Program Review Data Collection Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Program Review Data Collection Project

Description:

Over the course of the summer our UHCC DOI's worked together to provide the ... on data from different sources (MAPS reports, Program Health Indicators, etc. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: SGFL
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Program Review Data Collection Project


1
Program Review Data Collection Project
  • Brought to you by
  • The Data Delivery Team
  • (DDT)

2
What is the DOIs Program Review?
  • Over the course of the summer our UHCC DOIs
    worked together to provide the system with a set
    of program review data requirements that would be
    known as the Irreducible Core Indicators.
  • These program review data elements were intended
    to be the minimum data requirements for
    instructional program reviews.
  • By creating a commonly shared language we will be
    better prepared to compare programs across
    campuses.

3
Where did the 13 data elements come from?
  • Since committing to do our program reviews it
    became painfully clear that we would have to be
    moving quickly to determine what data we would
    need at the local level so we could begin to
    develop a tool to retrieve the data.
  • With this in mind we selected 13 key data
    elements from the DOIs list so that we could
    begin the process and move forward with
    development.
  • Since we currently do not have a reporting
    platform that could be used to retrieve this data
    it was necessary to design and develop a dynamic
    reporting tool, then test and retest the data
    output until it was being reported as specd.

4
What data is being provided to my program?
  • We have taken the 13 chosen data elements from
    the DOIs Program Review document and have gone
    through a number of iterations to ensure that the
    data we are providing will prove to be useful.
  • The primary purpose of this presentation is to
    provide clarity as to how the data is being
    collected, filtered, and displayed to you.
  • The intention here is to reduce the number of
    questions you may have so you will feel confident
    about using the data in your program reviews.
  • Click here for the list of data elements in part
    III.
  • Program Review

5
A word about the timing of the data snapshot...
  • Its imperative that the same data snapshot be
    used when doing analysis on data from different
    sources (MAPS reports, Program Health Indicators,
    etc.)
  • The data in Banner is constantly being updated.
    It differs from the first day of class to
    census date to closing date.
  • Unless otherwise noted, the data snapshot for the
    13 following data elements is
  • Semester specific data as of the last update in
    Banner.
  • For the most part data is last updated during
    closing each semester, with a few exceptions
    change of grade, incomplete grade make up, and
    administrative exceptions.

6
2 Distinct Program Course Categories
  • Program courses are broken into 2 categories
  • "Student Required Core" (SRC) courses are primary
    program courses required of the student. This
    does not include general ed, remedial, or
    elective courses. For example SRC courses for
    Accounting could include ACC 130, OAT 29, or ICS
    101. (note the course alphas are different).
    These apply to all except 8 - 10.
  • "Program Specific Courses" (PSC) courses are a
    subset of the SRC, used to help identify staffing
    sufficiency. Note that the program and course
    alpha are the same. For example ACC 130, ACC 20,
    or ACC 201. These apply to 8 - 10.

7
1. Number of Majors (Unduplicated headcount of
declared majors for both semesters.)
  • What it means to the DDT
  • Headcount of ALL registered students with a
    declared HawCC major for each semester. For the
    academic year this will be reported as
    unduplicated headcount by program.
  • Unduplicated headcount is defined as a student in
    Fall OR Spring semesters, OR both. By program
    they will only be counted once over the academic
    year.
  • These are students that were registered as of the
    start of the semester, regardless of whether they
    may have dropped later.

8
2. Student Semester Hours for program majors in
all program classes.
  • What it means to the DDT
  • These are all students where the primary campus
    is HawCC (PriCampHAW) and they had an active
    registration at some point in the semester.
  • Student semester hours (SSH) are the sum of all
    attempted credits in all Student Required Core"
    (SRC) classes.

9
3. Student Semester Hours for all program
classes. This will give a measure of crossover
interest in the program.
  • What it means to the DDT
  • Student semester hours (SSH) are the sum of all
    attempted credits in all Student Required Core"
    (SRC) classes, regardless of campus or major.

10
4. FTE Course Enrollment. SSH for all program
classes/15
  • What it means to the DDT
  • Using the output SSH from item 3 SSH
    attempted divided by 15 for any semester. These
    are students that are declaring ANY primary
    campus--not just HawCC.
  • FTE for a single semester is SSH/15.This number
    can be reported for the academic year ((SSH Fall
    SSH Spring)/30) as well and reported as an
    average.

