ConcordKannapolis Interbasin Transfer IBT: Supplement 2 Why FEIS Earns a Failing Grade - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

ConcordKannapolis Interbasin Transfer IBT: Supplement 2 Why FEIS Earns a Failing Grade

Description:

C-K's Preferred Alternative rewards: Unrestrained growth in C-K ... Attend Sept. 7th public meeting: Old Rock School, 400 W. Main St., Valdese, 5 PM ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: mediaGa
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ConcordKannapolis Interbasin Transfer IBT: Supplement 2 Why FEIS Earns a Failing Grade


1
Concord-Kannapolis Interbasin Transfer (IBT)
Supplement 2Why FEIS Earns a Failing Grade
August 2006
  • George Johnson
  • Professor Of Operations
  • Management, Retired, RIT

.
2
Professor gives C-K IBT Petition/FEIS Failing
Grade
  • Overlooked critical factor
  • Unrealistic assumptions
  • Inaccurate forecasts
  • Data input/conversion errors
  • Questionable model validity
  • Misinterpreted results
  • Encourages waste

3
Failing Grade, cont.
  • Overlooked critical factor
  • Yadkin-Pee Dee basin has almost twice the natural
    surface water supply
  • per person as
  • the Catawba

4
Failing Grade, cont.
  • Unrealistic assumptions, e.g.,
  • Future weather patterns will repeat the past
  • Duke Low Inflow Protocol (LIP) drought rules will
    be effective Dr. Robert Fearn
  • Whats the hurry?
  • Full quantity not needed until 2035
  • Duke relicensing conditions for water releases
    and LIP wont be known until at least 2008

5
Failing Grade, cont.
  • Inaccurate forecasts
  • C-K water demands are overestimated Dr.
    Robert Long
  • Water use per person (15 too high)
  • Population growth rate (12-16 too high)

6
Failing Grade, cont.
  • Inaccurate forecasts, cont.
  • Request is 50 higher than modeled water demand
    in 2038
  • Requesting 22 MGD Average
  • Modeled 15 MGD Average
  • Under estimates impact on Catawba

7
Failing Grade, cont.
  • Data input/conversion errors
  • Extra 14 MGD included in initial modeling
  • Data conversion errors understated IBT demand by
    80
  • Vastly under estimates impact on Catawba

8
Failing Grade, cont.
  • Validity of computer model
  • Modeled drought conditions unrealistic conflict
    with recent experience
  • Currently in Stage 1 drought
  • Duke voluntarily implemented proposed LIP
  • Most water customers along Catawba did not comply
    with request to implement their drought response
    plans

9
Failing Grade, cont.
  • Misinterpretation of results
  • Use of averages hides small changes
  • Simulated lake levels hover dangerously close to
    1192 (Lake James critical level for access to
    lake)
  • Frequent lake closings discourage public
  • recreation and undermine lakes economic role

10
Failing Grade, cont.
  • Misinterpretation of results, cont.
  • Illogical conclusion
  • Preferred Alternative (Catawba/Y-PD) -- 138.7 M
  • Alternative 2 (All Y-PD) -- 116.3 M
  • Other factors rated same for both alternatives
  • Environmental consequences (Low)
  • Secondary and cumulative impacts (Low)
  • Public health issues (Low)
  • Hydroelectric power generation (Low)

11
Failing Grade, cont.
  • C-Ks Preferred Alternative rewards
  • Unrestrained growth in C-K
  • Poor water quality practices in Y-PD basin Dr.
    Robert Long
  • Continued use of out-of-date sewage treatment
    plants
  • Failure to enforce sedimentation regulations

12
Failing Grade, cont.
  • Having assigned and evaluated numerous technical
    projects over 40 year career, I was very
    disappointed with the quality of this endeavor.
    As a result, it was assigned a failing grade.
  • George A. Johnson
  • Retired Professor, RIT

13
IBT Summary
  • Ignores Y-PD water supply advantage over Catawba
  • Permanently reduces growth potential of Catawba
    basin
  • True impact unknown - Final EIS full of errors
  • Poor public policy
  • Would reward
  • Unrestrained growth in C-K
  • Poor water quality practices in Y-PD basin
  • Conclusion
  • Reject IBT as proposed use Y-PD basin water only
  • Pass NC SB 1561

14
What You Can Do
  • C-K IBT
  • Send a letter or email with your concerns to
    NCDENR Phil.Fragapane_at_ncmail.net
  • Emphasize effects on economic development,
    environmental impacts, poor public policy and
    public recreation
  • Call EMC members, Governor, Lt. Governor,
    Senators, Representatives, etc.
  • Attend Sept. 7th public meeting Old Rock
    School, 400 W. Main St., Valdese, 5 PM (Arrive at
    4 PM)(Written and oral comments)

15
What You Can Do, cont
  • IBT Legislation
  • Ask state Senators and Representatives to push
    for Sen. Clodfelters bill SB 1561
  • LIP (FERC Duke Power)
  • Attend public relicensing hearing when it occurs

16
The (Desired) End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com