Zoning Petition ZP 698 Robert and Beth Cousins Town of Baring, Washington County - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Zoning Petition ZP 698 Robert and Beth Cousins Town of Baring, Washington County

Description:

Soil Suitability (septic, aquifer) Fire Protection. Tax impact. Review Comments ... Scientist expressed concerns regarding suitability of site soils Applicant has ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: mai5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Zoning Petition ZP 698 Robert and Beth Cousins Town of Baring, Washington County


1
Zoning Petition ZP 698Robert and Beth
CousinsTown of Baring, Washington County
  • Staff Recommendation
  • September 7, 2005

2
Proposal LocationMap 5 Lot 4Town of Baring,
Washington County
3
(No Transcript)
4
Proposal
  • Rezone 22 acres of existing 30.05 acre tract from
    General Management Subdistrict (M-GN) and
    Residential Development Subdistrict (D-RS) to
    General Development Subdistrict (D-GN)
  • Proposed rezone would allow development of a
    6-unit apartment complex and associated
    maintenance structure
  • The applicant has submitted an application for
    Development Permit DP 4717 for the proposed
    development

5
Public Hearing Comments(July 6, 2005)
Review Comments
  • State Soil Scientist expressed concerns regarding
    suitability of site soils Applicant has
    addressed
  • No other comments were received from
  • Maine Inland Fisheries and Wildlife
  • Maine Department of Environmental Protection
  • Division of Marine Resources
  • FEMA Flood Zone
  • Soil Suitability (septic, aquifer)
  • Fire Protection
  • Tax impact

6
Statement of Need
  • Increased need for multi-family housing due to
    newly proposed border crossing
  • Statements from area real estate professionals
    indicating shortage of multi-family housing
  • Evidence of interest from Petitioners
    advertisement

7
Adjacency
  • Adjacent to other residential development
  • Site abuts/contains and D-RS zones
  • D-GN zone exists on southerly side of US 1
  • Abutting development includes single-family
    residences and commercial uses

8
Review Criteria (Zoning Petition)
A land use district boundary may not be amended
unless there is substantial evidence that
  • The proposed land use district is consistent
    with
  • The standards for district boundaries in effect
    at the time
  • The Comprehensive Land Use Plan
  • The purpose, intent and provisions of this
    Chapter
  • The proposed district designation is more
    appropriate for the protection and management of
    existing uses and resources within the affected
    area.
  • 12 M.R.S.A. 685-A(8-A)

9
Conclusions
  • Proposed rezoning consistent with CLUP and
    Commissions Statutes
  • Proposal meets Commissions goals of guiding
    location of new development
  • Petitioner demonstrated sufficient need for the
    proposal
  • Proposed rezoning would not have an undue adverse
    impact on existing uses and resources

10
Staff Recommendation
  • Staff recommends approval of Robert and Beth
    Cousins petition to rezone 22 acres
  • From (M-GN) General Management Subdistrict and
    (D- RS) Residential Development Subdistrict
  • To (D-GN) General Development Subdistrict
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com