ARBITRATION CLASS 4 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

ARBITRATION CLASS 4

Description:

THE PURPOSE OF ARBITRATION IS MORE THAN JUST REACHING A DECISION ... ALLOW ME TO DRIVE LARGE VEHICLES LIKE THE BLOOD MOBILE. YES. ELAINE _ HEAD NURSE. SUTHERLIN, OR ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: michael129
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ARBITRATION CLASS 4


1
ARBITRATION CLASS 4
  • SEPTEMBER 10, 2008
  • EVIDENCE

2
EVIDENCE AND THE ROLE OF ARBITRATION
  • THE PURPOSE OF ARBITRATION IS MORE THAN JUST
    REACHING A DECISION
  • THERE IS A THERAPEUTIC PURPOSE TO THE HEARING
    ITSELF
  • HOW WOULD THIS EFFECT EVIDENTRY RULES?

3
DO MORE RELAXED RULES MAKE FOR PROBLEMS
  • REPETITIVE EVIDENCE
  • LONGER HEARINGS
  • UNRELIABLE INFORMATION
  • UNPREDICTABILITY
  • MORE DIFFICULTY IN PREPARING FOR YOUR CASE
  • MORE DIFFICULTY IN ANTICIPATING YOUR OPPONENTS
    CASE
  • MORE FUN

4
THE MECHANICS OF MAKING OBJECTIONS
  • SIT DOWN!
  • DONT MAKE A SPEAKING OBJECTION
  • STATE THE BASIS FOR YOUR OBJECTION FIRST
  • STATE YOUR ARGUMENT REGARDING THE OBJECTION
    SECOND
  • ADDRESS THE OBJECTION TO THE ARBITRATOR AND NOT
    YOUR OPPONENT

5
WHY MAKE OBJECTIONS?
  • REMIND THE ARBITRATOR OF THE UNRELIABILITY OF
    CERTAIN EVIDENCE
  • USE IT AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO ARGUE
  • USE IT TO THROW OFF YOUR OPPONENT
  • TRY TO ACTUALLY EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
  • SHORTEN THE HEARING

6
TYPES OF EVIDENCE
  • DIRECT
  • EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY
  • DOCUMENTS
  • CIRCUMSTANTIAL
  • ALLOWS INFERENCES TO BE DRAWN FROM FACTS PROVED

7
RELEVANCE
  • THE MAIN OBJECTION USED IN ARBITRATION
  • OFTEN MADE FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN EXCLUDING
    EVIDENCE, BUT RATHER TO SWAY THE ARBITRATOR TO A
    PARTICULAR THEME

8
HEARSAY
  • OBJECTION IS RARELY SUSTAINED
  • GENERALLY IT WILL BE PERMITTED AND WILL BE GIVEN
    APPROPRIATE WEIGHT
  • WHEN THE OBJECTION IS SUSTAINED IT WILL BE
    BECAUSE
  • THE INFORMATION OFFERED IS REALLY NOT RELEVANT TO
    BEGIN WITH
  • THE HEARSAY IS FROM A WITNESS WOULD BE AVAILABLE
  • SOMETIME BECAUSE WHAT IS SOUGHT TO BE PROVED
    THROUGH THE HEARSAY IS SO CRITICAL TO THE CASE
    THAT THE ARBITRATOR FINDS THE TESTIMONY TOO
    UNRELIABLE

9
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS
  • PARTY ADMISSIONS
  • PRESENT SENSE IMPRESSION
  • EXCITED UTTERANCE
  • STATE OF MIND
  • STATEMENT MADE FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT
  • DYING DECLARATION

10
EXHIBITS
  • SHOULD BE MARKED IN ADVANCE
  • COPIES TO THE ARBITRATOR, OPPONENT, A SET FOR
    WITNESSES
  • SHOULD BE PUT IN A NOTEBOOK WITH APPROPRIATE TABS
    INSERTED
  • A SUMMARY SHEET LISTING THE EXHIBITS SHOULD BE
    GIVEN TO ALL

11
A WITNESS LIST FOR EXAMPLE
  • EXHIBITS
  • DESCRIPTION DATE PAGES
  • U-1 Niemi to Wilkinson, Letter April 30, 2001 2
  • U-2 Statement of Grievance May 2, 2001 1
  • U-3 District Reduction of Hours Letter June 6,
    2001 1
  • U-4 Niemi to Wilkinson, Letter May 29, 2001 1
  • U-5 Hearings Officer Decision June 11, 2001 8
  • U-6 Niemi to Paradis, Letter June 25, 2001 2
  • U-7 Paradis to Niemi, Letter July 14, 2001 2

