Title: Drilling Mud Tracers for Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Engineering Applications
1Invasion Profiler TM
Drilling Mud Tracers For Formation
Evaluation Reservoir Engineering Applications
2Drilling Mud TracersPrincipal Uses
A properly executed tracer study can
provide Gold Standard answers for the following
questions
- What are the in-situ Sw hydrocarbon saturations
of my formation? - My formation doesnt produce water What is the
Rw? - Has oil-based drilling mud filtrate invaded my
core and altered the wettability? - Are my formation test reservoir fluids
contaminated by oil-based mud filtrate? If so,
what is the percent contamination?
?
3Drilling Mud Tracers for Core
A Simple Concept
Spike the coring fluid with one or more tracers
that will accompany the mud filtrate into the rock
That Requires Expert Execution
Precise controls over 1) mud design 2) mud
monitoring sampling 3) coring
procedures 4) wellsite core handling 5)
laboratory measurements
4Drilling Mud Tracers for Core
- Low Invasion Coring Practices Recommended
- Low spurt loss
- Low fluid loss
- lt 8cc for WBM
- 2-4cc for OBM
- High solids loading of properly-sized CaCO3 to
promote filter cake formation - Low invasion bit design
- High coring rates 80-120 feet/hour
- High Bit Weight
- High RPM
5Drilling Mud Tracers for Core
- Purpose-built Coring Fluids are Best
- Water Based Mud (WBM) Design Considerations
- Bentonite
- Starch
- Fluid Loss Agents (Low Vis PACs)
- Solids Suspension Agents (X-Gum)
- Weighting Agents (Barite)
- pH Control Agents (7.5-8.5)
- Minimize or eliminate surfactants
- Properly-sized CaCO3 Bridging Material ( 1/3
median pore size) - Tracer
6Drilling Mud Tracers for Core
- Purpose-built Coring Fluids are Best
- Oil-Based Mud (OBM) Design Considerations
- Base oil
- Organophilic Clay
- Spurt Loss/Fluid Loss Agents
- Low Water Content
- Emulsifiers (to minimize free water)
- High IFT (gt12 dynes/cm)
- Lime
- Electrical Stability gt 2000 volts (i.e., a tight
emulsion) - Tracers for both the oil and water phases
7Coring Procedures toMinimize Invasion
- Bit Design
- Conventional bits expose the core to filtrate
invasion in three areas
8Coring Procedures toMinimize Invasion
- Low invasion bits are preferred, but the best
bits are those that allow for high ROP and low
filtrate invasion
- Face discharge ports direct 80-90 of fluid flow
away from the core
- No gauge cutters in the throat to disturb the
filter cake
- Extended pilot shoe seats all the way into the
bit throat
- Parabolic profile along cutting surface
9Coring Procedures toMinimize Invasion
- Coring Rate
- Coring rates of 80 - 120 ft/hr will minimize
invasion
Source Rathmell et al, 1994 SPE 027045
10Drilling Mud Tracers For Cores
- Characteristics of High Quality Tracers
- No Background Use tracers that dont occur in
the reservoir - Soluble in the Filtrate The tracer must travel
homogenously with the mud filtrate - Biological Stability The tracer must not be a
food source for bacteria (e.g., nitrates) - Chemical Stability Thermal stability, pH
stability, and unlikely to react or precipitate
with anything in the reservoir - Accurate Detection in the Laboratory Highly
sensitive, state of the art technology able to
detect very low concentrations
11WBM Tracers
Iodide, Lithium and Bromide Salts
- Advantages
- Thermal and chemical stability
- No cation exchange with clays for iodide and
bromide - Typically available in most areas
- Limitations
- Background levels in the formation can vary
- The rock samples must be destroyed to retrieve
all of the tracer - Lithium will react with clay minerals
- Detection limits in the range of 1-10 ppm
- High concentrations required
12WBM Tracers
Dyes and Alcohols
- Advantages
- Inexpensive
- Readily available
- Limitations
- They can react with the rock
- They can evaporate at low temperatures
- The less volatile alcohols can break down in
crude oil
13WBM Tracers
Isotopes of Hydrogen
14WBM Tracers
Water H2O
18 Molecular Weight 20
15WBM Tracers
Deuterium Oxide
- Advantages
- Non-radioactive
- Properties similar to water
- Limitations
- Naturally occurring in water and formation brine
- Natural background can vary poor accuracy
- Requires a large dose 35 kilos/1000 barrels of
mud - The large volume required to overcome background
means high cost to deploy - Interferes with NMR logging
16WBM Tracers
Isotopes of Hydrogen
Hydrogen (H)
17WBM Tracers
Water H2O
18WBM Tracers
Tritium The Optimum WBM Tracer
- Tritium does not occur in formation water
- The amount of HTO found in cores is directly
proportional to the quantity of traced filtrate
water that entered the rock during coring
operations!!! - A very small quantity (10 ml) of HTO is required
to trace a 60 foot core in a typical well because
the detection level is gtgt 1ppb - HTO does not interfere with NMR logging like D20
19WBM Tracers
Tritium is Safe to Use
- Tritium is widely used in watch dials, gun
sights, luminous paints, exit signs, etc - Once the HTO is added to the mud system, the
drilling mud, the filtrate, and the core samples
are completely safe to handle without any need
for protection - The concentration levels required for highly
accurate results are ½ the allowable limit for
unregulated discharge
20Tritium is Safe to Use
- At the HTO concentrations used to trace a well.