11
5. Number of classes taught (n).(n) corresponds
to (n) in 6 and 7.
  • What it means to the DDT
  • Number of all "Student Required Core" (SRC)
    courses.
  • This is each and every section taught for this
    program.
  • This does not include cancelled sections.

12
6. Average Class Size.
  • What it means to the DDT
  • (The sum of all class enrollments)/number of
    class sections taught (n) from 5.

13
7. Average Class Fit
  • What it means to the DDT
  • Average Class fit is the ((sum of enrollments/max
    enrollment)/number of classes taught) x 100
  • For example when enrollments 15, 18, 20 and
    max enrollment for each is 30, 20, and 15
    respectively and 3 classes are taught 15/30
    18/20 20/15 .50 .90 1.33 2.73/3
    classes taught .91 x 100 91 Avg class fit.

14
7. Staffing Sufficiency
  • Up to this point (1 - 7) we have been using
    "Student Required Core" (SRC) courses for all
    calculations.
  • For the following items 8 through 10 we will be
    using "Program Specific Courses in order to
    calculate Staffing Sufficiency.
  • For items 11 through 13 we will return to using
    "Student Required Core" (SRC) courses for the
    remainder of the calculations.

15
8. FTE of BOR appointed program facultyHeadcount
of all on tenure, tenure track, and multi-year
contract faculty
  • What it means to the DDT
  • This is further defined as Full time and Part
    time faculty only--not lecturers.
  • FTE is for PSC courses taught by BOR Faculty.
  • This is the FTE that were hired into the program.
  • We will collect this information from the Program
    Initiators since the information is not kept in
    Banner.
  • This data will be hard coded into the Program
    Review.

16
9. FTE for classes taught in programCredits
taught/full teaching loadFull teaching load is
generally defined as 27 or 21 credits depending
on program
  • What it means to the DDT
  • Credits taught here is defined as credits for
    program specific courses (PSC) taught by both
    faculty and lecturers.
  • Full teaching load is 27 credits for Liberal Arts
    programs and 21 credits for CTE programs.

17
10. Student/Faculty ratio(Total SSH/15)/FTE
faculty -- Note FTE faculty is FTE for classes
taught in program (from 9)
  • What it means to the DDT
  • Item 4 FTE Course Enrollment (calculated using
    the PSC)/item 9, which is FTE faculty.
  • This will be reported for the academic year using
    a full teaching load of 27 credits for Liberal
    Arts programs or 21 credits for CTE programs.
  • The Student/Faculty ratio will be reported when
    results are gtor to .5, they round up to the
    next whole number.

18
11. Unduplicated number of Degree/certificatesNot
e All degrees and certificates awarded in a
program in a year to a single student are counted
as one item.
  • What it means to the DDT
  • The following items, 11-13 will be reported
    based on the Student Required Core (SRC) courses.
  • This is the highest degree awarded for the
    program pulled directly from the degree table in
    Banner.
  • Reported for the academic year.

19
12. Cost of program per student major.Regular
salaries, overload, lecturer costs, supply and
maintenance, and amortized equipment/(SSH of
majors /15)
  • What it means to the DDT
  • Costs/(item 2/15) for a single semester. Add
    both semester costs up for the academic year.
    Regular salaries, overload, lecturer costs,
    supply and maintenance, and amortized equipment
    will be included in the data request from the
    program leads.
  • We will need the cost to run the program before
    we can run this item in our report.

20
13. Persistence of majors year to year
  • What it means to the DDT
  • A student with the declared major that moves from
    spring from one academic year to the fall of the
    next academic year.
  • The declared major need not have a passing grade
    (fail or drop) to be included in the persistence
    pool.
  • We will be reporting on our 3 year academic
    period. This means that we will report out
    Spring 03 to Fall 03, and Spring 04 to Fall 04
    persistence.