12
STIPULATIONS
  • ARE PERMITTED AND OFTEN SHORTEN THE HEARING BY
    AVOIDING WITNESSES TESTIMONY TO INFORMATION WHICH
    IS NOT IN DISPUTE
  • BEWARE OF STIPULATIONS THAT CAN DISRUPT THE FLOW
    OF YOUR CASE

13
JUDICIAL NOTICE
  • SAME RULES APPLY AS THEY DO IN COURT PROCEEDINGS

14
INTRODUCTION OF EXHIBITS AND TESTIMONY AND
APPROPRIATE FOUNDATION
15
FOUNDATION
  • PROVIDES THE ARBITRATOR WITH INFORMATION THAT THE
    EVIDENCE ABOUT TO BE RECEIVED IS
  • RELEVANT
  • ADMISSIBLE
  • RELIABLE

16
FOUNDATION FOR DOCUMENTS
  • AUTHENTICATION THROUGH WITNESSES
  • TESTIMONY AS TO RECEIPT OF DOCUMENTMAIL BOX
    RULES
  • ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS-NOT USUALLY A PROBLEM IN
    ARBITRATION

17
IF HARRY IS GOING TO TESTIFY TO SEEING THE CAR IN
THE PARKING LOT
  • THAT HARRY CAN SEE
  • YOU MUST ESTABLISH THAT HARRY HAD THE OPPORTUNITY
    TO SEE THE CAR IN THE PARKING LOT

18
ANOTHER EXAMPLE FOUNDATION FOR EVIDENCE
REGARDING CONVERSATIONS
  • DATE
  • TIME
  • PLACE
  • WHO ELSE WAS PRESENT

19
STIPULATIONS
  • ARE PERMITTED AND OFTEN SHORTEN THE HEARING BY
    AVOIDING WITNESSES TESTIMONY TO INFORMATION WHICH
    IS NOT IN DISPUTE
  • BEWARE OF STIPULATIONS THAT CAN DISRUPT THE FLOW
    OF YOUR CASE

19
20
JUDICIAL NOTICE
  • SAME RULES APPLY AS THEY DO IN COURT PROCEEDINGS

20
21
OPENING STATEMENTS-INTRODUCTION
  • COMES IMMEDIATELY AFTER PRELIMINARIES
  • PRELIMINARY MATTERS
  • MARKING OF EXHIBITS
  • WHO GOES FIRST?
  • IF YOU GO SECOND, IT IS OK TO REACT TO OPPONENTS
    OPENING
  • SIT DOWNNO STANDING IN ARBITRATION
  • DONT INTERRUPT OPPOSING COUNSELS
    OPENING-ARBITRATORS HATE THAT
  • WRITTEN SUBMISSION?
  • RARELY DONEMORE A MATTER OF PERSONAL PREFERENCE
  • IF YOU DO SUBMIT IN WRITINGDONT READ IT OUT
    LOUD!

22
FORMAT FOR OPENING STATEMENTS
  • IDENTIFY THE ISSUE
  • LOOK TO THE CONTRACT OR CONTROLLING DOCUMENT AND
    REFERENCE HOW THEY RELATE TO THE ISSUE
  • REVIEW THE FACTS IN TERMS OF WHAT YOU CAN PROVE

23
MORE FORMATTING FOR OPENING STATEMENTS
  • REVIEW WHAT YOU UNDERSTAND TO BE OPPONENTS
    POSITION
  • CONTRAST YOUR POSITION WITH OPPONENTS
  • REVIEW YOUR THEMES AND THEORIES
  • DEFINE THE RELIEF REQUESTED

24
IDENTIFY THE ISSUE
  • DEFINE THE ISSUE IN A WAY MOST FAVORABLE TO YOUR
    CLIENT
  • OFTEN IT DOESNT MATTER MUCH
  • SOMETIMES THE DEFINITION OF THE ISSUE CAN BE USED
    TO HIGHLIGHT YOUR THEME

25
REVIEW THE FACTS IN TERMS OF WHAT YOU CAN PROVE
  • DONT OVER SELL YOUR FACTS
  • TRY TO FOCUS ON AS FEW FACTS AS POSSIBLE THAT YOU
    ARE SURE OF
  • DONT PREDICT FACTS YOU CANT PROVE
  • DONT MAKE FACTUAL ADMISSIONS THAT YOU DONT HAVE
    TO
  • KEEP IT BRIEF AND INTERESTING

