An XMM-Newton Study of the Centaurus A Northern Middle Radio Lobe - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

An XMM-Newton Study of the Centaurus A Northern Middle Radio Lobe

Description:

Introduction What is the Cen A Northern Middle Radio Lobe and Why is it Interesting? ... NE inner lobe `burst' (Morganti et al. 1999) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: ralph78
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An XMM-Newton Study of the Centaurus A Northern Middle Radio Lobe


1
An XMM-Newton Study of the Centaurus A Northern
Middle Radio Lobe
X-ray Universe 2008
  • R. P. Kraft, W. R. Forman, M. J. Hardcastle, M.
    Birkinshaw, J. H. Croston, C. Jones, P. E. J.
    Nulsen, S. S. Murray, D. W. Worrall

2
Outline of Talk
  • Introduction What is the Cen A Northern Middle
    Radio Lobe and Why is it Interesting?
  • Observations, Data Analysis, Results
  • Interpretation
  • Summary and Conclusion

3
Centaurus A - Overview
  • Nearest galaxy with bright active nucleus (3.7
    Mpc 117.9 pc, 11.076 kpc)
  • Classified as an FR I radio galaxy
  • Composite multi-band image on right taken from
    CXC website

4
Centaurus A (Chandra/ACIS-I 570 ks )
5
Centaurus A Radio Montage (Morganti et al. 1999)
6
Cen A Northern Middle Lobe (NML)
  • Cen A NML buoyant bubble from previous epoch of
    nuclear activity (Saxton et al. 2003) or has the
    NE inner lobe burst (Morganti et al. 1999)?
  • An X-ray filament associated with the NML was
    first reported by Feigelson et al. (1981) based
    on an Einstein IPC observation. They argued for
    a thermal origin for the emission.
  • This filament was detected in several other
    observations (ROSAT, ASCA, and EXOSAT) nature
    and origin of this X-ray emission (and the NML
    more generally) remained enigmatic.
  • Radio depolarization supported thermal
    interpretation (Morganti et al. 1999).

7
XMM-Newton Observation of the Cen A NML
  • We observed the X-ray filament of the Cen A NML
    with XMM-Newton (40 ks) to constrain the emission
    mechanism of the filament which will give us a
    better understanding of the dynamics of the NML
    more generally.
  • This was a C category observation that was
    observed!
  • The bottom of the filament was also contained
    within the FOV of a 100 ks Chandra observation
    (albeit far off axis spatial resolution similar
    to XMM-Newton).
  • Feedback between AGN and the ambient gas may play
    a critical role in the suppression of cluster
    cooling flows and the formation of stars (and
    galaxies) at high redshift.

8
Multi-wavelength Overview
9
MOS12 0.5-2.0 keV smoothed (Gaussian) exposure
corrected image of Cen A NML all unrelated
point sources removed
10
Chandra observation of Cen A NML
11
X-ray Contours on Radio Map (radio data taken
from Morganti et al. 1999) X-ray features
appear to be anti-coincident with radio features
12
Results from Spectral Analysis
  • Fit absorbed (Galactic) APEC (single temperature)
    models to all knots (PNMOS1MOS2
    simultaneously).
  • Thermal models provide acceptable fits in all
    cases, non-thermal models are rejected at high
    confidence (except for N5) -gt X-ray knots are
    thermal.
  • Temperature ranges from 0.4-1.0 keV for knots
    N1-N4, somewhat higher for N5 (few keV).
    Elemental abundance is low (typically lt0.2
    Solar). Chandra confirms these values for N3,
    N4, and N5.
  • Knots are enormously overpressurized (factor of
    10 or more) relative to ambient ISM and the
    equipartition pressure of NML.
  • Total mass of knots is about 107 Solar masses,
    thermal energy is about 1056 ergs. Lifetime
    (sound crossing timediameter/sound speed) is a
    few Myrs.
  • Diffuse X-ray emission along SE boundary of lobe
    perhaps gas pushing the NML to the NW?

