Wellesley Urban Health - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Wellesley Urban Health

Description:

Understand the politics of grantmaking, what the ... What headlines will be generated? What are the risks of not ... What headlines will be ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: kber8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Wellesley Urban Health


1
Wellesley Urban Health Capacity Building Workshop
Series CAP 103 Write a Winning Grant
Proposal !
2
Learning Outcomes
  • Upon completion of this program you will be able
    to
  • Distinguish between a project, operating or
    capital grant
  • Use funders' guidelines as a map to a successful
    application
  • Identify what funders are looking for and how
    they measure success
  • Understand the politics of grantmaking, what the
    guidelines don't tell you
  • List the factors to consider when working with a
    proposal writing consultant
  • Determine who needs to provide input, feedback,
    and approval for your proposal
  • Decide whether to go it alone or plan in
    partnership with other agencies
  • Describe the importance of avoiding "mission
    drift"
  • Create a proposal outline
  • Create a proposal summary statement

3
Agenda
  • Welcome / Intro
  • Types of Funding
  • The Grant Proposal Upfront Considerations
    Sample Assessment Criteria
  • Exercise 1 Thinking Like a Funder Proposal
    Evaluation
  • What the Guidelines Dont Tell You
  • To partner or not to partner
  • Avoiding Mission Drift
  • Getting Started Creating a Working Outline
  • Writing an Effective Proposal Summary
  • Exercise 2 Practicing Enhancing your Own
    Proposal Summary
  • Additional Sources of Funding / Resource
    Information
  • Wrap Up / Close

4
Types of Grant Funding
  • Project Grant
  • A one time initiative with a defined timeframe
  • May have several deliverables
  • Operating Grant
  • Support of an ongoing program
  • Support for administrative costs
  • Capital Grant
  • Renovation and construction
  • Equipment purchases

5
Thinking Like a Funder -- Evaluation Criteria
  • Goals Outcomes
  • Community Base Involvement
  • Collaboration / Partnering
  • Value / Benefit / Impact to the Community
  • Organizational Background
  • Implementation Plan Schedule
  • Financial Considerations
  • Reporting Evaluation
  • Risks
  • Situations that May Require Additional Explanation

6
Goals Outcomes
  • Clear and specific ?
  • Is the type of funding sought defined ?
  • Is there alignment of Goals Outcomes with
  • Agencys mission
  • The funders granting objectives
  • Are goals SMART?
  • Is there mission drift associated with
    funding request?

7
Practice 1 -Thinking Like a Funder
  • Turn to Page 10 in Participant Workbook 1.
  • Working in groups complete Exercise 1 Goal
    Objective

8
Community Base Involvement
  • Is the target population clearly defined?
  • What is the scope of community involvement?
  • Design, planning, implementation, etc
  • Roles responsibilities
  • How is the project structured?
  • Top down / agency driven
  • Community / consumer led
  • Is there outreach to isolated groups?
  • What, if any, is the role of business, local
    govt, service providers?

9
Collaboration / Partnering
  • Are partners needed?
  • Who are the partners? Fit?
  • Shared Vision?
  • Equal Investment? How?
  • History of collaboration? With whom? Outcome?
  • Reputation?
  • What do they bring to the project?
  • What grants are they applying for?
  • Are logical partnerships considered? Why? Why
    not?

10
Value / Benefit / Impact to the Community
  • Is the proposed project
  • Needed?
  • Proactive or reactive?
  • New or a continuation of another project?
  • Well researched?
  • A real benefit to the community?
  • A model for similar initiatives?
  • Is the proposal written in a way to gain
    attention in a positive way?

11
Organizational Background (Structure, History,
Reputation)
  • Does proposal demonstrate organizational
    alignment?
  • Board skills, leadership, policies and
    activities
  • How confident are we in the organizations
    ability to implement the project if funded
    explained?
  • (skills, resources, time, experience)
  • Has we funded this agency in the past ..
  • What were the outcomes, and achievements related
    to timely reporting, achieving deadlines and
    budget?
  • What is community perception of the agency?
  • Does agency support diversity through its
    programs?

12
Implementation Plan Schedule
  • 1. Does project plan include details related
    to
  • Project scope
  • Key milestones
  • Activities timelines for completion
  • Resources (appropriate , roles defined, etc)
  • Reporting Plan
  • 2. Is there clear alignment b/w goals,
    outcomes, activities, resources and budget?

13
Practice -Thinking Like a Funder
  • Turn to Page 11 12 in Participant Workbook 1.
  • Working in groups complete Exercise 2 Schedule
    and Exercise 3 Resource Plan

14
Financial Considerations
  • Agencys financial viability history
  • Does the agency have financial capacity
    accountability systems to make good use of funds?
  • Are financial statements prepared regularly?
  • Are financial statements regularly reviewed by
    the board or subcommittee?

15
Financial Considerations Contd
  • Is budget realistic to cover activities / costs?
  • Is the budget
  • detailed, realistic, accurate, complete,
    thorough
  • Are other funding sources confirmed?
  • What line items is the funder being asked to
    fund? Are there other funders?
  • Can the project succeed with this funding?
  • Can any budget items be replaced by community
    contributions?

16
Reporting Evaluation
  • What criteria will be used to measure success?
  • Quantitative qualitative measurements?
  • Is there an evaluation plan?
  • Who is involved in the evaluation?
  • When will evaluation occur?
  • Is there a plan for sharing learning with others?
  • Is it clear how the funder and agency will know
    if the project is successful?

