Title: Resource centres and self-study: issues in computer assisted language learning (CALL)
1Resource centres and self-study issues in
computer assisted language learning (CALL)
- The 4th Education in a Changing Environment
Conference - 12th-14th September 2007
- Huw Jarvis, School of Languages, University of
Salford
2Key questions
- Which CBMs do non-native speakers (NNS) of the
English language make use of in a RC and
elsewhere and why? - To what extent do students consider CBMs as
helping with their language studies? - Where access is available in a range of
locations, where do students choose to work and
what might the implications of this be for
Resource Centres (RC)? - What might the answers to these questions imply
for our understanding of computer-assisted
language learning (CALL)?
3These questions arise against a background of
- My observations of students working on computers
at HEIs - An expectation that
- HIE students access various types of CBMs beyond
the classroom in libraries, at home, in internet
cafes and in Resource Centres (RCs) where
Computer-based materials (CBMs) now dominate - such materials are, at times at least, being used
for self-study purposes. This is now has a
defining characteristics of learning at an HIE -
- E.g. A 15 credit module at M level will typically
involve 150 hours of study but as little as 24
hours of this time is face-to-face - An emerging research tradition within CALL
4The field of Computer assisted language learning
(CALL)
- learners learning language in any context
with, through, and around computer technologies.
Egbert (20054). CBMs are language specific as
well as more generic Information Technology (IT)
programmes. Jarvis (2004116) -
- Traditionally CBMs can be divided according two
functions (Taylor, 1980 Levy 1997) which
(sometimes) overlap - Tool-based CBMs are increasingly important for
all HEI students, ICT use, in terms of email,
word-processing, Power Point, and the Web, has
become standard as part of the teaching and
learning process Collins and Wende (2002 7) - Tutorial-based CBMs allow students to practise
language and receive feedback on whether their
answers are right or wrong - More recently a third medium function has been
added - this corresponds to a sociocognitive
phase of CALL (Warschauer and Kern, 2000)
5Methodology and the participants
- The study employs both quantative and qualitative
techniques -
- Participants were international students in the
School of Languages at Salford they were on one
of several English for Academic Purposes (EAP)
programmes and studying at a variety of levels - broad geographical spread
-
- 68 students returned questionnaires and 6 were
interviewed -
- Students were asked to indicate the how often and
for how long they used the RC, which specific
CBMs were used in the RC and elsewhere AND the
extent to which they helped with language
learning. A mix of tool, tutorial and
medium-based materials were included
6Which CBMs do non-native speakers (NNS) of the
English language make use of in a RC and
elsewhere and why?
- Informed, frequent users who block time and
prefer CBMs over other materials -
- 89.6 were shown round the RC and 82.1 were
specifically shown the CBMs - 48.5 4 to 5 times per week and 55.6 two to
three times per week -
- 42.6 usually spend 1 to 2 hours, 16.2 more than
two hours, 14.7 half an hour to one hour, 25
replied with it depends, only 1.5 reported
less than half an hour - 100 reported usually using CBMs compared to
35 TV and Video, 38.2 Books and Worksheets,
23.5 Audio cassettes and 7 Other materials
7Which CBMs do non-native speakers (NNS) of the
English language make use of in an RC and why?
- The most widely used CBMs are also perceived as
helping with language learning but although
Tutorial CALL is appreciated ,the tool (e.g.
word-processing) and medium (e.g. email)
functions are sometimes equally valued for
language learning
CBMs Used Every, Most or Some visits to the LCC () Helps A lot or To some extent with language learning ()
On-line dictionaries 70.1 75
Email to contact tutors and/or classmates 70.1 53.2
Live chats with friends and /or family 40.3 34.4
Live chats with tutors and /or classmates 25.4 37.7
The WWW to access sites with exercises to practise language 86.8 82
The WWW to access personal information 76.1 50
The word processor to write assignments 82.9 74.6
Power Point to work on presentations 38.8 44.3
Excel to present and collate data 36.9 31
8Which CBMs do non-native speakers (NNS) of the
English language make use of elsewhere and why?
- CBMs which are used inside the RC and are viewed
as helping with language learning are also used
outside the RC - Students tend to use synchronous CMC outside the
RC for social networking purposes
9Where access is available in a range of
locations, where do students choose to work ...?
- Many students would seem to view the RC as the
ideal environment for language learning in
self-study contexts, irrespective of a tutorial
function. Students were asked where the
preferred to work when using CBMs - Student 1 replied the LRC because the only
thing in my brain is to study. But when I am not
in the university, I will always remember playing
games, or looking movies in the LRC, I think,
the main, the main point I use computer is to
study. - Student 5 says But you know in a room, living
room, the more leisure times we should, should
spend, maybe we will use computer to listen ,
listen music. Play games and alsoalso do some
chat with all my friends. -
- Student 3 was particularly emphatic about the
value of the RC in helping him to focus I
cant work for my own course, I need support in a
sense. I need supportits no easy for me to work
from home.
10. and what might the implications of this be
for RCs?
- In an anywhere, anytime era of on-line access and
communication of information, such comments
remind us that despite all that the virtual world
has to offer, it is the physical location which
remains vitally important in helping students to
focus on learning activities -
- The study concludes that the point at which the
physical world meets the virtual world appears to
be highly significant in self-study contexts - Further work night look at what physical
conditions allow for efficient, effective and
appropriate on-line study
11What might the answers to these questions imply
for our understanding of CALL?
- The tutor\tool distinction does not appear to be
recognized by learners and in an emerging era of
the normalization of CALL Bax (2003) these
notions may now be dated - and yet CALL the medium has yet to fully come
of age it may be that the onus is on
practitioners to be more pro-active in this
respect. E.g. through on-line live tutorials - In a WWW-dominated age NNS learners seem to
recognize the significance of English as a lingua
franca in an academic environment for accessing
information - one of the challenges is to equip
them to make efficient, effective and
appropriately use of this - There has been some research in this area
(Helms-Park and Stapleton, 2006 Jarvis, 2001
Slaouti, 2002) but further work is needed -
12Resource centres and self-study issues in
computer assisted language learning (CALL)
- The 4th Education in a Changing Environment
Conference - 12th to 14th September 2007
- Huw Jarvis, School of Languages, University of
Salford