Introduction to Educational Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 72
About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction to Educational Research

Description:

... by self administered instruments or telephone polls. Descriptive Research ... How will the citizens if Yourtown vote in the next presidential election? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:8
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 73
Provided by: peterson3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction to Educational Research


1
Chapter 1
  • Introduction to Educational Research

2
Educational Research
  • The systematic application of a family of methods
    that are employed to provide trustworthy
    information about educational problems.

3
  • Research is usually an ongoing process, based on
    many accumulated understandings and explanations
    that, when taken together, lead to
    generalizations about educational issues and
    ultimately to the development of theories.

4
  • A single research study will not produce the
    certainty needed to assume that the same results
    will apply in all or most settings.

5
  • Personal experiences and generalizations provide
    us with much of understanding.

6
Understanding
  • Often use inductive and deductive reasoning to
    come to an understanding of something.

7
Inductive Reasoning
  • Develop generalizations from limited number of
    specific observations and experiences.

8
Inductive Reasoning
  • Example You examine the table of contents of
    four research books, all of which contain a
    chapter on sampling.
  • Therefore all research books contain a chapter on
    sampling (generalization).

9
Deductive Reasoning
  • Based on developing specific predictions from
    general principles, observations, or experiences.

10
Deductive Reasoning
  • All research texts contain a chapter on sampling
    (generalization). This book is a research text.
    Therefore, this book contains a chapter on
    sampling (specific conclusion).

11
Limitations to Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.
  • Relying on tradition stifles perspective.
  • Personal experience can be subject to
    idiosyncratic interpretations and prejudices.
  • Even experts are not infallible.
  • Most people have relatively limited experience on
    many of the issues we might seek to understand.

12
Quality of Inductive Reasoning (specifics to
generalizations)
  • Is highly dependent on the number and
    representativeness of the specific observations
    used to make the generalization.

13
  • Inductive reasoning provides no guide for the
    number and quality of specific examples needed to
    make generalizations.

14
Quality of Deductive Reasoning (generalizations
to specifics)
  • Depends on the truth of the generalizations it
    uses as a basis for its logic.
  • Example If one accepts the generalization that
    all professors are boring, extending this
    generalization to specific professors will not be
    accurate for at least a of the professorate.

15
  • Inductive and deductive reasoning are of limited
    value when used individually, when combined they
    are very important.

16
  • A scientific and disciplined inquiry approach to
    research is based on a systematic approach to
    examining educational issues and questions.

17
Systematic Approach
  • Combines features of inductive and deductive
    reasoning with other characteristics to produce
    an approach to understanding that, though
    fallible, is generally more viable than
    tradition, experts, personal experience, or
    inductive or deductive reasoning alone.

18
Biases and Beliefs in Research
  • Difficult to totally remove the biases and
    beliefs of the researcher in any research study.
  • Can lessen but never eliminate errors.

19
Scientific and Disciplined Inquiry Approach
  • Event he most extensive study cannot examine all
    the human and contextual factors that might
    affect a researchers findings.

20
Scientific and Disciplined Inquiry Approach
  • Incorporates checks and balances to to minimize
    impact of researchers emotions and biases.

21
Scientific and Disciplined Inquiry Approach (The
Process)
  • Recognize and identify a topic to be studied.
  • Describe and execute procedures to collect
    information about the topic being studied.
  • Analyze the collected data.
  • State the results or implications based on
    analysis of the data.

22
Defining Purpose and Methods
  • Topics can pose a variety of purposes
  • e.g. comparing, describing, relating, describing
    the history or effects of something.
  • See examples on page 6 of the text.

23
  • Approaches using an in-depth description analyses
    of of cultures or social settings are called
    qualitative studies.

24
  • Logically, if there are differences in the
    purposes of research topics, there also should be
    differences in the strategies and methods for
    investigating these topics.
  • The way data are collected and analyzed also
    differs among research topics.

25
Common Threads
  • Although there are a number of different
    questions, methods, and analyses related to
    conducting research, the threads that unite these
    differences are the four basic steps in the
    scientific and disciplined inquiry approach.

26
Classifying Research
  • Can be classified by the degree of direct
    applicability of the research to educational
    settings (basic or applied research).
  • Or by the methods the researcher uses to conduct
    the study (quantitative or qualitative research).