26
ARGUMENTATIVE OPENINGS
  • THERE IS A VERY FINE LINE BETWEEN WHAT IS
    ARGUMENT AND WHAT ISNT
  • TONE OF VOICE
  • STRIDENCY OF ARGUMENT
  • CONTRASTING POSITIONS
  • WHAT IS CLEARLY ARGUMENTATIVE IS
  • REQUESTING THAT INFERENCES BE DRAWN
  • WEIGHT THAT CERTAIN EVIDENCE SHOULD GET
  • COMMENTING ON CREDIBILITY
  • OVERT APPEALS FOR JUSTICE

27
DECORUM
  • ADDRESS YOUR STATEMENT TO THE ARBITRATOR
  • DONT BE A WISE GUY
  • DONT ACT LIKE IT IS PERSONAL
  • DONT BE DISMISSIVE OF THE OTHER CASE

28
WHERE ME AND THE BOOK DIFFER
  • I HAVE NEVER SEEN STIPULATIONS READ AS PART OF
    THE OPENING STATEMENT
  • I HAVE RARELY, IF EVER, SEEN REPLY OPENING
    STATEMENTS
  • I HAVE NEVER SEEN THE FAILURE TO ASSERT A FACT
    ASSERTED AGAINST A PARTY BY AN ARBITRATOR
  • DEALING WITH IMPROPER OPENING BY THE OPPONENTTHE
    BOOK SAYS OBJECT, I SAY ONLY IN EXTREME
    CIRCUMSTANCES
  • AFTER HE/SHE IS DONE-ASK FOR PERMISSION TO
    ADDRESS THE MIS-STATEMENTS, ETC.

29
ARBITRATION PREPARATION
  • DIRECT EXAMINATION

30
REVIEW CASE FACTS
  • DETERMINE WHAT YOU MUST PROVE
  • WRITE FACT NARRATIVE
  • DONT DISCRIMINATE EXCEPT ON GENERAL RELEVANCE
  • INCLUDE HELPFUL AND NOT HELPFUL FACTS
  • WHICH HELPFUL RELEVANT FACTS ARE NEED TO BE
    PROVED
  • WHICH NOT HELPFUL RELEVANT FACTS WILL THEY NEED
    TO PROVE

31
RELEVANT HELPFUL FACTS
  • WRITE NARRATIVE
  • NOTING WITNESSES AND DOCUMENTS
  • ORGANIZE CHRONOLOGICALLY
  • RESORT CHRONOLOGICALLY AND THEN BY WITNESSES
  • THEN ADD TO THE CHRONOLOGY EXHIBITS

32
RELEVANT NON-HELPFUL FACTS
  • WRITE NARRATIVE FROM THE OTHER POINT OF VIEW
    NOTING WITNESSES AND DOCUMENTS
  • ORGANIZE CHRONOLOGICALLY
  • RESORT CHRONOLOGICALLY AND THEN BY WITNESSES
  • THEN ADD TO THE CHRONOLOGY EXHIBITS
  • DEVELOP OBJECTION POSITIONS

33
COLOR CODE GOOD AND BAD FACTS (RED AND GREEN
ISN'T BAD)
  • BLEND TOGETHER THE STATEMENT OR NARRATIVE
  • CREATE WITNESS STATEMENTS BASED UPON HELPFUL AND
    NON-HELPFUL FACTS
  • COORDINATE EXHIBIT DOCUMENTS AND NUMBERS

34
EACH WITNESS STATEMENT
  • PUT IT ON AN INDIVIDUAL PAGE
  • SEPARATE EVERY SENTENCE OF THE STATEMENT AND
    DOUBLE SPACE IT
  • TAKE EVERY SENTENCE AND BREAK IT DOWN
  • GO FOR BITS OF INFORMATION

35
DIRECT EXAMINATION
  • TAKE THE BROKEN DOWN WITNESS STATEMENTS NOTED
    ABOVE
  • CREATE A QUESTION DESIGNED TO GET A BIT OF
    INFORMATION FROM THE WITNESS
  • RETYPE THE STATEMENT IN A FORM OF WITNESS Q AND A
    WITH THE As IN PARENTHESIS
  • MAKE SURE THAT FOUNDATION QUESTIONS ARE ASKED ON
    DOCUMENTS

