The Future IP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

The Future IP

Description:

Voice and video need low jitter ... Support for voice and video via 'flows' Use of router ... Sending host must find smallest MTU of path. Path MTU discovery ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: elliot8
Category:
Tags: future

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Future IP


1
The Future IP
2
Why?
  • IPv4 has been extremely successful
  • Has dealt with heterogeneity, new hardware
    technologies, huge scaling
  • Has limited address space
  • Running out of addresses and network numbers

3
Why Continued
  • New applications
  • Voice and video need low jitter
  • Must avoid changing routes often voice/video
    datagrams for the same call need to follow the
    same routing path
  • QoS more important

4
IPv6
  • Was IPng but then got version number 5 was
    used! So its IPv6!
  • Similar to IPv4
  • Connectionless
  • Each datagram routed independently
  • Hop count, etc.

5
New Features
  • Address size 128 bits 16 0ctets!
  • Header format different
  • Uses multiple headers base header plus
    extension headers (not one fixed header like v4)
  • Support for voice and video via flows
  • Use of router path establishment (connection)
  • Once router path set up, use flow number
  • More extensible

6
(No Transcript)
7
Header Differences
  • Smaller base header than IPv4 but can have any
    number of added extension headers before payload.
  • Multiple headers each tells its length and type
    of next header (could be payload)
  • Many extension header types (Route, Options,
    etc.)
  • Ext headers tell their own length and type of
    next header
  • Length in base header is only payload (payload
    length)
  • Hop Limit same as TTL
  • Use of traffic class and flow label for path
    usage connection like

8
Extensions
9
Extension Header
10
Fragmentation
  • Sending host responsible for fragmenting
  • Routers do not fragment
  • Sending host must find smallest MTU of path
  • Path MTU discovery
  • Send smaller and smaller datagram until no error
    message

11
(No Transcript)
12
Multiple Headers
  • Less overhead
  • IPv4 has, e.g., fragment information even if
    datagram not fragmented wasteful
  • Extensible can add new features by adding new
    header types
  • Can also experiment with new headers without
    affecting all of IPv6

13
Addressing
  • Network/host boundary anywhere
  • Has more than two levels of hierarchy
  • ISP gt Organization gt Site gt etc.
  • Types
  • Unicast
  • Multicast
  • Anycast providing cluster servers
  • Send datagram to one of a set
  • Allows for the replication of servers

14
Addresses
  • Dotted decimal
  • 105.220.136.100.255.255.255.255.0.0.18.128.140.10.
    255.255
  • Hex
  • 69DC8864FFFFFFFF012808C0AFFFF
  • Zero compression
  • FF0C000000B1 ? FF0CB1
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com