Title: Identified Particle Transverse Momentum Distributions from Au Au Collisions at 62'4 GeV per Nucleon
1Identified Particle Transverse Momentum
Distributions from AuAu Collisions at 62.4 GeV
per Nucleon Pair
- Conor Henderson
- 27 June 2005
- MIT PhD Thesis Defence
2Outline
- Introduction to Heavy-Ion Physics
- The proton/pion puzzle at intermediate pT
- The PHOBOS Detector
- Track reconstruction and particle ID
- Obtaining pT spectra
- Results and conclusions
3The QCD Phase Diagram
- Strongly-interacting matter can exist in a
variety of phases - Asymptotic freedom of QCD implies a stable
quark-gluon plasma
4A Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collision
- Heavy-ion collisions attempt to create and study
this QGP phase
5Heavy-Ion Collision Centrality
Central collision
Peripheral collision
6Npart and Ncoll Scaling
Number of participating nucleons, Npart
8 Number of nucleon-nucleon collisions, Ncoll 16
- What to expect for a nucleus-nucleus collision?
- Npart scaling - Wounded Nucleon Model
- Ncoll scaling - Independent superposition of
nucleon-nucleon collisions
7Transverse Momentum Spectra
PHOBOS
PRL 94, 082304 (2005)
AuAu 62.4 GeV
8High-pT Particle Suppression
- High-pT particle yields found to be suppressed
significantly below Ncoll scaling from pp
collisions
9Jet Quenching in Deconfined Medium
I. Vitev, QM2004
- Parton energy loss significantly greater in a
dense deconfined medium - Results in suppression of high-pT particles
10Proton/Pion Puzzle
- Proton/pion ratio at intermediate pT found to be
remarkably high in 200 GeV AuAu collisions
11Not seen in dAu at 200 GeV
- dAu collisions did not show such a high
proton/pion ratio
12Proton/Pion Puzzle II
- Protons and pions also observed to have very
different centrality-scaling in 200 GeV AuAu
collisions
13Parton Recombination Models
R Hwa, QM2004
R Fries, QM2004
- Predicts parton recombination to dominate over
fragmentation at intermediate pT - Results in baryon/meson enhancement
14Baryon Stopping Jet Quenching
Vitev, Gyulassy PRC 65, 041902, 2002
- Arises from pion suppression due to
jet-quenching plus large baryon contribution from
baryon stopping (transport of baryons from beam
to mid-rapidity) - Suggested mechanism is gluon junctions baryon
number is traced by junction, not by valence
quarks - easier to transport over large rapidities
15Motivation for this Thesis
- Identified particle pT spectra from AuAu
collisions at 62.4 GeV will investigate the
proton/pion puzzle at a new collision energy - This will help to understand the processes which
govern particle production at intermediate pT in
the complex system formed in heavy-ion collisions
16The Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider
17 Collaboration (June 2005)
Burak Alver, Birger Back, Mark Baker, Maarten
Ballintijn, Donald Barton, Russell Betts, Richard
Bindel, Wit Busza (Spokesperson), Zhengwei Chai,
Vasundhara Chetluru, Edmundo García, Tomasz
Gburek, Kristjan Gulbrandsen, Clive Halliwell,
Joshua Hamblen, Ian Harnarine, Conor Henderson,
David Hofman, Richard Hollis, Roman Holynski,
Burt Holzman, Aneta Iordanova, Jay Kane,Piotr
Kulinich, Chia Ming Kuo, Wei Li, Willis Lin,
Steven Manly, Alice Mignerey, Gerrit van
Nieuwenhuizen, Rachid Nouicer, Andrzej
Olszewski, Robert Pak, Corey Reed, Eric
Richardson, Christof Roland, Gunther Roland, Joe
Sagerer, Iouri Sedykh, Chadd Smith, Maciej
Stankiewicz, Peter Steinberg, George Stephans,
Andrei Sukhanov, Artur Szostak, Marguerite Belt
Tonjes, Adam Trzupek, Sergei Vaurynovich, Robin
Verdier, Gábor Veres, Peter Walters, Edward
Wenger, Donald Willhelm, Frank Wolfs, Barbara
Wosiek, Krzysztof Wozniak, Shaun Wyngaardt,
Bolek Wyslouch ARGONNE NATIONAL
LABORATORY BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY INSTITU
TE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS PAN, KRAKOW MASSACHUSETTS
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NATIONAL CENTRAL
UNIVERSITY, TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT
CHICAGO UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY OF
ROCHESTER
18The Detector 2004
TOF Walls
T0 Detectors
SpecTrig
Spectrometer
Paddle Trigger
NIM A 499, 603-623 (2003)
19Event Trigger
Au
Au
Paddle Triggers
- Good events are selected by timing
characteristics - A vertex trigger is used to further enhance the
selection of useful events
20Centrality Bins used in this Analysis
21The PHOBOS Spectrometer
- Silicon sensors
- Outer layers in 2T magnetic field
- High segmentation in bending direction
- Tracking within 10 cm of interaction point
- Coverage near mid-rapidity
x
22A Spectrometer Event
23Track Reconstruction
- Road-following algorithm finds straight tracks in
field-free region - Curved tracks in B-field found by clusters in
(1/p, ?) space - Match pieces, fit to determine best momentum
24Silicon dE/dx Particle Identification
p
K
?