13
Possible Interpretations
  • Synchrotron or IC/CMB
  • Super-bubble(s) from jet-induced star formation
  • Photo-ionization from beamed nuclear flux
  • Entrainment/buoyant bubble (thermal gas trunk
    Saxton et al. 2003)
  • Shock-heating from supersonic inflation of NML
  • Direct interaction with active jet

14
Disfavored Models
  • Synchrotron or IC/CMB rejected because of
    thermal spectra.
  • Jet-induced star formation rejected because
    thermal energy and total mass of gas too large
    (104-5 supernovae required to create knots) and
    lack of evidence of star formation around knots
  • Entrainment of gas by buoyantly rising bubble
    rejected as the equipartition pressure of the
    lobe is too low and buoyant rise time (about 170
    Myrs) too long
  • Supersonic inflation of NML Knots are then
    interior to the lobe -gt requires pressure of lobe
    to be roughly equal to knot pressure. The NML
    would then be enormously overpressurized relative
    to ISM and total energy of radio lobe would be
    large (1058 ergs) compared to the inner lobes.

15
Feasible Model 1 Photo-ionization
  • Beamed emission from nucleus could ionize a chain
    of dense clouds.
  • VLBI jet is roughly aligned with the filament (at
    least in projection).
  • NML is from a previous epoch of nuclear activity
    and has perhaps stripped the HI cloud.
  • Filamentary X-ray morphology could represent
    distribution of cold gas.
  • Naturally explains X-ray/radio anti-correlation
    the knots are compressing the lobe.
  • The NML is currently unpowered and buoyant.
  • May account for sidedness of NML large scale
    gas motions
  • Observed X-ray flux (5x1041 ergs s-1) from
    nucleus is far too low to ionizes these clouds at
    these distances (15-30 kpc from nucleus)
  • Requires (unseen) blazar type fluxes toward NML
  • For ionization parameter xL/nd2100 (typical
    value for Tgas700 eV), Lbeamed1046 ergs s-1
    scaled over 4p (Kallman and McCray 1982, Kallman
    1992).
  • Alternatively, AGN could have been (much) more
    luminous in the past.

16
Multi-wavelength Overview
17
Feasible Model 2 - Direct Interaction with Jet
  • Unseen jet shock-heating dense clouds to X-ray
    temperatures (De Young 1991, De Young et al.
    2002, Higgins et al. 1999, Wang et al. 2000).
  • NE inner lobe burst (Morganti et al. 1999)
  • The NE inner lobe is a channel for collimated
    energy transfer to NML
  • Filamentary structure is the result of ablation
    of clouds
  • Age/lifetime of X-ray knots of NML and SW inner
    lobe roughly consistent (3x106 yrs).
  • Some analogy to large-scale radio features of M87
    (Owen et al. 2000).
  • Jet must bend at least twice without disruption
  • What caused NE lobe to POP? What caused jet to
    bend twice? External gas motions (Kraft et al.
    2008)?
  • Thermal energy of the knots is a significant
    fraction (20-30) required to inflate the NML
    (i.e. shock heating of clouds must be efficient)
  • Why do the NE and SW inner lobes appear to be so
    similar at GHz radio frequencies?
  • Material did not originate from HI cloud jet
    would have to be proton dominated to provide
    sufficient momentum

18
Multi-wavelength Overview
19
Summary and Conclusions
  • The X-ray emission from the filament along the SE
    boundary of the NML is thermal.
  • The knots are greatly overpressurized relative to
    the NML unless the lobe is far from equipartition
    (in which case the NML is enormously
    overpressurized relative to the ambient gas)
  • Model 1 hot gas clouds created by
    photoionization from beamed nuclear flux
    requires blazar-type (beamed) flux from nucleus.
  • Model 2 cold clouds were shock-heated by direct
    interaction with jet - the NML is still being
    powered by a collimated outflow from the active
    nucleus in this scenario.
  • Con-X could distinguish between the two
    scenarios.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com