36
ANTICIPATE OBJECTIONS
  • TAKE NOTES
  • DO NECESSARY RESEARCH

37
PREPARING QUESTIONS
38
TAKING A WITNESS STATEMENT AND MAKING QUESTIONS
  • THE GRIEVANT IN THIS MATTER
  • 47 YEARS OLD
  • HISTORY WITH COMPANY
  • WORKED FOR THE COMPANY FOR 4 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS
  • HIS POSITION WAS A MUA/PHLOBOTOMIST
  • MUA MOBILE UNIT ASSISTANT
  • HIS POSITION IS A DOT CLASSIFICATION
  • AS SUCH HE IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A CDL-CLASS A
    LICENSE
  • SUPERVISION
  • HIS IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR IS ELAINE GRAVES, HEAD
    NURSE
  • SHE WORKS OUT OF SUTHERLIN, OR
  • HER SUPERVISOR IS MIKE M___, DIRECTOR OF
    OPERATIONS
  • HE WORKS OUT OF BEND, OR
  • STATE YOUR NAME
  • DID YOU FILE A GRIEVANCE IN THIS MATTER
  • HOW LONG DID YOU WORK WITH THE COMPANY
  • WHAT WAS YOU POSITION
  • WHAT IS AN MUA
  • WHAT IS A PHLEBOTOMIST
  • DO YOU REQUIRE ANY PARTICULAR GOVERNMENT
    CERTIFICATIONS TO DO YOUR JOB
  • WHICH ONE
  • ARE YOU REQUIRED TO HAVE A SPECIAL DRIVING
    LICENSE
  • WHAT DOES A CLASS A LICENSE ALLOW YOU TO DO
  • DO YOU HAVE A SUPERVISOR
  • WHAT IS HER NAME
  • WHAT IS HER POSITION
  • WHERE DOES SHE WORK
  • WHO IS HER SUPERVISOR
  • WHERE DOES HE WORK
  • WHAT IS HIS TITLE

39
GETTING ANSWERS FOR THE QUESTIONS YOU CREATE
  • STATE YOUR NAME
  • DID YOU FILE A GRIEVANCE IN THIS MATTER
  • HOW LONG DID YOU WORK WITH THE COMPANY
  • WHAT WAS YOU POSITION
  • WHAT IS AN MUA
  • WHAT IS A PHLEBOTOMIST
  • DO YOU REQUIRE ANY PARTICULAR GOVERNMENT
    CERTIFICATIONS TO DO YOUR JOB
  • WHICH ONE
  • ARE YOU REQUIRED TO HAVE A SPECIAL DRIVING
    LICENSE
  • WHAT DOES A CLASS A LICENSE ALLOW YOU TO DO
  • DO YOU HAVE A SUPERVISOR
  • WHAT IS HER NAME
  • WHAT IS HER POSITION
  • WHERE DOES SHE WORK
  • WHO IS HER SUPERVISOR
  • WHERE DOES HE WORK
  • WHAT IS HIS TITLE
  • MARTY
  • YES
  • ABOUT 4 AND A HALF YEARS
  • AN MUA/PHLEBOTOMIST
  • A MOBILE UNIT ASSISTANT
  • SOME ONE WHO DRAWS BLOOD
  • YES
  • I AM CERTIFIED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF
    TRANSPORTATION
  • YES, A CLASS A LICENSE
  • ALLOW ME TO DRIVE LARGE VEHICLES LIKE THE BLOOD
    MOBILE
  • YES
  • ELAINE _____
  • HEAD NURSE
  • SUTHERLIN, OR
  • MIKE ______
  • BEND, OR
  • DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS

40
DEVELOPING MORE QUESTIONS
  • HE HAD BEEN TESTED A NUMBER OF TIMES BEFORE
  • ALWAYS TESTED NEGATIVE
  • THIS TEST WAS ON NOVEMBER 18, 2003
  • HE WAS NOT IMPAIRED IN ANY WAY THAT DAY
  • HE HAD SMOKED A SMALL AMOUNT OF MARIJUANA A FEW
    DAYS BEFORE
  • HE WAS NOT A FREQUENT USER
  • AFTER TAKING THE TEST HE CONTINUED TO WORK
  • ON NOVEMBER 25, HE WAS NOTIFIED THAT HE TESTED
    POSITIVE
  • HE IMMEDIATELY CALLED JOHN CHRISTIANSON
  • HE CALLED CHRISTIANSON SINCE HE WAS HIS TRAINING
    ON DRUG TESTING
  • HE ALSO BELIEVED THAT CHRISTIANSON WAS HIS SAFETY
    SUPERVISOR
  • CHRISTIANSON WAS NOT IN,
  • MARTY LEFT A MESSAGE
  • HE ASKED CHRISTIANSON TO CALL
  • HE THEN CALLED JOAN WRAY,
  • WRAY IS IN THE COMPANYS HR DEPARTMENT
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com