27
Basic and Applied Research
  • Continuum- difficult to discuss separately.
  • Basic - conducted to develop or refine theory,
    not to solve immediate practical problems.
  • Applied- conducted to find solutions to current
    practical problems

28
  • Example of basic research - Skinners
    reinforcement of birds.
  • Years later was applied practical educational
    use.

29
  • Disagreement among educators about which end of
    the basic-applied continuum should be emphasized.

30
Evaluation Research
  • At the far end of applied research.
  • Distinguished by decision making purpose.
  • Evaluation research is concerned with making
    decisions about quality, effectiveness or value
    of educational programs, products or practices.

31
Different Types of Evaluation
  • Formative evaluation function is to form and
    improve what is being evaluated while it is being
    developed.
  • Summative evaluation function is to make a
    decision that sums up the overall quality or
    worth of the program or product.

32
Quantitative and Qualitative Research
33
Quantitative
  • Methods based in the collection and analysis of
    numerical data, usually obtained from
    questionnaires, tests, checklists, and other
    formal paper and pencil instruments.
  • But entails more than just the use of numerical
    data.

34
Quantitative
  • It also involves
  • stating the hypothesis studied, and the research
    procedures implemented prior to conducting the
    study,
  • maintaining control over contextual factors that
    might interfere with the data collected,
  • using large enough samples of participants to
    provide statistically meaningful data.

35
Quantitative
  • Employing data analyses that rely on statistical
    procedures.
  • Usually little personal interaction between the
    researcher and the people they study.

36
Quantitative
  • Uses underlying belief that we inhabit a stable,
    and measurable world.

37
Quantitative
  • Positivist Perspective- hold that the world and
    the laws that govern it are stable and can be
    understood by scientific observation.
  • Claims about the world are not meaningful unless
    they can be verified through direct observation.
  • This approach continues to be the dominant one in
    education.

38
Qualitative
  • Based on the collection and analysis of
    nonnumerical data such as observations,
    interviews, and more discursive sources of
    information.

39
Qualitative
  • Argues that meaning is situated in a particular
    perspective or context.
  • Different people have different perspectives and
    contexts.
  • There are many meanings in the world, none of
    which is necessarily more valid or true than
    another.

40
Qualitative
  • Tends not to state hypotheses or research
    procedures before data is collected.
  • Research problems and methods evolve as
    understanding of the research context deepens.

41
Qualitative
  • Context is not controlled.
  • Number of participants tends to be small because
    of time intensive methods like interviews.
  • Researchers often act with participants during a
    study

42
Qualitative and Quantitative
  • Should not be considered oppositional.
  • Together - represent the full range of
    educational research methods.
  • Both may be administered in some studies.
  • E.g. administration of a questionaire
    (quantitative) may be followed up by a small
    number of detailed interviews (qualitative).

43
Types of Quantitative research
  • Review-Intended to describe current conditions,
    investigate relationships, and study cause-effect
    phenomena.

44
Descriptive Research
  • Also called survey research, collects numerical
    data to answer questions about the current status
    of the subject of study.
  • Most obtain information about the preferences,
    attitudes, practices, concerns, or interests of
    some group.
  • Data are collected by self administered
    instruments or telephone polls.

45
Descriptive Research
  • Important to construct clear and consistent
    descriptive instruments.
  • Major problem- failure of participants to return
    questionaires or cooperate in telephone
    interviews.

46
Descriptive Research
  • Examples
  • How do second-grade teachers spend their teaching
    time?
  • How will the citizens if Yourtown vote in the
    next presidential election?
  • How do parents feel about a twelvemonth school
    year.

47
Correlational Research
  • Examines the degree of relationship between two
    or more variables.
  • A correlation is a quantitative measure (of the
    degree of correspondence between two or more
    variables).
  • E.g. SAT scores and freshman college grades.

48
Correlational Research
  • Degree of relationship is measured by correlation
    coefficient.
  • Plus/minus 1.00 indicating highly related
  • .00 indicating no relationship between the
    variables.