- You could drink 50-100bbls of traced mud and
still be below the US Govts Allowable Ingestion
Limit for HTO - You could drink 2 liters of the traced mud every
day for 365 days and still not have an exposure
problem - The weak beta radiation of the HTO will not
penetrate a piece of paper - You get more radiation from eating a banana than
from drinking a cup of HTO traced drilling mud!!
21Adding HTO to theWBM System
Suction Line
Mud Mixing Hopper
Mud Pump
Swivel
Add tritiated water
Kelly
Discharge Line
Collect mud samples
Mud Pits
Drill Pipe
Shale Shaker
Return Line
Core Barrel
Reserve Pit
Collar
Bit
22Mud-Tracer Mixing
- Add the tracer while the drilling mud is
circulating - Add the tracer 100 to 200 feet above core point
- Circulate bottoms up several times
23Mud Sampling
Obtain mud samples during drilling and coring to
measure HTO Levels
- In order to determine the amount of filtrate
invading the core, the amount of tracer in the
mud must be known - Samples of the mud should be taken before, during
and after coring at 5 -10 foot or 30 minute
intervals, whichever comes sooner - Mud samples need to be time-lag depth-corrected
24Processing the Core
- Sample the core quickly to eliminate diffusion of
tracers to the center of the core
- Experience suggests that within the first 48
hours, - diffusion is generally not a concern
- Variables such as ambient temperature and the
- permeability of the rock can influence
diffusion rates - When in doubt, process the core at the wellsite
25Processing Core
- All wellsite lab handling is performed so as to
minimize adding or removing water from the rock
26Processing Core
- Trim and plug the core with cool nitrogen as a
lubricant
27Processing Core
- Weigh the plug, wrap in saran foil, weigh it
again, place in ProtecCore
28Analyzing Corein the Laboratory
- Meticulous attention to equipment cleaning and
prep, and use reagent grade toluene
- Sample weights recorded at numerous stages to
develop a weight history throughout the process
29Analyzing Corein the Laboratory
Desiccant
Core
Condenser
Calibrated receiver
Core sample in extraction thimble
Boiling flask
Solvent
30Analyzing Corein the Laboratory
Desiccant
Condenser
Calibrated receiver
Core sample in extraction thimble
Boiling flask
Solvent
31Analyzing Corein the Laboratory
- Immediately transferred to sealed vials
32Determining HTO Concentrationsin the Laboratory
- The HTO concentration is detected in a
state-of-the-art liquid scintillation counter
33Example Results
34Core Analysis for Rw
- Determining Rw in traced cores starts with
obtaining companion plug sets
B
A
B
A
35Core Analysis for Rw
- PLUG SET A
- Clean leach
- Dry
- Measure pore volume (Vp)
- Saturate with brine
- Quantify CBW from NMR T2 distribution
A
Martin Dacy, 2004 SPWLA
36Core Analysis for Rw
- PLUG SET B
- Dean Stark to obtain total Vw
- Dry, weigh crush
- Leach salt
- Measure total Cl-
- Correct for filtrate Cl-
- Calculate corrected Cl- content
B
37Core Analysis for Rw
Remove Vcbw determined from NMR
Corrected Cl-
Formation Water
Yields Formation Brine Salinity Rw
Vfmw
Remove Vfil determined from tracer analysis
38Core Log Sw Well 1
- Clean, high quality cemented sand
- Limited diamond core
- Validated log f
- Provided HgPc model
- 10-35 Sw discrepancy Pc Core to Log
- Pc model thought correct given clean sand with
unambiguous FWL but uncertainties remained - Development decisions pending
- Decision to cut high quality low invasion core in
Well 2 to resolve Sw and other production
uncertainties
Hg Pc model
Source Rathmell, et al SCA 9902, SPE 57318,
1999
39Tracer-Corrected Core SwWell 2 - Low Invasion
WBM
40Core Log SwWell 2 - Low Invasion WBM
Source Rathmell, et al SCA 9902, SPE 57318,
1999
41Core Log SwWell 2 - Low Invasion WBM
- Well 2
- Pc Model Corrected Core Sw agreed
- Salinity (Rw) gradient and variable saturation
exponent (n) were employed for log Sw calculation - When core analysis findings were included in log
Sw model
Sw Log Sw Core Sw Pc
Source Rathmell, et al SCA 9902, SPE 57318,
1999
42OBM Tracers
CMT-1000 The Optimum OBM Tracer
- CMT-1000 is a deuterated hydrocarbon where one or
more of the hydrogen atoms has been replaced with
deuterium - Excellent detection level (lt5 ppb)
- Completely safe to use
- Very small quantities used, so no impact on the
