the highest energy neutrinos - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

the highest energy neutrinos

Description:

the highest energy neutrinos – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 63
Provided by: francis6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: the highest energy neutrinos


1
the highest energy neutrinos
francis halzen
2
the neutrino view of ? extragalactic
sources ? galactic sources ? the GZK
feature
3
energy (eV)
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
n
CMB
Radio
Visible
TeV sources!
flux
cosmic rays
GeV g-rays
4
Background Energy Distribution
Intensity nW m-2 sr-1
Frequency Hz
5
Natures Accelerators ?
protons gt 108 TeV photons gt 102
TeV neutrinos gt 102 TeV
6
extragalactic cosmic raysenergy density 3 x
10-19 erg/cm3
7
galactic and extragalactic cosmic rays
1 event km -2 yr -1
8
? energy in extra-galactic cosmic rays
3x10-19 erg/cm3 or 1044 erg/yr
per (Mpc)3 for 1010 years
3x1039 erg/s per galaxy 3x1044 erg/s per active
galaxy 2x1052 erg per gamma ray burst ? energy
in cosmic rays equal to the energy
in light !
1 TeV 1.6 erg
9
Neutrino Beams Heaven Earth
NEUTRINO BEAMS HEAVEN EARTH
Black Hole
Radiation Enveloping Black Hole
p g -gt n p cosmic ray neutrino
-gt p p0 cosmic ray gamma
10
energy in extra-galactic cosmic rays
3x10-19 erg/cm3 or 1044 erg/yr per
(Mpc)3 for 1010 years
3x1039 erg/s per galaxy 3x1044 erg/s per active
galaxy 2x1052 erg per gamma ray burst ? energy
in cosmic rays photons neutrinos
11
flux of extra-galactic cosmic rays
ankle ? one 1019 eV particle per km squared per
year per sr
12
diffuse muon neutrino flux

MPR bound
100 - 500 events per km2 year
WB
HBL blazars
13
active galaxy
radiation field ask astronomers
  • energy in protons
  • energy in electrons
  • photon target observed
  • in lines
  • gtgt neutrino flux calculable

14
0 seconds fireball protons and photons interact
PeV
EeV
TeV
- 10 seconds fireball protons interact with
remnant of the star
afterwards afterglow protons interact with
inter-stellar medium
15
heavenly beam dump
e only ?
synchrotron radiation
e
?
?e
?
p
?
e-
??
n
?sync
?sync
cosmic rays exist !
16
galactic cosmic raysenergy density 10-12
erg/cm3
17
Cas A supernova remnant in X-rays
Shock fronts
Fermi acceleration when particles cross high
B-fields
18
key issue magnetic field
19
HESS RX J1713 Spectrum
18 h 2003 data
1 10 neutrinos per km2 year KM3NeT
20
supernova beam dump
RX J1713-3946
21
hadronic electromagnetic 4 - 4
RX J1713 on astro-ph
22
? the accelerator
TeV photons trace the density of the molecular
clouds
23
galactic plane
Southern Hemisphere Sky
Standard Deviations
24
cygnus region Milagro and Tibet
Milagro contours are pion model with no sources
crosses are EGRET unidentified
sources TeV/matter correlation good chance
noncorrelation 1.5x10-6
24 neutrinos in IceCube per source
25
????? flux of galactic cosmic rays
a SNR at d 1 kpc transfers W 1050 erg to
cosmic rays interacting with molecular
clouds with density n 1 cm-3
2 SN per century supply the observed density of
galactic cosmic rays
e.g. RX J1713.7-3946
26
p-
p
p0
neutral pions are observed as gamma
rays charged pions are observed as
neutrinos nm g / 2
n m
n m-
g
g
e e-
e
g
e-
m
e
g
n
e
n
27
1000 models same n-rate
egret
milagro
28
cosmic neutrinos how ?
29
(No Transcript)
30
shielded and optically transparent medium
Cherenkov radiation
array of optical sensors
31
  • nanosecond timing allows
  • likelihood reconstruction of the
  • track with degree accuracy

m
n
  • photon counts reflect energy of the muon
  • that loses energy catastrophically
    (bremsstrahlung,)

