Title: Guidance for Responsible Health and Medical Research in Australia
1Guidance for Responsible Health and Medical
Research in Australia
Professor Warwick Anderson
2About NHMRC
- NHMRC was established in 1936 within the
Department of Health. - 1 July 2006 became an independent statutory
agency with a New Act and changed
accountabilities for the CEO. - April 2007 Incorporation of NICS.
3The Objectives of NHMRC
The objectives of NHMRC are to
- raise the standard of individual and public
health throughout Australia - foster the development of consistent health
standards between the various States and
Territories - foster medical research and training and public
health research and training throughout
Australia and - foster consideration of ethical issues relating
to health
4Structure of the NHMRC
5NHMRC Strategic Plan (2006-2009)
- Three year strategic plan that complements
- Ministers annual Statements of Expectations and
- CEOs annual Statements of Intent.
- Sets Strategic Objectives and key strategies and
performance indicators.
- Identifies
- major health issues
- national strategy for health and medical
research - a longer-term vision for NHMRC
6Five Strategic Objectives
7Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of
Research
8Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of
Research
- Jointly developed by
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Australian Research Council
- Universities Australia (formerly AVCC)
- Replaces the Joint NHMRC/AVCC Statement and
Guidelines on Research Practice (1997) - Promotes integrity in all Australian research
- Provides guidance on how to manage departures
from best practice.
9Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of
Research
- The Code covers
- All research disciplines
- Institutions, researchers and publicly funded
research bodies - All research institutions are encouraged to adopt
the Code as standard practice - The Code will provide the general public
reassurance of good practice in Australian
research
10Structure of the Code
- Part A Principles and practices to encourage
responsible research conduct - Best practice institutions and researchers
- How to manage research data and materials
- How to publish and disseminate findings
- Effective peer review
- Conflicts of interest
- Part B Breaches of the Code, research
misconduct, framework for resolving allegations - How to handle allegations of research misconduct
- How to handle breaches of the Code
- Roles and responsibilities of all parties
- Clear, effective and fair processes
11Changes to the Code Part A
Part A Principles and practices to encourage
responsible research conduct
- Definition of research
- Managing collaborative research with other
organisations - Reporting research misconduct
- Research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander peoples - Value of consumer involvement in research
- Communicating research findings to the public
- Appropriate attribution of authorship
- Importance and value of peer review
- Identification and management of conflicts of
interest
12General Principles
- Responsibility of Institutions
- Promote the responsible conduct of research
- Establish good governance and management
practices - Staff training
- Promote Mentoring
- Ensure a safe research environment
- Responsibility of Researchers
- Maintain high standards of responsible research
- Report research responsibly
- Respect research participants
- Respect animals used in research
- Respect the environment
- Report research misconduct
13Management of data and materials
- Responsibility of Institutions
- Retain research data and primary materials
- Provide secure research data storage and
record-keeping - Identify ownership of data and materials
- Ensure security and confidentiality of research
data - Responsibility of Researchers
- Retain research data and materials
- Manage storage of research data and materials
- Maintain confidentiality of research data and
materials
14Supervision
- Responsibility of Institutions
- Set Standards for supervision and mentorship
- Induct research trainees
- Responsibility of Researchers
- Ensure training
- Mentor and provide support
- Ensure valid and accurate research
- Ensure appropriate attribution
- Responsibility of Trainees
- Seek guidance
- Undertake induction and training
15Publication and dissemination
- Responsibility of Institutions
- Promote responsible publication and dissemination
- Protect confidentiality and manage intellectual
property - Support communication of research findings to
wider public - Responsibility of Researchers
- Disseminate all research findings
- Ensure accuracy of publication and dissemination
- Cite the work of other accurately and fully
- Multiple submission of research
- Obtain permission for republishing and disclose
support - Register clinical trials
- Manage confidentiality
- Responsibly communicate research findings in the
public arena
16Authorship
- Responsibility of Institutions
- Have criteria for authorship
- Responsibility of Researchers