49
Correlational Research
  • If two variable are highly related, it does not
    mean that one is the cause of the other there
    may be a third factor that causes both the
    related variables

50
Correlational Research
  • Examples
  • The correlation between intelligence and
    self-esteem.
  • The relationship between anxiety and achievement.
  • Use of aptitude test to predict success in an
    algebra course.

51
Causal-Comparative Research
  • Seeks to investigate cause and effect
    relationships.
  • Activity thought to make a difference is called
    the causal factor, treatment or independent
    variable.
  • The effect is called the dependent variable.

52
Causal-Comparative Research
  • In most studies the researcher does not have
    control over the causal factor because it has
    already occurred or cannot be manipulated.
  • Useful when it is impossible or unethical to
    manipulate the causal factor.

53
Causal-Comparative Research
  • The effect of preschool attendance on social
    maturity at the end of the first grade.
  • The effect of having a working mother on school
    absenteeism.
  • The effect of gender on algebra achievement.

54
Experimental Research
  • Also seeks to investigate cause-effect
    relationships.
  • Experimental researcher controls the selection of
    participants by choosing them from a single pool
    and assigning them at random to different causal
    treatments.

55
Experimental Research
  • Research also controls the contextual variables
    that might interfere with the study.
  • Because it randomly selects and assigns
    participants into different treatments,
    experimental research permits true cause-effect
    statements to be made.

56
Experimental Research
  • The comparative effectiveness of personalized
    instruction from a teacher versus computer
    instruction on computational skills.
  • The effect of self-paced instruction on
    self-concept.
  • The effect of positive reinforcement on attitude
    toward school.

57
Qualitative Research Methods
  • Historical Research Methods

58
Historical Research Methods
  • Involves interpreting past events.
  • Most focus on individuals, important social
    issues, links between old and new, and
    reinterpretations of prior historical work.

59
Historical Research Methods
  • Historians work with data already available in a
    variety of forms.
  • Primary sources - provided by first person
    eyewitnesses or authors.
  • Secondary Sources - non first person accounts
  • preferred by historians.

60
Historical Research Methods
  • Historians use external criticism to access the
    authenticity of their data and use internal
    criticism to assess the truthfulness of their
    data.

61
Historical Research Methods
  • Examples
  • Factors leading to the development and growth of
    cooperative learning.
  • Trends in elementary school reading instruction,
    1940-1995.

62
Qualitative Research Methods
  • Focus is on deep description of aspects of
    peoples everyday perspectives and context.
  • Provide filed-focused, interpretive, detailed
    descriptions and interpretations of participants
    and their settings.

63
Qualitative Research Methods
  • Usually involves long term immersion in setting.
  • Common methods of data collection include
  • observation, interviewing, tape and video
    recording, examining artifacts, and participant
    observation (researcher becomes part of the group
    being studied)

64
Qualitative Research Methods
  • Data analysis
  • based on categorizing and interpreting the
    observations, conversations with participants,
    documents, tape recordings, and interviews
    collected to provide a description and explanation

65
Qualitative Research Methods
  • Qualitative researcher writes from the
    perspective of the participants, not from the
    researchers own perspective.

66
Qualitative Research Methods
  • Examples
  • The problems, successes, and understandings of
    Jack, during his first year of teaching.
  • Study of the Hispanic culture in an urban
    community college.

67
Guidelines for Classification
  • Type of method needed depends on the problem
    being studied.
  • Same general problem can be investigated using
    many types of research.

68
Guidelines for Classification
  • Knowing the type of research applied helps one
    identify the important aspects to examine in
    evaluating the study.

69
Guidelines for Classification
  • The more information available, the easier it is
    to classify.

70
Guidelines for Classification
  • Method for classifying
  • determine whether qualitative or quantitative.
  • If quantitative, identify purpose to determine
    whether it is description, correlational, causal
    comparative, or experimental.

71
Guidelines for Classification
  • If qualitative, determine whether it is
    historical or qualitative
  • look for key words in the title of the study
    survey, description, relationship, historical,
    culture, and the like.

72
Limitations of the Scientific and Discipline and
Inquiry Approach
  • Four factors
  • inability to answer should questions.
  • inability to capture complexity of research site
    and participants.
  • limitations of measuring instruments.
  • Need to address participants ethical needs and
    responsibilities.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com