base oil properties - Irrefutable fingerprint
43OBM Tracers
CMT-1000 The Optimum OBM Tracer
D
H
H
D
H
H
H
H
D
Mass 78
79
80
81
44OBM Tracers Finding uncontaminated rock and FT
samples
- Oil-based muds (OBMs) are the mud of choice for
drilling poorly consolidated formations - OBMs tend to improve ROP and core recovery, as
well as produce in-gauge boreholes - OBMs can minimize adverse rock-fluid interactions
related to clay stability around the wellbore - BUT
- The oil phase and associated surfactants can
alter the wettability and relative perm
characteristics of the core material - By tracing the OBM, we can identify fresh-state
rock and/or quantify filtrate contamination
determine if our FT oil samples are contaminated
45OBM Tracers Determining In-Situ Saturations
- OBMs can reduce (or eliminate) filtrate water
invasion - BUT
- OBMs are rarely devoid of water. In a typical
OBM, 10-45 of the mud volume is water - The common assumption is that the OBMs never give
up water to the formation. This may or may not
be the case
46OBM Tracers for Cores
- The best solution is to trace both the water and
oil phases of the mud! - This allows independent verification of any
alteration of the in-situ oil and/or water
saturations - If any filtrate has entered the core, well
quantify it
47OBM Tracers
Multiphase Tracing
OIL
WATER
Add CMT-1000 to the oil phase
Add HTO to the water phase
48OBM Tracers
49OBM Tracers
CMT-1000 Marker Peak
50Tracers for Formation Test (FT) Sample
Contamination Studies
- FT oil samples are preserved at reservoir
conditions, minimizing or eliminating
irreversible changes in fluid properties that can
occur with changes in pressure and temperature - However, OMB filtrate can contaminate FT samples
and alter the very fluid properties that are
being sought (viscosity, asphaltene content, Bo,
IFT, Psat, etc) - Without precise fluid properties, there is a risk
of inaccuracy in reservoir and production
engineering calculations
51Tracers for Formation Test Sample Contamination
Studies
52Tracers for Formation Test-Sample Contamination
Studies
- Case History -
- 18 RFT samples taken and analyzed by 2 methods
- CMT-1000 tracer analysis - contamination ranges
from 3.1 to 16.0 - Passive (GC spectrum deconvolution) fingerprint
analysis contamination ranges from 0.0 to
24.0 - Client company created a blind test program of 33
samples to gauge confidence levels for the 2
methods
53Tracers for Formation Test-Sample Contamination
Studies
15 of 33 samples analyzed were splits of the same
sample!
- CMT-1000
- Contamination ranged from
- 8.5-9.5
- Rsd 3.9 (0.003)
- Passive Fingerprint
- Contamination ranged from
- 7.5 -13.5
- Rsd 23.2 (0.020)
54Tracers for Formation Test-Sample Contamination
Studies
Impact of OMB Filtrate Contamination on Fluid
Properties
Contaminated Oil Sample (7.7Mole NovaPlus)
Uncontaminated Oil Sample
Psat, psia _at_ 142ºF
4062
5772
1250
2012
GOR, scf/bbl
Bo
1.679
2.019
Viscosity, cp
0.344
0.283
55Summary
Drilling Mud Tracers forFormation Evaluation
andReservoir EngineeringApplications
Properly executed tracer jobs require tight
control over
- 1) Mud Design
- 2) Mud Monitoring Sampling
- 3) Coring Procedures
- 4) Wellsite Core Handling
- 5) Laboratory Measurements
56Summary
Drilling Mud Tracers forFormation Evaluation
andReservoir EngineeringApplications
The optimum drilling mud tracers have these
characteristics
- No Background
- Soluble in the Filtrate
- Biological Stability
- Chemical Stability
- Accurate Detection in the Laboratory
Tritium (for WBM) and deuterated hydrocarbons
(for OBM) meet all of these criteria and offer
best in class performance.
57Summary
Drilling Mud Tracers forFormation Evaluation
andReservoir EngineeringApplications
- Formation Evaluation Applications
- Determine Sw and hydrocarbon saturation
- Determine Rw in reservoirs that do not produce
water - Identify fresh-state OBM core samples for
relative permeability and wettability
measurements (i.e., accelerate analytical
programs) - Reservoir Engineering Applications
- Decrease uncertainty of formation test oil
analyses and improved facility design - Determine suitability of oil samples for core
analysis testing (sample aging, etc)
58Invasion Profiler TM
Drilling Mud Tracers For Formation
Evaluation Reservoir Engineering Applications