25Time-of-Flight Detectors
- Two TOF walls, at 90 deg. and 45 deg. to
beam-axis - 120 plastic scintillators per wall, PMT read-out
top and bottom - Start time provided by T0 Cerenkovs
- Total timing resolution 140 ps
TOF identification ?t d(E1 - E2)/p
26TOF Particle Identification
p
K
?
27Corrections Applied to Raw Data
- Geometrical Acceptance
- Tracking Efficiency
- Momentum resolution
- Ghost tracks
- Feed-down from weak decays
- Secondary particles
- Effect of Silicon and TOF Dead channels
28TOF and Spectrometer Data Synthesis
- Spectrometer and TOF cover different kinematic
ranges - Synthesis procedure used to present the data
in a detector-independent way
29Identified Particle pT Spectra, AuAu at 62.4 GeV
30Proton/Hadron Fraction at 62.4 GeV
- Protons are the dominant hadron species at
intermediate pT
31Proton/Hadron Fraction vs. Energy
- Proton/hadron fraction actually found to be
higher at 62.4 GeV than at 200 GeV
32Centrality Dependence at 62.4 GeV
- Protons and mesons exhibit different centrality
dependence
33Centrality Dependence at 200 GeV
- Similar centrality dependence seen at 200 GeV
34Proton/Pion Puzzle at 62.4 GeV
- The proton/pion puzzle does not suddenly appear
at 200 GeV - essentially the same features are
also present at 62.4 GeV AuAu collisions - This will provide important data for explanations
of the puzzle - No theoretical predictions for 62.4 GeV yet
- But the baryon junctions model must also describe
baryon stopping at 62.4 GeV - we can probe this
too using the present data
35Energy Dependence of Proton Spectra
- More low pT protons at 62.4 than at 200 GeV
- Baryon stopping must dominate low-pT proton
yields
36Integrating pT Spectra to get dN/dy
- Integrating pT spectra gives total particle
yield, dN/dy
37Net Protons vs. Npart
- Interesting linearity with Npart
- May constrain models of baryon transport
38Net Protons vs Beam Rapidity
(0-5)
- Fits smoothly into rapidity dependence of baryon
stopping
39Summary
- Identified particle pT spectra have been measured
for AuAu collisions at 62.4 GeV using the PHOBOS
Spectrometer and TOF - The proton/pion puzzle seen at 200 GeV is present
also at 62.4 GeV - will be interesting to see if
models can explain this energy dependence - Net proton yields near mid-rapidity also
presented - should further constrain model based
on baryon stopping
40Backup slides
41The Synthesis Procedure
42A Synthesized Example
43Acceptance and Efficiency Correction
- Largest correction is geometrical acceptance and
tracking efficiency - Obtained from Monte Carlo simulations of PHOBOS
detector
44Feed-down from Weak Decays
- Feed-down from weak decays makes
detector-dependent distortion of primary pT
spectra - Correction obtained by simulating ? and ? decays
- find relative probability of reconstructing
daughter proton relative to primary proton with
same pT - Input physical values to estimate correction
- Cross-check using a track quantity,
distance-of-closest-approach to event vertex,
which is shown to have sensitivity to feed-down
products
45Antiparticle/Particle Ratios
- Antiproton/proton ratio can be used to estimate
baryochemical potential, ?B - p/p ? exp(-2?B/T)
- Obtain
- ?B ? 80 MeV
- (if T 165 MeV)
p/p 0.38 ? 0.03 (sys.)
46Antiparticle/Particle Ratios vs. Energy
- These first results at 62.4 GeV fit smoothly
into the energy evolution of antiparticle/particle
ratios
47mT Spectra and mT-Scaling?
- Suggested that particle spectra should scale
with mT - Prelim results from dAu agreed with this but
AuAu at 200 GeV clearly violated mT-scaling - These results at 62.4 GeV do not support it
either
48Lattice QCD Phase Transition
- Lattice QCD calculations predict a phase
transition from hadrons to QGP
49Factorization of Energy and Centrality Dependence
- Centrality dependence of
- vs. pT is the same at 62.4 and 200 GeV
- Challenge to collision models to reproduce this
50Proton Centrality Dependence
51Antiproton/Hadron Fraction
52Antiproton/Hadron Fraction vs Energy
53Proton/Hadron Fraction vs. Energy
54Proton and Antiproton Yields vs Npart
55Charged Particle Multiplicity
- Multiplicity can be used to estimate the energy
density - Found to be above the Lattice QCD critical value
for a QGP
56Vertex-Finding
- PHOBOS vertex detector is able to determine
event vertex with resolution of 0.1mm - Other sub-detectors have worse resolution but
can provide additional information - A composite Selected Vertex is created from
all the info available
57Silicon Sensors in PHOBOS
- Based on principle of semiconductor pn-junctions
- reverse-biased to increase depletion zone
sensitive volume - Charged particle traversing sensor creates
electron-hole pairs - collected by electrodes as
signal in sensor
58Paddles/ZDC Correlation
59Track-Fit Probability
60DCA
61TOF Residuals
62K, Proton Momentum Reconstruction
63Lambda reconstruction - Found
64Lambda reconstruction - Not Found
65Various Lambda/p Ratios
66Centrality Determination
- Need an observable which closely correlates with
Npart - For PHOBOS, Paddle Signal is good measure
67Centrality Determination II
- Then divide the observed Paddle Signal
distribution in bins - Monte Carlo simulations determine Npart and
Ncoll for these bins
68Tracking Efficiency and Momentum Resolution
- Single-track reconstruction efficiency 90
- Momentum resolution better than 5 for pT lt 8
GeV/c