Intermarket Interactions and Efficiency in Electronic Markets: Eretailing Vs' Eauction Market - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Intermarket Interactions and Efficiency in Electronic Markets: Eretailing Vs' Eauction Market

Description:

Want to buy a ticket? Where? Travelocity.com. eBay.com. Priceline.com ... Lee (1997): Prices for used-cars on AUCNET higher than conventional market ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: uainfoA
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intermarket Interactions and Efficiency in Electronic Markets: Eretailing Vs' Eauction Market


1
Inter-market Interactions and Efficiency in
Electronic MarketsE-retailing Vs. E-auction
Market
  • Byungtae Lee
  • Associate Professor
  • Graduate School of Management
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and
    Technology
  • btlee_at_kgsm.kaist.ac.kr
  • Based on joint work with Kumar Mehta

2
Agenda
  • Motivation
  • Analytical Model
  • Empirical Model
  • Empirical Results and Implication
  • Future Research Direction

3
Economics of Information Systems Cybermics
Research
  • E-xciting Digital Economics of eBusiness and
    eCommerce,
  • Technology-driven (Pulled) new business/market
    models
  • Economic Principles are not changing (Shapiro and
    Varian) but still out-of-box phenomena
  • Theories Microeconomics, Macroeconomics,
    Industrial Organization, Institutional Economics
  • Tools Mathematical Economics and Econometrics

4
Cybermics (Continued)
  • Digitized (Agent, Business Process, Goods)
  • Economic Characteristics Change
  • Transaction Costs Change
  • Cyber-mediaries to deal with new transactional
    costs
  • New Market and Economic Organizations

5
Cybermics (Continued)
  • B2B EC IOS, EDI, SCM
  • Smart Cyber-Shopping Shopbots, PCA
  • E-Payment States vs. Federal Government
  • E-Lemon Market
  • E-Library
  • Component-ware Technology
  • E-Posted Price vs. E-Auction vs. E-Reverse
    Auction

6
Cybermics (Continued)
  • Surf or Ride?
  • Build or Rent? Portal Service
  • GIS-based DSS for EC Management
  • .

7
E-Channels
  • Want to buy a ticket? Where?
  • Travelocity.com
  • eBay.com
  • Priceline.com
  • Spot Market, Auction Market, Reverse Auction
    Market

8
Introduction
  • Rise of parallel market mechanisms
  • Increasing Popularity of Internet Auctions
  • Alternative to Internet Retailing
  • Mode for Dynamic Pricing
  • Claims and counter claims of bargain buys

9
What Mechanisms and Prices?
  • Are they different?
  • What mechanism should we use? As a buyer or a
    seller
  • E-Channel Management
  • E-Channel Design (Portfolio) Decision
  • E-Channel Yield Management
  • E-retailing vs. E-Auction Comparison

10
E-Auction
  • In 2002, 129 billion Internet Auction
  • 20 of transactions of 13B B2C e-Commerce in
    1998
  • B2C Auctions Constitute 33 of Auction Market
  • Potentially very large market with growth
    exceeding the retailing

11
Electronic Auction
  • Traditional Auctions vs. Electronic Auctions
  • Hard to price items vs. Readily available items
  • Competition from other auctions and retailers
  • Small number of bidders vs. Global market
  • Short duration vs. flexible duration
  • Access to information
  • Scale of operations
  • Diverse Bumping Rules

12
(No Transcript)
13
Smart Use of E-Auction Bidding
  • Individual price discrimination
  • Costless demand curve estimation
  • Global garage sale
  • Core Process for e-Procurement

14
Research Issues
  • Firms Strategy for Optimal Choice of Market
    Mechanism Auction vs. Retail
  • Correction of Price Bias from Winners Curse
  • Impact of multiplicity of market mechanisms
  • Other Determinant of Bid Dispersion

15
Price and Bid Dispersions I
16
Why Prices Disperse?
  • Stigler (1961)
  • Homogenous goods, Rational consumers
  • Price dispersion as a result of search costs
  • Grossman and Stiglitz (1980)
  • Arbitrage model, two types of agents
  • Market failure when at extremes of informational
    efficiency
  • More Rothschild (1973)
  • Market with Incomplete Information

17
Price Dispersion and Market Efficiency
  • Brynjolfsson and Smith (1999)
  • Internet vs. Conventional Posted-Prices
  • Internet posted-prices 6-7 lower
  • Smith and Brynjolfsson (1999)
  • Market heterogeneity, Branding, etc. as a source
    of increased price dispersion
  • Lee (1997) Prices for used-cars on AUCNET higher
    than conventional market
  • Clemons et al. (1998) Airline ticket prices vary
    by as much as 20
  • Seidman et al. (1999)
  • E-Auction beat e-Retailing on Average

18
Brick-n Mortar vs. E-channel?
  • Are E-Channel Prices from Equilibrium?
    (Borenstein and Saloner, 2001)
  • Are they same? May be different transaction
    costs and customers
  • Why and How Different?

