SuperB Accelerator Physics Activities: Beam Beam Interaction and Intrabeam Scattering - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

SuperB Accelerator Physics Activities: Beam Beam Interaction and Intrabeam Scattering

Description:

for the University of Liverpool Accelerator Group and Cockcroft Institute ... The next phase for the accelerator group is to form a team to complete the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: biag
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SuperB Accelerator Physics Activities: Beam Beam Interaction and Intrabeam Scattering


1
SuperB Accelerator Physics Activities Beam Beam
Interaction and Intrabeam Scattering
  • Gabriele Bassi
  • for the University of Liverpool Accelerator Group
    and Cockcroft Institute
  • SuperB QMUL Meeting
    London, July 11, 2008

2
Outline
  • SuperB project
  • Luminosity and Beam-Beam Interaction
  • Intrabeam Scattering
  • Outlook and Future Work

3
SuperB Project
  • SuperB aims at the construction of a very high
    luminosity (1-4 x 1036 cm-2 s-1 ) asymmetric ee-
    Flavour Factory, with possible location at the
    campus of the University of Rome Tor Vergata,
    near the INFN Frascati National Laboratory.

4
SuperB Accelerator Contributors
  • M. E. Biagini, M. Boscolo, T. Demma, A. Drago, S.
    Guiducci, M. Preger, P. Raimondi, S. Tomassini,
    C. Vaccarezza, M. Zobov (INFN/LNF, Italy)?
  • Y. Cai, A. Fisher, S. Heifets, A. Novokhatski,
    M.T. Pivi, J. Seeman, M. Sullivan, U. Wienands,
    W. Wittmer (SLAC, US)?
  • T. Agoh, K. Ohmi, Y. Ohnishi (KEK, Japan)?
  • I. Koop, S. Nikitin, E. Levichev, P. Piminov, D.
    Shatilov (BINP, Russia)
  • Wolski (Liverpool University/Cockcroft Institute,
    UK)?
  • M. Venturini (LBNL, US)?
  • S. Bettoni (CERN, Switzerland)?
  • A. Variola (LAL/Orsay, France)?
  • E. Paoloni, G. Marchiori (Pisa University,
    Italy)?

5
SuperB footprint on Tor Vergata site
6
Super-B New Parameters
7
Comparison of SuperB to SuperKEKB
8
Basic concepts
  • B-Factories (PEP-II and KEKB) reached very high
    luminosity (gt1034 s-1 cm-2 ), but to increase L
    of two orders of magnitude bordeline parameters
    are needed, such as
  • Very high currents
  • Smaller damping time Difficult and costly
  • Shorter bunches operation
  • Crab cavities for head-on collision
  • Higher power
  • SuperB exploits an alternative approach, with a
    new IP scheme
  • Small beams (ILC-DR like)?
  • Large Piwinski angle and crab waist
  • Currents comparable to present Factories

9
Beam-Beam Interaction (BBI)?
  • BBI most important limitation to luminosity
    performance
  • BBI is a complicated effect, it can be calculated
    only with computer simulations
  • Simulations for SuperB carried out with
    Weak-Strong BBI code LIFETRACK
  • Simulations for DA?NE carried out with 3D
    Strong-Strong BBI code BBSS
  • LIFETRACK not self-consistent, BBSS very time
    consuming
  • Improvements of existing codes/models is in our
    agenda

10
Crab-waist Studies at DAFNE at INFN Frascati
  • P. Raimondi et al DA?NE upgrade with improved
    interaction region to focus tighter the beams at
    IP and have a large crossing angle ? large
    Piwinski angle
  • Features
  • Smaller collision area
  • Lower???y
  • No parasitic crossings
  • No synchro-betatron resonances due to the
    crossing angle
  • Crab Waist sextupoles
  • Results very encouraging so far with improved
    tunes shifts and higher luminosity with smaller
    currents.

11

DA?NE tests showing Enhanced beam-beam Tune
shifts at lower Currents (Raimondi et
al)? (March 2008)?
12
  • SuperB beams are focused in the y-plane 100 times
    more than in the present factories, thanks to
  • - small emittances
  • - small beta functions
  • larger crossing angle
  • Tune shifts and longitudinal overlap are
    greatly reduced

y(?m)?
x(?m)?
z(mm)?
y(?m)?
x(?m)?
z(mm)?
13
Beams distribution at IP
Without Crab-sextupoles
waist line is orthogonal to the axis of one bunch
With Crab-sextupoles
waist moves to the axis of other beam
14
(M. Sullivan)?
15
Intrabeam Scattering (IBS)?
  • IBS multiple small-angle scattering events
  • IBS leads to emittance growth
  • Formalisms for IBS growth rates Piwinski,
    Bjorken-Mitingwa
  • For calculation of SuperB IBS emittance growth
    Kubo-Mitingwa-Wolski formulae based on
    approximations of Bjorken-Mitingwa formalism
  • Simulations of IBS for SuperB done by Wolski for
    old set of parameters (see CDR)?
  • Simulations for the new set of parameters is on
    our agenda

16
Outlook and Future work
  • The initial SuperB design meets the goals
    requested by the experimenters
  • Beam dynamics issues are receiving fresh look
  • Liverpool Accelerator Group/Cockcroft Institute
    BBI, IBS...
  • The next phase for the accelerator group is to
    form a team to complete the Technical Design
    Report
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com