- Follow policies on authorship
- Agree on authorship
- Include all authors
- Do not allow unacceptable inclusion of authorship
- Acknowledge other contributions fairly
- Extend the authorship policy to web-based
publications - Maintain signed acknowledgements of authorship
for all publications
17Peer Review
- Responsibility of Institutions
- Encourage participation in peer review
- Responsibility of Peer Reviewers
- Conduct peer review responsibly
- Responsibility of Researchers
- Do not interfere during peer review process
- Participate in peer review
- Mentor trainees in peer review
- Declare conflicts of interest
18Conflicts of Interest
- Responsibility of Institutions
- Maintain a policy
- Responsibility of Researchers
- Disclose conflicts of interest
19Collaborative research
- Responsibility of Institutions
- Establish agreements for each collaboration
- Manage conflicts of interest
- Manage access to research materials
- Responsibility of Researchers
- Comply with multi-institutional agreements
- Declare conflicts of interest
20Changes to the Code Part B
Part B Breaches of the Code, research
misconduct, Framework for resolving allegations
- Definition of research misconduct
- Specific examples of research misconduct
- Relationship of research misconduct to other
forms of misconduct - Roles and responsibility (e.g Advisor in research
integrity, Institutional and departmental) - Relationship between the Code and Workplace
agreements - Resolving complaints/allegations of research
misconduct inquiry - Establishment of independent research misconduct
inquiry - Internal versus external research misconduct
inquiry - What to do when the inquiry has been complete
21Examples of research misconduct
- Ways that researchers deviate from the Code can
include - Fabrication of results
- Falsification or misrepresentation of results
- Plagiarism
- Misleading ascription of authorship
- Failure to declare and manage serious conflicts
of interest - Falsification or misrepresentation to obtain
funding - Conducting research without ethics approval
- Risking the safety of human participants, animals
or the environment - Deviations from the Code through gross or
persistent negligence - Wilful concealment or facilitation of research
misconduct by others
22Framework for Resolving Allegations
- Anyone concerned that a researcher has not acted
responsibly must take action in accordance with
The Code. - In the first instance, complaints and allegations
are dealt with at departmental level. - If not resolved, a formal complaint or allegation
must be made, in writing, to the designated
person.
23Framework for Resolving Allegations
- The designated person must advise the CEO whether
there is a prima facie case, and how to proceed.
Options include - Dismissing the allegations
- Instructing department on how to deal with
allegations - Dealing with the complaint under provisions
unrelated to research misconduct - Investigating the matter further through a
research misconduct inquiry
24Framework for Resolving Allegations
- If a research misconduct inquiry is needed, the
designated person must decide whether to proceed
to an - Internal institutional research misconduct
inquiry or - Independent external research misconduct inquiry
- The inquiry must report findings to the CEO
- The CEO determines that actions to be followed,
in accordance to institutional policy - Subsequent action may include correcting the
public record of the research.
25Management of Research Misconduct
26National Statement on Ethical Conduct of Human
Research
27National Statement on Ethical Conduct of Human
Research
- Jointly developed by
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Australian Research Council
- Universities Australia (formerly AVCC)
- Replaces the National Statement on Ethical
Conduct in Research Involving Humans (1999) - First consultation (Dec 2004) resulted in 178
submissions - Second consultation (Jan 2006) resulted in 186
submissions
28National Statement on Ethical Conduct of Human
Research
- Tabled in both houses of Parliament 28 March 2007
- Institutions to report against it from 1 January
2008 - Transition period for information, promotion and
preparation for institutional compliance - National roll-out information sessions began in
August 2007
29- Towards a streamlined approach to scientific and
ethical review of Multi Centre research
30Background
- In Australia, research that is conducted in
multiple sites and jurisdictions, undergoes
separate ethical review. - This process is
- - time consuming
- - an inefficient use of resources, and
- - costly for researchers
31The NHMRCs role
- In 2006, Australian Health Ministers Advisory
Council (AHMAC) tasked NHMRC with developing an
approach to streamlining ethical review of
multi-centre research. - NHMRC is investigating the best way in which to
approach this initiative. - 5.6 million provided over three financial years
to implement the initiative.
32National Health and Medical Research
Council Professor Warwick Anderson www.nhmrc.gov.
au