17
Practice -Thinking Like a Funder
  • Turn to Page 13 in Participant Workbook 1.
  • Working in groups complete Exercise 4 - Evaluation

18
Risks
  • What are the risks of funding this proposal?
    Risks to
  • Organization /agency
  • Community
  • Funder
  • Who will be happy / unhappy if this proposal IS
    funded by this funder?
  • What headlines will be generated?
  • What are the risks of not funding this proposal?
  • Who will be happy / unhappy if this proposal is
    not funded by this funder?
  • What headlines will be generated?

19
Red Flags
  • Significant budget surplus or deficit in a given
    year
  • Significant accumulated surplus or deficit
  • Financial statements with unusual circumstances
  • Loans, unpaid salaries, large amounts of short
    term debit, overdue invoices, etc.
  • Large variations in revenues/ expenses
  • Narrow funding base for the organization
  • Size of grant request compared to agencys annual
    budget

20
Tips Best Practices
  • Respond to questions in a clear, concise and
    comprehensive manner
  • Be specific
  • Use statistics effectively
  • Present information in an easy to read format
    (table, matrix, chart, graph)
  • Show commitment
  • Write in an active vs passive voice
  • Check spelling grammar
  • Define acronyms and terms
  • Ensure statements can be substantiated
  • Provide evidence
  • Avoid words like, could or should
  • Showing support and matching funds from the
    community makes a stronger case
  • Follow guidelines with respect to font size, of
    pages, type style
  • Organize the proposal in the same sequence
    requested/outlined by the funder
  • Use the same language and terms as the funder
  • Read criteria carefully ensure answers address
    the questions that are asked
  • Ensure the final proposal reads as if it were
    written by one person

21
Practice
  • Working in your groups respond to the criteria
    outlined below for the same proposal we have been
    working on throughout the class.
  • Criteria Describe the materials that will be
    produced during the development
    phase of the project (worth 15
    points).

Time 20 minutes
22
Getting Started Creating a Working Outline
  • Key Concepts to Remember
  • The key to a great proposal is the effort that
    goes into the thinking and planning stages.
  • A thoroughly planned project has a higher
    success rate than one poorly conceived.
  • Grant reviewers read many proposals and develop
    the ability to easily see through a well-written
    but poorly planned proposal.

23
Getting Started Creating a Working Outline
  • Purpose
  • Helps with planning organizing information
  • Forms the foundation to engage consultants,
    approach potential partners or pose questions to
    funders
  • Value of a Working Outline
  • Delegate sections to others to research and draft
    content
  • Note The final proposal should appear to be
    written by a single author

24
Working Outline Best Practice
  • The person with overall responsibility for the
    proposal must
  • have a thorough understanding of the entire
    proposal
  • be able to speak knowledgeably about every aspect
    and item in the document
  • If you engage a consultant to write the proposal
    they will require the information that follows to
    prepare the proposal in a thoughtful and
    comprehensive manner.

25
The Working Outline
  • The outline should include the following
    items
  • Organizational background / Overview
  • Proposal / Executive Summary
  • Project Description
  • How the project will be implemented (activities /
    tasks / timelines)
  • Reporting (qualitative and quantitative measures)
  • Other Sources of Funding (if applicable)
  • Budget Major line items and costs
  • Current Financial Situation
  • Concluding summary
  • Note Each funder may have slightly different
    requirements. Check before you start.

26
Creating the Proposal / Executive Summary
  • If available, use the format defined by the
    funder
  • Include all essential information identified by
    the funder
  • Make it clear, concise, comprehensive and easy to
    understand

27
Creating the Proposal / Executive Summary
  • Answer the questions
  • How much, by when, what, how, for whom and
    results to be achieved

? timeframe action verb activities for
whom results / outcomes
28
Elements of the Proposal Summary
29
Elements of the Proposal Summary
30
Examples of Summary Statements
  • 43,000 over 2 years toward creating new
    playgrounds to improve fitness levels of
    preschool aged children in Ajax
  • 78,000 over 8 months to repair and renovate the
    Markham Community Centre to improve accessibility
    and safety of this highly used neighbourhood
    facility

31
Exercise 5 Creating / Enhancing your Own
Proposal Summary
  • Using the materials in your workbook as a guide,
    create / enhance your own proposal summary.

32
EXERCISE Create your own Summary Statements
  • Using the elements of a proposal summary, create
    a summary statement for a grant you are applying
    for
  • Be prepared to share with the group

33
Learning Outcomes
  • Having completed this program you should now be
    able to
  • Distinguish between a project, operating or
    capital grant
  • Use funders' guidelines as a map to a successful
    application
  • Identify what funders are looking for and how
    they measure success
  • Understand the politics of grantmaking, what the
    guidelines don't tell you
  • List the factors to consider when working with a
    proposal writing consultant
  • Determine who needs to provide input, feedback,
    and approval for your proposal
  • Decide whether to go it alone or plan in
    partnership with other agencies
  • Describe the importance of avoiding "mission
    drift"
  • Create a proposal outline
  • Create a proposal summary statement

34
Wellesley Urban Health Capacity Building Workshop
Series CAP 103 Write a Winning Grant
Proposal !
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com