Guidance for Responsible Health and Medical Research in Australia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Guidance for Responsible Health and Medical Research in Australia

Description:

NHMRC was established in 1936 within the Department of Health. ... Wilful concealment or facilitation of research misconduct by others ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: ten6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Guidance for Responsible Health and Medical Research in Australia


1
Guidance for Responsible Health and Medical
Research in Australia
Professor Warwick Anderson
2
About NHMRC
  • NHMRC was established in 1936 within the
    Department of Health.
  • 1 July 2006 became an independent statutory
    agency with a New Act and changed
    accountabilities for the CEO.
  • April 2007 Incorporation of NICS.

3
The Objectives of NHMRC
The objectives of NHMRC are to
  • raise the standard of individual and public
    health throughout Australia
  • foster the development of consistent health
    standards between the various States and
    Territories
  • foster medical research and training and public
    health research and training throughout
    Australia and
  • foster consideration of ethical issues relating
    to health

4
Structure of the NHMRC
5
NHMRC Strategic Plan (2006-2009)
  • Three year strategic plan that complements
  • Ministers annual Statements of Expectations and
  • CEOs annual Statements of Intent.
  • Sets Strategic Objectives and key strategies and
    performance indicators.
  • Identifies
  • major health issues
  • national strategy for health and medical
    research
  • a longer-term vision for NHMRC

6
Five Strategic Objectives
7
Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of
Research
8
Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of
Research
  • Jointly developed by
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Australian Research Council
  • Universities Australia (formerly AVCC)
  • Replaces the Joint NHMRC/AVCC Statement and
    Guidelines on Research Practice (1997)
  • Promotes integrity in all Australian research
  • Provides guidance on how to manage departures
    from best practice.

9
Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of
Research
  • The Code covers
  • All research disciplines
  • Institutions, researchers and publicly funded
    research bodies
  • All research institutions are encouraged to adopt
    the Code as standard practice
  • The Code will provide the general public
    reassurance of good practice in Australian
    research

10
Structure of the Code
  • Part A Principles and practices to encourage
    responsible research conduct
  • Best practice institutions and researchers
  • How to manage research data and materials
  • How to publish and disseminate findings
  • Effective peer review
  • Conflicts of interest
  • Part B Breaches of the Code, research
    misconduct, framework for resolving allegations
  • How to handle allegations of research misconduct
  • How to handle breaches of the Code
  • Roles and responsibilities of all parties
  • Clear, effective and fair processes

11
Changes to the Code Part A
Part A Principles and practices to encourage
responsible research conduct
  • Definition of research
  • Managing collaborative research with other
    organisations
  • Reporting research misconduct
  • Research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait
    Islander peoples
  • Value of consumer involvement in research
  • Communicating research findings to the public
  • Appropriate attribution of authorship
  • Importance and value of peer review
  • Identification and management of conflicts of
    interest

12
General Principles
  • Responsibility of Institutions
  • Promote the responsible conduct of research
  • Establish good governance and management
    practices
  • Staff training
  • Promote Mentoring
  • Ensure a safe research environment
  • Responsibility of Researchers
  • Maintain high standards of responsible research
  • Report research responsibly
  • Respect research participants
  • Respect animals used in research
  • Respect the environment
  • Report research misconduct

13
Management of data and materials
  • Responsibility of Institutions
  • Retain research data and primary materials
  • Provide secure research data storage and
    record-keeping
  • Identify ownership of data and materials
  • Ensure security and confidentiality of research
    data
  • Responsibility of Researchers
  • Retain research data and materials
  • Manage storage of research data and materials
  • Maintain confidentiality of research data and
    materials

14
Supervision
  • Responsibility of Institutions
  • Set Standards for supervision and mentorship
  • Induct research trainees
  • Responsibility of Researchers
  • Ensure training
  • Mentor and provide support
  • Ensure valid and accurate research
  • Ensure appropriate attribution
  • Responsibility of Trainees
  • Seek guidance
  • Undertake induction and training

15
Publication and dissemination
  • Responsibility of Institutions
  • Promote responsible publication and dissemination
  • Protect confidentiality and manage intellectual
    property
  • Support communication of research findings to
    wider public
  • Responsibility of Researchers
  • Disseminate all research findings
  • Ensure accuracy of publication and dissemination
  • Cite the work of other accurately and fully
  • Multiple submission of research
  • Obtain permission for republishing and disclose
    support
  • Register clinical trials
  • Manage confidentiality
  • Responsibly communicate research findings in the
    public arena