19
Price and Bid Dispersions II
20
Why Over-bidding?
  • Not Rational?
  • Entertainment Values?
  • Winners Curse?
  • Search Costs on Cyberspace?

21
Multiplicity of e-Mechanisms
  • From E vs. Bricks and Mortar to E vs. e
  • E and e Interact or Inform each other
  • E-Mechanisms affects bidding dispersion beyond
    firms differentiation strategies

22
Research Framework
Auction Participants can observe retail markets!
Posted prices distribution
Min. observed prices
23
Search Cost Determinants
  • Complexity of product description- Confidence on
    getting what you want
  • Price dispersion in retail get smaller as product
    information diffuses
  • Uncertainty increase in product generation change
  • Search efficiency of surfers
  • Expected marginal gain by search

24
Bidding Determinant
  • Observed (or Belief) Price distribution
  • Number of Participants
  • Mix of Surfing Expertise
  • Information Spill-over in the Market

25
Theoretical Model
  • Homogenous consumers
  • Implications similar to Stigler (1961)
  • Search will increasingly yield diminishing
    benefit
  • Optimal searching marginal benefitsearch cost
  • Frictionless ? Market Failure
  • Implications for auction of posted-price goods
  • Winning auction bids reveal degree of friction
  • Revenue increasing with increased no. of bidders
  • Increasing search cost beneficial for retailers

26
Theoretical Model (Continued)
  • Heterogeneous consumers
  • n1 Experts (informed) vs. n2 non-experts
    (uninformed)
  • proportion of cost disadvantage a
  • price uniformly distributed (0,1)
  • optimal sampling by both
  • Population mix l experts and 1-l non-experts
  • Population size N
  • Winning bid b

27
Implications
  • Probability of non-expert winning
  • increases as with decrease in l
  • increases with search cost disadvantage (a)
  • Mixed results for population size, N - depends on
    level of l

28
Summary of Search Theory
  • Different products have price dispersions
  • Different product attracts informed and
    uninformed customer distributions
  • Different auction mechanisms determine winning bid

29
Hypothesis
  • H1 Market Friction (Seemingly Winners curse)
    exists
  • H2 Degree of Over-bidding decreases as Market of
    The product matures
  • H3 Degree of Over-bidding decreases for More
    Informed Customers
  • H4 Discontinued products will not over-bidding

30
Data
  • Brand New Computer Products (Scanners, Digital
    Cameras, Drives, Printers, Motherboards)
  • Technical complexity used to categorize products
    in expert/non-expert
  • Age New Release, Mature, Discontinued
  • Winning Bids
  • Time and Day of auction closing (High/Low
    Traffic)
  • Auctions closing before or after 400 p.m.
  • Auctions closing on weekday or weekend
  • Retail prices for the exact same product on the
    same day
  • Informed Customers Homogenous (experts) and
    Heterogeneous (mix)

31
Data Descriptive Statistics
  • Total Observations 448 separate auctions
  • Product Category
  • Printers 157, Drives 68, Scanners 68
  • Digital Cameras 117, Motherboards 38
  • Product Type
  • Non-expert 368, Expert 80
  • Retail Price
  • Closing Time
  • After 4 PM 177
  • On Weekend 71

32
Data Collection
  • Bid Dispersion is collected from only ONE
    e-Auction site
  • Price Dispersion was collected from multiple
    sites with helps of Shopbots and PCA
  • At the same date with minimum delay

33
Empirical Results
34
Regression Results
Number of Observations 448 Adjusted
R-Square 0.761 F-Value 238.603 Coefficient
Value t-statistic
p-value Marginal Return, -0.251
-10.508 0.000 Price Dispersion (new),
0.179 6.917 0.000 Information
Subsidy (old), -0.563
-22.120 0.000 Increased Traffic (after 4
pm) 0.189 8.063 0.000 Search
Efficiency, 0.238
9.611 0.000 Weekend,
0.184 7.689 0.000 Preference
between Channels 0.265 7.463 0.000
35
Conclusions
  • Search cost / Market friction, manifests in form
    of Over-bidding in the auction market
  • E-auction is a very useful mechanism for sellers
  • Periodically estimating demand curves for pricing
  • Liquidation of inventory at the highest possible
    price
  • Some bidders do get bargain buys
  • E-auction market indicates that E-commerce is
    largely efficient in terms of price discovery

36
Implications for Auctioneer
  • Timing closing of auctions
  • Weekdays
  • Weekends
  • What mix of products?
  • New Release, Mature, Liquidation
  • High priced vs. low priced
  • Bargain buys on liquidation items can serve
    promotional purpose
  • Profit Margin or Fast Liquidation

37
Future Work
  • Bidder Data from Ubid
  • Auction vs. Reverse Auction Comparison
  • Asian Market Vertical Channel Control

38
Agent-Modeling
  • Prototypes for Market Mechanism Design and
    Evaluation Toolkits?
  • Auction, Power Market Design?
  • Seminar (Research-Oriented) Econ and IS Papers?

39
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com