can your empirical framework distinguish
    targeting a credit rating a range of leverage?
    Observationally equivalent without exogenous
    variation?
  • 70 of public firms dont have a credit rating
  • No effect of downgrades on leverage (0.6)

9
Concluding Thoughts
  • This is an interesting and relevant issue.
    However, I think addressing it is more difficult
    than what this paper suggests
  • My recommendations are to
  • Find a source of exogenous variation or, write
    down a model that provides identifying
    restrictions
  • Carefully state what the empirical specification
    is and why
  • Distinguish between (some) of the explanations
  • Carefully document what you do
  • Addressing these issues will result in a very
    nice paper
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com