32
antares
antares
33
antares zenith angle distribution
preliminary, see talk by Antoine Kouchner
34
Skyplot AMANDA and Baikal
AMANDA2000-2003, Baikal 1998-2002 galactic
coordinates
nm N ? m X
35
skyplot AMANDA
AMANDA sykplot 2000-2003 3329 events below
horizon 04 ? 4282 05 and 06 done
36
(No Transcript)
37
IceCube/IceTop
  • IceTop
  • 80 Stations à 2 Ice-C-Tanks
  • Last year 16 stations
  • 2830 m altitude
  • 125 m spacing
  • 3 ? 1014 lt E lt 1018 eV
  • Atot 1 km2
  • Last year 0.13 km²

electromagnetic
  • IceCube Strings
  • 4800 DOMs
  • Muon bundle detector
  • Emuon gt TeV

1450 m
muons
2450 m
38
IceTop PeV to EeV
39
IceTop-IceCube coincident event
40
(No Transcript)
41
22 strings 1320 digital modules 52 surface
detectors
42
IceCube event 22 strings
43
IceCube integrated volume
cumulative km3yr of exposure volume
5
4
3
2
also NESTOR NEMO
1
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2013 2014 year
? 1 km3yr reached 2 years before detector is
completed ? close to 4 km3yr at the beginning of
2nd year of full array operation
44
Parameters of neutrino telescopes
  • Effective ? area
  • 0.1 m² _at_ 10 TeV
  • 1-4 m² _at_ 100 TeV
  • 30 m² _at_ 100 TeV
  • 100 m² _at_ 100 TeV

AMANDA, ANTARES now IceCube complete
  • Point source sensitivity
  • AMANDA, ANTARES 10-10 ? / (cm² s) above 1 TeV
  • IceCube 10-12 ? / (cm²
    s) above 1 TeV

45
effective telescope area at 100 TeV
  • AMANDA ANTARES (1- 5) m2
  • IceCube 22 strings (now) 30 m2
  • IceCube 80 strings (final) 100 m2

46
IceCube
  • in the next 10 years IceCube will observe
  • 106 atmospheric neutrinos with energies
  • 0.11,000 TeV
  • 10 GZK neutrinos with energy gt 106 TeV
  • with m0.01 eV and E100 TeV
  • the gamma factor of the neutrino is

25 m
45 m
47
Livingston plot energy versus year
  • 1 event per year
  • in IceCube
  • radio/acoustic domain
  • priority determine
  • the event rate!

48
neutrinos from GZK interactions
49
cosmic rays interact with the microwave background
cosmic rays disappear, neutrinos appear
1 event per kilometer squared per year
50
neutrinosfromGZKinteractions
galactic
extragalactic
51
neutrino cross-section at 1018 eV ?
order of magnitude at 1020 eV
better than factor 2 at 1016 eV
flux itself is ambiguous because of spectrum and
evolution of the unknown sources
52
novel detection methodsradio, acoustic and
horizontal showers
53
neutrino showers
(distinguishable if almost horizontal)
downgoing (direct n interaction in atmosphere)
upgoing (n t in earth t decay in flight )
54
Muons
55
radio emission from neutrino-induced
electromagnetic cascades
  • Electromagnetic cascades electron-positron
    pairs and
  • (mostly) gammas ? electrically neutral, no
    radio emission.
  • But, Compton scattering of photons on atomic
    electrons creates
  • negative charge excess of 20
  • Negative charge radiates coherently at MHz GHz
    ?
  • Power Energy 2
  • Askarian effect demonstrated at SLAC consistent
    with
  • calculations

56
SLAC T486 (Jul06) Askaryan on ice
  • Opportunity to test the effect in a
  • medium relevant to several current
  • and future experiments
  • ANITA, RICE, etc.
  • 12-tons of ice ANITA
  • End Station A SLAC beam Ideal ANITA
  • calibration comprehensive
  • validation of Askaryan

57
current UHE neutrino limits projections
  • RICE
  • limits for 3500 hours livetime
  • GLUE
  • limits 120 hours livetime
  • FORTE
  • limits on 3.8 days of livetime
  • ANITA-lite 18.4 days of data, net 40 livetime
    with 60 analysis efficiency for detection
  • ANITA projected sensitivity
  • 1.5-2.5 orders of magnitude gain!