21
Opportunities
  • The core (program) courses or "Student Required
    Core" for each program are not flagged as such in
    the Banner system or elsewhere. This requires us
    to use the General Catalog and using a "best
    guess" approach, then a review by the Program
    Initiators for accuracy. This in itself builds
    in an additional margin for error. We should
    consider the possibility of adding a field in
    Banner so that when the courses are added to the
    catalog they are accompanied with a code denoting
    "program course (SRC or PSC). This will aid in
    both speed and accuracy of report development
    going forward.

22
Opportunities continued
  • There were also many courses that were reported
    by program initiators as being courses that
    needed to be included in their program profile
    but were NOT listed in the catalog. We need to
    find out why this is occurring so that we can
    begin to rely on the courses as they are listed
    in the catalog. What happens when a course is
    added after the catalog is printed? How come
    these courses are not being added the next year?
    Who is responsible for review of what goes into
    the catalog to ensure that it is accurate for
    their program year after year?

23
Opportunities continued
  • The process of determining what program courses
    belonged to what programs took way too long.
  • First, a course profile was built based on what
    was in the catalog.
  • All Math, English, and elective courses were
    stripped out.
  • The program profiles were then sent out to the
    Program Initiators for review.
  • Then, the exceptions came trickling incourses
    that were not listed in the catalog or Gen Ed
    courses that actually were part of the core
    program.
  • Then, we had to go through the exception process
    for each of these which added to the workload.
  • Then, the program profiles had to be updated with
    all of the exceptions.
  • All of this because we had no reliable source for
    what program courses belonged to what programs.
  • Much of this unnecessary work seems to be
    centered around the fact that the catalog is not
    being properly validated for accuracy prior to
    being published.

24
Opportunities continued
  • For 12 we sent out a template to aid in the
    collection of program costsnone were returned.
  • We need to clarify when and who should be using
    contact hour to credit hour conversions.
  • We need to build an example of an amortized
    equipment schedule and give it to the program
    initiators.
  • We need to determine which account codes the
    secretaries need to use in order to determine
    program expensesmy understanding is that they
    all have access to FMIS.
  • Instructions need to be built for collecting
    expense data with examples, and then shared with
    the Program Initiators and their secretaries.

25
Opportunities continued
  • There are unique courses in Banner that throw off
    program review data. For example, independent
    study/directed study classes, experimental
    classes, and variable credit classesthese
    classes often need waiver/substitution statements
    posted to their transcript.
  • How we handle waiv/subs needs to be further
    developed. We currently have about 2500 lines of
    comments. This process needs to be mechanized so
    we can easily locate and rename courses then
    sort, copy and paste them into our program
    profiles. This procedure will require a time
    investment for process development and data clean
    up.

26
Opportunities continuedAre we collecting all of
the data of interest? How about
  • admitted students into a classified program that
    were not enrolled on the first day of the
    semester?
  • regarding SSH? Are we only interested in students
    that stay enrolled? Or are we concerned about
    any student that drops at any time? If yes,
    dropped during the erase period, or after the
    erase period? For example, if 50 of the class
    withdrew by the end of the semester, do we need
    to know that data?
  • interest in General Ed or remedial courses?

27
Opportunities continued
  • Determining Full/Part time Faculty and who is a
    lecturer will be included in the data request
    from the Program Initiators until its determined
    how to load the information into Banner and then
    who will provide the necessary training.
  • Determination of full teaching load (other than
    the reported 27 or 21 credits already reported
    for the program) will be included in the data
    request from the Program Initiators until its
    determined how to load the information into
    Banner and then who will provide the necessary
    training.
  • Determination of Regular salaries, overload,
    lecturer costs, supply and maintenance, and
    amortized equipment will be included in the data
    request from the Program Initiators. We need to
    create an example expense template to help our
    program initiators better understand what account
    codes to use and how to handle equipment
    amortization.

28
Questions?
  • If you would like to discuss how we have arrived
    at the data for your program please do not
    hesitate to contact us for clarification. We
    will work to get an answer to you.
  • Thanks for your support in this important work as
    we move forward. This is the first time in a
    long time that program reviews have been required
    and we are all learning together. Lets try to
    enjoy the process!
  • Thanks from the Data Delivery Team.
  • Shawn Flood 974-7512 sgflood_at_hawaii.edu
  • Marv Kitchen 974-7710 kitchen_at_hawaii.edu
  • David Loeding 974-7753 loeding_at_hawaii.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com