16
Authorship
  • Responsibility of Institutions
  • Have criteria for authorship
  • Responsibility of Researchers
  • Follow policies on authorship
  • Agree on authorship
  • Include all authors
  • Do not allow unacceptable inclusion of authorship
  • Acknowledge other contributions fairly
  • Extend the authorship policy to web-based
    publications
  • Maintain signed acknowledgements of authorship
    for all publications

17
Peer Review
  • Responsibility of Institutions
  • Encourage participation in peer review
  • Responsibility of Peer Reviewers
  • Conduct peer review responsibly
  • Responsibility of Researchers
  • Do not interfere during peer review process
  • Participate in peer review
  • Mentor trainees in peer review
  • Declare conflicts of interest

18
Conflicts of Interest
  • Responsibility of Institutions
  • Maintain a policy
  • Responsibility of Researchers
  • Disclose conflicts of interest

19
Collaborative research
  • Responsibility of Institutions
  • Establish agreements for each collaboration
  • Manage conflicts of interest
  • Manage access to research materials
  • Responsibility of Researchers
  • Comply with multi-institutional agreements
  • Declare conflicts of interest

20
Changes to the Code Part B
Part B Breaches of the Code, research
misconduct, Framework for resolving allegations
  • Definition of research misconduct
  • Specific examples of research misconduct
  • Relationship of research misconduct to other
    forms of misconduct
  • Roles and responsibility (e.g Advisor in research
    integrity, Institutional and departmental)
  • Relationship between the Code and Workplace
    agreements
  • Resolving complaints/allegations of research
    misconduct inquiry
  • Establishment of independent research misconduct
    inquiry
  • Internal versus external research misconduct
    inquiry
  • What to do when the inquiry has been complete

21
Examples of research misconduct
  • Ways that researchers deviate from the Code can
    include
  • Fabrication of results
  • Falsification or misrepresentation of results
  • Plagiarism
  • Misleading ascription of authorship
  • Failure to declare and manage serious conflicts
    of interest
  • Falsification or misrepresentation to obtain
    funding
  • Conducting research without ethics approval
  • Risking the safety of human participants, animals
    or the environment
  • Deviations from the Code through gross or
    persistent negligence
  • Wilful concealment or facilitation of research
    misconduct by others

22
Framework for Resolving Allegations
  • Anyone concerned that a researcher has not acted
    responsibly must take action in accordance with
    The Code.
  • In the first instance, complaints and allegations
    are dealt with at departmental level.
  • If not resolved, a formal complaint or allegation
    must be made, in writing, to the designated
    person.

23
Framework for Resolving Allegations
  • The designated person must advise the CEO whether
    there is a prima facie case, and how to proceed.
    Options include
  • Dismissing the allegations
  • Instructing department on how to deal with
    allegations
  • Dealing with the complaint under provisions
    unrelated to research misconduct
  • Investigating the matter further through a
    research misconduct inquiry

24
Framework for Resolving Allegations
  • If a research misconduct inquiry is needed, the
    designated person must decide whether to proceed
    to an
  • Internal institutional research misconduct
    inquiry or
  • Independent external research misconduct inquiry
  • The inquiry must report findings to the CEO
  • The CEO determines that actions to be followed,
    in accordance to institutional policy
  • Subsequent action may include correcting the
    public record of the research.

25
Management of Research Misconduct
26
National Statement on Ethical Conduct of Human
Research
27
National Statement on Ethical Conduct of Human
Research
  • Jointly developed by
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Australian Research Council
  • Universities Australia (formerly AVCC)
  • Replaces the National Statement on Ethical
    Conduct in Research Involving Humans (1999)
  • First consultation (Dec 2004) resulted in 178
    submissions
  • Second consultation (Jan 2006) resulted in 186
    submissions

28
National Statement on Ethical Conduct of Human
Research
  • Tabled in both houses of Parliament 28 March 2007
  • Institutions to report against it from 1 January
    2008
  • Transition period for information, promotion and
    preparation for institutional compliance
  • National roll-out information sessions began in
    August 2007

29
  • Towards a streamlined approach to scientific and
    ethical review of Multi Centre research

30
Background
  • In Australia, research that is conducted in
    multiple sites and jurisdictions, undergoes
    separate ethical review.
  • This process is
  • - time consuming
  • - an inefficient use of resources, and
  • - costly for researchers

31
The NHMRCs role
  • In 2006, Australian Health Ministers Advisory
    Council (AHMAC) tasked NHMRC with developing an
    approach to streamlining ethical review of
    multi-centre research.
  • NHMRC is investigating the best way in which to
    approach this initiative.
  • 5.6 million provided over three financial years
    to implement the initiative.

32
National Health and Medical Research
Council Professor Warwick Anderson www.nhmrc.gov.
au
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com