Title: SCORECARDING AND HEAT MAPPING: TOOLS AND CONCEPTS FOR ASSESSING STRATEGIC UNCERTAINTY
1SCORECARDING AND HEAT MAPPING TOOLS AND
CONCEPTS FOR ASSESSING STRATEGIC UNCERTAINTY
- Joshua D. Detre, Brian C. Briggeman,
- Michael Boehlje, and Allan W. Gray
- Purdue University
- Department of Agriculture Economics
- Selected paper
- 2005 IAMA meetings in Chicago, IL
2INTRODUCTION
- Industrialization of agriculture
- Created uncertainties that differ from
traditional uncertainties (price, cost, etc) - Strategic uncertainty
- Sensitivity of the firms value to strategic
decisions - Creates
- Potential
- Exposure
3INTRODUCTION
- Major challenge for agribusiness managers
- Quantify the frequency of occurrence
- Quantify magnitude of the potential and exposure
of the strategic uncertainty
4OBJECTIVE
- Methodology to understand, assess, evaluate, and
manage strategic uncertainty - Mental model
- Assessment of strategic uncertainty from a
potential and exposure perspective - Tools to assess and manage strategic uncertainty
5CONCEPTS
- Strategic uncertainty is not just exposure to
losses but also potential for benefits - Focusing only on avoidance
- Firms overlook opportunities to create value
6 PROCESS FOR ASSESSING STRATEGIC UNCERTAINTY
- Strategic Uncertainty Assessment Scorecard
- Interpretation of the Consensus Scorecard
- Joint Heat Map Assessment of Potential and
Exposure - Generic Strategy and Response
7Potential and Exposure for Strategic Uncertainty
8Strategic Uncertainty Assessment Scorecard
- Scorecarding is a way to quantify the
potential/likelihood and exposure/likelihood of
the strategic uncertainty -
- Each strategic uncertainty is ranked relative to
the firm and their respective industry -
- Management teams complete a consensus scorecard
by averaging and discussing all individual scores
9Strategic Uncertainty Assessment Scorecard
10 Interpretation of the Consensus Scorecard
- Map the consensus scorecard
- Map potential/likelihood score first,
then
exposure/likelihood score - Average score gt 3 ? High
- Average score 3 ? Low
11 Interpretation of the Consensus Scorecard
12 Interpretation of the Consensus Scorecard
Likelihood/Potential Graph
Likelihood/Exposure Graph
13 Joint Heat Map Assessment of Potential and
Exposure
- Superimpose the map for the likelihood/exposure
graph into the correct quadrant of the
likelihood/potential graph - Joint heat map indicates one or more of the six
generic strategies for managing the uncertainty
14Generic Strategy and Response
15Generic Strategy and Response
16Beta Test
- Concepts and assessment tools were used with a
set of executives at the American Seed Trade
Association Advanced Management Forum - February
2005
17Participants analyzed the following vignette
- Regional Midwestern Seed Firm
- Products with latest technology
- Direct sales to customers
- Market share around 8
- Technology purchased under license agreements
- 10,000,000 in Assets
- Debt-to-Asset Ratio of 50
- Return on Equity averaging 8-10 last 5 years
18 Resulting Heat Map and Generic Strategies
19Proposed Participant Strategies
- Sell-off distribution and bagging facilities
- Economies of Scale
- Use profits to pay down high cost debt
- Debt-to-Asset Ratio of 30-35
- Become a Deal-making Firm
- Create needed products with customers and
technology suppliers
20Comments From Executive Participants
- Focusing on potential first is unique and
beneficial - Consensus scorecard motivates group
discussion on the important strategic
uncertainties - Heat map visually communicates potential and
exposure - Generic strategies filter to specific strategies
- Succinct and time effective compared to
traditional strategy tools
21Conclusions
- Scorecard and heat mapping tools
- Effective and systematic method for analyzing as
well as communicating the strategic uncertainties
faced by the firm - Further development and testing is necessary and
underway - Preliminary results suggest that the methodology
is useful in understanding, analyzing, and
communicating the potential as well as the
exposure of strategic uncertainty