Bunch Compression in the International Linear Collider - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Bunch Compression in the International Linear Collider

Description:

A planned future particle accelerator that extends about 30 km long and collides ... The Tool for Accelerator Optics. Developed at Cornell University ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: citpubl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bunch Compression in the International Linear Collider


1
Bunch Compression in the International Linear
Collider
  • Kellen Petersen
  • August 9, 2005
  • University of Utah
  • Mentor Professor Gerald Dugan (Cornell)
  • with Dr. Andy Wolski, Jiajun Xu, Jeff Smith,
  • and Prof. Lawrence Gibbons

2
What is a Linear Collider?
  • Advantages
  • Electromagnetic Radiation is Negligible (even at
    high energies)
  • More Cost Effective at Higher Energies
  • ILC can verify LHC discoveries and contribute its
    own discoveries
  • Disadvantages
  • Collision Frequency is Low
  • Difficult to make high number of particles stable

3
What is the International Linear
Collider?
A planned future particle accelerator that
extends about 30 km long and collides electrons
and positrons at collision energies of about
500-1000 GeV
4
Bunch Compressors
  • Why are BCs needed?
  • Damping Rings produce bunches few mm while Main
    Linac requires 100-300 um
  • Advantages
  • Shortens bunch lengths
  • Produces highly stable output

5
How does a Bunch Compressor work?
  • A Bunch Compressor reduces the rms bunch length
    while increasing the rms energy spread. This is
    accomplished through rotations of the
    longitudinal phase space of the bunch.
  • Components
  • RF Power
  • Phase Slip (wiggler, arc, chicane)

6
What is Phase Slip?
7
What is Phase Slip?
  • Wiggler, Arc, Chicane

8
What is Phase Slip?
  • This is the rotation of the long. phase space
    which shortens the bunch length

9
Schematic Layout of Bunch
Compressor (NLC)
  • Components
  • RF Power
  • Phase Slip (wiggler, arc, chicane)

Two-Stage BC Design
10
Design and Operational Issues
  • 6 mm rms bunch length compressed to 100-300 um
  • Transverse emittances must be preserved
  • Phase variations should not produce IP energy
    variations
  • Synchrotron Radiation Emittance Growth
  • Sensitivities to transverse and longitudinal
    errors

11
Bunch Compressor Designs
  • Single Stage Bunch Compression
  • Two-Stage Bunch Compression (A B)
  • Three Stage Bunch Compression
  • A Two 90 Rotations in Long. Phase Space
  • (total 180)
  • B Undercompression in First Stage (total 90)

12
Single Stage vs. Two-Stage Bunch Compressor
  • Advantages of Single Stage Design
  • Less expensive
  • Shortens bunch length to 300 um
  • Advantages of Two-Stage Design
  • Allows for acceleration between the two stages,
    leading to energy spread of lt1 (and not 3)
  • Possibility of tuning Bunch Compressor to bunch
    lengths of 150 um and 300 um
  • Provides for different transformations in Phase
    Space

13
Studies Done on BCs
  • G1 Single Stage (300 um)
  • Twiss Parameters (in BC and BC w/ Main Linac)
  • Long. Phase Space Distribution
  • Emittance Preservation (Perfect and 1 sy offset)
  • Orbit (absolute and normalized) with 1 sy offset
  • Long. Sensitivity Studies
  • G3 2-Stage (150A 150B)
  • Twiss Parameters (in BC and BC w/ Main Linac)
  • Long. Phase Space Distribution
  • Emittance Preservation (Perfect and 1 sy offset)
  • Orbit (absolute and normalized) with 1 sy offset
  • Long. Sensitivity Studies
  • Transverse Sensitivity Studies
  • Synchrotron Radiation Emittance Growth

compared to Lucretia results from SLAC compared
to corresponding G1 results still in progress
14
Simulations using TAO
  • The Tool for Accelerator Optics
  • Developed at Cornell University
  • Accelerator Design and Analysis Enviroment
  • Uses the Bmad Library

15
Bunch Compressor Parameters
16
Bunch Length vs. Energy Spread
G3 Two-Stage Bunch Compressors
17
G1 Single Stage BC Studies
  • Accomplishments
  • Studied various aspects of this design
  • Verified results obtained by simulations done at
    SLAC
  • Able to run MAD decks in TAO and show that
    simulations are running correctly

18
G3 Two-Stage BC Studies
  • I studied various aspects of both the G3 150A and
    G3 150B designs
  • Here I show some of the results of the for the
    150B design

19
Long. Phase Space Distribution
G3 150B BC Design
"Bunch compression is an inherently nonlinear
process."--Paul Emma
20
Emittance Preservation
Perfect
1 sy Vertical Offset
21
Synchrotron Radiation Emittance Growth
  • Synchrotron Radiation is emitted in wigglers of
    the Bunch Compressor (where the Phase Slip
    occurs)
  • Effects
  • Transverse Emittance Growth
  • Increased Energy Spread

22
Synchrotron Radiation Emittance Growth
Two Methods of Calculating SR Emittance Growth
Analytic Calculation via Helms Method using
Mathematica
  • Tracking 100,000 particles with several seeds
    through TAO with radiation turned on and
    measuring the change in emittance

23
Synchrotron Radiation Emittance Growth
Comparison of Analytical and Tracking
Calculations of Radiation Growth for Generation 3
(G3) Bunch Compressor Designs
24
Longitudinal Sensitivity Studies
Studies done on G3 150A and G3 150B BCs
  • Variations in
  • Energy
  • Energy Spread
  • Arrival Time
  • Bunch Length
  • Errors in
  • MDR Extraction Phase
  • BC1 RF Phase
  • BC1 RF Amplitude
  • BC2 RF Phase
  • BC2 RF Amplitude

25
  • MDR Phase
  • Extraction Error
  • for Two-Stage BC
  • G1 vs. G3
  • 150B

G1
G3
26
Transverse Sensitivity Studies
  • G3 design is a more optimal lattice designed to
    reduce dispersive emittance growth
  • EXAMPLE
  • Consider the case where there is a perfect
    lattice except for an rms BPM offset of 10 um wrt
    to the survey line
  • SLAC results show a much smaller emittance
    growth for G3 BCs

We are looking forward to TAO results of the G3
transverse sensitivities!
from SLAC BC Design Web page normal-mode
normalized emittance growth results obtained at
SLAC
27
Conclusions
  • Ran MAD decks in TAO and completed studies on
    various potential ILC BC designs
  • Verified the bunch length, energy spread, and
    transverse emittances
  • Investigated effects of Damping Ring phase errors
    and RF phase and amplitude variations
  • Determine emittance growth of 1 sigma vertical
    offset
  • Calculate the emittance growth from synchrotron
    radiation

28
Thanks
  • My mentor Prof. Gerry Dugan
  • Andy Wolski, for his knowledge and encouragement
  • Jiajun Xu, to whom I asked many questions and
    with whom I spent a lot of time working
  • Prof. David Sagan and Jeff Smith, for helping me
    with TAO--among other things
  • Prof. Lawrence Gibbons for all of his help
  • Prof. Rich Galik, for all he has done in
    organizing this REU Program

29
Beam Properties at Injection
  • Charge 2e10 (3.2 nC)
  • Energy 5 GeV
  • Energy Spread 0.15
  • Bunch Length 6 mm

30
Twiss Functions of G3 150B BC
G3 150B BC Design
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com