58
Existing Neutrino Limits and Future Sensitivity
  • RICE limits for 3500 hours livetime
  • GLUE limits 120 hours livetime
  • ANITA sensitivity, 45 days total
  • 5 to 30 GZK neutrinos
  • IceCube high energy cascades
  • 1.5-3 GZK events in 3 years
  • Auger tau neutrino decay events
  • 1 GZK event per year?

59
RICERadio Detection in South Pole Ice
Neutrino enters ice
  • Installed 15 antennas
  • few hundred m depth with
  • AMANDA strings.
  • Tests and data since 1996.
  • Most events due to local
  • radio noise, few candidates.
  • Continuing to take data,
  • and first limits prepared.
  • Proposal to Piggyback with
  • ICECUBE

Neutrino interacts
Antenna Cable
Cube is .6 km on side
Two cones show 3 dB signal strength
60
in-ice view of radio detection
61
ANITA
Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna Experiment
searching for GZK neutrinos with radio detection
in Antarctic ice
62
possible IceCube extensions
optical-radio-acoustic detector
IceCube Collaboration, ICRC2005
instrumented volume (110 3) km3
Optical 80 IceCube 13 IceCube-Plus strings
at a 1 km radius, 1.5-2.5 km depth Radio/Acousti
c 91 holes, 1 km spacing, 1.5 km depth 5 radio
300 acoustic receivers per hole
63
EVENT RATES
IceCube CoIlaboration, ICRC2005
Detection option GZK events/year)
IceCube 0.7
Optical 1.2
Radio 12.3
Acoustic 16.0
OpticalRadio 0.2
OpticalAcoustic 0.3
RadioAcoustic 8.0 !!!
Opt.Rad.Acou. 0.1
TOTAL 21.1
Numbers calculated, folding effective volumes
with ESS GZK neutrino flux model
64
staged IceCube enhancements
Optical 80 IceCube 13 IceCube-Plus
(astro-ph/0310152) holes at 1 km radius (2.5 km
deep) Radio/Acoustic determine GZK event rates
with 6 12 radio detectors at the surface or at
depth calibration with IceCube!
65
(No Transcript)
66
ARIANNA concept100 x 100 station array, 1/2
Teraton
Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica
300m
67
reflected and direct events
n
n
ice
ignore
Direct
Reflected (much greater solid angle)
sensitivity to neutrino cross section
68
The Thermo-Acoustic Model
G.A. Askaryan, At. Energ., vol.3, no.8, (1957)
p.152 Askaryan, Dolgoshein, Kalinovsky, NIM
164(1979) 267
? vol. expans. coefficient Cp specific
heat
? Particle cascades produce pressure pulses?
Pressure amplitude measures incoming energy ?
Pressure distribution measures incoming
direction? Frequency 10-100 kHz
69
TODAY ACTIVITIES AT MANY SITES
group experiment activities
Stanford SAUND data taking, signal processing, calibration , simulation
INR1 AGAM, MP10 signal processing, calibration , simulation
INR2, Irkutsk Baikal signal processing, noise studies, in-situ tests at Baikal
ITEP Baikal,Antares detector RD, accel. tests, in-situ tests at Baikal, signal proc., noise st.
Marseille Antares detector and installation RD, calibration, noise studies, simulation,
Erlangen Antares, KM3NET detector RD, accel. tests, calibration, simulation, noise studies, in-situ test measurements
Italy KM3NET detector RD
Italy NEMO installation RD, noise studies, simulation
UK Rona, KM3NET simulation, signal processing , calibration
US Salt Dome detector RD, attenuation studies, material studies
Aachen IceCube detector RD, general purpose ice test laboratory
IceCube detector RD, accel. tests, material studies, simulation, noise studies, in- situ test measurements (SPATS)

ARENA 2005 http//www-zeuthen.
desy.de/arena
ARENA 2006 http//www.shef.ac.uk
/physics/arena
70
2005, 2006, 2007 deployments
AMANDA
a km squared year data by 0809
IceCube string and IceTop station deployed 01/05
IceCube string and IceTop station deployed 12/05
01/06
data from completed Antares detector ? KM3NET
IceTop station only 2006
IceCube string and IceTop station to be deployed
12/06 01/07
new ANITA flight in summer 08-09
  • 604 DOMs deployed to date
  • Want to achieve steady state of 14 strings /
    season.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com